Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community

Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community (https://thetfp.com/tfp/)
-   Tilted Sports (https://thetfp.com/tfp/tilted-sports/)
-   -   Formula One (the F1 thread) (https://thetfp.com/tfp/tilted-sports/85761-formula-one-f1-thread.html)

superiorrain 03-20-2005 09:17 AM

Formula One (the F1 thread)
 
So we're now 2 races down, there are new rules, changing teams and well everything is slightly strange in the world of F1. Will this seasons finally mix things up, as it looks to be doing? and whats up with all the new rules, is really making the sport any better?

So whats eveyones thoughts on the last race? Will the Ferrari make its fight back or are Renualt now top dog?

This thread should be a place to discuss all things formula one, pre race, after race and anything else related. So please discuss...

Oh just to make it interesting i'm a Jensen Button fan, so lets hope that he'll do what he done last year but this time better. Not doing too well at the moment 2 retirements out of 2 races, poor show but it will make the next 17 races interesting.

Spartak 03-20-2005 01:08 PM

I think the FIA are screwing F1 with their new engine and downforce rules. I hope it doesn't take a fatal accident for them to realise that the way to reduce speeds is to limit the engine output, and not fuck with the downforce.

Craven Morehead 03-20-2005 09:02 PM

I'm a Button fan as well however I thought it was poetic justice that both Honda engines blew in the opening laps considering they were new engines (BAR Honda kind of took advantage of the rules). Mercedes McLaren might be strong, Williams BMW looks improved. The Cosworth engnines have improved tremendously. Renault is hot, very hot. But the season will really begin when the 2005 Ferrari finally makes it on the track. Ferrari looks very mortal at this point. Kind of fun to see the grid all mixed up. And Paul Stoddard is a tool.

Looking forward to the USGP.

boom29 03-21-2005 07:06 PM

Well, after two races it seems that the rule changes have at least evened out the field. Michael Schumaker has not even been close to sniffing first place. There's still a long way to go, but it appears that the season will be competitive. Maybe Montoya was right when he said that Schumaker's dominance was more due to Ferrari's cars, than Michael himself. We'll just have to wait and see...

Spartak 03-22-2005 12:07 AM

M. Schumacher won the F1 championship when he was with Benetton. I think Montoya needs to shut up until he wins one.

I think with the FIA babying down the sport it will be more upto the car, mainly the reliabilty and resistance to wear. Engines were built to last one race but now they have to last two, this simply ensures that mediocroty will triumph over excellence.

superiorrain 03-22-2005 02:57 AM

It's still too early to dismiss M Schumacher (but funny that Montoya does) at the moment, will be more interesting to see what he does with the new car. Hopefully he'll get that next race although it seems unlikely.

All the new rules certainly have mixed things up though. I'm still unsure of the engine rule to, i don't like the drivers having to hold back just to protect their engines.

fatbob 03-22-2005 03:58 AM

Button fans!!!?? why? He is sooooo dull!
I have soft spot for DC cos he gets no attention from the UK press despite the fact that he has been the most consistent British driver ever.

This season looks like it could be interesting although there is still not enough overtaking! Good to see Ferrari not doing so well and also McLaren too, Ron Dennis is a bit of a twat. Reanult have a little of the old F1 flare about them so lets hope that they keep up their good form, also Red Bull for DC.

Craven Morehead 03-22-2005 07:23 AM

DC? This is his year. Or was it last year? Or the one before that? There have been so many. :lol: :D

superiorrain 03-22-2005 07:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Craven Morehead
DC? This is his year. Or was it last year? Or the one before that? There have been so many. :lol: :D

Whatever was his year, i think we can say with some certainty that this will be his last. He may well be the most consistent driver in formula one he certainly has done anything spectaticular. However i do agree with him when he says that qualifying should change back to the old way. What was wrong with all the cars going out in the last 10 minutes all trying to get the best time, even if the first 50 minutes was shit TV. It's even crapper now than before, bring back old qualifying i say.

fatbob 03-23-2005 03:21 AM

i agree i actually liked the slow 50 mins 'cos you got all the gossip and chat from the pits etc and then 10 mins of mental action!

i feel really sorry for dc. he has proven himself to be a great driver, especially on race day but he has never been in the right place at the right time...after mika left mclaren became shit just when dc might have been in the position to be their number one driver...

desal75 03-23-2005 03:29 AM

The thing I hate about the new rules, especially the tire and engine rules is that now drivers are afraid to push. Whether it is because their tires are spent or they want to save the engine they just won't be able to safely charge after one another. An F1 race used to be a series of 15 lap sprints everytime a driver got new tires, now it is an endurance event.

dksuddeth 03-23-2005 06:43 AM

guess they didn't learn a thing from the NEXTEL circuit when they tried this in 93. They put more surface area on the rear spoiler and lowered the front air dam to slow down the cars on the superspeedways and all it did was bunch them up 3 wide all the way around the track.

Craven Morehead 03-23-2005 06:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by desal75
The thing I hate about the new rules, especially the tire and engine rules is that now drivers are afraid to push. Whether it is because their tires are spent or they want to save the engine they just won't be able to safely charge after one another. An F1 race used to be a series of 15 lap sprints everytime a driver got new tires, now it is an endurance event.

word - gone are the flashes of brilliance, especially during qualifications.

archer2371 03-23-2005 11:18 PM

Red Bull Racing is testing an American. His name is Scott Speed. No joke.

superiorrain 03-24-2005 02:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by archer2371
Scott Speed.

What a great name, he'll be the first american ever in formula one if he gets a drive, or was there another?

Craven Morehead 03-24-2005 07:37 AM

Mario and Michael Andretti. Danny Sullivan. Eddie Cheever. Phil Hill. Dan Gurney. Probably missing a few.......

Speed's good, he did it the right way. Raced in Europe.

Craven Morehead 03-24-2005 03:03 PM

sorry don't have a link to the original article - I copied this from another forum:

Quote:

Scott Speed impressive in first F1 test
Thu 24 Mar, 6:27 PM

Red Bull Racing and Williams started their testing work today in Barcelona.

Neel Jani and Scott Speed had the opportunity to test with Red Bull, the latest experiencing F1 for the first time. The American driver was impressive, finishing with the fastest time of the day at the wheel of last year's car.

Nick Heidfeld and Antonio Pizzonia were on duty at Williams, the two men driving the FW27.

