Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community  

Go Back   Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community > Interests > Tilted Technology


 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 04-15-2008, 07:49 AM   #1 (permalink)
Insane
 
Herk's Avatar
 
Location: Kansas City, MO
Open Source Mac (0.o)b

http://www.macrumors.com/2008/04/14/...ot-from-apple/
Quote:
<h3>'OpenMac' Promises $399 Headless Mac... But Not From Apple</h3>
A company called Psystar has started advertising a $399 computer called "OpenMac" which claims to be a Leopard compatible Mac built from standard PC-parts. For $399, you get a tower computer with the following specs:

- 2.2GHz Intel Core 2 Duo
- 2GB of DDR2 667 memory
- Integrated Intel GMA 950 Graphics
- 20x DVD+/-R Drive
- 4 USB Ports
- 250GB 7200RPM Drive

Many of the components can be upgraded, however. For example, the graphics card can be updated to a GeForce 8600GT 512MB for $155 more.

Psystar is marketing this as a cheaper and more expandable alternative to a true Apple Mac.

When comparing base configurations, the Mac Mini costs 150% of the price of the OpenMac while offering poorer performance, smaller storage space, and RAM. Not only that but the Mac Mini doesn't have the option for an nVidia GeForce 8600 video card like the OpenMac does so playing games on it is a lost cause.

The company claims that the machine is Leopard compatible with some "minimal patching" but does offer Leopard pre-installed. This is reportedly accomplished by using parts that are known to be compatible with Mac OS X Leopard, as well as the use of an EFI emulator.

With the EFI V8 emulator it is possible to install Leopard's kernel straight from the DVD that you purchased at the Apple store barring the addition of a few drivers to ensure that everything boots and runs smoothly.
Readers should note that these claims have not been independently verified, so this should not seen as an endorsement of this product. However, the technology appears to be derived from the osx86project, which has allowed hobbyists to install Mac OS X on their non-Apple PCs.

The concept is an interesting possibility, and will certainly draw the attention of Apple. The use of Leopard on non Apple-branded hardware is a violation of its End User License Agreement (EULA) and is specifically prohibited.

Update: Psystar appears to have changed the name of their product to "Open Computer". Whether this is a response to a direct request from Apple or is simply an internal company decision in recognition of possible trademark infringement remains unknown.
This is interesting. There are a few articles you can find on it. I checked out the website. I can't wait to see how this plays out. Either way, I think it will be good for Apple.

Here is the link to the site for information and purchasing. http://www.psystar.com/shop/openmac.html
__________________
-Blind faith runs into things!-
Herk is offline  
Old 04-15-2008, 08:12 AM   #2 (permalink)
... a sort of licensed troubleshooter.
 
Willravel's Avatar
 
I'm a bit torn here. While clearly the quality isn't present in this machine that you would find in a real Mac, and while it clearly breaches the End User Licensing Agreement, the EULA is somewhat restrictive and it would be nice if Mac allowed for some competition using their amazing OS.
Willravel is offline  
Old 04-15-2008, 08:13 AM   #3 (permalink)
Devoted
 
Redlemon's Avatar
 
Donor
Location: New England
Quote:
Originally Posted by Herk
I can't wait to see how this plays out. Either way, I think it will be good for Apple.
How so? Willravel, I'm sure, will fill in the details, but back when Apple allowed clones, the company almost went under. Not fighting this clone will hurt their bottom line. Fighting this clone may make them look like dicks. I don't see a benefit to Apple either way.
__________________
I can't read your signature. Sorry.
Redlemon is offline  
Old 04-15-2008, 08:27 AM   #4 (permalink)
... a sort of licensed troubleshooter.
 
Willravel's Avatar
 
Open Mac breaches the EULA and Psystar is now probably open to prosecution. Mac OS will only become available for non Apple computers when Apple says.

