Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community  

Go Back   Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community > The Academy > Tilted Politics


 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 10-27-2005, 12:12 PM   #1 (permalink)
Comedian
 
BigBen's Avatar
 
Location: Use the search button
Confirmation Hearings? Help a guy out here.

Can someone explain the whole US confirmation hearing thing? I don't get it.

The president nominates someone, and then they get interviewed on television and asked questions that are unanswerable or irrelevant...

Does everybody have to agree to hire the person?
Is it a given, and just a gauntlet the candidate has to run through?

Is this like our appointed Senate in Canada, where the PM just picks people, and they serve for life? Is that what confirmation hearings are for? If so, I understand that. Maybe we need them up here, too.

If I am waaaaay off the mark, please advise.
__________________
3.141592654
Hey, if you are impressed with my memorizing pi to 10 digits, you should see the size of my penis.
BigBen is offline  
Old 10-27-2005, 12:31 PM   #2 (permalink)
Gentlemen Farmer
 
j8ear's Avatar
 
Location: Middle of nowhere, Jersey
The US Senate must 'approve' many of the people the President nominates.

Essentially by a simple majority vote.

This happens after the relevant Senate Committe convenes (if necc) a hearing and then if approved (also by majority vote, and the party in power always has a majority in every committe), forwards the nomination to the full Senate for a confirmation vote.

The Senate also has some rules designed to prevent the majority party from rail roading through legislation and or other Senate Business, by requiring a super majority before a full Senate Vote can be taken. This is the cloture and or philibuster that you often hear about these days.

Hope this helps.

-bear
__________________
It's alot easier to ask for forgiveness then it is to ask for permission.
j8ear is offline  
Old 10-27-2005, 12:43 PM   #3 (permalink)
Cracking the Whip
 
Lebell's Avatar
 
Location: Sexymama's arms...
In more formal terms, this is the system of "checks and balances" that the three branches of the US government have on each other to help prevent any one branch from becoming too powerful.
__________________
"Of all tyrannies, a tyranny exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It may be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some point be satiated; but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end, for they do so with the approval of their own conscience." – C. S. Lewis

The ONLY sponsors we have are YOU!

Please Donate!
Lebell is offline  
Old 10-27-2005, 01:09 PM   #4 (permalink)
Deja Moo
 
Elphaba's Avatar
 
Location: Olympic Peninsula, WA
Carrying on with Lebell's post, the constitution gives the president the right of nomination and the senate is given the right of consent. The check and balance, if you will.

The hearing committee vets the nominee, and a simple majority in approval sends the nominee before the senate for confirmation. This is by no means a slam dunk. As we saw today, Harriet Miers had such wide opposition that she chose to withdraw and didn't even make it to committee hearings. John Roberts, on the other hand, was immenently qualified and sailed through the committee and senate confirmation.

On the third hand , was the Clarence Thomas nomination. He was not qualified for the position according to the ABA, and had some nasty sexual harrassment charges brought against him at the time. Pro wrestling would be considered tame in comparison. None-the-less, he now sits on the court.

Where's the confusion, Ben?
Elphaba is offline  
Old 10-27-2005, 01:12 PM   #5 (permalink)
buck fush
 
maestroxl's Avatar
 
Location: Tucson, AZ
The Constitutional Convention was concerned with the President having too much authority (remember they were still smarting from King George III), so they decided that nominations to certain offices should be subject to the "advice and consent" of the Senate, to ensure adequate oversight.
__________________
be the change you want
maestroxl is offline  
Old 10-27-2005, 04:30 PM   #6 (permalink)
Addict
 
politicophile's Avatar
 
During the convention, it was decided that it would be easier to hold to President accountable for choosing bad nominees than it would be to actually put the blame on certain Senators. In order to prevent the buck from being passed to the next guy, the framers gave the power of nomination to the unitary executive.

But, there was a concern that the President might pick people who were personal friends or who were not the best qualified to serve on the Court. To derail these nominations, the framers made it necessary to receive consent from the Senate for a nominee to be confirmed.

As we saw with Harriet Miers, the system works very well.
__________________
The peculiar evil of silencing the expression of an opinion is, that it is robbing the human race; posterity as well as the existing generation; those who dissent from the opinion, still more than those who hold it. If the opinion is right, they are deprived of the opportunity of exchanging error for truth: if wrong, they lose, what is almost as great a benefit, the clearer perception and livelier impression of truth, produced by its collision with error. ~John Stuart Mill, On Liberty
politicophile is offline  
Old 10-27-2005, 07:29 PM   #7 (permalink)
Deja Moo
 
Elphaba's Avatar
 
Location: Olympic Peninsula, WA
I wish it had worked as well with Clarence Thomas. He was a "quota" replacement of a well respected progressive black judge. Nominating an unqualified conservative black lawyer demeans the nomination process to the supreme court. Nominating Miers to replace O'Connor was another "quota" choice, and certainly not the best to be found as Bush claims.

There must be many other more qualified individuals for the Supreme Court than those two. Political "quota" choices should be an affront to all of us.
Elphaba is offline  
Old 10-28-2005, 06:52 AM   #8 (permalink)
Comedian
 
BigBen's Avatar
 
Location: Use the search button
thanks guys. I think I get it now.

I just see people sitting with microphones, and a panel of really ugly people asking questions, and then the person being interviewed talks a looooong time about nothing.

I understand the whole "Checks and Balances" thing. That clears it up.
__________________
3.141592654
Hey, if you are impressed with my memorizing pi to 10 digits, you should see the size of my penis.
BigBen is offline  
 

Tags
confirmation, guy, hearings


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:59 AM.

Tilted Forum Project

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
© 2002-2012 Tilted Forum Project

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360