"We’re back in Barcelona for just two days this week, testing parts in preparation for next weekend’s race in Bahrain," said Williams Test Team Manager Tim Newton. "With Nick and Antonio on duty for the team, we concentrated on the usual set-up work this morning. While Nick carried out a series of long runs this afternoon, Antonio put the FW27 through its paces practising starts. Both drivers will return to the track tomorrow.“

Barcelona - 24/03/05

1. S. Speed - Red Bull Cosworth - 1'16"122 (+0"000) - 39 laps
2. N. Heidfeld - BMW Williams FW27 - 1'16"674 (+0"552) - 121 laps
3. A. Pizzonia - BMW Williams FW27 - 1'17"160 (+1"038) - 111 laps
4. N. Jani - Red Bull Cosworth - 1'18"037 (+1"915) - 51 laps

desal75 03-25-2005 06:06 AM

I think the best thing about Scott Speed is that he has worked his way up through the ranks in Europe. He won't go into F1 with the attitude that Michael Andretti had. Andretti had already had some success in America and didn't really feel the need to prove anything. Thus a lack luster F1 effort. Speed on the other hand seems very hungry. If he indeed makes it I will do anything I can to support him as long as he doesn't turn into a peckerhead.

superiorrain 03-25-2005 08:55 AM

It's official the F2005 will debut in Bahrain, i wonder what that will do for Ferrari's fortunes. Maybe Schumacher will put some effort into the race next weekend unlike last weekend where i'm sure he was just going through the formalities.

Linky
Quote:

BAHRAIN DEBUT FOR F2005 - (ITV)

Off-form Ferrari has confirmed that it will race its new F2005 challenger in Bahrain next weekend.

The team has decided to bring forward the race debut of the new car, originally scheduled for the San Marino Grand Prix, in an effort to close the gap in performance to runaway championship leaders Renault.

"We'll take two new cars to Bahrain," said a Ferrari spokesman.

"We have all the parts.

"We will need to work a lot but everything will be ready for the race."

The team conducted an intensive three-day test with the F2005 at its Mugello track this week.

Both Michael Schumacher and Rubens Barrichello gave the car a resounding thumbs-up, and it is believed that the decision would have been made on Wednesday evening.

"The Mugello test, where both race drivers were able to drive the F2005 for the first time, confirmed its potential," said team principal Jean Todt.

"The poor results of the first two races have given us a positive stimulus.

"Together with (tyre supplier) Bridgestone, we have decided to speed up the development programme and believe that various new elements, car and tyres, will allow us to get back to attacking form after two races on the defensive.

"I have to say I am very pleased with how the team and all our partners have reacted to try and return quickly to our true level of competitiveness."

desal75 03-30-2005 03:28 AM

Any picks on who will win in Bahrain? More Peugot dominance? Brilliant debut for the F2005? What do you guys think?

Craven Morehead 03-30-2005 09:10 AM

No Montoya at Bahrain - broken scapula. Pedro de la Rosa will be in his place.

Serpent 03-30-2005 09:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by desal75
Any picks on who will win in Bahrain? More Peugot dominance? Brilliant debut for the F2005? What do you guys think?


peugot is in formula one? ... no hehe think you mean renault.

desal75 03-31-2005 03:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Serpent
peugot is in formula one? ... no hehe think you mean renault.



Sorry guys, I get those French teams mixed up some times. I do mean Renault.

superiorrain 04-02-2005 05:27 AM

After qualifying one i'd put good money on Schumacher winning tomorrow, plus no montoya to knoch him off the course only engine failure will stop him. Should be good though if he starts behind the two Renults as they're bound to be off the line quicker, but i think that micheal will surpass them. Who knows i maybe wrong, but the new car is looking like it has some pace.

All in all looks like it will be a good race tomorrow.

Craven Morehead 04-02-2005 07:24 PM

Alonso for me

Craven Morehead 04-03-2005 05:09 AM

Alonso :thumbsup:

Cheers for de la Rosa, as well!

superiorrain 04-03-2005 07:10 AM

All in all a good race, shame about michael though, would have like to seen more of a battle for the front spot. Thought DC done well taking RB on the last lap, as he get paid per point probably best he did. Yet again Ferrari comes away with nothing, bet there are some unhappy people there today.

desal75 04-04-2005 05:24 AM

The FIA changed the rules to make a more exciting season by preventing one team ie Ferrari from dominating. What if all they have done is taken away Ferrari domination and given us Renault? Congrats to them for their success though.

superiorrain 04-14-2005 02:46 PM

What does everyone think of the 'breakaway' world championship that there are currently talks of, afterall every team bar Ferrari and possibily RBR are said to be in talks. Would they really breakaway from the official F1 to start their own championship or is it just a show to get more money out of bernie?

And which would you watch if they did and were shown at the same time? or would it be the end of old F1.

Craven Morehead 04-16-2005 05:15 PM

Not sure what to make of it. Can't imagine F1 splitting into. For all practical purposes Ferrari is F1. My money's on Bernie. Manufacturers eventually screw it up.

superiorrain 04-24-2005 05:34 AM

Now that was some racing, the ferrari was amazing to get up to second place. Best race i've seen for ages. Can't wait for the next race.

Craven Morehead 04-25-2005 08:57 AM

Hell of a race!!! Alonso didn't break under the pressure. He knew the Schumacher was faster and still was able to hold him off w/o blocking. Very impressive. Sometime tomorrow once Renault comes down from a well deserved high, Flavio will realize they need to step up their game considerably as those red cars are back and very fast. Had Schu not screwed up in Sunday quals the outcoume would have been very different. This is starting out to be a great season.

superiorrain 05-05-2005 06:27 AM

I just can't believe it, BUTTON and BAR BANNED for two races!!!!! Thats way to harsh in my opinion, take their points away, but ban them for 2 races means at least in my book not so much excitement in the next races. I know i'm a button fan but even if it was anyother driver, i'd still say take the points away, banning is way too much.

Just needed to vent my anger. Bloody FIA. who cares if he was slightly underweight.

