Erotic Harp? umm NSFW!
 

Hey Guys,

Does anyone have or has anyone seen a bdsm picture of a woman as a human harp? She is laying with her head on a mans lap. There is a harp frame above her with strings attached to needles piercing her front.

I accidentally deleted a copy and can't seem to find it again.

If someone could post me a link to it I would be eternally greatfull.

DivasToy

Do you mean this? http://www.geocities.com/theartistmreyes/harp.jpg Found this in google search.

*blinks*

so...

*blinks*

I think my brain just broke

This thread title needs three or four NSFW's....

ouch.

i wonder how hard it is to tune.


/music nerd

I'm wondering how the hooks aren't ripped out of her skin. I'm guessing it's not actually tensioned.

I'm more of a Classic Rock/80's Pop mix kind of guy myself. My Lady prefers Rachmaninoff and Mozart.
Tastes in music differ.

I'm curious as to how this relates to the rest of the thread. Is this some obscure joke I'm not getting?

Apparently skin stretches a lot further than you'd expect.

I did a Google image search on Hellraiser for a project I was working on, and I ended up finding TONS of images of people hanging by hooks that were piercing their skin because they thought it was fun or spiritual, or whatever.

*shudders* To each their own, and all that, but damn--where do you draw the line?

/not a Thread Jack (I hope)

In another thread LittleTippler referred to an "Art Piece" which stepped through a door most of us wouldn't know existed. This BDSM/Piercing Eroto-Harp steps through yet another door which is completely away from where the majority of the posters in the thread (so far) tend to dwell. I have concurred with the majority by stating my preferences (in this case musically, which has been a chosen mode of consideration by thread posters) differ from my Lady (who tends to be rather close to me), and differ from the participants in the original photo shoot that we have witnessed here (who seem to be far from my personal path).
Now what has that got to do with the rest of the thread? Threads have ways of sharing expressions by various posters about an item. If you look at the posts here in order, you will see there is a wide variety of responses, some of which have music references, and some of which seem to feel that the photo represents something that is not in the poster's usual realm of experience.
My post (I believe) follows the others rather readily.
As for being obscure, or a joke - it happens. In this case not intentionally (being obscure) but that also happens.

/end of Not a Thread Jack (I hope)

Well, yes, but this is a whole other level. A properly tensioned guitar exerts about 100-150 lbs of force on the neck (which would be equivalent to someone hanging by six hooks I suppose). I know a piano exerts several tons of force on the frame. I would imagine a harp falls somewhere in the middle of those two, and would seem like it would be a bit much. But then what do I know? Maybe it is possible.

Yes, this makes more sense. It's just a bit more... lateral then I was expecting.

Omgwtf. :eek:

I get itchy just looking at it...

She's not really up for anything in the Mozart or Bach range, but I could see some Philip Glass being done.

Nothing attached to her nipples, what kind of sham-erotic harp is this!?

lol, this is just for show. People in certain segments of the bdsm scene do things much more intense and intensely invasive.

Thanks for the pic. You guys are fast!! :)

Actually, W/we are planning this in the near future and needed a reference.

btw...the needles slide out the way the go in...

DivasToy

Wow... looks like... ummmm..... fun?


*goes and hides in a corner*

I remember a few years ago, when I was more "net-naive", stumbling across a link to "flesh-hook suspension" and wondering what that was. Wow, were my eyes opened that day!.....end threadjack.

The image is beautiful and horrific all at once.

I don't see a good reason to do this...but each to his own.

my eyes ache... I'm really not sure what I think about this. I sure do <3 the TFP.

Why?

Well, there are many reasons...besides the fact that it's beautiful to see.

Imagine that you allow your lover to clasp your wrists in one hand , his leg is over both of yours and hooked in behind your ankle with his weight pressed across you at a slight angle.

Giving in to him at this moment and letting him take you and do as he pleases is a highly erotic feeling for many women and men alike. One that many people can understand.

This is a concentrated dose of that feeling.

Now, add in the rush of endorphins and you can enter a space where you are completely there in that moment, feeling the needles sliding into your skin, giving yourself completely to your lover to do with as they wish.

She turns me into a work of art and Her gentle loving touch is an exciting contrast to the aching pull of the needle.

Plus

W/we can say W/we did it.

My searching couldn't find "W/we"; punctuation screws up Google. What does this term mean?

I think it's a dom/sub thing.

Um, where the hell are the rest of her legs? They seem to stop at her knees. Is it possible it's not a real woman but a very real looking latex creation?

Um, never mind, they're bent underneath her. Carry on.

The W/we is a D/s term. Because what i was talking about was fairly intimate to me i decided it deserved the proper respect.

i won't be doing it all the time.

Unless i'm told to.

heh

Well, yes, I'd guessed as much. But, I still don't understand how "W/we" differs from "we". Could you spell it out for this interested idiot?

The capital W in W/we represents the Dominant aspect of U/us while the small w represents the submissive aspect.

W/we shows that W/we have a D/s relationship.

Hahaha +1

I hope this isn't disrespectful, but I feel the need to point out that even though I understand the significance it still reads to me as though you have a stutter.

If you do decide to go through with, heed this important safety tip: don't try to tune the harp.

Hey!

Are you making fun of my stutter?

I'm a little nervous. I mean... i hope i'll sound ok...