Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community  

Go Back   Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community > Interests > Tilted Sports


 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 08-27-2003, 01:08 AM   #1 (permalink)
Loser
 
Location: Paradise
if baseball had a SALARY CAP?

Who would be the worst team?
How bad would the yank's really be?

The A's would obviously be the best team in baseball (they may be now, with a 50 million dollar payroll).

The Met's would probably have to be the worst, when they can't get it done with almost 3 times the A's salary.

What do you guys think?
Cheese
cheesemoney is offline  
Old 08-27-2003, 04:54 AM   #2 (permalink)
Upright
 
I really don't know who would be the best or worst. But i.m.o baseball needs a salary cap if they ever plan on bring baseball back as Americas favorite past time. Baseball now is too one sided with a few that fall through the cracks, like the A's. I hope they take it all, and that is only because I hate the Yankees!
duhgravy is offline  
Old 08-27-2003, 06:14 AM   #3 (permalink)
The GrandDaddy of them all!
 
The_Dude's Avatar
 
Location: Austin, TX
i know astros have a bunch of good players for much less than their worth.

i heard that the entire astros' lineup was worth as much as the yankee pitching staff.
__________________
"Luck is what happens when preparation meets opportunity." - Darrel K Royal
The_Dude is offline  
Old 08-27-2003, 07:00 AM   #4 (permalink)
Squid
 
MikeyChalupa's Avatar
 
Location: USS George Washington
The NBA has had a salary cap since the 40's, but their "modern" salary cap has been in effect since the 1984-85 season. In the 18 seasons since the cap was instituted, only six teams have won an NBA title (LA, San Antonio, Houston, Chicago, Detroit, Boston). This list of cities includes the #2, 3, 4, 9, and 10th largest cities in the country. In major league baseball, since 1985, 12 teams have won a World Series. (Anaheim, New York Yankees, Arizona, Florida, Atlanta, Toronto, Minnesota, Cincinnati, Oakland, LA, New York Mets, and Kansas City Royals) which represent the #1, 2, 6, 36, 39, 41, 45, and 47th largest cities in the country. Cinncinati isn't in the top 50. Drop the New York teams and LA, and you have a list of teams complaining about the need for a salary cap.

-Mikey
MikeyChalupa is offline  
Old 08-27-2003, 07:01 AM   #5 (permalink)
Baltimoron
 
djtestudo's Avatar
 
Location: Beeeeeautiful Bel Air, MD
There is no real way to tell who would be best and worst. You still have to account for mismanagement in the front office, talent in the minor league systems, etc.
__________________
"Final thought: I just rented Michael Moore's Bowling for Columbine. Frankly, it was the worst sports movie I've ever seen."
--Peter Schmuck, The (Baltimore) Sun
djtestudo is offline  
Old 08-27-2003, 10:00 AM   #6 (permalink)
Tilted
 
Location: Mandeville, LA
Having a salary cap would bring teams like the Yankees in line with the rest of the league. Granted you can spend like the Mets and be terrible or the Yankees and be great, but even the Yankees make mistakes, they just don't have to live with them. When a small market team makes a big payroll mistake, they are frequently stuck with their error.
hfw01 is offline  
Old 08-27-2003, 10:06 AM   #7 (permalink)
Baltimoron
 
djtestudo's Avatar
 
Location: Beeeeeautiful Bel Air, MD
I don't fully believe that. Cashman is still a very good GM, so the team would still win all the time. Maybe they won't be able to spend the money, but they can spend the aura they have coming out the ass.
__________________
"Final thought: I just rented Michael Moore's Bowling for Columbine. Frankly, it was the worst sports movie I've ever seen."
--Peter Schmuck, The (Baltimore) Sun
djtestudo is offline  
Old 08-27-2003, 04:04 PM   #8 (permalink)
Insane
 
Location: Florida
A salary cap would certainly bring the spending of the Yankees in some but the Yankees are a good team because of baseball decisions and their own farm system talent. The Yankeees do outspend everyone else and take on riduculous salries in the name of winning but they have made excellent decisions as well. The Mets spend alot of money and they suck. The A's don't spend alot and are doing great. Money is a huge factor for success but it isn't the only factor and a salary cap won't stop teams from making bad personnel/ baseball decisions.
fearofmear is offline  
Old 08-27-2003, 04:05 PM   #9 (permalink)
Baltimoron
 
djtestudo's Avatar
 
Location: Beeeeeautiful Bel Air, MD
Three words...New York Knicks
__________________
"Final thought: I just rented Michael Moore's Bowling for Columbine. Frankly, it was the worst sports movie I've ever seen."
--Peter Schmuck, The (Baltimore) Sun
djtestudo is offline  
Old 08-27-2003, 04:27 PM   #10 (permalink)
Loser
 
Location: Paradise
three letters...
NFL
cheesemoney is offline  
Old 08-27-2003, 04:28 PM   #11 (permalink)
Baltimoron
 
djtestudo's Avatar
 
Location: Beeeeeautiful Bel Air, MD
???
__________________
"Final thought: I just rented Michael Moore's Bowling for Columbine. Frankly, it was the worst sports movie I've ever seen."
--Peter Schmuck, The (Baltimore) Sun
djtestudo is offline  
Old 08-27-2003, 08:43 PM   #12 (permalink)
Crazy
 
Location: Illinois
This would allow baseball to regain the title of "national pastime" and take it away from the nfl
Blu2e354 is offline  
Old 08-28-2003, 01:23 AM   #13 (permalink)
Squid
 
MikeyChalupa's Avatar
 
Location: USS George Washington
MLBPA would have to agree to it, so it will never happen.

Owners would have to agree to it, so it will never happen.

