A Question for Women... - Page 2 - Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community

Regziever · 09-02-2003, 08:36 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by motdakasha
There are exceptions to every generalization. Duh.

True, therfore a generalization can not be taken for the absolute truth. Statistics are uncertain proof.
But the point still stands, mentally the male and female mind can perform at the same levels within all areas. Therefore we are no better and no worse than eachother.

btw.
Your "Duh." was rather childish.

hu-man:
Hehehe.. Loved your last post!

motdakasha · 09-02-2003, 08:47 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Regziever
True, therfore a generalization can not be taken for the absolute truth. Statistics are uncertain proof.

Statistics give you a better idea and understanding of what's actually happening/occuring in this world. If it weren't for research, we wouldn't know that females are more susceptible than men to developing ostereoperosis. (Stating the obvious for you so you don't have to do it again: Just because more females than males get it doesn't mean all get it.) Knowing the numbers overwhelmingly support this, I'm willing to believe it even though it's "uncertain proof" because it's based on statistics/research.

I think most people understand generalizations are not absolute truth. The word general implies that. Are you going to go around the world and nitpick over every fucking generalization?

And yeah, I'm childish. So. What.

Regziever · 09-02-2003, 11:44 AM

Statisticly there are more intellectual differences between a 25 year old man and a twenty year old man (the same for women) than there is between men and women in general.

Abot nitpicking the "fucking" generalizations. (as you so poeticly put it).
No.

The "exeptions" I mentioned all have a thing in common. They have all trained to do what they do (x-ept the girl who can't chew and walk and the guy who can't calculate squares).
This mean that some individuals can learn these skills, as well as there are individuals who can't. But to say that women in general are better at this or men in general are better at that is merly pointing out traits that society inprints on our gender roles, not some kind of biological differences. That is my point.

For the childish thing:
I just expected better from you.

motdakasha · 09-02-2003, 12:33 PM

And I still disagree with your point.

Too bad.

FYI:
Main Entry: ex·cep·tion
Pronunciation: ik-'sep-sh&n
Function: noun
Date: 14th century

Double D · 09-02-2003, 01:55 PM

My, this thread seems to be getting personal.
Maybe we should take a breath?
Hugs all 'round?

Frenchie · 09-02-2003, 04:44 PM

Women aren't superior to men. Neither are men superior to women. They aren't equal either. Women and men have different qualities that make them better than the other, but it all equals out.
Read the book. The Essential Differneces. It explains a lot... and may help you, if that is what you are asking for.

Regziever · 09-03-2003, 04:59 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by motdakasha
And I still disagree with your point.

Too bad.

FYI:
Main Entry: ex·cep·tion
Pronunciation: ik-'sep-sh&n
Function: noun
Date: 14th century

I'm so utterly sorry for not being english.

This discussion is over, it has turned into a flame-war and I will have no part of it.

09-02-2003, 11:44 AM	#43 (permalink)
Regziever Sexy eh? Location: Sweden	Statisticly there are more intellectual differences between a 25 year old man and a twenty year old man (the same for women) than there is between men and women in general. Abot nitpicking the "fucking" generalizations. (as you so poeticly put it). No. The "exeptions" I mentioned all have a thing in common. They have all trained to do what they do (x-ept the girl who can't chew and walk and the guy who can't calculate squares). This mean that some individuals can learn these skills, as well as there are individuals who can't. But to say that women in general are better at this or men in general are better at that is merly pointing out traits that society inprints on our gender roles, not some kind of biological differences. That is my point. For the childish thing: I just expected better from you. __________________ Life is shit, Death is even worse, So what's the point of killing yourself? /Ignatius Camryn Paladine Last edited by Regziever; 09-02-2003 at 11:48 AM..

09-02-2003, 12:33 PM	#44 (permalink)
motdakasha Hiya Puddin'! Miss me? Location: Silicon Valley, CA	And I still disagree with your point. Too bad. FYI: Main Entry: ex·cep·tion Pronunciation: ik-'sep-sh&n Function: noun Date: 14th century __________________ =^-^= motdakasha =^-^= Just Google It. BA Psychology & Photography (I'm not going psychoanalyze you nor will I let you cry on my shoulder. Have a nice day.) Last edited by motdakasha; 09-02-2003 at 12:35 PM..

09-02-2003, 01:55 PM	#45 (permalink)
Double D Junkie Location: Chicagoland	My, this thread seems to be getting personal. Maybe we should take a breath? Hugs all 'round?

09-02-2003, 04:44 PM	#46 (permalink)
Frenchie Crazy Location: Muncie, IN	Women aren't superior to men. Neither are men superior to women. They aren't equal either. Women and men have different qualities that make them better than the other, but it all equals out. Read the book. The Essential Differneces. It explains a lot... and may help you, if that is what you are asking for.