Research Shows Topless Blowjobs More Satisfying - Page 2 - Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community

Plan9 · 04-23-2009, 01:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The_Jazz

Duh. Water is also wet.

Frankly, I'm disappointed with your response, father.

No witty quip, no cheap shot at my grammar, no pearl of wisdom popped outta your watertight Upstanding Citizen (TM) blowhole... nothing.

I need your love!

...

I offer boobs AND oral sex with colorful descriptors and all I get is a halfhearted "Duh" remark?!

Willravel · 04-23-2009, 02:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Crompsin

Frankly, I'm disappointed with your response, father.

Welp, that's about the creepiest thing I've ever read on TFP.

ItWasMe · 04-23-2009, 10:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ratbastid

...
Not to stray into the slightly more serious topic this thread prompts, but the power dynamics of oral sex are very interesting. While it may seem that the receiver is subjugating the performer, I assert that ALL the power in the whole thing is in the er... hands of the blower, not the blowee...

Well, you kind of beat me to it, Ratbastid, but I'm going to say it anyway...

Quote:

Originally Posted by Crompsin

Is it the subtle feeling of dominance over a shirtless kneeling partner?

I think it's absolutely hilarious that a guy would feel any feeling of dominance over a person who has her sharp teeth wrapped around his private parts.

Thanks for the laugh!

Plan9 · 04-23-2009, 10:18 PM

*refrains from going off on a complacent-woman-as-fuck-prop dominance tangent*

Quote:

Originally Posted by ItWasMe

I think it's absolutely hilarious that a guy would feel any feeling of dominance over a person who has her sharp teeth wrapped around his private parts.

Thanks for the laugh!

Oh, she's not so dangerous when I hide her dentures.

Poppinjay · 04-24-2009, 04:48 AM

Approves the change in direction of this thread

kramus · 04-24-2009, 08:22 AM

FWIW Crompsin, my Lady brought this thread up in conversation last night. She was surprised that there had been no comments on the validity of your purported study, and was offended and appalled at the weakness and lack of rigour in what reads as a scientific endeavor. I replied that it was an all-in-fun bit of fluff thread which may or may not bring up some interesting points, but was not a serious take on the scientific method. She replied that it is all good to have fun, but if you are going to structure your thread around science, you ought to make some effort/gesture to accomodate science.

Where are your controls, she asks. Where is the data on clothed GoH vs topless/nude GoH vis-a-vis total satisfaction? What measures/values/quantifiable results demonstrate any credibility, dependability, or confirmability? What are the benchmarks, the repeatable phenomenon, the goals that allow repeatability of results and reliable forecasting of outcome?

She ended her riff by suggesting that you will never get head from a scientist if this is the sloppy methodology you demonstrate - that there must be some accountability here.

I never thought that there would be a reason for you to revisit the structure of your study until my Lady opened my eyes. The very real possibility exists that there are men out there who could be deprived of Scientific Method based improvement in the head they may get. Simply because these men are not willing to give science it's due

Now, I tell you from first hand experience that when a thoroughbred decides to go for improvement, repeatable results and refinement of various techniques which are all dedicated to outcome, there is no substitute for guided experience coupled with applied sensual intelligence.

My .02 cents.

JumpinJesus · 04-24-2009, 07:19 PM

Communication is key. If that doesn't work, run away as fast as you can.

Charlatan · 04-24-2009, 07:30 PM

So Kramus... did your lovely lady offer to assist you in furthering the science of this or was she just blowing smoke (so to speak).

What kind of scientist isn't willing to test a theory to see of it's valid?

settie · 04-24-2009, 11:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Crompsin

TFP Ladies: How do you feel about this topic? Do you find it more enjoyable to give your partner oral sex sans shirt?

I prefer giving blowjobs topless.

My fave blowjobs have always started by pinning my man against a wall or door, and slowly pulling my clothes off as I tease him. My method is similar to lindy from there on, pressing myself against him, and finally touching his cock with my tongue.

