Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community  

Go Back   Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community > Interests > Tilted Technology


 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 07-31-2003, 11:45 PM   #1 (permalink)
Psycho
 
OS Smackdown: Linux vs. Windows vs. Mac OS vs. Unix vs. Open BSD

What's the best operating system overall? Judging criteria should include: performance, security, usability, stability, compatibility, and any other bility you can think of.

If you can think of any other OS's then nominate them these are just what came to mind at the moment.

You can also choose a multisystem setup or say something like Linux with the ability to run windows virtually using VMware.

So really the only limitation is that you have to be able to run the system or systems on one computer (or server). Meaning you can't say: "well I'd have a windows computer set up for this and a mac set up for that and that's my ideal"

Well, I think the Tuxheads might push Linux home, but some find you can't get along without windows, and then there's always the Mac people.

So without further ado:

LET"S GET READY TO RUMBLE!
sadatx is offline  
Old 08-01-2003, 12:55 AM   #2 (permalink)
Rookie
 
cliche's Avatar
 
Location: Oxford, UK
Windows for day to day stuff (I'm sorry, but I need my powerpoint and word - and Openoffice.org doesn't quite cut it yet in terms of handling all the features)

Linux (dual boot system) for everything else - development etc. Good range of development environments; I have a setup with mySQL/PHP/Apache - all free, and capable of a hell of a lot. Easy access to gcc and a whole lot of other stuff. And, I think, a bit more stable than even Win2k.
__________________
I can't understand why people are frightened of new ideas. I'm frightened of the old ones. -- John Cage (1912 - 1992)
cliche is offline  
Old 08-01-2003, 05:10 AM   #3 (permalink)
Upright
 
xp pro and FreeBSD here.
LHFire is offline  
Old 08-01-2003, 07:29 AM   #4 (permalink)
Stop. Think. Question.
 
rubicon's Avatar
 
Location: Redondo Beach, CA
I'm using XP Pro for desktop and OSX for laptop.

The Fink project allows me to run quite a bit of UNIX software on OSX and more keeps coming.
__________________
How you do anything is how you do everything.
rubicon is offline  
Old 08-01-2003, 07:51 AM   #5 (permalink)
Addict
 
XP Pro, as I am a digital artist.

And please don't give me any bullshit about Mac's being better. I do A LOT of 3d (Maya) and I've used Maya on the Mac. Its buggy, slow, and lacks many features.
yakimushi is offline  
Old 08-01-2003, 09:37 AM   #6 (permalink)
Stonerific
 
drawerfixer's Avatar
 
Location: Colorado
I've only used Macs, so OSX is very nice to me.
__________________
They that can give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety. - Benjamin Franklin
drawerfixer is offline  
Old 08-01-2003, 10:01 AM   #7 (permalink)
Tilted
 
I have no problems with Win XP pro it does everything that I ask of it.
tronims is offline  
Old 08-01-2003, 10:07 AM   #8 (permalink)
Insane
 
Location: Central N.Y.
The ONLY reason that I have any MS software on my computer is the fact that some specialized applications are proprietary and will only run on an MS operating system. For all day to day usage, I'm strictly Linux. As time passes, Linux matures; soon it will be able to run proprietary apps, no more MS crap then.
__________________
"If I had it to do all over,
I'd do it all over you."
bullgoose is offline  
Old 08-01-2003, 10:29 AM   #9 (permalink)
Crazy
 
Location: Notre Dame
Quote:
Originally posted by yakimushi
XP Pro, as I am a digital artist.

And please don't give me any bullshit about Mac's being better. I do A LOT of 3d (Maya) and I've used Maya on the Mac. Its buggy, slow, and lacks many features.
Plus you can only get Maya Complete on the Mac - Unlimited is not yet available.
__________________
No mercy for the bandwidth impaired
LNCPapa is offline  
Old 08-01-2003, 10:36 AM   #10 (permalink)
Fucking Hostile
 
tinfoil's Avatar
 
Location: Springford, ON, Canada
XP at work for my desktop machine. FreeBSD and OSX at home.
__________________
Get off your fuckin cross. We need the fuckin space to nail the next fool martyr.
tinfoil is offline  
Old 08-01-2003, 10:47 AM   #11 (permalink)
Banned
 
Location: St. Paul, MN
OSX, Jaguar...and i can't wait for panther. Once in a while i bitch about what games don't always make it over to mac, but for everyday ease of use, i'd rather have mac, cause it's what i've used since forever.