Apple's best move would be to create a subsidiary and allow them to make the Mac Mini, which would give the illusion of competition.
Willravel is offline  
Old 04-15-2008, 08:33 AM   #5 (permalink)
spudly
 
ubertuber's Avatar
 
Location: Ellay
I really doubt that will happen. That was one of the Great Lessons learned in the companies dark ages: keep everything under one roof. Letting other people compete with you at making your own stuff doesn't make sense. Besides, there is a fervent belief that the juju of Apple is in their ability to control both aspects of the machine - hardware and software. Steve has said as much in many interviews.
__________________
Cogito ergo spud -- I think, therefore I yam
ubertuber is offline  
Old 04-16-2008, 05:03 AM   #6 (permalink)
Insane
 
Herk's Avatar
 
Location: Kansas City, MO
Quote:
Originally Posted by Redlemon
How so? Willravel, I'm sure, will fill in the details, but back when Apple allowed clones, the company almost went under. Not fighting this clone will hurt their bottom line. Fighting this clone may make them look like dicks. I don't see a benefit to Apple either way.
Well the way I see it, this is very different than the cloning mid-90's. This Apple didn't allow. So, if they turn out like crap the result is that Apple's have unmatchable quality. If they are great, it will open an opportunity to bring the Apple experience to a much larger audience, and in doing so, increase their sales of mac software and peripherals.

There are arguments to the contrary, as well. Like if these are solid products, I'd imagine Apple might lose some sales off the bat. However, will this do anything other than force Apple to finally increase support to the mid range/upgradeable pc market.

I don't know. I'm no analyst, but I see Apple being in a lot more places if people start giving them a run for their money.
__________________
-Blind faith runs into things!-
Herk is offline  
Old 04-16-2008, 06:47 AM   #7 (permalink)
Devoted
 
Redlemon's Avatar
 
Donor
Location: New England
So, who is Psytar, anyway?
Quote:
We dig around the company that says it'll sell non-Apple kit loaded with Leopard. How did they move office in a matter of hours? And who *are* they?
April 15, 2008 7:02 PM

You'll have noticed the claims of Psystar that it will be selling an "OpenComputer" (smart, avoiding the use of the Apple trademark in the "OpenMac" name it previously used) that will, in effect, be an Apple clone.

But we thought we'd look further, because if the company's going to make these big claims about what it can do, why, that's interesting; but what sort of company is behind it?

The Psystar site talks a lot. OK. The site was registered in 2000, according to whois, but what's odd is that searches on Google and on Live.com don't turn up anything about the company before this week. Zip. Zero. Nada.

I called the Miami Chamber of Commerces and its Better Business Bureau. They've never heard of it.

I called the company. The automated system asked if I want Sales? Support? Human Resources? Let's have a laugh and call HR. No reply. (This was 11.45am their time.) Did I want to leave a message? Press the pound key when done. I did. "Error."

Call again - let's try Support this time. A man answers, doesn't give his name, and refers pretty much all questions to press@psystar.com. While he's on, why isn't there any reference to Psystar online before this week? "We're a small IT company, doing solutions anywhere from small office networks to enterprise-level networks." The company's latest product, he said, was a storage area network.

OK, so who are the clients? Why no mention in any forums or press releases of the wonderful work Psystar has done for these small and large businesses? Most people are delighted, after all, to pump out words about what they've done. But zero hits? "We were a local company with little to no presence on the web," he explained. Uh-huh. But the website has been around since 2000, and moved hosts in 2005.

He referred us again to the press email address. OK, did Psystar offer a 24-hour support line? (Even the teams in The Apprentice do that. For your laundry, no less.) "No." Oh. Were there many people doing support for Psystar? "I'm not support." But I thought... "I'm just answering the phones." Oh.

Sent an email to Psystar. No reply so far.

And then we thought we'd look closer at the location they're in. And that's where things got really strange.

The address had changed completely.

Earlier in the day, it was giving 10645 SW 112 St, Miami FL 33176. (Happily, I took a screenshot.)

