Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community  

Go Back   Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community > The Academy > Tilted Politics


View Poll Results: Should towns pay retailers to set up in their town?
Yes, it builds the local economy and tax base 3 17.65%
Yes, these 'payments' are just tax breaks (which are good) 2 11.76%
No, breaks for big guys are unfair to small businesses and residential tax payers 6 35.29%
No, this is corporate welfare and will hurt the local economy in the end 8 47.06%
Not sure 3 17.65%
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 17. You may not vote on this poll

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 09-23-2005, 07:01 AM   #1 (permalink)
Insane
 
joshbaumgartner's Avatar
 
IKEA to be paid $5m to set up shop

Round Rock, TX, a suburb of Austin, has decided to pay IKEA $5 million to move in. This struck me as worthy of question. This isn't a re-hash of the old debate about a Ford plant or a new sports team moving into town. What got me about this one was that it was a retailer, with unique economics associated. But the town officials were saying the standard old lines about bringing in new money and jobs to the city, and particularly hilighting the increase in property value added to the city's rolls.

While I find a lot of valid arguments in why a community should vie for a manufacturing entity, and while sports teams have their own unique arguments for and against offering incentives to them, I don't know that it makes sense with a retailer. My logic is that for example, a Ford plant will build cars that are sold globally, bringing that economic stream through the city, but a retailer doesn't really bring in money to the town from outside like that, but instead almost the opposite. Retailers offer goods and services to the town and take revenue from it. Local ones keep that revenue there, but larger ones distribute a good amount of it from the city to outside.

Does it make sense to pay a big retailer to set up shop in your town?
joshbaumgartner is offline  
Old 09-23-2005, 07:09 AM   #2 (permalink)
Getting it.
 
Charlatan's Avatar
 
Super Moderator
Location: Lion City
I don't know if it makes sense to pay to have a retailer set up shop but there are things to consider:

1) Ikea will provide jobs
2) Those jobs will pay into the tax base
3) I bet there is a study that corelates the precense of an Ikea (or similar box stores) to an increase in housing starts and/or renovations. Property tax increasing.
4) I'm not certain Ikea qualifies but there is a direct relationship between quaint shopping districts and the increase in property values or gentrification


Again, I don't know if these things apply in this instance but there is a good chance that some if not all of these points play a factor in the decision making process.
__________________
"My hands are on fire. Hands are on fire. Ain't got no more time for all you charlatans and liars."
- Old Man Luedecke
Charlatan is offline  
Old 09-23-2005, 08:22 AM   #3 (permalink)
“Wrong is right.”
 
aberkok's Avatar
 
Location: toronto
To me it just seems like helping the big guys get bigger, while the smaller businesses that make life more diverse and interesting get swallowed up or swept away. I realize there are benefits like jobs, but if things continue this way everyone'll be working for Ikea!! It also increases consumption and way more people are buying crap they don't need.

That is my gut emotional response....bring on the economists (like my dad)...
__________________
!check out my new blog! http://arkanamusic.wordpress.com

Warden Gentiles: "It? Perfectly innocent. But I can see how, if our roles were reversed, I might have you beaten with a pillowcase full of batteries."
aberkok is offline  
Old 09-23-2005, 08:46 AM   #4 (permalink)
Devoted
 
Redlemon's Avatar
 
Donor
Location: New England
Here's a link to an audio/text report: NPR : 'Jobs Scam' Costs Taxpayers, Author Says. I heard it, it is pretty persuasive. From the text on the site:
Quote:
Efforts by states and cities to "create" jobs cost taxpayers $50 billion a year, author Greg LeRoy says. And given the nature of corporate America, there's no guarantee those jobs will stick around... or even materialize in the first place.
__________________
I can't read your signature. Sorry.
Redlemon is offline  
Old 09-23-2005, 10:12 AM   #5 (permalink)
Junkie
 
Seaver's Avatar
 
Location: Fort Worth, TX
I live in Austin. This is going to be within a rock throw's of Dell. Not just a factory, but THE factory.

Dell has been HUGE for Austin. We are now considered the biggest technological boom in the country (not up to Silicone Valley, but growing at a faster rate). Because of them, Texas Instruments (calculator manufacturer) has also moved in, and we're becoming a hub for technology research in the South.

To understand our area you must understand that. Round Rock is one of the biggest booming cities (was barely a town 10 years ago) in Texas, they see this as an added boost.