Craven Morehead 05-05-2005 06:54 AM

From what I've heard, BAR was doing this all last year, as well. There's just no way to prove it now. The FIA was tipped off by at least one former BAR employee. Rumored to be David Richards!!! I wonder if F1 were fielding 24 cars each race, if the penalty would have been more severe. They were using a 'hidden' fuel tank that allowed the car to run underweight at various times during the race, but never at the end of the race. When the car was drained of fuel for post race inspection, the hidden tank was never drained. That is, until Imola when the FIA was on the look out for it. They 'hoovered' the fuel out of the tank. Clearly running under weight or longer between refueling would give the car and advantage. No wonder Jense wanted to get away from BAR at the end of last season.

http://www.autoracing1.com/Images/20...appendix_c.jpg

powerclown 05-05-2005 08:43 AM

A joke...It's not like BAR was tearing it up in the meantime. It's one thing for BAR to be doing this and not getting any results; it'd be a bigger deal if, say, Ferrari was doing it. I'm pretty surprised though; I thought BAR had 2 drivers good enough that they didn't need to cheat to get results. Is the car really that bad? And what has happened to the charging, aggressive style that Sato was showing a year or 2 ago? I really thought he was going to be something special, a potential world champion even.

I was impressed with the race in Imola between Alonso & Schumacher. This has to have been the best F1 race in a looooong time. Reminded me of the Monaco GP years ago where Senna held off a faster Mansell lap after lap after lap, to take the win. Here's hoping for more of the same! :thumbsup:

Craven Morehead 05-05-2005 08:53 AM

Last year BAR was second in the constructor's championship which results in a huge monetary gain for the team. So maybe it wasn't all up to the drivers, if indeed BAR did this last year as rumored. No way to prove it, though.

I've just been passed another rumor that all the teams fuel tanks come from the same manufacturer. I'm not sure if they are all to the same spec, or if they are to different specs for different teams.

Too many rumors.

superiorrain 05-05-2005 08:55 AM

but two races!!! still too much, would be funny to find out that David Richards was the guy that tipped them off. Nice picture btw.

Be interesting to see this weekends race. Still would have been better with more cars, even if any points won by them weren't valid.

Craven Morehead 05-05-2005 08:58 AM

Yeah, the David Richards angle is way too funny! Wouldn't surprise me, he didn't leave on good terms. And when he was there it wasn't all rainbows and sunshine. I guess he can be 'difficult' :D

Craven Morehead 05-05-2005 09:01 AM

BTW - Mosely thinks BAR got off easy

Quote:

Mosley says BAR punishment not enough The Court of Appeal stopped short of the ultimate sanction of excluding the BAR Honda team from the World Championship. The Honda-powered team were called to appear before the FIA's International Court of Appeal on Wednesday to answer charges they raced an underweight car in the San Marino GP. On Thursday the FIA handed down their verdict, stripping Jenson Button and Takuma Sato of their points from Imola and banning the team for the next two races.

powerclown 05-05-2005 09:46 AM

Quote:

Last year BAR was second in the constructor's championship which results in a huge monetary gain for the team.
Good point. 2 races is going to be quite an expensive punishment. They're lucky to still be in the series.

This just in: Minardi disqualified for the Season - Entire secondary fuel cell discovered...inside nosecone!! :p

Craven Morehead 05-06-2005 11:30 AM

BAR will not appeal. They must feel they don't have a shot at it. Also they estimate they will lose $19 million for the suspension. :eek:

superiorrain 05-06-2005 03:02 PM

That's a shit load of cash, they must be gutted.

But on a happier note it's race weekend and if it's anything like last weekend then it should be excellent. The only thing we're missing are the big crashes, but who knows what race day will bring. Have to say my money is going on michael this weekend, his sheer pace race would have been unbeatable had he started in the top 5 of the grid.

What are your thoughts Craven?

Craven Morehead 05-07-2005 07:16 PM

I'd love to see Alonso win at home. Would be spectacular. Other than that I just want a good race. And a safe one. Will be interesting to see how Montoya does. He's got to be sore from his 'tennis' accident and then he totally trashed the McLaren on Friday. Rubens also had to change an engine. Watch that red car eat up the field. Should be a good race.

BTW - here's Speed TV's explanation of what BAR did. Good video w/ Steve Matchett.

And here's BAR's submission to the FIA. All 103 pages!

ARTelevision 05-08-2005 08:31 AM

Hi. Just stopping by from over at the NASCAR thread.

I do appreciate the great F1 cars and drivers and catch the races when possible. I just don't know F1 and international racing as well as I do the US racing circuits.

But I admire the engineering and the sharp look of F1 cars. They're the ultimate in racing in many ways.

As I get a bit more familiar with what's going on with Formula One, I'll stop in a bit more here.

Thanks for the good thread.

superiorrain 05-08-2005 10:46 AM

^ Please join us, and enjoy the various sights of the world as F1 travels across the globe. Though don't base you're F1 opinions on todays race, i thought it was a bit dull but guess after the last race it was to be expected.

I still think the race was the worse for not having BAR there (thanks for the vid link). Still waiting for michael to do something, can't believe he had two wheel failures, worse luck (this tyre changing rule should be scrapped, i like watching the wheels being changed). I only want him to win to keep it tight up at the top.

Must admit that i am looking forward to Monte-Carlo in two weeks. It is always the best race of the season.

Craven Morehead 05-12-2005 08:08 PM

I would love to go to Monte Carlo. Can't afford it but I can dream. This year's race will be decidedly different since Price Ranier has died recently. Am looking forward to the USGP, haven't missed one yet. The track layout is nothing special but being in the presence of these machines is quite an experience. If you only hear them on TV, you're in for quite a surprise when you hear them live.

aKula 05-13-2005 03:03 AM

I live in Melbourne and when the F1 race is on I can hear the cars from over 4 kilometres away.

Daval 05-13-2005 04:42 AM

Unfortunately I missed the Spanish GP, I had set my TiVo to record it as usual and for some reason it didnt :( I couldnt find a replay of it later in the day either.

Concerning the new rules, I am actually quite pleased to see the mixxed up field. Although I will heartily admit that Michael is probably the most talented and dominating driver of the generation and I will probably tell my grandchildren that I saw each of his world championships, I do prefer to see a mixxed up world championship.

I do like the aggregate qualifying better than the 1 lap wonder of that last year or two, more chaos can and will happen if conditions change. If they could find a happy medium of the aggregate times and the excitiment in that last 10 minutes of qualifying of old it would be a lot of fun to watch.

I'm perfectly fine with a engine lasting for two races, I would consider 1 tire change in the race at least though, going from 3 to 4 sets of tires per race down to 1 is quite a harsh change, let them change it once maximum.

