|
View Poll Results: Have you had 3some? | |||
Yes. | 53 | 25.98% | |
No. | 116 | 56.86% | |
I'm a virgin... | 35 | 17.16% | |
Voters: 204. You may not vote on this poll |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
08-18-2003, 09:02 PM | #42 (permalink) |
Banned
Location: Santa Cruz
|
but in chasing amy the situation revolves around sexually insecure longtime buddies and a couple that is in serious trouble. i think that in ordinary situations group sex can be fun and emotionally safe for all involved as long as the only motive going in is to have fun.
|
08-18-2003, 09:05 PM | #43 (permalink) |
I run E.
Location: New York
|
I would just like to point out that this poll is skewed because anyone who has had a threesome definitely voted when they saw this thread. If 25% of people really had threesomes, I should hope I would've been one of them by now.
__________________
I hold with those that favor fire. |
08-19-2003, 08:25 AM | #46 (permalink) |
Psycho
Location: northern california
|
Well threesomes are great fun I love multiples and I cant understand why anyone would said a MFM is not more fun than a FMF. I mean only one guy and two girls geeshhhh come on that is a 6 to one ratio. I much prefer a 3 to 2 ratio, hehhehe. I guess im not bi enough go really get into the other fem thing that much. but, give me two guysssss Yeaaaaahhhh!!!!!!
__________________
...We find ourselves in a struggle for our very right to exsist... We will not go quietly into the night... We will not give up without a fight... |
08-19-2003, 08:54 AM | #47 (permalink) |
Crazy
|
I think 3somes are one of those things that sound like a great idea but when you actually think about it, you realize it isn't...b/c what I mean is it's not gonna be like a porn where both girls are blowing you/take it out and blow you while banging the other one :/
|
08-19-2003, 09:55 AM | #48 (permalink) |
Turn off your TV.
Location: ... .- -. ..-. .-. .- -. -.-. .. ... -.-. --- --..-- -.-. .-
|
I think men prefer FMF (as opposed to MFM) because they're afraid to touch another guy (unless the participants are bi- or comfortable with their sexuality). The thought of accidentally touching or feeling some guy's wang is just not as appealing as the soft caress of two girls. That's one reason for the discrepancy, I guess. Too bad.
__________________
"inhuman fiery goat worship" is an anagram for "information superhighway" -kingvolc |
08-19-2003, 08:50 PM | #50 (permalink) | |
/nɑndəsˈkrɪpt/
Location: LV-426
|
Quote:
__________________
Who is John Galt? |
|
08-19-2003, 09:57 PM | #51 (permalink) |
God-Hating Liberal
Location: Silicon Valley, CA
|
I have 3 problems with MFM, and I'll be the first to admit they are (relatively) selfish:
1. If I'm having a threesome I want all-around participation. Since I'm not interested in having sex with another guy, that cuts out a part of the potential. Whereas with FMF, assuming both females are ok with some bi action (much more common), everyone gets in on the group spirit. 2. It's not a matter of "being comfortable with your sexuality." I wouldn't want to fuck with another guy. This isn't because I'm afraid it would make me gay, it's because sex is a personal thing and to be shared with people you want to be sexual with. 3. I don't want to share my girlfriend with another man. That may make me possessive, but this is a male trait and likely can be attributed to the other guy in the threesome as well. I am not comfortable with opening the door to another man trying to be possessive over someone I have an emotional attachment to.
__________________
Nizzle |
08-19-2003, 10:05 PM | #52 (permalink) |
Turn off your TV.
Location: ... .- -. ..-. .-. .- -. -.-. .. ... -.-. --- --..-- -.-. .-
|
That makes sense. I was making a general inference based on the feedback I've read from men, but of course there's more than one reason for men to prefer FMF. Thanks for demystifying that for me.
__________________
"inhuman fiery goat worship" is an anagram for "information superhighway" -kingvolc |
09-03-2003, 05:45 AM | #54 (permalink) |
is Nucking Futs!
Location: On the edge of sanity
|
We've had a few over the past year or so with a former neighbor of ours. It was a MFM threeway. The first couple of times it was exciting and lived up to our expectations. Lately though, he's been a dick about it, so, no more with him. He's becoming the "fuck and run" type. We feel he's not interested in the friendship aspect of it, he just wants to fuck.
Would we do it again? Possibly, if we could find the right person or couple. (NO, we're NOT looking, so don't PM offering your services. )
__________________
I may look attentive, but I'm taking peeks down your blouse faster than the human eye can follow. |
09-03-2003, 09:57 AM | #55 (permalink) | |
Loser
|
Quote:
|
|
09-03-2003, 06:48 PM | #56 (permalink) | |
Crazy
|
MFM and FMF here.
The FMF was at a friend's house on poker night. After a few drinks it became "strip poker night" and things proceeded from there. For the MFM, chalk up a score for college. No bi-curious stuff or anything, just a good time upstairs at a frat house. I wasn't her boyfriend, and neither was the other guy. Naturally, upon finding out that we just tag-teamed the little sister of one of the ranking brothers in that chapter, we ran like hell.
__________________
Quote:
|
|
09-04-2003, 09:54 AM | #58 (permalink) |
Vanishing, like I do..
Location: Austin, TX
|
No.
Not that I am not sexually open, it just seems too.. weird. Me and my wife are *very* close, and I am pretty sure she wouldn't want to either. It'd just feel TOO WEIRD afterwards, and both of us have a problem with paranoia and past sexual abuse.. I'll pass.
__________________
Toy-like people make me boy-like. |
09-04-2003, 09:57 AM | #59 (permalink) | |
Vanishing, like I do..
Location: Austin, TX
|
Quote:
|
|
Tags |
3some |
|
|