Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community  

Go Back   Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community > The Academy > Tilted Politics


 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 09-15-2005, 09:34 PM   #1 (permalink)
2+2=5? Not again!
 
MichaelFarker's Avatar
 
Location: Dallas, Texas
Firm Rule More Fair?

How does a government that is firmly in control enjoy a greater opportunity to rule fairly?

I've wondered for over a decade why many consider this to be true, ever since I discussed it in a history class. It feels reasonable but I'm having a hard time formulating support for it.

I'm thinking about it tonight because of a passage I just read:
"The soldiers were there ... to remind the huge crowd ... Axum rules by the spear, when all is said and done. ... The crowd [felt] no resentment ... That rulers will rule, was a given. That being so, best to have a strong rule, and a firm one. That makes possible—possible—a fair rule as well." (Drake, Flint Fortune's Stroke)
MichaelFarker is offline  
Old 09-19-2005, 03:42 AM   #2 (permalink)
Junkie
 
Location: bedford, tx
fairness of rule lies solely on the ruler, not the firmness of said ruler.
__________________
"no amount of force can control a free man, a man whose mind is free. No, not the rack, not fission bombs, not anything. You cannot conquer a free man; the most you can do is kill him."
dksuddeth is offline  
Old 09-19-2005, 02:17 PM   #3 (permalink)
Crazy
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by MichaelFarker
How does a government that is firmly in control enjoy a greater opportunity to rule fairly?

I've wondered for over a decade why many consider this to be true, ever since I discussed it in a history class. It feels reasonable but I'm having a hard time formulating support for it.

I'm thinking about it tonight because of a passage I just read:
"The soldiers were there ... to remind the huge crowd ... Axum rules by the spear, when all is said and done. ... The crowd [felt] no resentment ... That rulers will rule, was a given. That being so, best to have a strong rule, and a firm one. That makes possible—possible—a fair rule as well." (Drake, Flint Fortune's Stroke)
First rule of understanding politics:

There are classes in societies, these classes of people have conflicting interests so all that you read may not be true and may be words of an enemy.
Because they are the words representing a particular class interest.

I've never heard of this quote before or statement.
Let's analyse:
So the soldiers represent and remind the masses of the power of the state.
Ok, in whose interest is the state working?
The masses accept this and can't see an alternative at this time.

This being so, 'best to have a strong rule and this makes possible a fair rule as well. ' This is a nonsense summary.
The person means they want military rule and this makes possible a fair rule.
It also makes possible an unfair rule, a dicatorship, massacres. It makes possible anything against the masses.

I see the statement is basically saying a government that rules by law, backed by the power of the armed forces can implement rule better than one that doesn't have armed support of the state. The idea that this is fair is obviously stupid. Fair for whom? Fair for which class? Fair for all?

I guess they are saying the choice is military authoritarian rule or anarchy.
__________________
Human beings : who could ever claim to like them all?
Mr Honest is offline  
Old 09-19-2005, 05:49 PM   #4 (permalink)
Junkie
 
powerclown's Avatar
 
Location: Detroit, MI
Quote:
Originally Posted by MichaelFarker
How does a government that is firmly in control enjoy a greater opportunity to rule fairly?
Depends upon the style of leadership, I would say.

If a government retains power through force and brutality, the masses are kept down by violence, and typically have few if any civil rights.
If a government retains power through a democratic system of laws, the masses are voluntarily consenting to be ruled through representation of their interests.
powerclown is offline  
Old 09-20-2005, 09:09 PM   #5 (permalink)
2+2=5? Not again!
 
MichaelFarker's Avatar
 
Location: Dallas, Texas
Thank you for your insight.

To clarify, by firm rule I am thinking of both stability and security. This does not usually mean using soldiers against your own people.
If everyone is afraid of attacking your country and there is no threat of civil war, your rule is more firm.
On the other hand, secret warrants and secret trials might be part of a firm rule too.

As for fairness, do the rich and poor have equal standing before the law? Are they taxed in an equitable way? Do equally capable and connected people have equal opportunity? As powerclown suggests, civil rights are a significant part of this.

And powerclown I almost agree that the style of leadership is a key factor. I would rather say the legitimacy of the leadership, which seems similar to what you are saying. I do not know if the form of government is important, whether it is a democracy or established monarchy for example.

dksuddeth, I agree that the fairness of the rule depends on the character of the ruler. I feel that some circumstances must by nature limit the options of a ruler though. In the US circumstances and public opinion may have more effect than character since decisions are made by compromise. If we could somehow find enough people of unshakable character to fill all the roles of our government they still might be swayed by the wishes of those who elected them.
MichaelFarker is offline  
Old 09-21-2005, 06:31 AM   #6 (permalink)
Crazy
 
Location: South Florida
I believe the onyl way to rule fairly is to be consistant. if you are consistant 100% of the time you have your standards and you stick to them nobody can ever accuse you of being unfair. Will this ever happen? Unlikely but one can hope so. Considering we change leadership and direction at least every 8 Years sometime sooner. Yes we have a constitution but it is up for interpretation. Thus the the supreme court. I theory Communism is a whole form is the only truly far way to build a country and rule it. however as Cuba and Russia have proven that its can never be used because there is one glithc in the problem. HUMANS. We are inherintly greedy and want more. thus you end up with the 80-20 effect. 80% of the wealth ends up in 20% of the population. Not so fair is it.
As far as Firm goes same thing. We have ou standards of crime punishment and you break it you pay the penalty. Thats the problem one guy can murder somebody and serve a life sentence and one guy can murder somebody and get the death penalty. there is no consistancy. Maybe that is why so many people die every year. Who knows.
florida0214 is offline  
 

Tags
fair, firm, rule

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:41 PM.

Tilted Forum Project

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
© 2002-2012 Tilted Forum Project

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360