Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community

Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community (https://thetfp.com/tfp/)
-   Tilted Sexuality (https://thetfp.com/tfp/tilted-sexuality/)
-   -   Falling in love with multiple people at same time? (https://thetfp.com/tfp/tilted-sexuality/151520-falling-love-multiple-people-same-time.html)

curiousbear 10-19-2009 01:05 AM

Falling in love with multiple people at same time?
 
Apart from one night-stands, being attracted, flirting etc - Does a serious and sensible falling in love with multiple people at same time possible?

Have any of you or your SO had this kind of situation?

I think this question is very important because this may help understanding whether monogamy is a natural behavior meant for Human? Or is it just a social/cultural implementation...

Personally I never had this situation in my life (Loving and hating same person at same time happens all the time thou :) )

MrFriendly 10-19-2009 01:14 AM

It might sometimes depend on how much you actually love someone and how much you're just convincing yourself you love someone.

Personally, no, I've not found myself in the situation where I've been in love with multiple people.

No doubt that it happens though.

Xerxys 10-19-2009 01:16 AM

I go with a strict rule of life that is "You do not Love anyone know less than 3 months".

Love is enduring of all things. Hence impossible for me to ever find, but that aside, I've felt an instant attraction to someone I've just met, only one person though. So no multiple partners for me for a while.

StellaLuna 10-19-2009 03:07 AM

*waves* It's possible... my SO and SO and I are going on 3 years now.

SecretMethod70 10-19-2009 04:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by curiousbear (Post 2718439)
I think this question is very important because this may help understanding whether monogamy is a natural behavior meant for Human? Or is it just a social/cultural implementation...

I don't think it's that simple, really. Just like there are different sexual inclinations, it seems to me that there are different inclinations for relationships. More people are probably capable of non-monogamy than realize it, but all the evidence I've seen points to monogamy as the standard for human interaction. Of course, being standard doesn't make it superior... just standard. There are people I know who are definitely more suited for non-monogamy, and I think with the right personality it's certainly possible for someone to learn non-monogamy, but it's not likely to be easy.

Anyway, it's possible, and probably more possible than it seems in our culture, but certainly not the norm, and I don't think it ever will be.

ngdawg 10-19-2009 04:49 AM

It's not the "norm" because I think most people won't allow it to be.
Yes, it is very possible to be "in love" with more than one as I have been for quite a while. Love is not one thing or one defining emotion, it's a mixture of feelings, actions and interactions brought together in a harmonious circle. And just as everyone is different, the feeling of loving others will be as well, but no less important one person to the next.
I often explain it as : You have more than one child, you don't love one at a time, why should it be any different with others in your life? Your heart doesn't divide, it grows.

seamaiden 10-19-2009 05:11 AM

I'm sure it's possible, although, fortunately it's never happened to me (excluding my children, family, and friends...but I know you're asking about a different kind of love here). Life is complicated enough without trying to balance the emotional needs of more than one lover.

Monogamy is SO important to me. I've been cheated on...it was shattering for me, but I hung on to that relationship for many years, without ever really trusting him again. I love being intimate, in every way, with my partner. I give him all I can, but if it's not enough for him, then he needs to move on. I can guarantee my lover will be my one and only and expect the same in return. It's just what works for me.

thirdsun 10-19-2009 06:39 AM

I think it sort of depends on how a person defines the concept of love.

There are folks who define love as exclusivity. Be it monogamy or polygamy (I am using these terms loosely & generally for the sake of brevity), but they have no real desire for a similar relationship or commitment with more people or anyone else. In other words, they define love as that high contentment / compatibility / commitment level with the person(s) whom they love. In my opinion, this is a more mature or refined type of love than say, infatuation, lust, having sex, etc.

If you are asking: can a person be infatuated, lusting, and/or having sex with more than one person? Of course. Personally, I wouldn't define those emotions and activities as love, but I realize that perhaps many people might.

Daniel_ 10-19-2009 12:21 PM

I think it is possible to love more than one person, I love my wife, I love my daughter, I love my parents and my brother; but all in different ways.

I think the poster meant is it possible to love romantically two partners. This I believe is certainly possible, but requires all parties to share mutual love - if A loves B and C, but B cannot stand C, then there will be problems.

For it to work fully, A and B and C have to love each other, and when it happens, it's great.

Halx 10-19-2009 12:23 PM

This is called Polyamory and it exists for real.

FuglyStick 10-19-2009 12:37 PM

Works for some; not for me.