And now, while I'd been writing this post, it's moved - to 10481 NW 28th St, Miami, FL 33172.

OK, that's got to be the weirdest thing I've ever seen in years of covering technology. The first address, on Google Maps, looks like your average row of suburban houses.

The second - new! - one looks far more office-y, or at least industrial.

But you know what's most interesting? Apple's complete silence on this. It hasn't said a word. I suspect that it's waiting to see if anything emerges from this. It hasn't stopped the Mac world working itself into a lather, poring over EULAs and talking about EFIs; it's just nobody seems to have bothered to pick up a phone and call.

But forgive me for being a bit sceptical, but isn't it far, far more important whether the company has been around, has a reputation, and is going to deliver a machine? Isn't it?
__________________
I can't read your signature. Sorry.
Redlemon is offline  
Old 04-16-2008, 07:21 AM   #8 (permalink)
... a sort of licensed troubleshooter.
 
Willravel's Avatar
 
Ha! It's a fake! Mac Rumors might be in trouble.
Willravel is offline  
Old 04-16-2008, 01:25 PM   #9 (permalink)
Insane
 
Herk's Avatar
 
Location: Kansas City, MO
Quote:
Originally Posted by willravel
Ha! It's a fake! Mac Rumors might be in trouble.
Like I said, I can't wait to see how this plays out. Also, I saw the story elsewhere. You can see a lot of news articles popping up on it. It is liking watching news coverage of a Brittany Spears mishap, but now the target audience of the sensationalism is the geeks... wait a second... I no longer have any interest in this issue.
__________________
-Blind faith runs into things!-
Herk is offline  
Old 04-16-2008, 05:22 PM   #10 (permalink)
immoral minority
 
ASU2003's Avatar
 
Location: Back in Ohio
It is a gray area, but my current Linux laptop had MacOSX on it for a few days. It worked pretty well, but there were a few issues that made me switch to Linux.
ASU2003 is offline  
Old 04-16-2008, 05:45 PM   #11 (permalink)
... a sort of licensed troubleshooter.
 
Willravel's Avatar
 
I have yet to try Mac OS X on a non-Mac. I'd be curious to see how it's done and how well it compares to the real thing.
Willravel is offline  
Old 04-16-2008, 06:13 PM   #12 (permalink)
immoral minority
 
ASU2003's Avatar
 
Location: Back in Ohio
I would say that 95% of the basic OS worked right away. There were some graphics things that weren't supported (external/internal display resolution of 1024x768 max), which is fine for my laptop because that is the max resolution, but not good for a 1080p LCD that I use as my computer monitor at home. Some video formats weren't supported out of the box, and a few other minor issues that I would hope wouldn't be there on an actual mac. I did enjoy using it, and my current Linux setup kind of resembles the file system and folder directories of a mac. I would look into buying a mac for my next computer if they can meet my long list of requirements (SSD, HDMI/DVI out, thin, wired network port, LED backlit display, 4+ hour battery,...)

My wireless card didn't work right away, but it was $20 to buy one that did.

Linux is working for me right now though. Although iTunes is a problem that Linux needs to figure out. There are alternatives, but there is nothing that matches what it can do.
ASU2003 is offline  
Old 04-16-2008, 06:14 PM   #13 (permalink)
Crazy
 
smoore's Avatar
 
Location: West of Denver
Quote:
Originally Posted by willravel
I have yet to try Mac OS X on a non-Mac. I'd be curious to see how it's done and how well it compares to the real thing.
Wouldn't it be the same? As long as the hardware was 100% compatible you shouldn't be able to tell the difference.

