Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community  

Go Back   Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community > Interests > Tilted Sports


 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 11-02-2005, 06:06 AM   #1 (permalink)
Junkie
 
Borla's Avatar
 
Torii Hunter missed 64 of 162 games this year, 40% of the season................

................and still won the Gold Glove for Centerfielders. Way to many season awards are handed out nowadays based on reputation and past achievement.

Sure he is awesome in the field, but he barely played in 60% of the season! Especially when you have two very good candidates in Johnny Damon and Aaron Rowand, both of whose defense contributed to their teams making it to the playoffs. I'm biased towards Rowand because I watched him the most and saw him consistently rob batters of extra-bases, make phenomenal catches on balls in the gap, sacrifice his body by going into the wall time and time again, etc, but I'd rather have seen even Damon win it before someone who missed 2/5ths of the season.
__________________
Coimhéad fearg fhear na foighde!!!!
Borla is offline  
Old 11-02-2005, 06:22 AM   #2 (permalink)
Junkie
 
Damon's only average in the field. Hunter's 98 games at CF were better than anyone else's 162.
alansmithee is offline  
Old 11-02-2005, 06:32 AM   #3 (permalink)
Junkie
 
Borla's Avatar
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by alansmithee
Damon's only average in the field. Hunter's 98 games at CF were better than anyone else's 162.


Damon had the second highest fielding percentage of all Centerfielders, and the most put-outs (a good sign of range in the field). Aaron Rowand was the highest in fielding percentage and was constantly on Web Gems on ESPN for his amazing (and body sacrificing) plays.

Maybe I am biased as a Sox fan, but I felt Rowand deserved. I especially have an issue when a player who barely played over half the season wins an award intended for a full season's achievement. Don't get me wrong, Hunter is awesome, but he just simply didn't play enough this year IMO.
__________________
Coimhéad fearg fhear na foighde!!!!
Borla is offline  
Old 11-02-2005, 06:42 AM   #4 (permalink)
Junkie
 
Borla's Avatar
 
Digging in a little deeper to this........(and worse for Hunter's case, IMO).........of the 98 games he played, several he either pinch hit or DH'd, because it only shows 93 games in the field.

In his 93 games, Hunter made 3 errors in 230 chances. Rowand played 157 games and had 394 defensive chances, he only had 3 errors. So the argument could be made that Rowand was better even if they played the same amount of games, let alone the fact that Rowand only took 5 days off all year, Hunter missed more than two months.
__________________
Coimhéad fearg fhear na foighde!!!!
Borla is offline  
Old 11-02-2005, 07:41 AM   #5 (permalink)
Junkie
 
kutulu's Avatar
 
Gold Gloves haven't been about defense for a long time. It's all rep and media.
kutulu is offline  
Old 11-02-2005, 07:44 AM   #6 (permalink)
Junkie
 
Borla's Avatar
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by kutulu
Gold Gloves haven't been about defense for a long time. It's all rep and media.
That is unfortunate, but obviously true when you examine this case.
__________________
Coimhéad fearg fhear na foighde!!!!
Borla is offline  
Old 11-02-2005, 09:12 AM   #7 (permalink)
Lennonite Priest
 
pan6467's Avatar
 
Location: Mansfield, Ohio USA
Quote:
Originally Posted by kutulu
Gold Gloves haven't been about defense for a long time. It's all rep and media.
It was very apparent in the case of Omar Vizquel throughout the 90's and early 00's when A-Rod was winning it over and over and over. Yet, Omar had far better range (making unbelievable plays look ordinary and effortless), fielding pct. and was probably the most respected SS in his day as far a pure fielding went.

I was able to see Omar in his heyday and I have seen Larkin, Ozzie Smith, A-Rod, Jeter and other highly touted SS, and I'm sorry but Omar was the greatest SS I have ever seen and there were many a writer, player and fan who said the same. I can't think of 1 other player that made everyone else around him look better than they were, almost every single game for a decade.
__________________
I just love people who use the excuse "I use/do this because I LOVE the feeling/joy/happiness it brings me" and expect you to be ok with that as you watch them destroy their life blindly following. My response is, "I like to put forks in an eletrical socket, just LOVE that feeling, can't ever get enough of it, so will you let me put this copper fork in that electric socket?"
pan6467 is offline  
Old 11-02-2005, 10:54 AM   #8 (permalink)
Junkie
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by pan6467
It was very apparent in the case of Omar Vizquel throughout the 90's and early 00's when A-Rod was winning it over and over and over. Yet, Omar had far better range (making unbelievable plays look ordinary and effortless), fielding pct. and was probably the most respected SS in his day as far a pure fielding went.

