![]() |
Clinton blasts US approach to international affairs
LINKY
This is amazing to me. Let's see, this asshole's international affairs probably only included getting his dick sucked by a chic that wasn't American. He's a fucking joke, and I can't belive that people even listen to him or his obviously retarded wife. How can anyone respect a woman who married a man that cheated on her, lied to her, and everyone in the country that he was the president of. Then the best part. She didn't divorce him. Proving that she is a complete moron. Just shows how fucking stupid people are. Quote:
|
Mister Clinton seems to have a valid point.
Aside: I too can't stand his dumb wife. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
It's really sad how Clinton did a lot of good things during his Presidency and has a lot of sensible things to say after it, but because of his stupid misogyny he's discounted it all to nought.
Never has so much political capital been lost for so little. |
Er, in terms of an International Stateman, Clinton was one of your best. Remember his involvement in the Northern Ireland conflict and the Israeli/Palistinian conflict. On the latter he came so close to resolving things. Now it looks like Bush could fuck it all up
|
Re: Clinton blasts US approach to international affairs
Quote:
This comment makes much more sense to me: Quote:
If Bush were a democrat, it seems much more would have been made of his "military record" than was made. Don't know why that is, but my point is that probably every president has lied about personal shit. Good link though. thanks. |
i agree w/ those statements.
"We can't run," Clinton pointed out. "If you got an interdependent world, and you cannot kill, jail or occupy all your adversaries, sooner or later you have to make a deal." if you find somebody that disagrees w/ you, the next thing you do is NOT threaten military action. |
I agree with Clinton here. I do not always agree with him, but what he's saying is more or less how i feel. And the war for our prosperity, scares me...
|
A few points...
Correct me if I am wrong, but the terrorist training grounds found in Iraq were located in the Kurdish controlled Northern Iraq were they not? There is very little evidence to support that Hussein himself was funding or supporting terrorists. What gets me with all of this is the complete hypocrisy we show towards some countries. North Korea poses a greater threat to the US soil AND has broken several resolutions as well. The Saudis have done more to support terrorism than any other country, but we don't raise an eyebrow. |
whoa! by terrorist u mean palestianian "terrorists" right?
there's a SHITLOAD of KNOWN terrorist training camps in pakistan btw. |
Re: Re: Clinton blasts US approach to international affairs
Quote:
|
clinton's are my liberal heroes
|
Quote:
All I can say is. I'm happy as hell that I'm not a liberal. |
i dont give a damn what somebody says about their personal life.
it's their business, not mine. |
Quote:
Seriously though, I have very little respect for Bill Clinton and certainly not just because of the sex scandal. |
Quote:
especially on the tax cut issue - i mean, come on. and as far as the cheating thing goes - jfk is still regarded as a good president, and look how many people he slept with. he did a hell of a lot more than getting head from an intern. |
I find it funny that people screech about how Bush was AWOL (from the national guard) during vietnam, and don't mention this guy ran to Canada during the draft.
|
Quote:
|
Re: Clinton blasts US approach to international affairs
Quote:
You seem to imply that no matter what good he did, as long as he had his dick sucked and lied about it, he must be a moron, to be ignored forever. His wife must obviously be stupid, because she stays with him, whereas other people with marital problems are always encouraged to talk it over, and stay together "for the sake of the children". Did it ever occur to you that Hillary might have *chosen* to stay with Bill because it was good for her career? That she might be smart enough to see that being married to an ex-President is better for your future than being the ex-wife of an ex-President? And what about the fact that tons of US presidents have cheated on their wives? This has never been a problem before Clinton... kinda hypocrytical, isn't it? Makes you wonder if there was some sort of political motivation behind the whole episode - say the Republicans wanting to get rid of a Democratic president. But it's not like they had wanted to impeach him for this incident, had they? Oh, wait... I think you're underestimating the Clintons, just like a lot of people underestimate Bush. You don't become a President by being stupid - it takes a lot of intelligence and political insight. And actually, I think Clinton's quote is rather good - it's intelligent and obviously correct. |
Yeah, what Dragonlich said.
|
Re: Re: Clinton blasts US approach to international affairs
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
I like Clintons politics and political style a lot. I agree with most of what he did in office.
I do not respect however his sexual problems and the farce that their marriage had become. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Clinton is absolutly correct.
It takes a lot of money to run an empire. Here's something to think about too....... If Clinton could run again, he would defeat Bush in an instant. Sex scandle and all, he would burn Bush to a cinder. Clinton's only mistake in office was his CHOICE in women, not the fact that he had affairs. What was he thinking with that chick. |
Quote:
Clinton is just jealous that two Republicans, both Bush's, both surrounding his own term, freed 3 countries between them and have done more for the world than Clinton ever could. Also, he's trying to help Hellary with her campaign once he decides to run. |
Hey Boco... did you forget about the whole peace thing in Bosnia, the liberation of Kosovo, almost having peace in the middle-east, bombing Iraq for not cooperating with the UN, encouraging peace in Ireland... you know, things that happened during Clinton's years in office?
Selective memory is nice, isn't it? |
Re: Re: Clinton blasts US approach to international affairs
Agree with Clinton on this.
Some people care way too much about other people's sex life. |
i just dont get the deal.....
y'all have no other dirt on clinton than his sex deal. IT'S HIS PRIVATE BUSINESS FOR GOD'S SAKES! we're supposed to judge his performance in presidency, NOT what the hell he does in bed! did having his dick sucked effect his job doings? it's his PRIVATE life! |
Quote:
|
It's his personality. The same kind of guy that steals candy from a baby and mugs people is the same kind of guy that's going to steal money from tax payers and nuke everyone. These are things we have to know, they aren't minute details of someones "private life." They are important factors in accurately describing a persons personality. We both need and want to know these things so we can vote in, or kick out any crazies or irresponsible leaders trying to gain power.
|
Quote:
|
I know a lot of anti-Clinton people won't agree, but anyway...
It is my understanding that a LOT of people cheat on their wifes and lie about it. Of course, I don't have percentages, but it's out there. People do it all the time, some are just more exposed to outside attention. If loads of people do it, why is it only bad when Clinton did it? It does *not* say anything about his performance as a President, and I don't agree with Phaenx that it is somehow related to a bad personality. People cheat, people lie about it, and life goes on. It's called "human nature", you know. But then again, I don't think sex is bad, nor that Presidents should be asked in court if they cheated on their wife. I mean, if you think such things are important, what about the reported cocaine use by Bush? Isn't that worse? |
Re: Re: Re: Clinton blasts US approach to international affairs
Quote:
|
Re: Re: Re: Re: Clinton blasts US approach to international affairs
Quote:
|
Quote:
And I'd also like to point out that the military that is fighting for us is what was maintained and built up by Clinton. We haven't seen much of anything from those companies that Bush threw money at after 9/11. And as far as Clinton not doing as much, he never invaded another country in blatant violation of international law. I can think of a certain curernt president who has. |
Quote:
The war in Kosovo wasn't sanctioned by the UN, you know. Technically, it was a violation of international law. (As were the bombings of Sudan and Afghanistan, by the way) |
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:39 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
© 2002-2012 Tilted Forum Project