04-15-2008, 07:49 AM | #1 (permalink) | |
Insane
Location: Kansas City, MO
|
Open Source Mac (0.o)b
http://www.macrumors.com/2008/04/14/...ot-from-apple/
Quote:
Here is the link to the site for information and purchasing. http://www.psystar.com/shop/openmac.html
__________________
-Blind faith runs into things!- |
|
04-15-2008, 08:12 AM | #2 (permalink) |
... a sort of licensed troubleshooter.
|
I'm a bit torn here. While clearly the quality isn't present in this machine that you would find in a real Mac, and while it clearly breaches the End User Licensing Agreement, the EULA is somewhat restrictive and it would be nice if Mac allowed for some competition using their amazing OS.
|
04-15-2008, 08:13 AM | #3 (permalink) | |
Devoted
Donor
Location: New England
|
Quote:
__________________
I can't read your signature. Sorry. |
|
04-15-2008, 08:27 AM | #4 (permalink) |
... a sort of licensed troubleshooter.
|
Open Mac breaches the EULA and Psystar is now probably open to prosecution. Mac OS will only become available for non Apple computers when Apple says.
Apple's best move would be to create a subsidiary and allow them to make the Mac Mini, which would give the illusion of competition. |
04-15-2008, 08:33 AM | #5 (permalink) |
spudly
Location: Ellay
|
I really doubt that will happen. That was one of the Great Lessons learned in the companies dark ages: keep everything under one roof. Letting other people compete with you at making your own stuff doesn't make sense. Besides, there is a fervent belief that the juju of Apple is in their ability to control both aspects of the machine - hardware and software. Steve has said as much in many interviews.
__________________
Cogito ergo spud -- I think, therefore I yam |
04-16-2008, 05:03 AM | #6 (permalink) | |
Insane
Location: Kansas City, MO
|
Quote:
There are arguments to the contrary, as well. Like if these are solid products, I'd imagine Apple might lose some sales off the bat. However, will this do anything other than force Apple to finally increase support to the mid range/upgradeable pc market. I don't know. I'm no analyst, but I see Apple being in a lot more places if people start giving them a run for their money.
__________________
-Blind faith runs into things!- |
|
04-16-2008, 06:47 AM | #7 (permalink) | |
Devoted
Donor
Location: New England
|
So, who is Psytar, anyway?
Quote:
__________________
I can't read your signature. Sorry. |
|
04-16-2008, 01:25 PM | #9 (permalink) | |
Insane
Location: Kansas City, MO
|
Quote:
__________________
-Blind faith runs into things!- |
|
04-16-2008, 06:13 PM | #12 (permalink) |
immoral minority
Location: Back in Ohio
|
I would say that 95% of the basic OS worked right away. There were some graphics things that weren't supported (external/internal display resolution of 1024x768 max), which is fine for my laptop because that is the max resolution, but not good for a 1080p LCD that I use as my computer monitor at home. Some video formats weren't supported out of the box, and a few other minor issues that I would hope wouldn't be there on an actual mac. I did enjoy using it, and my current Linux setup kind of resembles the file system and folder directories of a mac. I would look into buying a mac for my next computer if they can meet my long list of requirements (SSD, HDMI/DVI out, thin, wired network port, LED backlit display, 4+ hour battery,...)
My wireless card didn't work right away, but it was $20 to buy one that did. Linux is working for me right now though. Although iTunes is a problem that Linux needs to figure out. There are alternatives, but there is nothing that matches what it can do. |
04-16-2008, 06:14 PM | #13 (permalink) | ||
Crazy
Location: West of Denver
|
Quote:
I'm a Linux user, tried to drink the OSX KoolAid and it just didn't go down that well. Hardware (MacBookPro) sure was nice though. I would have kept it had it not been for the single-button trackpad. Need my three buttons Quote:
Ah, video issues, the bane of Linux circa 2000. Those do indeed suck. re: iTunes: does it work with WINE? I'm going to go look at winehq.com
__________________
smoore Last edited by smoore; 04-16-2008 at 06:16 PM.. Reason: Automerged Doublepost |
||
04-17-2008, 12:03 PM | #15 (permalink) | |||
Insane
Location: Kansas City, MO
|
*UPDATE*
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
-Blind faith runs into things!- |
|||
04-18-2008, 08:47 AM | #16 (permalink) | |
Devoted
Donor
Location: New England
|
And even more entertainment, for those playing the home game:
Quote:
__________________
I can't read your signature. Sorry. |
|
04-18-2008, 10:14 AM | #17 (permalink) |
Junkie
Location: France
|
This is fascinating.
I do wish a more serious, more "real" and authentic company than PsyStar(what kind of name is that, anyway?) would try to get in talks with Apple to develop custom mac machines. I'm sure the demand would be incredibly high for users to make their own PC's, choose their own hardware, and have the choice to run Windows, Mac and Linux on it. The only legal way for us to do this now is by getting the Apple built machines, but often people do want to have their own touch. Especially since Apple's consumer base has been expanding quite fast recently, more of their costumers are bound to be likely to want to have some freedom in their choice of hardware configs. Anyway, I don't it'll legally happen anytime soon. Apple hardware is selling well enough for Apple as it is, and as others have said, it's been Apple's philosophy to keep everything "under the same roof" (and it works well for them).
__________________
Check it out: The Open Source/Freeware/Gratis Software Thread |
Tags |
0ob, mac, open, source |
|
|