Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community  

Go Back   Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community > Interests > Tilted Technology


 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 11-14-2003, 08:51 PM   #1 (permalink)
At The Globe Showing Will How Its Done
 
MahlerIsGod's Avatar
 
Location: London/Elysium
Silly Harddrive Question?

I have two harddrives: a 40 and 160GB. The 40 is my primary drive and the 160 is where I store my music, videos, pictures, etc. Retrieving and looking for things on the 40 is just slightly faster than my 160. My question is this: is my 40 faster because of the smaller size and because it simply doesn't have as much or as many places to look than the 160GB? Is that even a factor? Just wondering. Thanks
__________________
"But a work of art is a conscious human effort that has to do with communication. It is that or its nothing. When an accident is applauded as a work of art, when a cult grows up around the deliciousness of inadvertent beauty, we are in the presence of the greatest decadence the West has known in its history."
MahlerIsGod is offline  
Old 11-14-2003, 08:55 PM   #2 (permalink)
The GrandDaddy of them all!
 
The_Dude's Avatar
 
Location: Austin, TX
no, each hardrive has its own access speed. check the specs to find this speed.
__________________
"Luck is what happens when preparation meets opportunity." - Darrel K Royal
The_Dude is offline  
Old 11-14-2003, 08:55 PM   #3 (permalink)
Junkie
 
Location: North Hollywood
larger hard disks tend to have more heads so they can be as fast or faster, but it all depends on the drive, theres no rule that smaller - faster with drives though or vice versa

track to track seek times, rpms etc all affect speed.

fragmentation can be an issue too, buffer size of the drive itself.
charliex is offline  
Old 11-15-2003, 01:26 PM   #4 (permalink)
Devils Cabana Boy
 
Dilbert1234567's Avatar
 
Location: Central Coast CA
defrag every week and it will keep the speed up.

also drives have difrent rotational speeds, 7200rpg v 5400 rpm usualy. in addition the mechanics inside determin the acces speed.
__________________
Donate Blood!

"Love is not finding the perfect person, but learning to see an imperfect person perfectly." -Sam Keen
Dilbert1234567 is offline  
Old 11-15-2003, 04:48 PM   #5 (permalink)
Insane
 
If you're transferring from one disk to another, you may want to check the Master and Slave settings. If you're transferring to and from the same ide controller, it'll be a bit slower than from one controller to another.

but the speeds of the individual drives may come into play as well.
sandeep is offline  
Old 11-15-2003, 08:09 PM   #6 (permalink)
Crazy
 
Location: Indiana
Assuming the 40gb is the master and the 160gb is the slave (PC terminology isn't very PC!) then that's to be expected, because the slave drive is going to have a higher latency than the master (since it's last in the chain).
As for bigger drives being slower, no I don't think it's really going to be a noticeable change in speed.
rock_bottom is offline  
Old 11-15-2003, 09:24 PM   #7 (permalink)
Go Cardinals
 
soccerchamp76's Avatar
 
Location: St. Louis/Cincinnati
Depends on a lot of stuff:
Buffer: 2mb vs. 4mb vs. 8mb
Rotation speed: 5400rpm vs. 7200rpm vs. 10000 rpm
Latency time
% of drive fragmented
Master/Slave
__________________
Brian Griffin: Ah, if my memory serves me, this is the physics department.
Chris Griffin: That would explain all the gravity.
soccerchamp76 is offline  
Old 11-16-2003, 06:03 AM   #8 (permalink)
Addict
 
Location: Dodging the ice pick
If I understand the master/slave configuration correctly, all instructions for both hard drives go to/through the master drive. If the instructions are destined for the slave drive they have to be routed to there by the electronics on the master hard drive. This would slow down the speed of accessing or writing information to the slave drive somewhat.

If that is correcty, then this may not be the sole cause of the speed difference but it could have a noticable effect. As others have said buffer size, rotational speed, fragmentation, and the seek latency of the individual drive also play a role.
__________________
COYW

Last edited by darkure; 11-16-2003 at 07:51 AM..
darkure is offline  
Old 11-16-2003, 06:10 AM   #9 (permalink)
Crazy
 
Location: Pittsburgh
so far, I agree with all of everyone's opinions, however I would like to add some insite to the fragmentation possiblity.

I do not have any proof of this, just personal experience, but the size of the partition on the 160g HD also can play a factor. If you are not defraging and have 1 hell-of-a-large partition, you can really kill the speed of any drive. If you were to create multiple partitions of the 160g drive, fragmentation is limited and also requires less defrags.

Take that for what you will, and again, just my own person belief.
gigawatz is offline  
Old 11-16-2003, 09:54 AM   #10 (permalink)
Upright
 
The information to/from the slave drive doesn't travel through the master drive.
splooge is offline  
Old 11-16-2003, 10:47 AM   #11 (permalink)
beauty in the breakdown
 
Location: Chapel Hill, NC
Quote:
Originally posted by Dilbert1234567
defrag every week and it will keep the speed up.
Yes. Regardless of the specs on the drive, defragging it regularly will help speed it up. I dont think you need to do it every week unless you are adding, deleting, or moving a lot of files around on that drive, but a regular defrag schedule is a must.
__________________
"Good people do not need laws to tell them to act responsibly, while bad people will find a way around the laws."
--Plato
sailor is offline  
 

Tags
harddrive, question, silly

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:50 PM.

Tilted Forum Project

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
© 2002-2012 Tilted Forum Project

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360