Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community  

Go Back   Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community > Interests > Tilted Technology


 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 09-22-2009, 04:47 AM   #1 (permalink)
pinche vato
 
warrrreagl's Avatar
 
Location: backwater, Third World, land of cotton
Anti-Photo Shield

There is an article here on Wired Magazine about a Russian billionaire installing an "anti-photography" device on his yacht to keep the press at bay. Rather than quote the entire article, I'll sum it up by basically saying that the device sweeps the area around the yacht in a constant laser sphere until it detects electronic light sensors in a nearby camera. At that point, it fires a beam of light at the camera and disables it from recording a digital image.

Is this dangerous to the eys of the person looking through the camera? What are your thoughts? Have paparazzi brought this on themselves?
__________________
Living is easy with eyes closed.
warrrreagl is offline  
Old 09-22-2009, 06:35 AM   #2 (permalink)
Custom User Title
 
Craven Morehead's Avatar
 
The sensor on the yacht seeks out CCDs (wish they would have expanded on how it works in the article). In a digital SLR the CCD is not exposed until the image is captured, otherwise it is covered by a mirror reflecting the scene being viewed into the viewfinder. Therefore the photographer is not viewing the scene through the camera since the mirror would have flipped out of the way of the CCD when the image is captured. However, the scanning laser could possibly be harmful. I would have thought any possible health effects would have been covered in the article.
Craven Morehead is offline  
Old 09-22-2009, 10:52 AM   #3 (permalink)
MSD
The sky calls to us ...
 
MSD's Avatar
 
Super Moderator
Location: CT
Depending on the delay between detection and response, an SLR with a sufficiently high shutter speed could probably defeat this, but whoever is looking through the lens could easily be blinded after the mirror sets back into place.

What's going to be funny is when some guy with a 35mm SLR and a huge telephoto lens with an IR filter starts snapping pictures.
MSD is offline  
Old 09-22-2009, 10:57 AM   #4 (permalink)
Evil Priest: The Devil Made Me Do It!
 
Daniel_'s Avatar
 
Location: Southern England
Quote:
Originally Posted by MSD View Post
Depending on the delay between detection and response, an SLR with a sufficiently high shutter speed could probably defeat this, but whoever is looking through the lens could easily be blinded after the mirror sets back into place.

What's going to be funny is when some guy with a 35mm SLR and a huge telephoto lens with an IR filter starts snapping pictures.
My first thought!
__________________
╔═════════════════════════════════════════╗
Overhead, the Albatross hangs motionless upon the air,
And deep beneath the rolling waves,
In labyrinths of Coral Caves,
The Echo of a distant time
Comes willowing across the sand;
And everthing is Green and Submarine

╚═════════════════════════════════════════╝
Daniel_ is offline  
Old 09-22-2009, 02:41 PM   #5 (permalink)
Banned
 
Zeraph's Avatar
 
Location: The Cosmos
Sounds more like an automated laser pointer device. I'm sure the lasers they're using are not mad scientist grade and aren't going to hurt the photographer. You don't need much extra light to ruin a photo.
Zeraph is offline  
Old 09-22-2009, 02:51 PM   #6 (permalink)
Evil Priest: The Devil Made Me Do It!
 
Daniel_'s Avatar
 
Location: Southern England
But if it seeks CCD it will be thrown off by film, and if it seeks IR it will be thrown off by distance/manual focus
__________________
╔═════════════════════════════════════════╗
Overhead, the Albatross hangs motionless upon the air,
And deep beneath the rolling waves,
In labyrinths of Coral Caves,
The Echo of a distant time
Comes willowing across the sand;
And everthing is Green and Submarine

╚═════════════════════════════════════════╝
Daniel_ is offline  
Old 09-23-2009, 08:16 AM   #7 (permalink)
MSD
The sky calls to us ...
 
MSD's Avatar
 
Super Moderator
Location: CT
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zeraph View Post
Sounds more like an automated laser pointer device. I'm sure the lasers they're using are not mad scientist grade and aren't going to hurt the photographer. You don't need much extra light to ruin a photo.
It doesn't take much to damage an eye, especially if a laser is focused through an SLR's lens.
MSD is offline  
Old 09-27-2009, 09:10 AM   #8 (permalink)
Banned
 
Zeraph's Avatar
 
Location: The Cosmos
Quote:
Originally Posted by MSD View Post
It doesn't take much to damage an eye, especially if a laser is focused through an SLR's lens.
I don't know. I've heard of it happening but I've been hit with handheld (strong though) laser pointers in the eye several times. Like direct hits where I'm blinded for several minutes. But my vision has always returned to normal. Maybe I'm just lucky.
Zeraph is offline  
Old 09-27-2009, 11:33 AM   #9 (permalink)
Junkie
 
Location: My head.
Why is it wrong to blind someone then?

This is rather shaky area for me. I have a right to privacy. Understand that not all that can be seen is fair game. I have a right for you not to be taking photos of me just the way I can put barbed wire over my fence to prevent burglars.

I feel it beats reason, I'm not walking down the street naked and I am ok with people having their picture taken while on the street, there is no privacy there. But in their own secluded home if someone goes through the trouble of climbing over hedges and perching precariously on a branch to take a naked picture of me then they do deserve to be blinded by the fail safes placed to prevent that.
Xerxys is offline  
Old 09-29-2009, 02:13 PM   #10 (permalink)
Insane
 
Location: at home
How does one detect a CCD with a laser since it is a passive device ?
Could it be a low power IR laser that constantly sweeps a sphere around the yacht that could interfer with CCD but would be invisible to naked eye ?

Trivia of the day: Digital cameras can be used to see if IR remotes are transmitting.
__________________
Sodomy non sapiens. : I'm buggered if I know
Zweiblumen is offline  
Old 09-29-2009, 05:58 PM   #11 (permalink)
Currently sour but formerly Dlishs
 
dlish's Avatar
 
Super Moderator
Location: Australia/UAE
i didnt read the article..its too early to think here..

what if you didnt use the flash?
__________________
An injustice anywhere, is an injustice everywhere

I always sign my facebook comments with ()()===========(}. Does that make me gay?
- Filthy
dlish is offline  
 

Tags
antiphoto, shield


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:43 AM.

Tilted Forum Project

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
© 2002-2012 Tilted Forum Project

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360