Otherwise its been a good year, and its great to see McLaren back in the hunt, I've always been a big McLaren fan.


BTW, that page with the vids is great, I've bookmarked it.

Daval 05-13-2005 04:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by aKula
I live in Melbourne and when the F1 race is on I can hear the cars from over 4 kilometres away.


I'm personally in Toronto, Canada, but my Aunt lives in a small village about 1 mile from Brackley where BAR, Jordan and other teams are located. Its about 5 miles from Silverstone Speedway and she can hear the cars as well.

I've not been to visit yet to go see a race, but I may do the trip next year with a few mates.

powerclown 05-13-2005 08:34 AM

My favorite is also Monte Carlo, along with Spa and Montreal. Suzuka and Imola are also favorites. The new generation tracks (China, Bahrain, Indy, et al) are not so interesting in themselves, but it is interesting to see the brand new, high tech facilities at these modern tracks. The start/finish line structure and covered seating at the China track are quite impressive.

Qualifying is ok, but I prefer the low tanks, special qualifying engines, 3 lap tires, flat-out style. It's annoying how the rules change ever year. First it was V12s, then V10s, now I hear they are considering V8s. Maybe soon, inline four bangers lol. They don't know whether to speed up the cars, or slow them down, to have more interesting racing. I do like watching every car qualify, where before they would only televise the top guys.

I am/was(??) expecting a huge season for Fisichella in the Renault this year. He seems to have run into problems after winning in australia. I always thought he had great potential in a good car...

powerclown 05-13-2005 11:39 AM

2 particularly enjoyable scenes from the last race:

http://www.motorsport.com/photos/f1/...pa-xp-0733.jpg

http://www.motorsport.com/photos/f1/...pa-xp-0736.jpg

I love it when 7x champions get flat tires. :p

superiorrain 05-13-2005 01:13 PM

^ nice pics. Quite funny that two tyres went.

I'm still liking old qualifying the manic few minutes at the end. Even if the first 50 minutes was of little interest.

I agree with Daval, allowing one tyre change would be an excellent idea and i'm sure schumi would agree.

aKula 05-13-2005 08:44 PM

I'm all for tyre changes, it makes the race more interesting. It allows for more strategy and watching the pit stops with tyre changes is always exciting.

superiorrain 05-21-2005 06:19 AM

At last they're axing qualifying on Sunday morning in favour of a single session on Saturday.

I miss qualifying today so won't be making any predictions on who will win, though i will say i think coulthard will do well.

superiorrain 05-21-2005 08:40 AM

The FIA are asking the fans opinions on the future of F1 and you can take the survey online. So hopefully next season will be better structured and they will stick with more of the rules.

survey link

Serpent 05-21-2005 03:15 PM

and as with everything the FIA gets their hands on, it doesn't work..

Craven Morehead 05-21-2005 04:47 PM

Saw some of today's action. Schumacher the Lesser really had a big one. Tore the right side off. Juan Pablo is sent to the back of the pack for brake checking in practice causing a multi-car pile up. Jacques out qualifies Scuderia Ferrari???? WOW!!!

Craven Morehead 05-29-2005 10:14 PM

This thread needs revived. Monaco, great race. Nurburgring, great race. Kimi probably disagrees though. LOL

Webber needs to quit screwing up in races. Or Jensen will have his seat next year.

Pacifier 05-30-2005 07:22 AM

Yes, it was a cool race at Nürburgring but Ron Dennis has to stop whining and complaining about the Rules. It would have been perfectly legal for them to change Kimis tyre since it was clearly damaged:

"74) Quantity and type of tyres
[..] Unless a precautionary tyre change is necessary for clear and genuine safety reasons, only a punctured or damaged tyre may be changed during a race."

Craven Morehead 05-30-2005 04:36 PM

Just read that Montoya also had a flat spot as well as missing body parts from when Webber clouted him at T1. You're right about Dennis, he could have changed the tire in question and the FIA would have been fine with it. Might not have won but at least they would have gotten points.

Rippley 06-01-2005 01:30 PM

I doubt Kimi would have been allowed to change the tire un-punished. I read an article (that of course I can't find), where Kimi states that he made the decision. He would basically have thrown the race, had he pitted and changed the tires. It was a gamble that didn't pay off. That's racing. That said, I disagree with the new tire regs. Rather have a bhp limit on the engines or some such. The Pit strategy/tire changes is such a crucial part of the sport. To me, far more crucial than building engines with marginally more power.

I'm somewhat surprised this season by the incredibly poor form being shown by Schumi. Alonso be rocking the circuits, though! Awesome to see some real competiion this season. And way to go Alonso keeping Schumi behind him a few weeks ago. Talk about icewater in his veins!!

Hadn't noticed this thread before. Excellent initiative! Can't wait to rant after the next race :D

archer2371 06-19-2005 01:23 PM

I am just shocked as to what happened today. The pigheadedness shown by the FIA and Bernie Ecclestone is completely uncalled for. I am at a loss for words. However, I must say that if it's found out that Toyota screwed it up for everyone because they were running tire pressures too low, then I have a feeling that the wrath of God will be brought down upon them. This one set of tires per race rule has got to go, it's totally ridiculous and I knew that it would cause problems from day one, I just didn't envision something like this. I thought that the tire issue would cause someone to be hurt, not cause 14 of the 20 cars to pull out of the race. Idiotic. Completely idiotic. I'm glad I didn't go this year.

sbscout 06-19-2005 02:41 PM

If Formula One wants to play games, I can find something else to do with my Sunday afternoons... NASCAR, old movies, mowing the lawn...

They've gotten the last of my money.

superiorrain 06-19-2005 03:00 PM

Finally i'm back to the board and have time to write a message, now to the last 2 races which i'm yet to comment on, bloody excellent.

I have little to say about todays race, i'm shocked that the problems were not resolved and it had to come to a little more than a country drive in the summer. What we saw today was not racing and proof if it was needed of how much in politics F1 has in it today.

I feel sorry for the people that went to see the race, the drivers and for formula one in america. Surely this will not aid the sports progress in the one market it needs to break to ensure even greater success. The question remains, will there be a race in america next year or was that it? I'll be honest and say i'm not a fan of the US gran prix at least in indie, i would have liked a brand new track or a city track - Vagas style. But for it to be the end of a american GP is not a good thing but i fear it may well be.