Like lindy, one of the main reasons I give blowjobs topless is because of the opportunity for titty fucking, and because my man is more likely to play with my breasts during a blowjob if they're uncovered, which I love.

And I have to agree with ItWasMe... I fail to see how a man could feel dominant during a blowjob...with perhaps one exception: when a man thrusts himself into your mouth. Yeah, he really has control/dominance there, for a short while.
But, when I give a blowjob, the man turns to jello, and I do as I please... haha.

ItWasMe · 04-25-2009, 12:05 AM

I like getting my hair brushed while I'm doing it. As for being topless, I think we're both pretty much always naked when messing around. There is something great about bare skin on bare skin, no matter which body parts are involved.

Plan9 · 04-25-2009, 05:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kramus

FWIW Crompsin, my Lady brought this thread up in conversation last night. She was surprised that there had been no comments on the validity of your purported study, and was offended and appalled at the weakness and lack of rigour in what reads as a scientific endeavor. I replied that it was an all-in-fun bit of fluff thread which may or may not bring up some interesting points, but was not a serious take on the scientific method. She replied that it is all good to have fun, but if you are going to structure your thread around science, you ought to make some effort/gesture to accomodate science.

Where are your controls, she asks. Where is the data on clothed GoH vs topless/nude GoH vis-a-vis total satisfaction? What measures/values/quantifiable results demonstrate any credibility, dependability, or confirmability? What are the benchmarks, the repeatable phenomenon, the goals that allow repeatability of results and reliable forecasting of outcome?

She ended her riff by suggesting that you will never get head from a scientist if this is the sloppy methodology you demonstrate - that there must be some accountability here.

I never thought that there would be a reason for you to revisit the structure of your study until my Lady opened my eyes. The very real possibility exists that there are men out there who could be deprived of Scientific Method based improvement in the head they may get. Simply because these men are not willing to give science it's due

Now, I tell you from first hand experience that when a thoroughbred decides to go for improvement, repeatable results and refinement of various techniques which are all dedicated to outcome, there is no substitute for guided experience coupled with applied sensual intelligence.

*throws down gauntlet*

What? HUH? Oh, it's on! I'll deal with this mockery in a bit.

I'm off to do more research, but I'll handle this insulting critique soon.

genuinegirly · 04-25-2009, 07:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Strange Famous

If you get head while watching football or rugby, is that kind of gay?

As long as it's a woman giving the blowjob, I don't see how it could be considered gay.

I'm turned on by athletes. I love watching the athletic men run around the field in tight pants. My idea of a little slice of heaven is to give a bj while watching a football game on TV. My husband is completely turned off when watching sports, though. This makes football season a long, sexually frustrating time of the year.

This girly's nipples are extra sensitive. I'd rather do it with a bra or shirt and keep control over the situation. Otherwise I end up pleasured before he does, and that - while fun - ruins the sense of dominance.

Shaindra · 04-25-2009, 08:34 AM

Yeah, this thread just made me hot...again. *wanders off to ponder how I can get reliable good sex without actually having to date to do it*

kramus · 04-26-2009, 07:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Charlatan

So Kramus... did your lovely lady offer to assist you in furthering the science of this or was she just blowing smoke (so to speak).

What kind of scientist isn't willing to test a theory to see of it's valid?

Actually my Lady was concerned because there didn't appear to be real science underpinning the study. That being said, she experiments and tests in ways that a non-scientist spouse finds, well, a bit unnerving

Example - have you heard of 2-point perception testing? Where you determine nerve density and composition by using a pair of sharp points pressed into skin and vary the distance between the points? The goal is to see how far apart the points are before there is a distinct perception of 2 separate places of contact. In the early days of our relationship I sat on a couch, eyes closed, while my Lady applied broken toothpicks to my rampant courting-tackle. She was amazed at how few nerve endings were apparent in some of the different areas tested. It was, shall we say, unnerving.