I think the biggest step forward mac will take is when apple releases a complete office productivity suite...by the look of keynote, it's going to be a real competitor with the M$ suite. At less than half the price, too. Office needs real competition again, and if apple can work out interoperability of files, this could be it.
chavos is offline  
Old 08-01-2003, 11:57 AM   #12 (permalink)
Crazy
 
Location: Notre Dame
I think each OS has advantages over any other. I use several OSes
Win2K Server
Windows 2003 Server Standard
WinXP Pro
Redhat 7.3
Redhat 9
Mandrake PPC 7.?
Mandrake PPC 9.1
Mac OS X Server 10.15
Mac OS X 10.2 (Jaguar)
Mac OS X Server 10.3 (Panther) Dev Prev
Solaris 2.8 (although I can't point out any advantages here - but I don't really want to install linux on my SUN box)
__________________
No mercy for the bandwidth impaired
LNCPapa is offline  
Old 08-01-2003, 01:09 PM   #13 (permalink)
Insane
 
Location: USA
did you guys hear that pixar is probably switching to macs (g5's)? I think OSX os well on its way to being an even better operating system, expecialy because its updated so often.
__________________
S U C C E S S

some people dream of success, while other people live to crush those dreams
3zos is offline  
Old 08-01-2003, 01:21 PM   #14 (permalink)
Stonerific
 
drawerfixer's Avatar
 
Location: Colorado
I'm a Mac guy, so I'm not trying to be mean, but if memory serves, Pixar is owned or managed (?) by Steve Jobs.
__________________
They that can give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety. - Benjamin Franklin
drawerfixer is offline  
Old 08-01-2003, 01:45 PM   #15 (permalink)
Banned
 
Location: 'bout 2 feet from my iMac
drawer: you got it. pixar's Jobs' "other" baby.
cheerios is offline  
Old 08-01-2003, 01:49 PM   #16 (permalink)
I am Winter Born
 
Pragma's Avatar
 
Location: Alexandria, VA
I use personally:
WinXP Pro, Win2k Server, OpenBSD

I manage:
WinNT, Win2k Pro, Win2k Server, Win2k Advanced Server, WinXP Pro, Win2k3 Enterprise Server, OpenBSD, Redhat Linux, Solaris 8, Solaris 9.

Every OS has it's use. I prefer XP and OpenBSD, but everyone has their own tastes.
__________________
Eat antimatter, Posleen-boy!
Pragma is offline  
Old 08-01-2003, 05:15 PM   #17 (permalink)
Junkie
 
Location: North Hollywood
XP Pro, 2k Server and SGI IRIX mainly.

I prefer XP, its very stable and has all the apps and features i need for pleasure and work.

Though i use irix less and less, its my prefered *nix
charliex is offline  
Old 08-01-2003, 10:04 PM   #18 (permalink)
Crazy
 
Location: Miami Beach, Fl
Most people hate MSFT, but ya'll gotta admit WinXP is a fine OS. It does everything that most people need it to do. It's even great for media editing where Mac has the spotlight. MSFT makes great software, and will eventually buy out their competition and take over the world.
__________________
/Knowledge is Power/
SiphonX is offline  
Old 08-02-2003, 01:16 PM   #19 (permalink)
Upright
 
Location: Kansas
It all depends on what your needs are. XP and OSX are good systems for the average user. Linux is great if you know what you are doing, but it is not ready for the average user. Software installation needs to be made much simpler before it will be ready for the masses.

I use Linux as my primary OS, but still use Windows for gaming.
nick1701a is offline  
Old 08-02-2003, 01:45 PM   #20 (permalink)
Psycho
 
Location: London
Mac OS 9.2, as OSX still has some things that need to be sorted out.
more fire is offline  
Old 08-02-2003, 05:14 PM   #21 (permalink)
Crazy
 
Location: Notre Dame
LOL - and OS9 doesn't?
__________________
No mercy for the bandwidth impaired
LNCPapa is offline  
Old 08-02-2003, 08:37 PM   #22 (permalink)
Know Where!
 
MacGnG's Avatar
 
Mac's ROCK
MacGnG is offline  
Old 08-02-2003, 09:44 PM   #23 (permalink)
kel
WARNING: FLAMMABLE
 
Location: Ask Acetylene
Well for different purposes different OS's

For a server box I go with SUSE all the way.

For gaming I of course have little choice but to use XP

And for my laptop? Well I could go either way, but I end up leaning towards OS X, It's hella expensive and not as blazing fast as it should be for the money I pay. But shiz... I just surf and surf and surf and surf and surf and surf... no problems.
Projectbuilder is also free, no frills, but free. The debugger is shite though, and I haven't found any alternatives in OS X

I actually develop on all 3 systems, I write mostly algorithmic system independent code right now, so I can move from one box to another with ease. The only hard part is maintaining current versions. But I have the CVS server on the linux box to take care of that :-)

When I develop graphical programs I usually go with windows simply because I want other people to be able to run them.
Also hands down there is no C++ IDE I enjoy more then Microsoft's. The only thing that comes close is KDE's IDE.
__________________
"It better be funny"
kel is offline  
Old 08-02-2003, 09:51 PM   #24 (permalink)
Banned
 
Location: shittown, CA
new IDE replacing PB called xCode, it's got a number of missing features which is nice. but there is always Code Warrior.
juanvaldes is offline  
Old 08-02-2003, 09:56 PM   #25 (permalink)
Insane
 
I run windows 2000, i have for a while now. Since SP3, it has been a great personal computing OS, as well as an incredibly stable os that won't shake unless you ask it to.

