04-21-2006, 02:04 PM | #1 (permalink) |
The Death Card
Location: EH!?!?
|
NHL Playoffs Round 1 Discussion
Ok, point totals are nearing completion. As always, double check and PM me if you see any discrepancy.
Scores can be found here: http://www.nhl.com/scores/index.html Here's a summary table of the picks for the first round: Winners are in bold Code:
n = 16 EAST WEST Name OTT@TBL|CAR@MTL|NJD@NYR|BUF@PHL|DET@EDM|DAL@COL|CGY@ANA|NSH@SJS|Points|Playoff Total| Ace_O_Spades OTT 5 CAR 6 NYR 7 BUF 6 DET 5 DAL 6 ANA 7 SJS 7 9 9 Antikarma OTT 5 MTL 7 NJD 6 PHL 6 DET 6 COL 7 CGY 6 SJS 5 6 6 BigBen OTT 5 MTL 7 NJD 7 PHL 6 EDM 6 DAL 4 CGY 6 SJS 7 6 6 BulletCatcher OTT 4 CAR 6 NJD 6 PHL 6 DET 5 DAL 6 CGY 5 SJS 5 6 6 Coppertop OTT 6 CAR 5 NJD 6 BUF 4 DET 4 DAL 5 CGY 7 SJS 5 6 6 Daoust OTT 5 CAR 5 NJD 6 BUF 7 DET 5 DAL 6 CGY 7 SJS 6 6 6 feelgood OTT 5 CAR 5 NYR 6 BUF 6 DET 4 COL 7 CGY 6 SJS 6 7 7 goddfather40 OTT 6 CAR 4 NJD 5 BUF 6 DET 6 DAL 6 CGY 6 SJS 7 6 6 matteo101 OTT 6 MTL 7 NYR 6 PHL 6 DET 5 DAL 6 ANA 7 SJS 5 5 5 maximusveritas OTT 5 CAR 4 NJD 5 PHL 6 DET 4 DAL 6 CGY 7 SJS 6 5 5 Nikilidstrom TBL 7 CAR 6 NJD 5 BUF 7 DET 5 DAL 6 ANA 7 SJS 6 7 7 Quadraton OTT 5 CAR 5 NJD 4 BUF 6 DET 6 DAL 7 CGY 6 SJS 6 8 8 silent_jay TBL 6 MTL 7 NJD 6 BUF 6 DET 5 DAL 6 CGY 5 SJS 6 4 4 streak_56 OTT 5 CAR 4 NJD 6 BUF 6 DET 4 DAL 7 CGY 6 SJS 6 7 7 Tamerlain OTT 5 CAR 6 NJD 7 BUF 7 DET 5 DAL 6 CGY 7 SJS 7 7 7 willravel OTT 6 CAR 7 NJD 6 BUF 7 DET 4 DAL 7 CGY 6 SJS 5 6 6 %Top Seed 87.5 75 81.3 68.8 93.8 87.5 81.3 0 %Bottom Seed 12.5 25 18.7 31.2 6.2 12.5 18.7 100
__________________
Feh. Last edited by Ace_O_Spades; 05-04-2006 at 10:56 PM.. |
04-21-2006, 02:53 PM | #3 (permalink) |
Comedian
Location: Use the search button
|
Edmonton, I swear if you break my heart one more time, I am never cheering for you again.
You hoisted me back on that bandwagon of yours with the 2nd last game of the season. Please, for all things holy, let them win a couple.
__________________
3.141592654 Hey, if you are impressed with my memorizing pi to 10 digits, you should see the size of my penis. |
04-21-2006, 03:33 PM | #6 (permalink) |
Addict
Location: Sarasota
|
I missed the picks but since this is the discussion thread.......
GOOOOOO LIGHTNING !!!!! Nobody is giving them a chance but hey, they are the defending champs. Honestly, I can quote lots of good stats but the Lightning are playoff winners and Ottowa is used to losing. The first game is key. Lightning have nothing to lose and will freewheel it. Ottowa will feel the pressure of the number 1 seed. Goaltending and special teams will rule. Lightning in 6.
__________________
I am just a simple man trying to make my way in the universe... "Go confidently in the direction of your dreams. Live the life you have imagined." - Thoreau "Nothing great was ever accomplished without enthusiasm" - Emerson |
04-21-2006, 03:44 PM | #7 (permalink) | |
The Death Card
Location: EH!?!?
|
Quote:
__________________
Feh. |
|
04-21-2006, 07:59 PM | #8 (permalink) |
Addict
Location: Ottawa, ON, Canada
|
My analysis of the first game between the Sens and Lightning.