I was able to see Omar in his heyday and I have seen Larkin, Ozzie Smith, A-Rod, Jeter and other highly touted SS, and I'm sorry but Omar was the greatest SS I have ever seen and there were many a writer, player and fan who said the same. I can't think of 1 other player that made everyone else around him look better than they were, almost every single game for a decade.
He's no Ozzie Smith, but I'd agree that he's a better fielder than the others you named. Especially A-Rod and Jeter. Hopefully HoF voters won't forget about him when Visquel comes up for eligibility.
alansmithee is offline  
Old 11-02-2005, 02:28 PM   #9 (permalink)
Baltimoron
 
djtestudo's Avatar
 
Location: Beeeeeautiful Bel Air, MD
Gold Gloves come mostly from reputation or offensive production.

Rafeal Palmeiro won at first base once playing the majority of his games as a DH.

Johnny Damon is not that good. Nor is Jeter. Most "webgem"-type plays come off of either poor range or player screwups.

I did like how Orlando Hudson seemed completely shocked he beat out Brian Roberts.
__________________
"Final thought: I just rented Michael Moore's Bowling for Columbine. Frankly, it was the worst sports movie I've ever seen."
--Peter Schmuck, The (Baltimore) Sun
djtestudo is offline  
Old 11-02-2005, 02:34 PM   #10 (permalink)
Baltimoron
 
djtestudo's Avatar
 
Location: Beeeeeautiful Bel Air, MD
One thing on shortstop defense. It seems that in most cases they fall into one of two catagories. On one end are those with great range and arms, but who tend to have a problem getting the glove on the ball: guys like Renteria, Cabrera, Fucal, and even Tejada (). At the other are guys who don't have the same range and arms, but get their glove on just about everything they get to: guys like Jeter, Eckstein, and Cal Ripken Jr.

Sometimes you have to decide what is most important.
__________________
"Final thought: I just rented Michael Moore's Bowling for Columbine. Frankly, it was the worst sports movie I've ever seen."
--Peter Schmuck, The (Baltimore) Sun
djtestudo is offline  
Old 11-02-2005, 03:23 PM   #11 (permalink)
whoopity doo
 
Bobaphat's Avatar
 
Location: Seattle
What about the rookie Jeremy Reed in Seattle? He had the same fielding percentage as Rowand in nearly as many chances (he did play several fewer innings) and he had the highest range factor and zone rating of all center fielders in MLB. Not to mention, he had more assists than Rowand (however fewer than Hunter). While Reed was a disappointment with the bat, he shined on the field.

As for Hunter, I agree that he shoudln't have been considered. There should be minimum requirements. You may hit .500 in 2 at bats, but you sure won't win the batting title when its all said and done.
__________________
--size matters not-- yoda
Bobaphat is offline  
Old 11-02-2005, 06:35 PM   #12 (permalink)
Lennonite Priest
 
pan6467's Avatar
 
Location: Mansfield, Ohio USA
Quote:
Originally Posted by djtestudo
One thing on shortstop defense. It seems that in most cases they fall into one of two catagories. On one end are those with great range and arms, but who tend to have a problem getting the glove on the ball: guys like Renteria, Cabrera, Fucal, and even Tejada (). At the other are guys who don't have the same range and arms, but get their glove on just about everything they get to: guys like Jeter, Eckstein, and Cal Ripken Jr.

Sometimes you have to decide what is most important.
Very true but Vizquel had both man. I truly am blessed as a lover of baseball to say I watched him play for 10+ years, and I seriously doubt I will ever see another SS like him. NOT 1 in that list or off AL or NL, over the same time period could hold a candle to Omar.

I never saw a guy at short be able to dive catch the ball and throw to first in one motion. Much like the perfect swing of JR or Manny, Omar was sheer magic on the diamond. I mean look at like 1998 when he made an unheard of 5 FIVE errors ALL season long..... 149 games started at SS 720 chances and only 5 errors...... or the year 2000 154 games started at SS and 3 THREE freaking errors all season. Only 7 of his seasons did he have double digits in errors and 3 were in his first 5 seasons, only 2 (his first year and 1996) did he have over 15. ONLY IN HIS ROOKIE YEAR DID HE HAVE 20 (HIS MOST IN A SEASON) ERRORS.

The very best Ozzie (who everyone claims was the "gold standard") could manage was 1 ONE year over 100 games started where he had single digits in errors (8 in 1991 with 151 games). Ozzie had 5 years (his first 3 and in '83 and '88) where he had over 20 errors, and he had 5 season of 15-20 errors.