The application of hot and cold - ice cubes and hot coffee - those experiments are sometimes still brought into play. Or foreign objects such as an olive pit held in her mouth and applied with varied speed/pressure to my essentials. Humming, sighs, various tools such as the use of vibrators on my scrotum/shaft/glans . . . been there many times. Positional changes, light changes, types of eye contact with and without mirrors. What is said and how, the presentation of breasts, back, belly - how the hair is held in the hands (mine or hers), left loose, or tied in pony tails (the position of the pony tail varies depending on whether it is to be used as a handle or a visual prop, we find). What sorts of places, public, indoor, outdoor, natural or man-made give the greatest thrill or allow her as the GoH the greatest freedom of movement when doing her thing. What kinds of music. If in water, should the water be running as in a shower, still like in a bath, cold like a stream, deeper and underwater like in a pool, heated like a hot tub, indoors or out, what is a good immersion depth for me, for her . . . Should I be filming the act, the orgasm, experiencing the orgasm with various types of either her or my own hand contact or her licking tongue. If suction is applied during the orgasm how much and with what varied types of sucking action before, during and after orgasm? How long to continue to lick or to suck, to wipe my still stiff cock across her lips and cheeks, or stroke with her hands? While telling me about how she had enjoyed my orgasm she goes through a checklist to determine what could be done to improve it or change it up. And most important - give her a number

Was it an 8, a 9, maybe only a 5 or a 6 - once a 10 (but I always say 10's mean you die, so they don't happen often).

Charlatan, I can say without fear of contradiction that my Lady does not just blow smoke, and the Scientific Method is often brought into play in the Manor.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Crompsin

*throws down gauntlet*

What? HUH? Oh, it's on! I'll deal with this mockery in a bit.

I'm off to do more research, but I'll handle this insulting critique soon.

Please understand, Crompsin, the critique was not meant to be insulting. It was more of a complaint that there was no real science in what was supposed to be a scientific study. That being said, I fully support anyone who is willing to both do research and share the results here. Afterall, we are interested in the growth of the community and the individuals within the community are what make that happen. And knowledge gained will lead to that growth.

If willing, please post pictures - my Lady is out of town and I'm horny after running a speed-tape of knowledge gained in the Manor through my mind in order to write this post

Shaindra · 04-27-2009, 02:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kramus

Actually my Lady was concerned because there didn't appear to be real science underpinning the study. That being said, she experiments and tests in ways that a non-scientist spouse finds, well, a bit unnerving

Example - have you heard of 2-point perception testing? Where you determine nerve density and composition by using a pair of sharp points pressed into skin and vary the distance between the points? The goal is to see how far apart the points are before there is a distinct perception of 2 separate places of contact. In the early days of our relationship I sat on a couch, eyes closed, while my Lady applied broken toothpicks to my rampant courting-tackle. She was amazed at how few nerve endings were apparent in some of the different areas tested. It was, shall we say, unnerving.

The application of hot and cold - ice cubes and hot coffee - those experiments are sometimes still brought into play. Or foreign objects such as an olive pit held in her mouth and applied with varied speed/pressure to my essentials. Humming, sighs, various tools such as the use of vibrators on my scrotum/shaft/glans . . . been there many times. Positional changes, light changes, types of eye contact with and without mirrors. What is said and how, the presentation of breasts, back, belly - how the hair is held in the hands (mine or hers), left loose, or tied in pony tails (the position of the pony tail varies depending on whether it is to be used as a handle or a visual prop, we find). What sorts of places, public, indoor, outdoor, natural or man-made give the greatest thrill or allow her as the GoH the greatest freedom of movement when doing her thing. What kinds of music. If in water, should the water be running as in a shower, still like in a bath, cold like a stream, deeper and underwater like in a pool, heated like a hot tub, indoors or out, what is a good immersion depth for me, for her . . . Should I be filming the act, the orgasm, experiencing the orgasm with various types of either her or my own hand contact or her licking tongue. If suction is applied during the orgasm how much and with what varied types of sucking action before, during and after orgasm? How long to continue to lick or to suck, to wipe my still stiff cock across her lips and cheeks, or stroke with her hands? While telling me about how she had enjoyed my orgasm she goes through a checklist to determine what could be done to improve it or change it up. And most important - give her a number

Was it an 8, a 9, maybe only a 5 or a 6 - once a 10 (but I always say 10's mean you die, so they don't happen often).