I said it in the previous post, and I'll say it again here. The Tampa Bay Lightning are all skill, and little to no work ethic. Don't believe me? Watch the highlights during the Sens third goal, where they scored shorthanded. Ignoring the fact that the Tampa D allowed Schaefer to squeeze by along the boards (which can happen to the best of teams), notice how the trailing defenceman for Tampa (I think it was Boyle) rushes back, but at the last minute, he stops skating. Had he taken an extra couple of strides, he would have been in the perfect position to intercept the pass across made by Schaefer to Fisher. Instead, he decides to start coasting along, and ends up nowhere near in a defensive position. That's just one example, but that's really the way they played the whole night. They only looked like they were in the game for the first two periods because the Sens weren't playing the game they are capable of. Once the third period came around, and the Sens finally woke up, the Lightning were unable to touch them. Even when they were shorthanded, the 5 Lightning players couldn't stand up against 4 Senators. If the Lightning really want to win against the Sens, I'm telling you, they need to take a page out of the Bruins handbook. Despite being a non-Playoff team, Boston has given the Sens all sorts of problems throughout the season, and they did this by playing an aggressive box on the PK, racing for lose pucks, and waiting for the Sens to turn over the puck (I'm looking at you Spezza). Of course, the Bruins also had Thomas, who could keep the team alive for a couple of rounds. Seriously, did Grahame think his net was some sort of fort? He was hiding so deep in it, I was waiting for him to hang up a "No Girlz Allowed" sign, and hold "Super Top Secret Meetings" with all his friends. Of course, it is just one game, and maybe it was just a bad one for the Lightning. I'm interested in seeing if Tortorella can convince his team to play a better game (or if he'll just yell at them some more, because that always works). If all else fails, he can resort to throwing out more benign psychological salvos, talking about all this immense "pressure" the Senators must be under. Game 2 on Sunday.
__________________
"A witty saying proves nothing" - Voltaire Last edited by Quadraton; 04-21-2006 at 08:25 PM.. |
04-21-2006, 08:07 PM | #9 (permalink) |
... a sort of licensed troubleshooter.
|
Nashville beats Sharks 4-3, but I'm not worried. The Sharks have done an excellent job this season of having really crappy starts. The next game will be insanely close, and the the 2 games folloing that will be clear Shark victories. The really interesting game will be the game at Gaylord Center on the 30th.
|
04-21-2006, 08:51 PM | #10 (permalink) |
Free Mars!
Location: I dunno, there's white people around me saying "eh" all the time
|
Wow, the first game of Detroit/Edmonton series was surprising
On a side note, there's a playoff pool in my family. Wanna know what's stupid about it? Everybody's forced to take a team that they don't want and I wasn't there at the draw and I ended up having Calgary, Buffalo and Philadelphia. Why the fuck would I want 2 team that's gonna play each other in the first round?
__________________
Looking out the window, that's an act of war. Staring at my shoes, that's an act of war. Committing an act of war? Oh you better believe that's an act of war |
04-21-2006, 10:54 PM | #12 (permalink) |
Psycho
Location: Yellowknife, NWT
|
This is freaking great. Thanks for the work mate, absolutely awesome!
I coulda cried at the end of the Edmonton game. So close, and then Roloson leaves the 5-hole open wide enough to roll a beach ball through. FANTASTIC game, one error was all it took.
__________________
"Whoever you are, go out into the evening,
leaving your room, of which you know each bit; your house is the last before the infinite, whoever you are." |
04-22-2006, 12:13 AM | #13 (permalink) | |
who ever said streaking was a bad thing?
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Would you rather have Montreal and San Jose are two of your three picks? Atleast you know that one of your picks is going to the second round. And I have to ride the Dallas star bandwagon. And our stupid frickin step brother gets both Detroit and New Jersey, he has never watched a hockey game in his life. |
|
04-22-2006, 12:36 AM | #14 (permalink) | |
Free Mars!
Location: I dunno, there's white people around me saying "eh" all the time
|
Quote:
__________________
Looking out the window, that's an act of war. Staring at my shoes, that's an act of war. Committing an act of war? Oh you better believe that's an act of war |
|
04-22-2006, 09:49 AM | #15 (permalink) | |
Insane
Location: Victoria
|
Quote:
I'm surprised that everyone has picked San Jose over Nashville. Sure, we've only got 16 people playing, but still - I would have thought at least one person would pick Nashville to go to the second round. Thanks for putting all of this together, Ace_O_Spades. -Tamerlain
__________________
I never let school interfere with my education. |
|
04-22-2006, 09:50 AM | #16 (permalink) |
The Death Card
Location: EH!?!?
|
Yeah I was surprised by that as well Tamerlain
It's always amusing to see the trends in people's picks, thats why I included the percentages at the bottom of each column. I'll provide more summary stats once I get some real data after the round ends. Today's games are: Dallas @ Colorado, Series (0-0) New York @ New Jersey, Series (0-0) Montreal @ Carolina, Series (0-0) Philadelphia @ Buffalo, Series (0-0)
__________________
Feh. Last edited by Ace_O_Spades; 04-22-2006 at 10:32 AM.. |
04-22-2006, 06:05 PM | #17 (permalink) |
Addict
Location: Ottawa, ON, Canada
|
Good game 1 in Raleigh today. It's hard to say what happened to the Carolina Hurricanes, other than the fact they ran into a hot goaltender. They looked like they were playing a very good game. They chased the puck, made some good passes, and had more than twice the amount of shots on goal than the Canadiens. They just couldn't put the puck past Huet.