Charlatan 10-19-2009 03:53 PM

Sure it's possible. I know I have been in love with two women at once. Unlike the LurkBastidLuna's I had to make a choice. It was an excellent choice but I sometimes wonder what it might have been if other options had been possible.

amonkie 10-19-2009 04:30 PM

I find that for me, loving people takes work. I make the choice to love them, and this manifests itself in relationships and spending time and energy on these people. When I am loving someone, I find I generally have less time and overall desire to cultivate loving other individuals to the same degree. Not to say it couldn't be done, but it would take exceptional individuals in my eyes to continue on both roads to the same degree.

Soshi Aroso 10-22-2009 09:19 PM

First, English isn't great to have this conversation in, as all we have is "love." Other languages differentiate between the love and obligation of family, the love and camaraderie of colleagues, and the love and infatuation of romance.

Second, Love <> Attraction <> Sex <> Relationship.

What exactly do you think of love as? Can you stop loving someone? Do you love someone despite their faults, or for them? Does trust come automatically with love? Can love be unreciprocated? These and more are all very important questions that are seldom agreed on, and without knowing a stance on them, any answer to your question is gonna to be basically meaningless.

jaymoney 10-22-2009 10:11 PM

hell yeah its possible shit i love my wife and my girlfriend

Plan9 10-23-2009 12:47 PM

Sounds like an expensive hobby.

curiousbear 10-25-2009 07:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by StellaLuna (Post 2718460)
*waves* It's possible... my SO and SO and I are going on 3 years now.

Hi Thanks for sharing the info :) You folks are FMM or MFF?

I know a man who had married two sisters. They lived together. Their daughter told me about it.

---------- Post added at 07:35 AM ---------- Previous post was at 06:58 AM ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by SecretMethod70 (Post 2718486)
...all the evidence I've seen points to monogamy as the standard for human interaction. Of course, being standard doesn't make it superior... just standard.

Very well said! Standards are for standard people :) Thanks

Quote:

Originally Posted by ngdawg (Post 2718505)
Yes, it is very possible to be "in love" with more than one as I have been for quite a while.

Thanks - I hardly know people like you
It never happened to me - May be I never thought or felt it is POSSIBLE

Quote:

Originally Posted by ngdawg (Post 2718505)
Love is not one thing or one defining emotion, it's a mixture of feelings, actions and interactions brought together in a harmonious circle. And just as everyone is different, the feeling of loving others will be as well, but no less important one person to the next.

Very true! The harmonious circle takes so much to establish even with two people :)

Quote:

Originally Posted by ngdawg (Post 2718505)
I often explain it as : You have more than one child, you don't love one at a time, why should it be any different with others in your life? Your heart doesn't divide, it grows.

'Your heart doesnt divide, it grows' - Nice saying...
But some how I am not able to agree on this

Quote:

Originally Posted by thirdsun (Post 2718555)
I think it sort of depends on how a person defines the concept of love.

Agreed. Personally Love = Like Personality + Attracted Physically + Respect Character + Trust the relationship + Intimate Sexually + Enjoy Company + Committed.

Sorry I should have said this in OP.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Daniel_ (Post 2718701)
For it to work fully, A and B and C have to love each other, and when it happens, it's great.

Thanks - I got the answer

Quote:

Originally Posted by Halx (Post 2718702)
This is called Polyamory and it exists for real.

Thanks Halx I looked up wiki "Polyamory is the practice, desire, or acceptance of having more than one intimate relationship at a time with the consent of everyone involved"

Quote:

Originally Posted by amonkie (Post 2718805)
I find that for me, loving people takes work. I make the choice to love them, and this manifests itself in relationships and spending time and energy on these people. When I am loving someone, I find I generally have less time and overall desire to cultivate loving other individuals to the same degree. Not to say it couldn't be done, but it would take exceptional individuals in my eyes to continue on both roads to the same degree.

Wow! In the place I live, I see more and more people stopping with a single Kid! May be this is how Monogamy came to existence...

Quote:

Originally Posted by Soshi Aroso (Post 2720199)
First, English isn't great to have this conversation in, as all we have is "love." Other languages differentiate between the love and obligation of family, the love and camaraderie of colleagues, and the love and infatuation of romance.

Second, Love <> Attraction <> Sex <> Relationship.

What exactly do you think of love as? Can you stop loving someone? Do you love someone despite their faults, or for them? Does trust come automatically with love? Can love be unreciprocated? These and more are all very important questions that are seldom agreed on, and without knowing a stance on them, any answer to your question is gonna to be basically meaningless.