Charlatan, I can say without fear of contradiction that my Lady does not just blow smoke, and the Scientific Method is often brought into play in the Manor.

Please understand, Crompsin, the critique was not meant to be insulting. It was more of a complaint that there was no real science in what was supposed to be a scientific study. That being said, I fully support anyone who is willing to both do research and share the results here. Afterall, we are interested in the growth of the community and the individuals within the community are what make that happen. And knowledge gained will lead to that growth.

If willing, please post pictures - my Lady is out of town and I'm horny after running a speed-tape of knowledge gained in the Manor through my mind in order to write this post

The sex geek in me is quivering at the thought of all that knowledge to be gained and topics to be explored.

piismyname · 04-27-2009, 04:10 PM

Wow. My first inclination is to answer 'topless is obviously better', but after reading Kramus' recounting of rigorous experiments, I no longer have any confidence in how accurate my statement was. I am in awe of his Lady, and wondering if she offers lessons to other women?

ratbastid · 04-27-2009, 04:11 PM

Naturally Kramus hasn't pointed out how massively flawed her methods are, since she only has a sample population of one....

Plan9 · 04-27-2009, 04:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ratbastid

Naturally Kramus hasn't pointed out how massively flawed her methods are, since she only has a sample population of one....

Send in the stunt cocks!

The_Jazz · 04-27-2009, 04:45 PM

Leave it to Crompsin to do a scientific study with no actual science. Or study. Buddy, I'm amazed that we aren't learning that this study is "conducted" with no one else in the room, simply using your own legendary flexibility.

Crompsin: self-abuse pioneer. Coming soon to Tilted Exhibition - Crompsin's Roll Back Foto's!

Did I cover the gamut there? Let's see, witty quip, pearl of wisdom, mockery of your butchery of your mother tongue. Yep. Got it all.

Plan9 · 04-27-2009, 05:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The_Jazz

Leave it to Crompsin to do a scientific study with no actual science. Or study. Buddy, I'm amazed that we aren't learning that this study is "conducted" with no one else in the room, simply using your own legendary flexibility.

Crompsin: self-abuse pioneer. Coming soon to Tilted Exhibition - Crompsin's Roll Back Foto's!

Did I cover the gamut there? Let's see, witty quip, pearl of wisdom, mockery of your butchery of your mother tongue. Yep. Got it all.

...but I can't see Tilted Exhibition. You took my porn / poultry privileges months ago.

Gawd, sorry I ruined your bathroom break copy of Hustler.

...

The gamut was covered. Yes, I am satisfied. Was it good for you? "Duh." Oh, you're such a kidder.

...

Truth be told: I tested my half-ass hypothesis yet again this weekend and additional factors came into play: man standing while topless woman is sitting on the floor proves to be utterly satisfying in a pulling-up-carpet-with-my-toes / pert nipples grazing my thighs kinda way and issues related to room temperature and body position became a new concern. As previously mentioned: general feeling is that topless is always better and that breasts, the source of life and amusement for many men, should be involved in every blowjob. So far the thread consensus follows my finding. Further "research" will be necessary to prove boobs = doubleplusgood satisfaction causation. I'm willing to continue this laborious endeavor in the name of science, waking up sleeping roommates, and prostate health. It's a tough job, but somebody has to clench their teeth as their soul is vacuumed out of their inflamed crotchbat.

And that somebody is Crompsin.

...

Fuck, it's hot outside and it isn't even summer yet. Can it be too hot for oral sex? Mmm, another thread brewing.