Ozzie Smith was great, and he could do great backflips running out there, but he was no Omar. Granted I didn't see Ozzie on a daily basis like I did Omar.

Even career Fielding pct. show it. Omar is at .983 with 16 years (The highest career average EVER for a SS) and Ozzie is at .978 over 19 years and sits behind Larry Bowa in the NL highest career average.

Also having done research on this there were a few surprises.... Ripken has the highest season fielding percentage with ony 3 THREE errors all season, in 1990, yet lost the gold glove to Ozzie Guillen. Ripken did win it in '91 and '92.

And I was wrong I thought Omar lost to A-Rod a couple times but he didn't between 1993 and 2001 Omar DID win every year.

Anyway, I appologize for the threadjack but it gave me the chance to talk about IMHO the most underrated player between 1990 and present day.
__________________
I just love people who use the excuse "I use/do this because I LOVE the feeling/joy/happiness it brings me" and expect you to be ok with that as you watch them destroy their life blindly following. My response is, "I like to put forks in an eletrical socket, just LOVE that feeling, can't ever get enough of it, so will you let me put this copper fork in that electric socket?"

Last edited by pan6467; 11-02-2005 at 07:19 PM..
pan6467 is offline  
Old 11-02-2005, 09:13 PM   #13 (permalink)
Junkie
 
Borla's Avatar
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bobaphat

As for Hunter, I agree that he shoudln't have been considered. There should be minimum requirements. You may hit .500 in 2 at bats, but you sure won't win the batting title when its all said and done.


Maybe there should be a "minimum chances" decided for each position (somewhere reasonable, maybe what is average for someone in playing 120-ish games in that position), and no one under that is eligible.
__________________
Coimhéad fearg fhear na foighde!!!!
Borla is offline  
Old 11-02-2005, 09:30 PM   #14 (permalink)
Lennonite Priest
 
pan6467's Avatar
 
Location: Mansfield, Ohio USA
Quote:
Originally Posted by Borla
Maybe there should be a "minimum chances" decided for each position (somewhere reasonable, maybe what is average for someone in playing 120-ish games in that position), and no one under that is eligible.
I thought there was a minimum number of games played in order to get considered.
__________________
I just love people who use the excuse "I use/do this because I LOVE the feeling/joy/happiness it brings me" and expect you to be ok with that as you watch them destroy their life blindly following. My response is, "I like to put forks in an eletrical socket, just LOVE that feeling, can't ever get enough of it, so will you let me put this copper fork in that electric socket?"
pan6467 is offline  
Old 11-02-2005, 09:34 PM   #15 (permalink)
Junkie
 
Borla's Avatar
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by pan6467
I thought there was a minimum number of games played in order to get considered.


I know of no such minimum for the Gold Glove award. As mentioned, Torii Hunter only played like 92-93 games in the field, but still won.
__________________
Coimhéad fearg fhear na foighde!!!!
Borla is offline  
Old 11-02-2005, 09:37 PM   #16 (permalink)
Lennonite Priest
 
pan6467's Avatar
 
Location: Mansfield, Ohio USA
That is pretty sad. It's either a statement that the voters didn't have much of a choice or Hunter kissed major ass.

Isn't he going to be a FA this winter? I'm sure that GG will help improve salary offers somewhat.
__________________
I just love people who use the excuse "I use/do this because I LOVE the feeling/joy/happiness it brings me" and expect you to be ok with that as you watch them destroy their life blindly following. My response is, "I like to put forks in an eletrical socket, just LOVE that feeling, can't ever get enough of it, so will you let me put this copper fork in that electric socket?"
pan6467 is offline  
Old 11-02-2005, 11:36 PM   #17 (permalink)
Lennonite Priest
 
pan6467's Avatar
 
Location: Mansfield, Ohio USA
My bad it's Jacque Jones that's the F/A.
__________________
I just love people who use the excuse "I use/do this because I LOVE the feeling/joy/happiness it brings me" and expect you to be ok with that as you watch them destroy their life blindly following. My response is, "I like to put forks in an eletrical socket, just LOVE that feeling, can't ever get enough of it, so will you let me put this copper fork in that electric socket?"
pan6467 is offline  
Old 11-02-2005, 11:59 PM   #18 (permalink)
Winner
 
I know Ozzie Guillen said that he thought Torii should be out of the running due to missing that much time. I tend to agree, but we're both biased.
Gold Gloves have always been subjective since defensive stats can't tell you as much as offensive stats do.
maximusveritas is offline  
 

Tags
162, 40%, games, hunter, missed, season, torii, year


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:10 AM.

Tilted Forum Project

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
© 2002-2012 Tilted Forum Project

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360