Someone please tell me who to blame, i'm tending towards the FIA, more power than sense.

Also should the other guys have raced? i'm split on this to, what a day for racing. I'm looking forwards to the fall out of this now, should be interesting.

archer2371 06-19-2005 03:42 PM

Personally, I think Toyota fucked it up and since the other teams were finding problems (that they said were different and fixable) with their Michelin's which means Michelin investigated and got scared about the quality of their tyres. Therefore they couldn't guarantee their safety. My question is, why wait until Saturday to even think about maybe replacing them? Then Michelin brings in a new batch of tyres that they can guarantee the safety of. However, because the FIA is a giant cluster fuck, they won't budge on a goddamn thing and they only hurt themselves. If it is found out that Toyota had the tyre pressures unreasonably low and that caused them to have failures, then I hope to God they get banned. I think this will be the death of F1 in America, and I'm sad to see it, especially on a weekend where Scott Speed made his debut. I can't express in words how fucking angry I am. This is bullshit, and it needs to stop and the fans need to get their money back.

powerclown 06-19-2005 04:53 PM

And ShoeMaker gets 10 points for this nonsense? That is a joke. He's now 3 points behind Raikkonen for second place in the standings. I don't know much about what exactly happened today, but the FIA has been taking F1 down the wrong road for years. Has it been brought up that Ferarri is behind this in any way?

archer2371 06-19-2005 05:07 PM

Unless you can prove that Jean Todt went down Gasoline Alley and sabotaged all of the Michelin tyres, I think that's a really ignorant statement. For lack of a better word, it was a "race" it was sanctioned by the FIA and Bridgestone didn't have any problems, so they shouldn't have been penalized for Michelin fucking up. I blame both the FIA and Michelin, more so Michelin because they didn't bring the proper equipment. These guys could have run slower lap times, Barrichello had to retire at Malaysia because of tyre failure. But oh! That's just Ferrari, they deserve bad shit to happen to them because they're evil and run the world./sarcasm. It's on Michelin because they didn't bring the proper equipment and Bridgestone who had their shit together shouldn't be penalised.

powerclown 06-19-2005 05:32 PM

I was just asking...I said I didn't know the specifics, and wasn't blaming anyone. I could give a shit in all honesty, as the racing in F1 for the last few years has been terrible, and I really don't care who wins or loses, besides Sato. I hope Sato runs over Alonso's foot in the pitlane and takes the title.

But you never know with ShoeMaker...he would do ANYTHING to win an 8th Championship, don't you think? ;)

Craven Morehead 06-19-2005 08:50 PM

Its Michelin's fault entirely. The oval track was resurfaced over the past year. In April there was an aborted Firestone (owned by Bridgestone) tire test. Aborted as the track was much to abrasive as well as other issues related to the repaving. The entire track was diamond ground to give it a perfectly level surface. I would assume the Bridgestone was tipped off my Firestone, hence their tires were OK.

BTW - I was there, stayed through to the end. A sad day for motorsports. Also sad to see so called fans throwing beer bottles and cans onto the track. Very low class.

The reprecussions of this will last for years. Peter Windsor insinuated it was as much political as anything. A result of the break away series. The only team to support F1 as is, is Ferrari. Ironcially, the other teams are all controlled by the engine manufacturers supporting the breakaway series are all on Michelins.

Spendrups 06-20-2005 12:54 AM

Quote:

As explained in our earlier letter, your teams have a choice of running more slowly in Turn 12/13, running a tyre not used in qualifying (which would attract a penalty) or repeatedly changing a tyre (subject to valid safety reasons).

It is for them to decide. We have nothing to add.

Michelin had 3 alternative to get the race underway, but chosed to blackmail FIA to change the layout of the circuit. Very bad move

US GP ruined by France ;)

healer 06-20-2005 02:23 AM

I feel sorry for the fans - I truly do. They did nothing wrong. But neither did the guys at Bridgestone, nor the teams using their tyres. Now they're being persecuted as if they sold out the sport and the fans and all that other bullshit.

superiorrain 06-20-2005 06:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Craven Morehead
BTW - I was there, stayed through to the end. A sad day for motorsports. Also sad to see so called fans throwing beer bottles and cans onto the track. Very low class.

First, sorry to hear that you were there, i would have been so angry. What i want to know is, did you get your money back? will you get your money back? and i'm guessing the first you knew that there wouldn't be a 'race' was when all the teams pulled into the pits, what the hell did you think was going on? I know i would have been totally confused by it all.

powerclown 06-20-2005 06:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Craven Morehead
Its Michelin's fault entirely. The oval track was resurfaced over the past year. In April there was an aborted Firestone (owned by Bridgestone) tire test. Aborted as the track was much to abrasive as well as other issues related to the repaving. The entire track was diamond ground to give it a perfectly level surface. I would assume the Bridgestone was tipped off my Firestone, hence their tires were OK.

I agree...95% Michelin's fault for bringing the faulty tires. The other 5% to the FIA for not putting in a damn chicane and having everyone race. But, they shouldn't of had to modify the track at all if Michelin hadn't of screwed up. OK, 98% Michelin's fault. :p

Quote:

The Michelin runners completed a curtailed practice programme as they battled to adjust to new set-ups, designed to protect tyres on the notoriously tough Indianapolis Motor Speedway.

A Michelin statement read: "We have explained the situation to our partners and to the FIA and we have advised on the conditions for test, qualifying and for the race. These decisions have been taken in the interest of safety of the drivers."

"We've been working with our people in Clermont-Ferrand in order to identify a product that we know is capable of running at Indianapolis and we are in the process of discussing this possibility with the FIA and are actively pursuing the dispatch of these tyres to Indianapolis."
"In order to identify a product we know is capable of running at Indianapolis..."

Doh! Maybe those products should have made the trip across the Atlantic in the first place?

Quote:

Two BAR mechanics were assaulted by angry spectators when they went to retrieve their van from the car park, forcing the team to send someone out to buy 60 USGP t-shirts so that the rest of the crew could move around incognito.
What a mess.

powerclown 06-20-2005 06:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Craven Morehead
Peter Windsor insinuated it was as much political as anything. A result of the break away series. The only team to support F1 as is, is Ferrari. Ironcially, the other teams are all controlled by the engine manufacturers supporting the breakaway series are all on Michelins.

CM, I'd be interested in hearing your thoughts about this...

Why political? What breakaway series are you referring to?

