For those that look at porn sometimes on the net.
 

Do you feel that when you see pictures of the girl from the "Litte April" Webpage your doing something wrong? I dunno if its just me but that girl seems wayyyyy to young to do porn and even though they say on the webpage shes 18 I can't seem to think that since I think she doesn't look 18, I just feel like a some pervert looking at kiddie porn when I see her on those free porn image sites and what not. How do you all feel?

I haven't seen this site, but if it makes you uncomfortable, than you probably souldn't be doing it!

Not to sound prudish (that term could not, in any sense of the word, be applied to me :rolleyes: ), but most of the time your gut instinct will help in determining whether or not you should be doing something.

I avoid any and all sites involving "little girls"...

Actually, my wife and daughter were away visiting her family this last weekend, so for the first time in a coon's age I rented some porno videos. I learned that
1) There is no longer any attempt at a story; just a brief interview and fucking;
2) Every time some 18-year old would come on, I would think "don't you have better options than this? You really should go to college";
3) Based on the selection at the store (a relatively friendly, upscale adult video store), apparently the only thing folks watch are anal, DPs, and "Cumsuckers!!!"

I got bored and took them back the next day. I'm just too old (42), I guess. I told my wife when she got back and she just laughed at me. ;-)

I tend to avoid sites like that as well, cause you never know if the girl lied about her age, and besides young and nubile is one thing, but some of the supposed 18 yr. old girls that I have seen on the 'net looked like they were 13. I prefer the look of women who are at least 20 (exept for my girlfriend who is 18 and in my opinion the most beautiful girl in the world).

I hear you all its not I go lookin for it I just sometimes stumble upon them when I get bored and look at some porn, hell I even see the girl on the titty board before I believe some others said shes too young to do that also.

Try "The Masseusse" with Jenna Jameson. It's got a decent plot, good sex scenes, and of course Jenna

I've seen a few pictures of her on another forum here, and she does absolutley nothing for me. But yes, she does look underage.

C'mon guys, she has to be 18+. With all the crackdown the feds are pulling these days, don't you think somebody would have noticed in there was a 15 year old girl on the net posing nude? It'd make national news!!

There are a quote a few girls who are 18 and look much younger, and quite a few who look much older. I know an 18 year old girl who looks 12, wouldn't wanna see her in porn though thats wrong. I guess this kinda appeals to those guys who like the young looking girls, but they want them legal.

It's pretty much a legal attempt at targeting the pedophile demographic.

My instinct is that any nude girl on any site even remotely mainstream is going to be 18+. Too risky for any site owner or photographer. That being said, I rarely find the very young looking ones to be all that sexy any way. So I rarely hit on any "teen" sites, or threads over on the TB, anyway.

Any big commercial site will be legit -- the risks are to big to take. That little April site is a rather busy site, so yeah they will be legal.

I am gonna have to check for myself.

After checking out the site, I think she's 18, but only just. The site does seem to be aiming at promoting her as being in underage scenarios, that I don't like. That aside, if there was just a pictorial of her posing in a tasteful or seductive way, I would see nothing wrong with it. She is hot, the underage stuff is not.

i'm 18 myself, so its all good to me

im 18, but seeing immature looking girls doesnt do anything for me, the innocent schoolgirl look is just bizarre and turn offish.

She doesnt look too young to make me feel dirty. If she looked like a 6 year old then I would think it was sic, but since she looks like someone about the age of 16 its ok, any younger is not good.

I'm sure there are sites that post porn featuring girls under 18. Remember, the net is global, and in some places 16 is the legal age and its not even enforced. Uncle Sam has a long reach but without local cooperation in foreign jurisdictions he has his hands tied.
The internet is the wild frontier of this world. You can find all kinds of strange, bile, and wonderful stuff there.

As others have said, I'm sure that if she's on a commercial site, she's 18 - there's too many crackdowns going on for that to happen.

However, I don't think you necessarily have to feel guilty for being attracted to girls younger than 18 - after all, that's an arbitrary age decision for pornography only (all states in the US allow marriage, and all that entails, well before 18, sometimes as early as 12 or 13). Also, that boundary is a US boundary only, in Europe and other countries it is legal to have pornography of 16 or 17 year old girls, and possibly younger.

Also, it's obviously a rather common thing, judging by the number of "schoolgirl" porn shots there are - most men are attracted to youth and health, and biologically we're constructed to feel lust towards any female of reproductive age, the younger the better (more chance of bearing healthy children without dying). So you're by no means a freak if you do feel attracted to younger looking girls.

Of course, if you like looking at girls BELOW repreductive age, that's not a biological imperative, that's something else.

However, that all said, it IS illegal to possess or view material involving people younger than 18, so you're right to be careful. Also, many people feel that 18 is not only a legal boundary, but a moral one, so expressing that you like looking at girls who look under is not a wise choice generally.

Bingle

.com sites are all US right?

Not neccessarily