Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community  

Go Back   Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community > Interests > Tilted Technology


 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 10-23-2003, 06:14 AM   #1 (permalink)
Tilted
 
RAID question......

I currently have a RAID-ready mobo (ASUS A7V333) with a single WD Caviar 80GB 8MB cache 7200 drive. I am planning on getting another drive fairly soon, but I recently read that setting up a RAID array is a good way to boost performance.
If I get another identical drive and set them up in a RAID array, I understand that it will be recognized as a single 160GB drive. Will I still have the advantage of the caches, as in a 16MB cache? Can anyone offer any advice or point me to any tutorials or anything about doing this, risks involved, performance, etc.?
scavengertype is offline  
Old 10-23-2003, 06:33 AM   #2 (permalink)
Quadrature Amplitude Modulator
 
oberon's Avatar
 
Location: Denver
When you say RAID, you need to specify the RAID type. Since you have an 80GB drive currently and are planning on only getting one more, I assume you mean RAID 0, which is striping.

The primary disadvantage of such a configuration is the loss in reliability. That is, if one drive fails, you lose both. Performance will probably not be MUCH better than if the drives were alone (and being used at the same time), but that depends mostly on the solution used to implement it. That is, performance won't improve by 100%, it will be more marked, probably more like 50% or less.

The caches are not combined; they are still specific to the drive they belong to.

So, in short, there are some pitfalls. But if you backup your data anyway, then why not?
__________________
"There are finer fish in the sea than have ever been caught." -- Irish proverb
oberon is offline  
Old 10-23-2003, 12:32 PM   #3 (permalink)
I am Winter Born
 
Pragma's Avatar
 
Location: Alexandria, VA
Here's a Quick Explanation of RAID for you while you're at it.

The individual drives will still have an 8MB read cache, plus they'll benefit from the RAID0 striping (which is I think what you were asking).
__________________
Eat antimatter, Posleen-boy!
Pragma is offline  
Old 10-23-2003, 02:00 PM   #4 (permalink)
Tilted
 
Location: south east US
I have a promise RAID controller, and have had no problems (why did i just say that) with it thus far.

The speed boost is definatly noticeable; being able to copy files while listening to mp3s and surfing is very tolerable with raid 0.

with 2 channels i have 2 partitions; i can use winimage and rebuild win98 in 4:30 mins

your best bet is to stick with an identical drive.
keef is offline  
Old 10-24-2003, 03:46 PM   #5 (permalink)
Insane
 
Location: Truro, Nova Scotia
Yeah the speed is a HUGE plus, the way it works is that each file is writen across each drive in the same ammount. The problem with doing it this way is 2 fold as most have already said, the stability is not good, but if your only running home apps you risk a HDD Crash anyway, second if your dealing with MANY small files, your drive will still use the same amount of space with a 1kb file as it will with a bigger (around 64k mostly) file. You can change this size with most RAID controlers, but some you cannot. On the plus side tho, My 4 way RAID 0 WDSE100JB drives were performing around 3x the speed of a 15000RPM pro SCSI drive. That makes moving things around, and just the basic use of the drive SUPER easy. Also if your into DV editing you will really love how the drives give you that extra boost when recording things.

I wouldn't recomend using it as a primary drive tho (as in a Boot partition) because everytime you go to wipe your system you will need to boot the RAID Drivers along with your CD Rom, its not THAT hard, but it is an annoyance.
Vanquish is offline  
Old 10-25-2003, 12:44 PM   #6 (permalink)
Psycho
 
steveincolumbus's Avatar
 
Location: BFE, Kentucky
the bad point of raid 0 is when you double the number of drives (1 drive to 2) you also double the amount of failers possible do to hard drive failer and now have to recover all of that data that you lost do to no redundancy, I would prefer raid 5, or at least have a good way to backup important data....
steveincolumbus is offline  
Old 10-25-2003, 01:20 PM   #7 (permalink)
It wasnt me
 
tekaweni's Avatar
 
Location: Scotland
So in summary, raid 0 = take lots of backups and enjoy ~70% performance increase. Your risk of hardware failure is doubled assuming 2 disks - ohhh right, you can add even more......

And yes, the benefit is incremental. I run 4 striped disks. Sub-10second boot for win2k on an xp1800 cpu system, but I accept the 4x failure risk. When you lose one striped drive, you lose 'em all

Same as a Ferarri, thats the price of the fast lane.
__________________
If you always do what you've always done, you'll always get what you've always gotten
tekaweni is offline  
Old 10-27-2003, 09:16 AM   #8 (permalink)
Tilted
 
If a drive fails, assumming the data is recoverable, could you copy the data to a new identical drive and replace the failed drive?
scavengertype is offline  
 

Tags
question, raid

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:26 PM.

Tilted Forum Project

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
© 2002-2012 Tilted Forum Project

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360