I'm a Linux user, tried to drink the OSX KoolAid and it just didn't go down that well. Hardware (MacBookPro) sure was nice though. I would have kept it had it not been for the single-button trackpad. Need my three buttons

Quote:
Originally Posted by ASU2003
I would say that 95% of the basic OS worked right away. There were some graphics things that weren't supported (external/internal display resolution of 1024x768 max), which is fine for my laptop because that is the max resolution, but not good for a 1080p LCD that I use as my computer monitor at home. Some video formats weren't supported out of the box, and a few other minor issues that I would hope wouldn't be there on an actual mac. I did enjoy using it, and my current Linux setup kind of resembles the file system and folder directories of a mac. I would look into buying a mac for my next computer if they can meet my long list of requirements (SSD, HDMI/DVI out, thin, wired network port, LED backlit display, 4+ hour battery,...)

My wireless card didn't work right away, but it was $20 to buy one that did.

Linux is working for me right now though. Although iTunes is a problem that Linux needs to figure out. There are alternatives, but there is nothing that matches what it can do.

Ah, video issues, the bane of Linux circa 2000. Those do indeed suck.

re: iTunes: does it work with WINE? I'm going to go look at winehq.com
__________________
smoore

Last edited by smoore; 04-16-2008 at 06:16 PM.. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
smoore is offline  
Old 04-17-2008, 04:34 AM   #14 (permalink)
immoral minority
 
ASU2003's Avatar
 
Location: Back in Ohio
I can get iTunes to work, it is the iPod stuff that doesn't work (automatically). I'm not sure if it is a USB or network issue.
ASU2003 is offline  
Old 04-17-2008, 12:03 PM   #15 (permalink)
Insane
 
Herk's Avatar
 
Location: Kansas City, MO
*UPDATE*

Quote:
Originally Posted by http://www.news.com/8301-13579_3-9921271-37.html?tag=newsmap
Psystar violated terms of merchant services agreement
Posted by Tom Krazit | 3 comments

The payment-processing merchant for Mac clone maker Psystar abruptly ended its relationship with the company Wednesday after it discovered what was for sale on Psystar's site.

Powerpay refused to process any more transactions for the Open Computer after learning what it was.
(Credit: Psystar)

Powerpay had been the payment processor for Psystar's online store until Wednesday, when it yanked its services from Psystar's Web site. That move sent the store offline for several hours midday Wednesday, halting sales of Psystar's Open Computer, which comes preinstalled with Mac OS X Leopard in violation of Apple's licensing agreement for its operating system.

Psystar posted a statement on its Web site Thursday explaining the downtime. "Midday yesterday our store was not receiving any orders. This was due to the fact that our merchant gateway, Powerpay, dropped the ball on us and refused to process any more transactions from our company."

Louisa Deluca, vice president of loss prevention for Powerpay, said on Thursday that her company dropped Psystar because it violated the terms of its agreement with Powerpay. She declined to cite specific violations, but said "there are plenty of reasons why we shut the account off. We did not know that's what he was selling, we learned that yesterday."

Psystar has since switched merchant services providers to PayPal, who processed my transaction with the company on Wednesday. A PayPal representative did not immediately return a call seeking comment on that company's policies regarding sales of goods such as the Open Computer.

Psystar is still under siege from the press. A gentleman answering the phone Thursday morning directed all inquires to a press e-mail alias, and if I receive a response from the company, I'll let you know.

UPDATED 11:30am - I managed to obtain the cell phone number for Rudy Pedraza, who appears to be the owner of Psystar. A polite gentleman who answered the phone said that he was not Rudy, but confirmed the number belonged to Rudy. He took a message for Rudy, and promised to have him call back. Right. Holding breath.

The company also attempted to explain the elusive nature of its home address in Southern Florida in a statement posted on their site Thursday. Psystar's address has changed no less than three times in three days since the story exploded on Monday.

"We're in the process of moving to a new location which is now listed on our contact page," the company said in the statement. "The first new address posted (10481) was in error and our correct address is 10475 NW 28th Street. Psystar was, prior to this past week, not ready to handle the enormous production capacity demanded by the online community. Due to the incredible response we have now expanded to a larger commercial unit to handle the supplies and assembly of Open Computers."