COMING SOON FROM UNIVERSITY OF CROMPSIN: Female-on-top positions and proper box fan placement.

mixedmedia · 04-27-2009, 05:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ratbastid

Not to stray into the slightly more serious topic this thread prompts, but the power dynamics of oral sex are very interesting. While it may seem that the receiver is subjugating the performer, I assert that ALL the power in the whole thing is in the er... hands of the blower, not the blowee. For me, part of what I love is surrendering and letting her have her way with me.

You know. With her boobs out.

While it is true that submission is, in a way, top down dominance (and vice versa). All it takes is the assumption of the roles to make them true. True enough, at least.

kramus · 04-27-2009, 06:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ratbastid

Naturally Kramus hasn't pointed out how massively flawed her methods are, since she only has a sample population of one....

There is knowledge for knowledge’s sake. Collecting and collating, gathering and garnering. The worker bees of pure science would indeed feel that a sample population of one is no population at all. After all, if you have only one data point you have no reference point. In another forum my signature line reads "Absent a mechanism for connecting symbol structures to experienced reality, thinking is nothing more than empty symbol crunching." Charles S. Peirce It is quite possible that a single data point when considered separate from the reality of application outside of my particular pair-bond is nothing more than another empty symbol set.

However, there is a key consideration regarding the sample population my Lady is working with that is very relevant to Ratbastid's post. My Lady is not creating data for the benefit of the larger world. There is no intent to add to anything outside of our own relationship. Understand this, she is applying herself to one goal and one goal only. That goal is my own personal pleasure and my complete satisfaction with her and what she does with/to me. My orgasm is her orgasm. My having an ever-upward climb in my sexual satisfaction within our pair-bond makes her happy, fulfilled and satisfied. That sample size of one is the end-goal of her study, her application, her rigour. That in turn means that you need to invert that statement, Ratbastid. My Lady's methods are not massively flawed. Indeed, they are quite the opposite. They are perfectly applied and yielding results which are (trust me in this) very positive.

/threadjack

Now, if Charlatan had not asked if my Lady was just blowing smoke I would have only made my original post regarding some concerns that I had heard about Crompsin's "science". Being the recipient of a dedicated scientist's study in the arts of eros makes it worthwhile to at least let people out there know that true science, when brought into play in this particular manner, is totally awesome

I have responded to Charlatan and let him know that if there are smoke and mirrors being brought into play in the Manor, it is because they are being used as pleasure props.

Any further study, any larger sample size, any other application of what can be learned regarding GoH and increase of pleasure in the RoH is not the concern of this couple. We are doing our own part, using the scientific method to make beautiful love even more so, and we are very happy doing it. If other couples (such as the self-proclaimed sex-geek Shaindra) take what we have been doing and explore/expand on it themselves that is great. It is however, not a goal to go outside our own pair-bond and accumulate data sets involving cocks other than mine

/end threadjack

ratbastid · 04-27-2009, 06:37 PM

Well rebutted, my friend.

CinnamonGirl · 04-27-2009, 06:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Shaindra

*wanders off to ponder how I can get reliable good sex without actually having to date to do it*

If you find out, let me know, please.

For the record, I like to leave my bra on. Just a personal preference.

FlatLand Flyer · 04-27-2009, 08:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CinnamonGirl

\

For the record, I like to leave my bra on. Just a personal preference.

BOO!!

Topless=More gooder no matter the situation.

BlueStar · 04-30-2009, 02:43 AM

Topless most of the time, definitely. But some of the most memorable I've gotten were fully clothed. It comes across as slightly illicit, which is cool. I'm thinking of one time I spent a night with my partner, and in the morning we got dressed and I was getting ready to leave for work, when she sat me down, unzipped me and gave me a bj (making me late for work, but that was ok). She actually wanted to give me a second one the same way and make me even later. I should have taken her up on it

.

curiousbear · 05-04-2009, 10:29 PM

snowy/Shanindra/Lindy, I wish my girl reads this thread

Quote:

Originally Posted by snowy

I asked my SO what he thought. He replied, "Isn't it obvious?"

Apparently a topless girl is always better than a clothed one.