Spendrups 06-20-2005 06:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by powerclown
CM, I'd be interested in hearing your thoughts about this...

Why political? What breakaway series are you referring to?


The GPWC (Grand Prix World Chamionship)

there are the carmanufactors are mostly threathing Bernie Ecclestones company that have the commercial rights to F1, and the carmanufactor teams like mercedes, renault, bmw(so basicly all teams execpt ferrari, that have broken out of GPWC and signed with FIA when the other teams walked behind Ferraris back in last year in brazil) and so on whant more money from Bernie, and ofcourse he dosent whant to give away money... so therefor they almost blackmailing bernie and say that they are not in F1 if they dont get more money.

here you can read a little more
http://www.motorsm.com/motorsport/auto/F1/GPWC.asp

Craven Morehead 06-20-2005 08:18 AM

Here are some of Peter Windsor's comments from his appearance on WindTunnel last night. WT is a racing program on Speed TV.

Taken from a pay site I am registered on.

Quote:

06/20/05


Wind Tunnel quotes F1 USGP Below are select quotes from SPEED Channel Formula One analyst Peter Windsor from a Sunday night appearance on 'Wind Tunnel with Dave Despain.' Windsor comments on the Formula One debacle, where Michelin teams refused to race at the USGP, citing safety issues for its drivers, leaving the lone F1 event in the U.S. with a six-car field.

Wind Tunnel with Dave Despain airs Sunday nights at 9 on SPEED Channel.

WINDSOR: "I think this business about the Michelin tires being unsafe to race has been exaggerated by the teams and, indeed, by Michelin, because as far as I understand it, they were only considered to be unsafe, by Michelin, on one very specific corner. And talking to a lot of the drivers, there were ways of getting around that corner, reducing the amount of load that was going through it - obviously we are talking about Turn 13, the vertical load. So, I think first of all, we need to be very careful about "the tires were unsafe." I think they were unsafe, but unsafe when used in a specific way. Beyond that, I am as shattered as anyone else. I love Formula One. I've been involved for 30 years and to see that happen on the warm-up lap, the formation lap, all those cars coming in like that, I think it was an absolute disgrace. To be honest, our obligation in this sport, or any sport is to the fans and for that to happen is just appalling."

"I think the Michelin was naïve in thinking that there would be a solution that falls outside the framework of the Formula One regulations ... because they suggested a chicane that makes cars go slower through Turn 13, but that was never going to happen in a million years. The FIA, the governing body of the sport - this is the governing body that disqualifies cars for having a brake duct half a millimeter too large - they are never going to put in a chicane in on race morning, around which the cars are not allowed to practice or do anything at all ... equally, there was talk about using another batch of tires, but that was never going to happen either."

"Tell me where the difference is in what happened today and what might happen at any Grand Prix where there is a sudden downpour and one tire company, on intermediate tires, with no grip at all, everybody spins off on the straight and there is only five cars left in the race. That's happened before and everyone thinks 'Wow, what a great race.' They should have been out there racing and if there are problems, you drive around the problems as best you can. Racers are racers."

"It's the teams, these massively paid teams and drivers, who have a responsibility to the fans ... not one of those Michelin team guys said 'We made a horrendous mistake today and we take full responsibility. All they did was blame the FIA, blame Bernie, blame Ferrari, blame Bridgestone, blame everyone else, but they never actually blamed themselves. Do you know how many teams from Michelin actually did the pre-USA tire test to select the correct tire for Indianapolis? ... Two - Felipe Massa and Anthony Davidson - everyone else was at Silverstone."

"One of the watersheds of today was that Bernie Ecclestone stared people in the eye, literally eyeball to eyeball before the race, and said you are going to get in that car and race - not to the drivers, but to the team owners ... and they stared him back. At the end of the day, in this particular situation, the eyeballing didn't work for Bernie. It's the first time I can remember it not working for him and there will be repercussions."

"F1 is about people getting out there and going motor racing. We race in the rain. We race in the wind. We race in the hail. We race in the hot weather. And we have tire failures and lots of other terrible things, but that's what Formula One is all about, for good and for bad."

Craven Morehead 06-20-2005 08:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by superiorrain
First, sorry to hear that you were there, i would have been so angry. What i want to know is, did you get your money back? will you get your money back? and i'm guessing the first you knew that there wouldn't be a 'race' was when all the teams pulled into the pits, what the hell did you think was going on? I know i would have been totally confused by it all.


No word on reimbursement for the tickets. I doubt it that will occur. The track would have to issue a refund and its doubtful that they would if they still must pay F1 a sanction fee. The track has as much expenses this weekend as they would have incurred had all 20 cars started the race.

What should happen is Michelin issuing credits to each ticket holder for the amount of the tickets applied to a new tire pruchase. Even then, I'm not sure I would ever buy a Michelin, Goodrich or Uniroyal product (all manufactured by Michelin). Fully one third of Michelin's sales comes from the US. The bad PR associated with this will be immeasurable.

Not the first time I had a race cancelled. I booked flights and hotel room in Las Vegas in 2003 so I could drive to the Fontana CART race from LV. The southern California fires caused the race to be cancelled. I was left 'stranded' in Las Vegas. :thumbsup: I did get a full refund on those tickets, however I did spend a bunch on flights and hotels that I otherwise wouldn't have. On Sunday morning I was walking through the manufacturers compound with my brother and we both were pleasantly surprised by all the foreign fans in attendance, Asian, Indian, European and South American. Probably come Canadians also, but they blend in too well. ;) Those were the people that got royally screwed by Michelin. I only had a 2.5 hour drive and spent the night with some friends close to the track. Not a total loss to me.

powerclown 06-20-2005 09:25 AM

Veeeery interesting...thanks for the links guys. It appears there is more here than meets the eye.

It is indeed very curious that Michelin only sent 2 drivers to test their tires for the conditions at Indy beforehand (I'm assuming they did these tests at Indy) So what conclusions did they come to from the tests? Did they know they weren't going to have the right compound for Indy? What I don't understand is why did teams participate in 4 full Practice sessions and a full Qualifying before deciding the tires were faulty. And what if Schumacher or Zonta were killed in their crashes because they had tires Michelin knew were faulty, based on prior testing? It's not entirely clear when Michelin knew the tires were bad - during testing before the race, after Practice, or after the crashes.

