Ladies: Would you fuck a 1995 Michael Jackson?
 

I just got into a heated debate over the difference between wealthy eccentric assholes and wealthy eccentric assholes that are total weirdos with one of my female friends. She compared old MJ to Donald Trump and Mick Jagger. I don't think those are even close.

She insists that a lot of today's women would have fucked a 1995 Michael Jackson based on his talent, wealth, and popularity... regardless of the weirdo factors of his racial identity crisis, inability to maintain other glove, Neverland Ranch, incessant crotch grabbing, etc.

I do concede that the guy was immensely talented, popular all over the planet (played constantly Iraq in 2003), and definitely $$$ loaded.

Ladies of TFP, what do you think? Would you have fucked The Albino Mr. Potatoheadface from 1995? You can use the anon function if necessary.

...

Larger debate may include how much talent / money / fame it would take for you to climb aboard a freak show's love torpedo.

Thing is, unless those women were 10 year old boys, he wouldn't have been interested.

Too soon?

I'd fuck him now.

His doctor already did...

Hey, none of you fuckers are ladies. Failure to read instructions.

No. I never thought of Michael in a sexual way. god no.

Nope.
1985 maybe...
You've got to have a hell of a lot fewer issues
than that guy to stick a dick in me.
No matter what the starfucker factor.

I wouldn't waste piss on him. Then or ever.

Michael Jackson. R.I.P.

Sheesh. The guy is dead already. Can't we just leave him be? He probably doesn't even want to be dead, but I am just guessin'...

I'm gonna go listen to Dangerous now....

My apologies to Plan9 and all the ladies. You're entitled to your thread. I'm done.

Every single damn Halloween commercial is playing 'Thriller.' You can't help but not be reminded of him.

here is a timeline of his face... might help... The HisTory of Michael Jackson's face

I would imagine this to be a difficult question to answer. I'll put it in my terms: my uber-filtered, media-based, fictitious version of Salma Hayek is the end-all-be-all lay fantasy of my life. In real life, she's probably a complete pain in the ass and I wouldn't want to be in the same room as her after 10 minutes. Since I'd only need about 3 minutes with her, that might still work out - but I digress. So, do they have to fuck the "media version" of the 1995 MJ or the real life version (which was probably an incredible turnoff)?

Wait, crotch grabbing is a turn off for women? That explains so much about my life.

Put me down as a No

Pfft. Put this in Ladies Lounge if you're going to make rules like that.

I'd fuqq the 1985 version because he'd be closer to my age.

Haah.

I'd erm, do him for money!

No, he was disgusting throughout the 90's in my opinion.

No.:no:

Lindy

Yes, but not because I am attracted....it would be an awesome story.

I'm a story whore!

Wow, his face changed a fair bit over the years.