I'll have to remember that for next time, though honestly, I prefer to do it topless, because I like to bring my breasts into play.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Shaindra

My preference is him prone, and me naked, so I can start off the action by sort of caressing his cock with my stomach, breasts, and face while maintaining eye contact the entire time. No hands, no tongue yet...all body movements. Then I begin with my "signature move" of the firm, flat tongue pressing the cock flat against his belly while licking slowly from balls to tip, again, maintaining eye contact.

This all works much better without a shirt on.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lindy

This lady will definitely vote for topless. I love giving head. I don't know if I find it more enjoyable sans shirt, but my partners always seem to like it when I can involve my big 34D girls and maybe a little bit of lube.

I always like to give quite a bit of hand as well as mouth action, and being shirtless allows for some titty fucking at the same time.

Lindy

Quote:

Originally Posted by snowy

Personally, I like giving head while a guy is distracted by something else--it's like a challenge!

From the receiving end, a delayed climax is intense!

I prefer topless due to visual stimulation, touch/feel. Forget about BJ, even a self handjob works great with a pair of boobs to see

---------- Post added at 10:29 PM ---------- Previous post was at 10:26 PM ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by ItWasMe

I think it's absolutely hilarious that a guy would feel any feeling of dominance over a person who has her sharp teeth wrapped around his private parts.

Thanks for the laugh!

Quote:

Originally Posted by genuinegirly

This girly's nipples are extra sensitive. I'd rather do it with a bra or shirt and keep control over the situation. Otherwise I end up pleasured before he does, and that - while fun - ruins the sense of dominance.

ItWasMe, I never felt sense of dominance receiving BJ. I am mostly laid on my back... But see genuinegirly's post.

Plan9 · 05-05-2009, 06:44 AM

I'll have you all know that my "science" is good for prostate health.

I'm here for you.

dksuddeth · 05-09-2009, 08:04 PM

hmmmm, lets see.....blowjob from topless woman or blowjob from woman wearing top.....

I got to say that I think the only reason a topless one would be better is if the blowjob part isn't that great to begin with. seriously....if the oral part is great, who cares about the rest?

---------- Post added at 11:04 PM ---------- Previous post was at 10:59 PM ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by settie

I prefer giving blowjobs topless.

My fave blowjobs have always started by pinning my man against a wall or door, and slowly pulling my clothes off as I tease him. My method is similar to lindy from there on, pressing myself against him, and finally touching his cock with my tongue.

And I was doing serious consideration of scientific research to prove my side of the argument.......until YOU came along and ruined every bit of concentration I had. Thanks. I think I'm going to my bunk now.

settie · 05-09-2009, 10:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dksuddeth

And I was doing serious consideration of scientific research to prove my side of the argument.......until YOU came along and ruined every bit of concentration I had. Thanks. I think I'm going to my bunk now.

Clearly both topless and clothed methods must still be studied extensively. Sorry I can't be of further help

Plan9 · 05-09-2009, 10:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by settie

Sorry I can't be of further help

Actually...

Quote:

Originally Posted by dksuddeth

I got to say that I think the only reason a topless one would be better is if the blowjob part isn't that great to begin with. seriously....if the oral part is great, who cares about the rest?

Uh, did you fail Male School math, DK? Blowjob + heaving breasts = Doubleplusgood. Get with the program, chachi!

Shaindra · 05-10-2009, 08:29 AM

Damnitall. Please stop bumping this thread while I am sans partner to test out these theories further.

Thank you.

vinceco252 · 05-10-2009, 09:25 AM

^Sorry.

jewels · 06-06-2009, 05:34 AM

Of course it's better topless. If I were still clothed, I wouldn't be that into it.

Once a lady's topless, it becomes a much more sensual experience. More sensual = more aroused = enhanced experience for all.

Plan9 · 06-09-2009, 09:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Shaindra

Damnitall. Please stop bumping this thread while I am sans partner to test out these theories further.

Thank you.

Quit whining! Women complaining about not being able to give oral sex is like a fat guy complaining that he can't get out to the store to buy more Twinkies!