I've used XP in numerous personal computing applications, and i prefer 2k to xp. It just feels like XP is 2000 with a fancy t-shirt. That t-shirt by the way, requires 500 more megs of ram and a few hundred clicks on the cpu clock.

compatibility wise, i've never had any problems running software on 2000, which is what many folks are afraid of.
sandeep is offline  
Old 08-02-2003, 10:17 PM   #26 (permalink)
Psycho
 
Location: Tempe,Az....until I figure things out...
I like XP for the school stuff... but I am very much in love with Linux. Gotta make my next system a dual booter so I can have the best of both worlds
__________________
"Things can only get so bad before they have no choice but to get better.."

Quote:
Nitz Walsh : It's not fair God. Why am I still a virgin?........ Stupid gnome.
BlueBongo is offline  
Old 08-03-2003, 03:59 AM   #27 (permalink)
42, baby!
 
Dragonlich's Avatar
 
Location: The Netherlands
Win98SE was simple, relatively stable, and fast. Win2K is my current OS, and it's great. WinXP looks crappy, and I managed to destroy the OS in two days.

As for Linux... tried it, loved it, grew tired of it, tried it again, grew tired, tried it some more, etc. It's a nice, stable OS, but I simply can't get exited by it. It's too much work after using Windows.
Dragonlich is offline  
Old 08-03-2003, 05:48 AM   #28 (permalink)
In Your Dreams
 
Latch's Avatar
 
Location: City of Lights
What about OS/2 Warp 4????? hahahaha
Latch is offline  
Old 08-03-2003, 10:59 PM   #29 (permalink)
Psycho
 
Man, quite a few people chose OpenBSD. I'm surprised. I've never been able to get that system to work on my computer (although I know a number of people who swear by it). To the people that selected it, why OpenBSD? Security? Stability?
sadatx is offline  
Old 08-03-2003, 11:04 PM   #30 (permalink)
Banned
 
Location: shittown, CA
the old saying goes...

BSD for those who loves Unix, Linux for those who hate Microsoft.
juanvaldes is offline  
Old 08-03-2003, 11:07 PM   #31 (permalink)
Psycho
 
I gotta write that down.
sadatx is offline  
Old 08-04-2003, 12:57 AM   #32 (permalink)
Insane
 
Location: Plugged In
Quote:
Originally posted by Latch
What about OS/2 Warp 4????? hahahaha
Latch is absolutely correct. OS/2 rules. End of discussion.

-- Boner, former TeamOS/2 member
Boner is offline  
Old 08-04-2003, 03:12 AM   #33 (permalink)
The Original JizzSmacka
 
Jesus Pimp's Avatar
 
Quote:
Originally posted by Dragonlich
Win98SE was simple, relatively stable, and fast. Win2K is my current OS, and it's great. WinXP looks crappy, and I managed to destroy the OS in two days.

Win98 was slow and got bogged down when you have a lot of programs installed. As for XP Pro, I hope you know you can set it to look like win2k or get skins. There's no reason to use the default.
__________________
Never date anyone who doesn't make your dick hard.
Jesus Pimp is offline  
Old 08-04-2003, 06:14 AM   #34 (permalink)
In Your Dreams
 
Latch's Avatar
 
Location: City of Lights
Quote:
Originally posted by Boner
Latch is absolutely correct. OS/2 rules. End of discussion.

-- Boner, former TeamOS/2 member
When Warp 4 first came out, I loved it (I started on Warp 3).... Wish they would have kept going, but I can see how it wasn't really possible with M$ there.

I find it kind of ironic that my current favourite desktop setup (Ximian Desktop 2 on Redhat 9) has the main menu in the top right.. almost exactly where Warp 4 had it's menu (which I loved).
Latch is offline  
Old 08-04-2003, 07:43 PM   #35 (permalink)
Addict
 
Location: The one state that doesn't have black outs: TEXAS BABY!!!
Win XP pro / Linux Mandrake dual boot -what i used to use


XP = plug and play ... heaven
Linux = plug and fix it yourself damnit ... more work

I cannot compute without my windows appz either
__________________
Did you Google it yet?

Join the TFP Typing team!!
sub zero is offline  
 

Tags
bsd, linux, mac, open, smackdown, unix, windows

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:00 AM.

Tilted Forum Project

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
© 2002-2012 Tilted Forum Project

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360