01-21-2005, 07:21 PM | #45 (permalink) | |
Insane
|
Quote:
|
|
01-21-2005, 07:42 PM | #46 (permalink) |
Natalie Portman is sexy.
Location: The Outer Rim
|
I'm going with the Steelers, even though the Patriots will probably win.
__________________
"While the State exists there can be no freedom. When there is freedom there will be no State." - Vladimir Ilyich Lenin "Reason has always existed, but not always in a reasonable form."- Karl Marx |
01-21-2005, 08:44 PM | #47 (permalink) |
Junkie
Location: Pats country
|
I'm (obviously) pulling for the Pats, and I think they can do it but it won't be easy. Pittsburgh has a good team, you don't win 15 games by accident, and they are at home, but if they slow down the run enough to make Ben throw, I think they will have some problems. Roth has been nothing short of average in the second half of the season, throwing about as many picks as TD's, less YPA etc., and he was pretty bad last week. If he tries to come out and prove that last week was an abberation he may be a little over-anxious and make some bad decisions. My guess is that if anyone tips the scales towards Pitt on offense it will be Staley not Bettis. I think the Pats are too quick and tackle too well to let the Bus have a big game against them in the playoffs.
Every team in the league has been affected by injuries, but any impartial observer would acknowledge that the loss of Dillon at game time and Law and 40% of their O-line during the game greatly affected the outcome of the Oct 31st meeting. The only thing that I would take out of that game is that the two teams are pretty evenly matched so whoever is able to execute their game plan better will likely be the winner. BTW Sion, your bias is showing if you think that the Pitt O-line vs. the Pats front seven favors the Steelers. The Pats are deep and talented at almost every position with diciplined, versatile, veterans. Their LB's and "hybrid" edge players, like Mcginist and Vrabel are exactly the reason teams have difficulty game planning and matching up against the Patriots. I say Pats by six.
__________________
"Religion is the one area of our discourse in which it is considered noble to pretend to be certain about things no human being could possibly be certain about" --Sam Harris |
01-21-2005, 09:58 PM | #48 (permalink) |
Everything's better with bacon
Location: In your local grocer's freezer.
|
Pats of course, 'nuff said, or maybe not. This time against the Steelers, they'll have a RB, and all their receivers. Last time, no RB and no receivers, they should have lost. I will grant the the Steelers have a great team, but I think that the Pats are up the challenge this time. It's going to be a great game either way.
__________________
It was like that when I got here....I swear. |
01-21-2005, 11:18 PM | #49 (permalink) |
Crazy
Location: Sudbury, Ontario
|
With regard to falcons. If Vick steps his game up even higher, can anyone stop him? or would they be prepared to? I don't think anyone should be too quick to dismiss the Vick factor.
__________________
"Love is a perky elf dancing a merry little jig and then suddenly he turns on you with a miniature machine gun" -Matt Groening |
01-21-2005, 11:25 PM | #50 (permalink) | |
Dumb all over...a little ugly on the side
Location: In the room where the giant fire puffer works, and the torture never stops.
|
Quote:
as is yours with that statement. look at some of the front 7's the Steelers have faced this season. then look at our yards/game. we ran ALL OVER the Ravens, who have a better front 7 than the Patriots. and as for the NE depth, they are lacking that in both the Dline and the secondary. you have nearly as good a LB corps as we do. Other than that, its no contest defensively.
__________________
He's the best, of course, of all the worst. Some wrong been done, he done it first. -fz I jus' want ta thank you...falettinme...be mice elf...agin... |
|
01-23-2005, 08:12 PM | #54 (permalink) | |
Junkie
Location: Pats country
|
Quote:
__________________
"Religion is the one area of our discourse in which it is considered noble to pretend to be certain about things no human being could possibly be certain about" --Sam Harris |
|
Tags |
so, winning |
|
|