Meanwhile, a News.com reader passed along an e-mail from a colleague who had alerted him to Psystar's existence on April 6, a week before the Psystar story blew up on Sunday night and Monday morning. That's the first instance I've heard of somebody who was aware of the Open Computer prior to Sunday evening, but if other people were aware of its existence earlier this month or year, please send me an e-mail or leave a comment below.
Quote:
Originally Posted by http://government.zdnet.com/?p=3761
Walk through the Psystar fiasco with me. Many things are confusing. At a minimum, it’s clear that the OpenMac is bogus. It’s extremely dubious that Psystar is a legitimate company. It is increasingly likely that the whole thing is a phishing or credit-card scam.

Item: The wandering hardware company. Psystar’s address, as displayed on its website has changed four times since the story hit on Monday.

Address 1: 10645 SW 112th St., Miami

Address 2: 10481 NW 28th St., Miami

Address 3: 10471 NW 28th St., Miami

Address 4: 10475, NW 28th St., Doral

Psystar attempts to address suspicions about this with this statement on the website:

We’re in the process of moving to a new location which is now listed on our contact page. The first new address posted (10481) was in error and our correct address is 10475 NW 28th Street. PSYSTAR was, prior to this past week, not ready to handle the enormous production capacity demanded by the online community. Due to the incredible response we have now expanded to a larger commercial unit to handle the supplies and assembly of Open Computers. THANK YOU for all of your orders.

The whole address thing is admirably reported by The Guardian’s Charles Arthur and the loyal readers of Gizmodo, who tracked down the addresses and snapped pics. It’s not clear to me that the latest address actually exists. Mapquest says the address exists. Google Maps says it doesn’t.

psystar1.jpg

Item: No lawyers: Here Psystar (who no one’s ever heard of) is challenging one of the largest and most litigation-friendly companies in Silicon Valley on a matter that goes to the heart of end-user license agreements — a complicated and unsettled area of law — and one with ramifications for the entire industry. But Psystar’s lawyers are nowhere to be heard of. Even weirder: Psystar’s Rodolfo Pedraza has been talking to the media. Assuming he has lawyers, they’re not telling him to shut up?

Item: Credit-card processing. Psystar is taking credit card numbers. It’s not processing them. People who tried to order machines yesterday got this message:

Thank you for visiting Psystar. We’re sorry but the store is temporarily down due to the fact that we are currently unable to process any credit card transactions. Please send an e-mail to support@psystar.com with the subject line “UPDATE” so that we can update you when the store comes back online. For customers who have already placed orders: if you received a confirmation e-mail then your item is in queue to be built and shipped.

Today Pystar confesses they don’t have a processor:

Midday yesterday our store was not receiving any orders. This was due to the fact that our merchant gateway, Powerpay, dropped the ball on us and refused to process any more transactions from our company. We have reverted to Paypal until we can find a high-volume merchant. Apparently Powerpay was not ready to handle the community’s demand for Open Computing.”

News.com’s Tom Krazit reports today that Powerpay yanked Psystar’s account Wednesday when it discovered what it was purporting to sell.

Louisa Deluca, vice president of loss prevention for Powerpay, said on Thursday that her company dropped Psystar because it violated the terms of its agreement with Powerpay. She declined to cite specific violations, but said “there are plenty of reasons why we shut the account off. We did not know that’s what he was selling, we learned that yesterday.”

Item: Floridatek.com. Psystar principal Rodolfo Pedraza is also listed as the registrant for a company called FloridaTek.com. As pointed out on Gizmodo, if you go to the site and click almost anywhere, you will get the chance to save a .exe file to your computer.