-Mikey
MikeyChalupa is offline  
Old 08-28-2003, 08:59 AM   #14 (permalink)
Baltimoron
 
djtestudo's Avatar
 
Location: Beeeeeautiful Bel Air, MD
The MLBPA might not. But since the proposal comes from the owners' side, and benifits them more then the players, I have an inkling they might agree with it.
__________________
"Final thought: I just rented Michael Moore's Bowling for Columbine. Frankly, it was the worst sports movie I've ever seen."
--Peter Schmuck, The (Baltimore) Sun
djtestudo is offline  
Old 08-28-2003, 09:56 AM   #15 (permalink)
Squid
 
MikeyChalupa's Avatar
 
Location: USS George Washington
Steinbrenner will block it, just like he tried to block the luxury tax. He eventually agreed to it because a salary cap won't hold down the Yankees, just like luxury tax revenue sharing won't. If baseball EVER gets a cap, it would be an NBA-style soft cap with exemptions, or an NFL-style cap with penalties. Either way Steinbrenner won't want to deal with either, but would easily make do if he had to.

-Mikey
MikeyChalupa is offline  
Old 08-28-2003, 10:01 AM   #16 (permalink)
Squid
 
MikeyChalupa's Avatar
 
Location: USS George Washington
What baseball needs is a MINIMUM salary cap. That would prevent firesales like we saw in Cincinnati and Pittsburgh this year. It would force owners and GM's to field a team that is competitive, not take the team's income and pocket it at the expense of the team and fans. Owning a major league franchise is not cheap, that's why none of us do. If you aren't willing to put the money into your team, fucking sell it to someone who will.

-Mikey
MikeyChalupa is offline  
Old 08-28-2003, 03:20 PM   #17 (permalink)
feeling tingly
 
Quote:
Originally posted by MikeyChalupa
What baseball needs is a MINIMUM salary cap. That would prevent firesales like we saw in Cincinnati and Pittsburgh this year. It would force owners and GM's to field a team that is competitive, not take the team's income and pocket it at the expense of the team and fans. Owning a major league franchise is not cheap, that's why none of us do. If you aren't willing to put the money into your team, fucking sell it to someone who will.

-Mikey

Thank you Mikey...once again, you brought sanity to the party.

I have no problem with a salary cap. If an organization wants to limit the amount of spending to increase competition, who am I to argue?

However....there should be a minimum standard for teams such as Detroit, Cincinnati and Tampa Bay. (by the way, since when is Detroit a SMALL market city???)

If you're not willing to invest enough money to be competitive, you have a choice, sell the team or fold. Every few years, there is a team which explodes to the top with a small payroll. This year it's Kansas City--and I think it's a wonderful story, but there are too many teams content with winning about .478 of their games, as long as they turn a bit of a profit.

Of course, a profit is the goal of any business....but sports is not like any other business. It's a combination of profit and success in the standings. Both work in tandem.

If you spend money, you can make money....if you make money, you can spend money.

If your starting staff makes as much as Albert Belle is collecting while sitting at home....something is wrong.
__________________
My mom is a Diamondbacks fan. She really likes the Big Unit
JoeyB is offline  
Old 08-28-2003, 04:45 PM   #18 (permalink)
Insane
 
agreed this will never happen unless ther is some major work stoppage for a prolonged period of time and the union splits. There's just too much money being thrown around now.

But if it somehow did happen, yeah the A's would be great, the Royals would be in great shape, Twins also.... I'd say the Cubs would be tops in the NL, they've got some great young studs...
Begora21 is offline  
Old 08-28-2003, 08:24 PM   #19 (permalink)
Loser
 
Location: Paradise
I'm sorry, but cashman's made enough mistakes to bring down just about every other team in the league, outside of the mets, mariners, and braves.

Billy Beane, with the A's, has made ONE mistake. Jermaine Dye has about 10 mil/yr salary, has been injured since breaking his leg in the playoffs in years past on a hard line drive to the leg, and hasn't been the same since. Shit, they coulda picked up a couple of Tejadas, a Rod Beck, and another Eric Chavez and maybe throw in a couple of Zitos for that amount of money.


Dye currently represents 1/5 of the A's entire payroll.
That said, they are first in the AL west, and have beat the Yanks in season play this year.
I personally don't know why Cashman, with all his money, didn't pick up Arod and move Jeter to second and put soriano in left.

God knows Jeter is in the worst third of fielders in the league with his 3.7 assists per game or so, has no range, but would make a decent second baseman.

God knows the yanks made enough mistakes at third that they coulda just signed Arod, stuck Jeter at third, and not had to purchase Booney at third.

Shiat, I almost feel sorry for Cashman, cause he can't do right, being that he must win it all AND dominate, which the yanks just aren't doing enough of (I'm talking winning way over 100 games Mariners style). And if he loses in the post-season, he outta be fired.
They're lucky BK Kim is in love with blowing saves the way of Armando Benitez (good move getting rid of that guy, Cashman).

Cheese
cheesemoney is offline  
Old 08-28-2003, 08:28 PM   #20 (permalink)
Baltimoron
 
djtestudo's Avatar
 
Location: Beeeeeautiful Bel Air, MD
Anyone else read Fair Ball by Bob Costas? He devotes most of the book to the changes he'd make to baseball. Salary cap, salary floor, slight realignment is all covered so well that he would be my vote for next commissioner.
__________________
"Final thought: I just rented Michael Moore's Bowling for Columbine. Frankly, it was the worst sports movie I've ever seen."
--Peter Schmuck, The (Baltimore) Sun
djtestudo is offline  
 

Tags
baseball, cap, salary


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:18 AM.

Tilted Forum Project

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
© 2002-2012 Tilted Forum Project

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360