You gotta put a little effort in to get that cream filling. It can't be that hard. You're holding the commodity between your chin and nose.

...

Or... just get on Craig's List and it'll come right to you.

Shaindra · 06-11-2009, 04:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Crompsin

Quit whining! Women complaining about not being able to give oral sex is like a fat guy complaining that he can't get out to the store to buy more Twinkies!

You gotta put a little effort in to get that cream filling. It can't be that hard. You're holding the commodity between your chin and nose.

...

Or... just get on Craig's List and it'll come right to you.

Yeah, but it can't be just any ole weiner. And it has to come with some hope of decent reciprocation.

And CL? Gah! I'll buy a used lawnmower on there, but a second-hand cock? No thanks.

TomSmith65 · 06-15-2009, 11:44 PM

I have to agree ... even topless ax murdering is better than fully clothed. I mean, If you have to be ax murdered anyway, seeing a pair of boobies as the blade does its nasty work is the way to go.

Am I wrong?

Plan9 · 06-15-2009, 11:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TomSmith65

I have to agree ... even topless ax murdering is better than fully clothed. I mean, If you have to be ax murdered anyway, seeing a pair of boobies as the blade does its nasty work is the way to go.

Am I wrong?

If you liked this, SEE: Friday the 13th (horror film series), Nightmare on Elmstreet (Horror film series), Halloween (horror film series)

...

Quote:

Originally Posted by Shaindra

weiner.

Hahaha... my god, people actually use that.

04-24-2009, 04:48 AM	#45 (permalink)
Poppinjay You had me at hello Location: DC/Coastal VA	Approves the change in direction of this thread __________________ I think the Apocalypse is happening all around us. We go on eating desserts and watching TV. I know I do. I wish we were more capable of sustained passion and sustained resistance. We should be screaming and what we do is gossip. -Lydia Millet

04-24-2009, 08:22 AM	#46 (permalink)
kramus loving the curves Location: my Lady's manor	FWIW Crompsin, my Lady brought this thread up in conversation last night. She was surprised that there had been no comments on the validity of your purported study, and was offended and appalled at the weakness and lack of rigour in what reads as a scientific endeavor. I replied that it was an all-in-fun bit of fluff thread which may or may not bring up some interesting points, but was not a serious take on the scientific method. She replied that it is all good to have fun, but if you are going to structure your thread around science, you ought to make some effort/gesture to accomodate science. Where are your controls, she asks. Where is the data on clothed GoH vs topless/nude GoH vis-a-vis total satisfaction? What measures/values/quantifiable results demonstrate any credibility, dependability, or confirmability? What are the benchmarks, the repeatable phenomenon, the goals that allow repeatability of results and reliable forecasting of outcome? She ended her riff by suggesting that you will never get head from a scientist if this is the sloppy methodology you demonstrate - that there must be some accountability here. I never thought that there would be a reason for you to revisit the structure of your study until my Lady opened my eyes. The very real possibility exists that there are men out there who could be deprived of Scientific Method based improvement in the head they may get. Simply because these men are not willing to give science it's due Now, I tell you from first hand experience that when a thoroughbred decides to go for improvement, repeatable results and refinement of various techniques which are all dedicated to outcome, there is no substitute for guided experience coupled with applied sensual intelligence. My .02 cents. __________________ And now to disengage the clutch of the forebrain ... I'm going with this - if you like artwork visit http://markfineart.ca

04-24-2009, 07:19 PM	#47 (permalink)
JumpinJesus Junkie Location: Chicago	Communication is key. If that doesn't work, run away as fast as you can. __________________ "I can normally tell how intelligent a man is by how stupid he thinks I am" - Cormac McCarthy, All The Pretty Horses

04-24-2009, 07:30 PM	#48 (permalink)
Charlatan Getting it. Super Moderator Location: Lion City	So Kramus... did your lovely lady offer to assist you in furthering the science of this or was she just blowing smoke (so to speak). What kind of scientist isn't willing to test a theory to see of it's valid? __________________ "My hands are on fire. Hands are on fire. Ain't got no more time for all you charlatans and liars." - Old Man Luedecke