Peter Windsor makes some good points. But I disagree with his wet weather analogy. The rain is the rain, its an uncontrollable variable and you have the option to switch to perfectly functional wets. Drivers shouldn't be forced to race with faulty equipment.

As far as the Manufacturers vs. Eccelstone infighting, well, I think there is only one inevitable conclusion. The Manufacturers will end up running the show, as opposed to the smaller, less powerful, lower profile, one-off engineering companies such as Williams and McLaren who only manufacture Formula One chassis. It is after all car racing, so it seems logical that car makers should be in control. Yet, it took the creativity, showmanship and vision of Eccelstone to transform the series into what it is today, so he's not going to let go easily and maybe the manufacturers owe him something for providing them with such a huge international showcase for their brands.

As an aside, I ran into this:

Quote:

In an effort to boost attendance, and give IRL founder Tony George a little jab, Champ Car announced late Sunday afternoon it would honor all U.S. Grand Prix tickets to this Sunday's Grand Prix of Cleveland

Janey 06-20-2005 09:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Craven Morehead
Probably come Canadians also, but they blend in too well. ;)



gosh! thanks :icare:

I was watching the race in confusion (around lap 49) and then with mounting indignation. What a load.

Craven Morehead 06-20-2005 10:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by powerclown
Veeeery interesting...thanks for the links guys. It appears there is more here than meets the eye.

It is indeed very curious that Michelin only sent 2 drivers to test their tires for the conditions at Indy beforehand (I'm assuming they did these tests at Indy)

It was at Barcelona. Go figure! :hmm: :crazy: :confused:

Spendrups 06-20-2005 10:24 AM

Quote:

F1 disgraces Indy, disrespects few American fans it still has

On Sunday, in front of the racing world, Formula One spit in the face of the small group of American supporters it had left.

As a Hoosier, an American and a racing fan, I'm as outraged as they come.

Thanks to a tire concern few Americans will ever give two hoots about, the glorious United States Grand Prix was a race of six cars. Twenty cars were supposed to run, but 14 refused to race.

What was the problem, exactly?

Michelin didn't come prepared? Turn 13 wasn't safe, or slow, enough? The Federation wouldn't allow a chicane? Sanction this, sanction that?

Whatever!

Americans, including this one, couldn't care less.

Your tires weren't ready. We understand, but we still don't care.

Excuses are what we expect from disgruntled employees and worthless uncles, not from a multi-million dollar industry that fans pay hundreds of dollars to watch. To be unprepared is unacceptable.

Simply put, American's don't want your excuses, or your problems. They wanted a race.

America's attention is powered competition. Americans all insist on value for their money. Perhaps most importantly in this case - especially in Indiana - Americans demand a respect for the most hollowed racing circuit in the world.

Sunday, the United States Grand Prix provided none of it.

The only thing it provided was an uppity attitude - the same one the preppy kid carried in high school that got him shoved in a locker.

Great job F1, now you've done it. You've finally figured out how to capture the intrigue of the biggest market in the world. Only problem is the intrigue is on the wrong side of the spectrum.

Rather than be excited next year for the race, Americans will laugh at the suggestion that it even be called a race.

You want a race, call Danica Patrick, Dan Wheldon and the rest of the 2005 Indianapolis 500 field and start taking notes. You want a race, call NASCAR, where the good old boys laugh in the face of tire wear.

Hell, you want a race, call the local YMCA Kid's Mini Marathon organizers and they'll provide a more entertaining show than the crap you called the U.S. Grand Prix.

So what's next for the USGP?

Hopefully nothing.

The only possible positive thing that can, and should, come out of this debacle is a lifelong ban of Formula One at the Indianapolis Motor Speedway. It was a kingdom built by milk drinking and brick crossing, not flag waving and temper tantrums.

Joie Chitwood, president and chief operating officer at the Indianapolis Motor Speedway was asked after the race if the damage done on Sunday was repairable.

"I hope it is. I'm not sure; I hope it is," he said.

If the Speedway intends to save face, it should never again allow the faces of Formula One near the Speedway.

F1 claims the best - fastest and most technological - racing in the world.

Fine. Keep it.

Just keep it out of America. And please keep it out of Indianapolis, forever.

Greg Fallon is a sports columnist for The Star Press.

http://www.thestarpress.com/articles...-7343-006.html
what do u think of this, is it that bad? or can F1 comeback,

hopefully not in Indy becasue its a terrible track for F1, but usa have a bunch of other tracks that would be better for F1

Craven Morehead 06-20-2005 11:04 AM

I think the author of that article is too far over board. A knee jerk reaction from someone that doesn't understand the politics surrounding Michelin's refusal to race. Its not as simple as he stated it. F1 (the organization, FIA) is not to be blamed here, they are not the bad guys (for a change). Its Michelin, pure and simple.

Yes, Indy is a lousy track but there are none that have the physical structure requirements that F1 mandates, such as F1 garages connected to the pit lane, etc. Indy has always had garages but those weren't at F1 specs, so knew ones were built for exclusve use by F1. Its doubtful that IMS has recouped their cost of creating the cicuit for F1. And even more doubtful that other tracks will want to invest the same amount after yesterday.

laconic1 06-20-2005 11:08 AM

I think F1 can comeback, it just needs to be in an appropriate venue. I enjoy watching oval track racing, I enjoy watching road racing, I don't enjoy watching cars race on a bastardized road coarse carved out of an oval track. F1 should run at Watkins Glen again if ISC spent the money to update the facilities to current F1 requirements.

powerclown 06-20-2005 11:49 AM

That guy who wrote the article is off his rocker. This was a bizarre, once-in-a-decade type thing. No need to bash F1 as a series, there are millions of F1 fans in the States. Be nice if there were 1 decent American F1 driver, but I digress.

"The most hallowed racing circuit in the world?"
The oldest maybe, but not the most hallowed. And it's not a 'circuit' its an oval.

crazybill5280 said it:
"I don't enjoy watching cars race on a bastardized road coarse carved out of an oval track."

Everybody knows that Indy is an oval course, not a freaking road course. To have the United States Grand Prix at Indianapolis is ridiculous. It's like having a hydroplane race in a swimming pool. It belongs at Watkins Glen or Laguna Seca or Road America.

Maybe Eccelstone should leave sooner rather than later. :lol:

powerclown 06-20-2005 11:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Craven Morehead
It was at Barcelona. Go figure! :hmm: :crazy: :confused:

Hehe...how's that for R&D. :lol:

*note to self: never buy michelin tires for car.