I support their attempt at growing their city, however for those of us who are local it's a big pain in the ass. Because Austin is VERY liberal in a conservative state, they have steamrolled any/all attempts to seriously combat the congestion of the city. From making a loop around the city, to even creating a toll road. The problem is Austin and Round Rock sit on I-35, which runs from Canada all the way down to Mexico, so we have a LOT of traffic through the cities ontop of simple city traffic. THIS is what concerns people around here, everyone knows it'll bring in more money than it will cost if you simply count increased tax revinues, but it'll require a huge construction boom on a stretch of highway already streched to its limit with a hard fight to do anything about it.
Seaver is offline  
Old 09-23-2005, 11:35 AM   #6 (permalink)
Insane
 
joshbaumgartner's Avatar
 
Seaver, I live in Pflugerville myself...that's how I caught the story.
joshbaumgartner is offline  
Old 09-23-2005, 01:36 PM   #7 (permalink)
Baltimoron
 
djtestudo's Avatar
 
Location: Beeeeeautiful Bel Air, MD
A couple years ago Prince George's County in MD did some infastructure work in order to have an Ikea built in College Park, including rerouting traffic and giving it direct access from the ramps to and from the Capital Beltway.

I think part of it is Ikea is BIG business; it's almost its own attraction.
__________________
"Final thought: I just rented Michael Moore's Bowling for Columbine. Frankly, it was the worst sports movie I've ever seen."
--Peter Schmuck, The (Baltimore) Sun
djtestudo is offline  
Old 09-23-2005, 02:47 PM   #8 (permalink)
<3 TFP
 
xepherys's Avatar
 
Location: 17TLH2445607250
I believe it's reasonable. First of all, IKEA is not an American Corporation. Remember this before going on the rich get richer tirade. It's an imported chain that does well in this country. On that note it provides jobs, and draws people in from nearby. I know of people personally that will drive 30 miles one way to go to the closest IKEA. I'd imagine some folks probably drive even further.

Also, big businesses bring other big businesses. Best Buy and Circuit City and JC Penney's and several restaurant chains all use the same marketing groups that study areas that are ripe to provide them with business. It's more purposeful than one might think that those types of stores are generally bundled together despite being competitors. If an IKEA goes in, then maybe a Lowe's follows. With a Lowe's and an IKEA, maybe some chain restaurants land nearby. Well, with this type of shopping, a strip mall or two opens up and maybe a small commercial district for local offices. This brings in more money and more people. These people need entertainment, so a new movie theatre and additional restaurants pop up bringing more money into the local economy and more jobs. Now all this turns into a mall area, and perhaps a legitimate mall forms with department stores. Ad Nauseum...

So... how is this BAD for a town?
xepherys is offline  
Old 09-23-2005, 07:28 PM   #9 (permalink)
All important elusive independent swing voter...
 
jorgelito's Avatar
 
Location: People's Republic of KKKalifornia
Hmmm...my only complaint is why the $5 milliion payout? Does the city recoup the money ( not just from sales taxes)? I actually, really don't know as I'm no good at running numbers. but if someone ran the numbers and it was win-win then hey why not?

But then again, there are no guarantees right?

Anyways, I don't think the govt. should be involved in business, especially retail.
jorgelito is offline  
Old 09-23-2005, 07:49 PM   #10 (permalink)
“Wrong is right.”
 
aberkok's Avatar
 
Location: toronto
I've seen the soul slowly being sucked out my hometown of Kingston, Ontario because of big box business like Ikea. The strip malls have taken business away from what used to be a vibrant downtown core. What used to be beautiful rolling plains have now been paved over with parking lots and I'm sure the wildlife has suffered.

Peoples' ability to walk has increasingly diminished. These strip malls are generally too far from residental areas to walk so people become increasingly car dependent (since there's nowhere left to walk to). Almost everyone I know in Kingston is shocked when I say I'm walking somewhere, because it seems so far to them. Housing developments spring up around these strip malls and these days it seems like every house is the same, without individual character, like a scene out of Edward Scissorhands.

So no, I don't believe that towns should pay retailers to set up shop.

Sure, Ikea isn't an American business, but that does not exclude them from the "rich get richer" paradigm.
__________________
!check out my new blog! http://arkanamusic.wordpress.com

Warden Gentiles: "It? Perfectly innocent. But I can see how, if our roles were reversed, I might have you beaten with a pillowcase full of batteries."

Last edited by aberkok; 09-23-2005 at 07:50 PM.. Reason: to stay on topic
aberkok is offline  
 

Tags
$5m, ikea, paid, set, shop

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:08 AM.

Tilted Forum Project

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
© 2002-2012 Tilted Forum Project

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360