04-25-2009, 12:05 AM	#50 (permalink)
ItWasMe But You'll Never Prove It. Location: under your bed	I like getting my hair brushed while I'm doing it. As for being topless, I think we're both pretty much always naked when messing around. There is something great about bare skin on bare skin, no matter which body parts are involved. __________________ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . "Ok, no more truth-or-dare until somebody returns my underwear" ~ George Lopez I bake cookies just so I can lick the bowl. ~ ItWasMe

04-25-2009, 08:34 AM	#53 (permalink)
Shaindra Psycho Location: Massachusetts	Yeah, this thread just made me hot...again. wanders off to ponder how I can get reliable good sex without actually having to date to do it __________________ "Never regret something that once made you smile."

04-27-2009, 04:10 PM	#56 (permalink)
piismyname Upright Location: massachusetts	Wow. My first inclination is to answer 'topless is obviously better', but after reading Kramus' recounting of rigorous experiments, I no longer have any confidence in how accurate my statement was. I am in awe of his Lady, and wondering if she offers lessons to other women?

04-27-2009, 04:11 PM	#57 (permalink)
ratbastid Darth Papa Location: Yonder	Naturally Kramus hasn't pointed out how massively flawed her methods are, since she only has a sample population of one....

04-27-2009, 04:45 PM	#59 (permalink)
The_Jazz Asshole Administrator Location: Chicago	Leave it to Crompsin to do a scientific study with no actual science. Or study. Buddy, I'm amazed that we aren't learning that this study is "conducted" with no one else in the room, simply using your own legendary flexibility. Crompsin: self-abuse pioneer. Coming soon to Tilted Exhibition - Crompsin's Roll Back Foto's! Did I cover the gamut there? Let's see, witty quip, pearl of wisdom, mockery of your butchery of your mother tongue. Yep. Got it all. __________________ "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." - B. Franklin "There ought to be limits to freedom." - George W. Bush "We have met the enemy and he is us." - Pogo

04-27-2009, 06:37 PM	#63 (permalink)
ratbastid Darth Papa Location: Yonder	Well rebutted, my friend.

04-30-2009, 02:43 AM	#66 (permalink)
BlueStar Upright	Topless most of the time, definitely. But some of the most memorable I've gotten were fully clothed. It comes across as slightly illicit, which is cool. I'm thinking of one time I spent a night with my partner, and in the morning we got dressed and I was getting ready to leave for work, when she sat me down, unzipped me and gave me a bj (making me late for work, but that was ok). She actually wanted to give me a second one the same way and make me even later. I should have taken her up on it .

05-05-2009, 06:44 AM	#68 (permalink)
Plan9 I Confess a Shiver	I'll have you all know that my "science" is good for prostate health. I'm here for you. __________________ *Whatever you can carry.* "You should not drink... and bake."

05-10-2009, 08:29 AM	#72 (permalink)
Shaindra Psycho Location: Massachusetts	Damnitall. Please stop bumping this thread while I am sans partner to test out these theories further. Thank you. __________________ "Never regret something that once made you smile."

05-10-2009, 09:25 AM	#73 (permalink)
vinceco252 Upright Location: Keller, TX	^Sorry.

06-06-2009, 05:34 AM	#74 (permalink)
jewels Eponymous Location: Central Central Florida	Of course it's better topless. If I were still clothed, I wouldn't be that into it. Once a lady's topless, it becomes a much more sensual experience. More sensual = more aroused = enhanced experience for all. __________________ We are always more anxious to be distinguished for a talent which we do not possess, than to be praised for the fifteen which we do possess. Mark Twain

06-15-2009, 11:44 PM	#77 (permalink)
TomSmith65 Upright Location: Youngstown, Ohio	I have to agree ... even topless ax murdering is better than fully clothed. I mean, If you have to be ax murdered anyway, seeing a pair of boobies as the blade does its nasty work is the way to go. Am I wrong?