Spendrups 06-20-2005 11:55 AM

great to hear that it dosent are completly over, tru that there are few circuits that are going to raise the circuit saftey after this, but maybe, MotoGP are to Laguna Seca and because of that they have upgraded that track safety... how much idont know, but maybe there are a chance there

Spendrups 06-20-2005 11:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by powerclown
That guy who wrote the article is off his rocker. This was a bizarre, once-in-a-decade type thing. No need to bash F1 as a series, there are millions of F1 fans in the States. Be nice if there were 1 decent American F1 driver, but I digress.

soon hopefully you will have Scott Speed in F1 :thumbsup: the driver with the coolest name of all F1 drivers :D :)

Craven Morehead 06-20-2005 08:25 PM

Michelin's post race interview video :D

BTW - you can drop them a note and let them know how you feel about their actions

healer 06-20-2005 10:09 PM

In a way, I feel sorry for those poor bastards at Michelin - I mean this is going to hurt them for a long time to come. OK maybe I dont feel sorry for them...the bastards. I hope Bernie chews their asses out good and proper at this upcoming meeting though.

aKula 06-21-2005 02:42 AM

Yes the FIA is not to blame. I don't think Michelen had any other option open to them though? That having been said, I still don't like the new rules regarding tires.

Craven Morehead 06-21-2005 05:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by aKula
Yes the FIA is not to blame. I don't think Michelen had any other option open to them though? That having been said, I still don't like the new rules regarding tires.

The FIA offered several options to Michelin, but they refused them all.
1. run slower speeds through T13
2. change tires during the race - will be penalized
3. use a harder compound - each team has the choice of a hard and a soft compound. It is not known if Michelin even had a second compound at the race. Had they used a harder compound, they would have ran slower. But still ran.

The FIA had previously warned Michelin about concerns it had over the longevity of its tires. Michelin was on notice.

Spendrups 06-21-2005 03:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Craven Morehead
The FIA offered several options to Michelin, but they refused them all.
1. run slower speeds through T13
2. change tires during the race - will be penalized
3. use a harder compound - each team has the choice of a hard and a soft compound. It is not known if Michelin even had a second compound at the race. Had they used a harder compound, they would have ran slower. But still ran.

The FIA had previously warned Michelin about concerns it had over the longevity of its tires. Michelin was on notice.


some corrections at #2 they could change the left right tyre with the subject safety... without them being penalized, they was only being penalized if they change the tyre to a comletly dirrent tyre that they havent beiing inspected by the FIA before the race.

FIA would normaly need the cuircuit to be aproved 90 days before the Grand Prix start...



Quote:

As explained in our earlier letter, your teams have a choice of running more slowly in Turn 12/13, running a tyre not used in qualifying (which would attract a penalty) or repeatedly changing a tyre (subject to valid safety reasons).

It is for them to decide. We have nothing to add.

if thera are anyone who is not beliving that FIA och Ferrari and bridgestone teams are not gulity in this question. read this http://www.fia.com/mediacentre/Press..._Sport/f1.html

Craven Morehead 06-29-2005 08:14 AM

Michelin yesterday indicated it would reimburse the cost of the race tickets for ill fated 2005 race and donate 20,000 tickets for the 2006 race. No details on either were given. Big props to Michelin for standing up and doing the right thing. It was their error.

The FIA has ruled today and found the teams guilty on some of the charges, penalty to be determined in Sept. Rumors were flying that if the penalty was too sever the 7 teams would boycott Magny Cours. This effectively delays that from happening until later in the season.

superiorrain 07-03-2005 02:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Craven Morehead
Michelin yesterday indicated it would reimburse the cost of the race tickets for ill fated 2005 race and donate 20,000 tickets for the 2006 race. No details on either were given. Big props to Michelin for standing up and doing the right thing. It was their error.

Looks like you should also get your money back, be nice if you get a freebie for next year, if it all still goes ahead that is.

After todays race, i feel that racing is back, ganted not the most interesting race but at least it was a race, which was nice. I so looking forward to the british GP next week, just wish i could have afforded the ticket at the time, but hopefully i should be gainfully employed this time next year and thus will have the money. All things said and done next week looks to be building up to be an excellent race, i'm hoping the british weather will add to the excitement.

Nice to see michael coming up the table in points, will be good to have a 3 way battle by the end of the season.

One more thing i want to discuss is the BMW Williams situation, i happy that BMW are forming a works team, i think this will be excellent and push yet another team to the fight for the front of the grid. But what of Williams, i sure they will no longer use the BMW engine but where will they get a new one from, any thoughts? will someone from outside F1 come to their aid, Aston Martin engine would be cool.

Craven Morehead 07-07-2005 01:59 PM

superiorrain are you attending the British GP at Silverstone this weekend?

Regardless, I hope for a quiet and uneventful race, the only action should be on the track. I attended the first USGP just weeks following 9-11 without a concern. Life must go on.

superiorrain 07-10-2005 03:22 AM

Life does indeed go on, but the tickets sold out in such a quick time this year that i had no chance of getting any. However the TV is on and race day is here. I'm so excited, always something special about the home GP and that Button is on the front row with what looks like a nice package, so here's hoping...

This should be one hell of a race.

Craven Morehead 07-10-2005 11:53 AM

Well, JPM had a hell of a race, that's for sure. What a start!!! And Kimi had a nice charge through the pack. McLaren owned today.

superiorrain 07-10-2005 04:03 PM

Kimi certainly done a nice nice job, how the heck does he keep on doing it, 2 times now starting towards the middel of the grid and twice get up there. Good drive for him for sure, would be nice if he showed some emotion though. Shame about Button but i'll keep living in hope.

Silverstone is the 3rd most highly rated track according to the recent FIA survey, some what suprising for a race that struggles every year to be put on the list.

Craven Morehead 07-10-2005 10:01 PM

I love Silverstone, it always produces a decent race. Unlike the Tilke designed tracks that are better suited for go karts.

djflish 07-11-2005 05:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by superiorrain
Shame about Button but i'll keep living in hope.

Don't worry, it's gonna happen. One day Jenson Button will be world champion! :)
And looks like he'll have a better chance to win a race next season, if the speculation about him replacing Barrichello at Ferrari is true


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:10 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
© 2002-2012 Tilted Forum Project


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360