Of course, Carolina could just be realizing something that Ottawa has known for far too long. A fantastic regular season record means dick all in the Playoffs.
__________________
"A witty saying proves nothing" - Voltaire |
04-22-2006, 07:32 PM | #18 (permalink) |
who ever said streaking was a bad thing?
Location: Calgary
|
Montreal, New Jersey, Buffalo and Colorado were winners today. Montreal surprised me, as did Buffalo. I thought that Buffalo would've dominated the series a little more. But I think that they'll be limping into the second round.
|
04-22-2006, 08:16 PM | #19 (permalink) |
Addict
Location: Sarasota
|
Quad,
Good analysis. Although I did think the Lightning did what they wanted to try to do. They put on a lot of pressure and took a lot of shots early. They just didn't convert enough. As I mentioned, it comes down to goal tending and special teams. Graham will not lead us any farther than Ottowa in the playoffs, and maybe not even that far The Sens killed off penalties with an agressive style. The Lightning have not been agressive at all with the man advantage all year, IMO. In the Lightning run last year they played a 'never give up' style. I think they are playing the same way, but they are making mistakes and it costs them. Kubina, Sydor especially. I just got done watching the Sabres Flyers game. 2OT. Esche absolutely stood on his head. The Sportscenter shot on Umberger was awesome. The Sabres are a very good offensive team. All the cliches are true. There is nothing like playoff hockey.
__________________
I am just a simple man trying to make my way in the universe... "Go confidently in the direction of your dreams. Live the life you have imagined." - Thoreau "Nothing great was ever accomplished without enthusiasm" - Emerson |
04-22-2006, 10:36 PM | #20 (permalink) |
Stick it in your five hole!
Location: Michigan, USA
|
Carolina is just finding out what Detroit learned in the last 2 playoffs. Hot goaltending will carry you far, and whats worse, Montreal has seemed to be able to rack up some goals in the later half of the season. Thats a deadly combination, especially when Gerber seems to be struggling a little lately as well.
As far as everyone picking SJ over Nashville, if you've watched Vokoun over the last 3 seasons, you know he is the only reason they have had any success. He often makes 40+ saves a night just so they can win 2-1 or 3-2. So without him, its time for them to show that they can actually play some team defense in front of Mason (who is a huge question mark himself), and maybe show that their offense can bail out their goalie on one of his off nights. With San Jose, they have 2 solid lines of offense, and 2 goalies who can get the job done. Their defense is a little questionable, however, and often lets teams back into games they should never have been in, but the offense from the top line usually can make up for it. |
04-23-2006, 06:57 AM | #21 (permalink) |
who ever said streaking was a bad thing?
Location: Calgary
|
I agree with you Nikilidstrom on everything.
The San Jose/Nashville series is going to be more offensive because of Vokoun missing and a question mark defence on San Jose. If you match line for line, San Jose seems to have the best offense but as it was seen in the regular season, Nashville can get goals from almost any line and they find a way to win. Much like the Tampa Bay Lightning last time. Carolina is a great team on paper but thats not going to necessarily translate into a good playoff run. Montreal surprised them by playing a modified Montreal game. They used a quick counter attack but were really cautious defensively. Carolina fell into playing that sort of game. They didn't play IMO as strong as offensive effort. Carolina played a defensive game that was not made for an offensive regular season. Detroit to me, has been here before, they looked so relaxed on friday and not panicing. They all know what playoff hockey is like and their younger guys are relaxed by the older players. That team has some really good leaders and many hall of famers. |
04-24-2006, 09:07 PM | #24 (permalink) |
The Death Card
Location: EH!?!?
|
Ohhh baby, Montreal over Carolina in 2OT!!! What a game!!!
I'm feeling like a bad Montreal fan for not picking them in this. I thought it was a sure lock in the east... especially with how poorly they played against them in the regular season. Oh well... GO MONTREAL!
__________________
Feh. |
04-25-2006, 04:02 AM | #25 (permalink) | |
Junkie
Location: Ontario, Canada
|
Quote:
But damn, the boys are doing well so far. Keep it up, guys!
