Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community  

Go Back   Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community > Interests > Tilted Technology


 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 03-25-2004, 10:17 PM   #1 (permalink)
/nɑndəsˈkrɪpt/
 
Prince's Avatar
 
Location: LV-426
Starting out with C

Well, since we've been seeing questions about programming, and getting started with it...

I've some minor exp in Pascal and then Delphi, but I've wanted to learn C.
I've considered learning Java, but... the thing is, I hate it with a passion.

Anyway, I picked up this book called "Teach Yourself C in 21 Days". I am not expecting to be a programming guru three weeks later, but I am hoping that this will teach me the basics in a pace that I can handle.

Has anyone read this book? Any other suggestions?

Since I'm used to using an IDE, I'm going to use either Borland's C++ BuilderX, or Visual Studio .NET, not sure which. Any recommendations would be welcome. Thanks.
__________________
Who is John Galt?
Prince is offline  
Old 03-25-2004, 10:40 PM   #2 (permalink)
 
KnifeMissile's Avatar
 
Location: Waterloo, Ontario
If you go with VisualStudio, use vesion 6.0. It's less buggy!

If you already have some experience programming then your book will do fine, surprisingly. I mean, one can easily learn C syntax in 21 days. Now, learning how to program in 21 days...

Well, that's another story...
KnifeMissile is offline  
Old 03-25-2004, 11:02 PM   #3 (permalink)
/nɑndəsˈkrɪpt/
 
Prince's Avatar
 
Location: LV-426
Yeah, I just want to learn the very basics at this point. C seems quite different from Pascal/Delphi.
__________________
Who is John Galt?
Prince is offline  
Old 03-25-2004, 11:16 PM   #4 (permalink)
Follower of Ner'Zhul
 
RelaX's Avatar
 
Location: Netherlands
Re: Starting out with C

Quote:
Originally posted by Prince

I've considered learning Java, but... the thing is, I hate it with a passion.
Finally, a likeminded person.
__________________
The most likely way for the world to be destroyed, most experts agree, is by accident. That's where we come in; we're computer professionals. We cause accidents.
- Nathaniel Borenstein
RelaX is offline  
Old 03-26-2004, 04:10 AM   #5 (permalink)
 
KnifeMissile's Avatar
 
Location: Waterloo, Ontario
C is exactly the same as Pascal (I've never seen Delphi). More precisely, C is isomorphic to Pascal. So, if you're already familiar to programming in languages like Pascal, you should have even less than the very basics to learn!
KnifeMissile is offline  
Old 03-26-2004, 08:03 AM   #6 (permalink)
Wehret Den Anfängen!
 
Location: Ontario, Canada
Pascal and C have a few cultural differences, and a few philosphical differences. But they are very similar.

First, Pascal tends to use keywords for structure, while C tends to avoid structureal keywords.

Ie, in Pascal, the 'content' of an if statement is between BEGIN and END, while in C it is between a { and a }.

A cultural difference between Pascal and C is how they deal with strings.

Strings in Pascal can be built in, and are often stored as 'length' then a buffer of characters.

Strings in C are a pointer to a buffer. The 'end' of the string is the first character whose binary value is 0.

Turbo (or Think or one of many enhancements) Pascal and C++ are both extensions to the base language. It is quite possible you have only written in an enhanced pascal.

The various enhancements to Pascal, and C++, also have a different set of cultural and philsophical differences.

But, in the end, the differences aren't all that large. You just might have different hoops to jump through along the way. =)
__________________
Last edited by JHVH : 10-29-4004 BC at 09:00 PM. Reason: Time for a rest.
Yakk is offline  
Old 03-26-2004, 03:54 PM   #7 (permalink)
Insane
 
Location: Belgium
Re: Starting out with C

Quote:
Originally posted by Prince

I've considered learning Java, but... the thing is, I hate it with a passion.
Why whould you hate it ? You don't have any experience with it so don't judge it that fast !!
__________________
Let's GO
Cuball is offline  
Old 03-26-2004, 04:14 PM   #8 (permalink)
/nɑndəsˈkrɪpt/
 
Prince's Avatar
 
Location: LV-426
Quote:
Originally posted by Cuball
Why whould you hate it ? You don't have any experience with it so don't judge it that fast !!
I've some experience with it, but very limited, so my opinion of it are based on what I am sure to professional or advanced programmers would seem as unfounded misconclusions, but for me, observations.

It's painfully slow. It's needlessly verbose (just compare 'print' to 'System.out.println', for example). The GUIs that can be produced with it are really fuckin' ugly. You can use it to create small apps that run slowly in a browser, for chats or slow db clients, but major desktop applications? Or even powerful system tools? Forget it.
__________________
Who is John Galt?
Prince is offline  
Old 03-27-2004, 01:25 AM   #9 (permalink)
Insane
 
Location: Belgium
You do have a point about the GUI issue, it can be slow, but they are working on that ! But Ugly ? You have to set the looks windows a like (don't know the exact thingy) and then you can create gui's that just look like normal GUI applications (VB) but fat clients isn't everything you know... what about J2EE ? widly used in n-tier applications
__________________
Let's GO
Cuball is offline  
Old 03-30-2004, 04:55 PM   #10 (permalink)
Upright
 
Quote:
Originally posted by Prince
It's painfully slow. It's needlessly verbose (just compare 'print' to 'System.out.println', for example). The GUIs that can be produced with it are really fuckin' ugly.
(Emphasis, obviously, mine)

I agree 100% with this statement. One of the things that turned me off Java was

itsIncrediblyLongAndConvolutedFunctionNamesThatAreImpossibleToRemember();

My experience coding in java has not been enjoyable at all. thoseDamnFunctionsAndClasses take too long to type, especially if you don't remember them. I mean ... "ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException"?!

I mean, I agree that in some ways it's a good thing to have some sort of syntax that's somewhat easy to remember (as opposed to asm), but Java's *way* across the line. I prefer stuff like c, which I actually prefer to code in. Call me crazy, but I'd take pointers and crazy typecasting over longAssPointlessFunctionNames() any day =)

I do recognize Java's strengths though - namely that it's multi-platform, and therefore I can play online games with other people (being as I'm on Linux ) Stupid Macromedia and its Shockwave..........
mgcloud is offline  
Old 03-30-2004, 05:06 PM   #11 (permalink)
Loser
 
If you're looking for some reading material, there's a book called "How to Program C" by Deitel that covers C, C++, and some Java.
WarWagon is offline  
 

Tags
starting


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:50 AM.

Tilted Forum Project

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
© 2002-2012 Tilted Forum Project

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360