Conclusion: Psystar is collecting credit cards numbers, encouraging that people send them email, and engaging in spyware. It’s a phishing/credit-card scam. If you gave them your credit card number you should alert your bank. You might want to contact the FL Attorney General. I contacted them and they said to date they have no complaints about Psystar or Pedraza.
Quote:
Originally Posted by http://government.zdnet.com/?p=3762
Posting email I received from Andrew Storms, director of security ops at nCircle Network Security:

There are absolutely enough key indicators here to warrant concern. The Pystar folks simply aren’t escaping from this one unharmed. Lets start with Apple. They will most certainly sue under the terms of their EULA. Despite the outcome of any lawsuit, Apple has enough cash to send Pystar to
bankruptcy regardless. Next, the consumers are going to have field day on this. If Pystar fails to deliver a product and they took credit cards,
expect more lawsuits. This all assumes that Pystar is truly attempting to run a legitimate business.

What if they really aren’t so innocent and they are in the business of crime? We already have a number of crimes committed which will send them to jail for a long time. Lets start with fraudulently collecting credit card numbers and misrepresenting themselves to the public. And now according to
the Gizmodo piece, it appears that the same people are running a website which may be hosting malware. Let us not forget that these people and the
websites are located in the US. Nobody launches or runs Internet based attacks from inside the US, its an instant go directly to jail coupon. I
bet the FBI is already on the case and has these people under surveillance.
__________________
-Blind faith runs into things!-
Herk is offline  
Old 04-18-2008, 08:47 AM   #16 (permalink)
Devoted
 
Redlemon's Avatar
 
Donor
Location: New England
And even more entertainment, for those playing the home game:

Quote:
by Nilay Patel, posted Apr 16th 2008 at 1:12PM
Uh-oh, it looks like wannabe Mac clone maker Psystar has more than one licensing issue with the Open Computer: the company didn't get permission from developers working on the OSx86 Project to sell their work. Netkas, who developed the EFI emulator Psystar is using, posted up a blog entry yesterday calling Psystar "liars" and has re-released his code under a license that specifically forbids commercial usage. We chatted briefly with Netkas and he told us that not only did Psystar take his code without permission, it's using other code from the project like the NVInject graphics patch developed by Gotoh, and that he contacted Psystar when he learned about the Open Computer with no results. We also talked to several other members of the OSx86 scene who believe that Apple is tolerant of (and even subtly assisting) their efforts, and are worried that the Psystar flap might end that relationship and bring the hammer down -- after all, there's no Psystar without OSx86.

Interestingly, when we called Psystar to get comments on all of this, Rudy Pedraza, the president, first wanted to know if we could make Netkas call him, then denied using the EFI emulator, then repeatedly asked us for Netkas's phone number (in Russia!) so he could talk to him directly, and then finally promised to call us back. Yeah, he never called back. That's a lot of uncertainty around a pair of machines that haven't shipped from a company with two different addresses that's been in business for less than a year -- and Apple hasn't even gotten involved yet. At this point we're going to say that if you really want a hackintosh, you're likely better off rolling up your sleeves and building one yourself -- you'll probably have it done well before this whole mess gets sorted out.
__________________
I can't read your signature. Sorry.
Redlemon is offline  
Old 04-18-2008, 10:14 AM   #17 (permalink)
Junkie
 
biznatch's Avatar
 
Location: France
This is fascinating.
I do wish a more serious, more "real" and authentic company than PsyStar(what kind of name is that, anyway?) would try to get in talks with Apple to develop custom mac machines. I'm sure the demand would be incredibly high for users to make their own PC's, choose their own hardware, and have the choice to run Windows, Mac and Linux on it. The only legal way for us to do this now is by getting the Apple built machines, but often people do want to have their own touch.
Especially since Apple's consumer base has been expanding quite fast recently, more of their costumers are bound to be likely to want to have some freedom in their choice of hardware configs.
Anyway, I don't it'll legally happen anytime soon. Apple hardware is selling well enough for Apple as it is, and as others have said, it's been Apple's philosophy to keep everything "under the same roof" (and it works well for them).
__________________
Check it out: The Open Source/Freeware/Gratis Software Thread
biznatch is offline  
 

Tags
0ob, mac, open, source


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:45 AM.

Tilted Forum Project

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
© 2002-2012 Tilted Forum Project

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360