__________________
Si vis pacem parabellum. |
|
04-25-2006, 07:10 AM | #26 (permalink) |
Addict
Location: Ottawa, ON, Canada
|
I have to say I'm really surprised at the current outcome of the Carolina-Montreal game 2. I knew the Hurricanes would be able to solve Huet. What I wasn't expecting was Montreal finding the ability to score goals, considering they are hardly a scoring powerhouse.
__________________
"A witty saying proves nothing" - Voltaire |
04-25-2006, 08:48 AM | #27 (permalink) | |
Junkie
Location: Ontario, Canada
|
Quote:
The first half of the season Montreal's goal production was weak; the latter half it really seemed to improve, playing in front of a goaltender they could rely on. Having said that, they lack a game-breaker type player - an Ovechkin, Jagr, Cheechoo, type guy.
__________________
Si vis pacem parabellum. |
|
04-26-2006, 07:08 AM | #30 (permalink) | |
Addict
Location: Ottawa, ON, Canada
|
Quote:
__________________
"A witty saying proves nothing" - Voltaire |
|
04-26-2006, 09:55 AM | #32 (permalink) |
Stick it in your five hole!
Location: Michigan, USA
|
While I am not very happy about how Detroit keeps falling apart in their own end, I would be utterly ashamed if I was an Oilers fan considering the BS move Roloson pulled last night, as well as the other call on Holmstrom during that same play in which Jason Smith set a pick on him, yet Holmstrom gets called for a penalty. To have a professional athlete that eager to make the entire sport look like a joke by taking dives 10 feet from their crease is disgusting, and Roloson should be shamed out of the league.
I will say, however, that I am surprised at how well Pronger is doing, and equally surprised at how little attention Detroit is paying him on the PP. He has at least a point in every game, but they have yet to send someone out to the point to really challenge him, rather then just handing him an open lane for a shot to the net. |
04-26-2006, 11:05 AM | #33 (permalink) |
The Death Card
Location: EH!?!?
|
Uhhh Nikilidstrom, I watched the game, and I watched the replay, and nowhere did it seem to me that Roloson intentionally knocked the net up. Looked entirely accidental to me. Even if he hadn't, that shot wasn't going in. It would have hit off the side of the net.
__________________
Feh. |
04-26-2006, 01:47 PM | #34 (permalink) |
Stick it in your five hole!
Location: Michigan, USA
|
Thats not the play I'm talking about. That was clearly not a goal, and it was the right call. I'm talking about the play near the end of the 1st where Roloson intentionally skated out of his crease, at least 10 feet, and ran himself into the shoulder of Holmstrom who was leaving the zone, and then threw himself on the ground, as if Holmstrom had checked him to the ice. Roloson received a diving penalty, as he should, but Homlmstrom received a goalie interference penalty on top of the other BS penalty he received earlier in that play for Jason Smith setting a moving pick on him. This is what set up what would eventually turn into a 5-3 after Chelios chucked the puck over the glass. Detroit killed the remainder of the period, but began the next period still 5-3, and Oilers scored the 3-1 goal.
I am in no way questioning how well the Oilers are playing against Detroit, only that play in particular, which is in my opinion, absolutely disgusting. Things like that are why more people don't watch Hockey. |
04-26-2006, 02:39 PM | #35 (permalink) | |
Her Jay
Location: Ontario for now....
|
Meh, that play wasn't a big deal, goalies have been diving for years to get the player the penalty even when they don't touch them, it's all part of the game at this point.
Quote:
__________________
Absence makes the heart grow fonder |
|
04-26-2006, 03:29 PM | #36 (permalink) |
Stick it in your five hole!
Location: Michigan, USA
|
I knew somebody would say something about me being a Detroit fan. The way I feel about this play has nothing to do with Detroit, especially since that particular play had little to do with the eventual outcome of the game, and the fact that Edmonton has been my second favorite team since the days Doug Weight played there. And if you think any player diving, be it goalie or skater, doesn't hurt the league's credibility as a whole, you are sadly mistaken. Season after season players make the refs look like idiots with plays like these, and put the sport at risk of being relegated to the ranks of other novelty sports. You cannot be a legitimate sport when cheating is as much of a part of the game as passing, and your refs are incapable of upholding the rules of the game. For a player to disregard the integrity of the game to the level that Roloson did last night is shameful, and is as harmful to the growth of the sport as thugs like Bertuzzi and Marchment are. I can't count he number of times I've tried to introduce new people to the sport, only to have them ask me about phantom calls, or no calls, and have no other explanation for them except "the player intentionally dove", or "the refs have lost their minds", knowing they will never watch another hockey game.
And while Ulf is hardly a good comparison to this situation, I was just as pissed at Hasek when he dove constantly while playing pucks behind the net, including his days in Detroit. And at least Hasek was actually hit at some point during those dives, unlike Roloson, who actually threw himself at Holmstrom far in front of the crease. |
Tags |
discussion, nhl, playoffs, round |
|
|