On English +1
And on your questions - I need to first answer them for myself carefully :) Thanks a lot for your post

What exactly do you think of love as? I tried to define in my response to thirdsun above
Can you stop loving someone? I think yes in some extreme cases
Do you love someone despite their faults, or for them? Yes
Does trust come automatically with love? There is no Love without Trust
Can love be unreciprocated? Yes

dlish 10-25-2009 09:01 AM

from someone who's allowed multiple wives...

no its not possible to have the same feelings for multiple people.

i'll just mention that i know someone who has two wives, and im certain that he has feelings for one more than the other.

sure you can fall in love with more than one person at a time, but thats not love. love is an all encompassing feeling of helpless belonging that no one can fill except the person for which it is intended. i cant see how that can be two people at any one time.

Strange Famous 10-25-2009 11:44 AM

I dont think I personally could fully romantically love two people at once. I could fancy two people at once - sure, but that isnt the same thing.

nikkiana 10-25-2009 12:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dlish (Post 2721310)
from someone who's allowed multiple wives...

no its not possible to have the same feelings for multiple people.

i'll just mention that i know someone who has two wives, and im certain that he has feelings for one more than the other.

sure you can fall in love with more than one person at a time, but thats not love. love is an all encompassing feeling of helpless belonging that no one can fill except the person for which it is intended. i cant see how that can be two people at any one time.

Having been in polyamorous relationships, I would NOT say that one partner is loved any less than the other in a healthy polyamorous relationship, however there almost always are differences in how that love is expressed. Different people have different needs. Sometimes one partner takes priority over another at a given time based on circumstances.

taurus 10-26-2009 08:35 AM

I would have to say that it is easy to lust for multiple people and act on that lust, but the result isn't love.

To answer the original question, I have had sex with two guys who didn't know about each other, felt attracted and in-sync with both of them...and I think I loved them both, each for very different reasons. I do not, however, think I could be "in-love" with both of them at the same time. Then, I have never been in love.

Is the quiet tender love of a partner who holds your hand and cooks you dinner but never has sex with you enough or do we need more?

Toaster126 10-26-2009 05:36 PM

I think love is different for every person in our lives, and that we have a supply of love to give limited only when we claim it is.

What we are limited on is time. Relationships take time.

SecretMethod70 10-26-2009 05:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Toaster126 (Post 2721941)
I think love is different for every person in our lives, and that we have a supply of love to give limited only when we claim it is.

What we are limited on is time. Relationships take time.

We have a winner.

curiousbear 10-29-2009 09:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SecretMethod70 (Post 2721945)
We have a winner.

+1

Time, Capacity

Datalife2 11-18-2009 04:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Toaster126 (Post 2721941)
I think love is different for every person in our lives, and that we have a supply of love to give limited only when we claim it is.

What we are limited on is time. Relationships take time.

perfect!

gentlesoul43 11-21-2009 09:52 AM

Love is much misunderstood if it's only seen as an emotion. And even so, the description of love is different for different people. A highly charged infatuation feeling is deemed as love, and so is a comfortable, moderately satisfying long term relationship.

Monogamy may not be a natural human behavior. Perhaps it is just a set of rules created by a civilized society bent on giving basic rights to all. If you don't believe me, just look back and look around. Polygamy is banned in developed countries just not too long ago. In some lesser developed societies (look at Asia and Africa), polygamy is allowed and having multiple partners is seen as an achievement of able persons.

If our natural instinct is similar to that of the animal kingdom, then the Survival of the Fittest rule states that only the strongest will get to perpetuate their genes, i.e. only Alpha males get laid. This doesn't work well in a civilised society, so rules are set so that everyone gets their share. In a civilized society, everyone has the same rights, including race and gender. But this is not the natural order in the wild.

So is it possible to love more than 1 person at a time? I ask back: Is it possible not to if you are allowed to and are free of the man-made rules that bind us?

Shaindra 11-21-2009 06:25 PM

Quote:

If our natural instinct is similar to that of the animal kingdom, then the Survival of the Fittest rule states that only the strongest will get to perpetuate their genes, i.e. only Alpha males get laid.
Not quite. Humans pursue two mating strategies. Short-term mating (which favors alpha males who can spread their seed among many women) and long-term mating (which actually favors beta males, who will provide resources to their mates to help raise the children.)

Is monogamy "natural"? Why does it matter? Lots of things people do aren't natural. And natural doesn't mean superior either.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:39 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
© 2002-2012 Tilted Forum Project


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360