03-15-2005, 08:37 PM | #1 (permalink) | |
Psycho
Location: io-where?
|
I need some help guys!
My glorious and previously accepting state of Iowa just passed legislation (54-44) making marriage in the state valid only between a man and a woman. This has me bursting at the seams with commentary and I don't have anywhere to vent. How can I let my reps and my senators know what I'm thinking? And possibly how others can let them know as well. I've found the personal homepages of both my senators (D-Harkin, R-Grassley). Do I just email them my thoughts on the matter? I've never felt more helpless about the issue, maybe because this groundless fear and intolerance has finally hit home.
Edit: Here's the official story from tonight: http://www.dmregister.com/apps/pbcs..../50315004/1001 Quote:
__________________
the·o·ry - a working hypothesis that is considered probable based on experimental evidence or factual or conceptual analysis and is accepted as a basis for experimentation. faith - Belief that does not rest on logical proof or material evidence. - Merriam-Webster's dictionary Last edited by Fourtyrulz; 03-15-2005 at 08:43 PM.. |
|
03-15-2005, 08:41 PM | #3 (permalink) | |
Baltimoron
Location: Beeeeeautiful Bel Air, MD
|
Quote:
__________________
"Final thought: I just rented Michael Moore's Bowling for Columbine. Frankly, it was the worst sports movie I've ever seen." --Peter Schmuck, The (Baltimore) Sun |
|
03-15-2005, 09:01 PM | #4 (permalink) |
Somnabulist
Location: corner of No and Where
|
I doubt writing your Senators will help - they operate at the national level. However, I highly suggest writing your State Senator and Congressman about the issue.
I just attended a panel last Friday that included 6 Iowa State Senators and Congressmen. The focus of the panel was overcoming partisanship in the fact of an almost perfectly divided legislature (25-25 in the Senate, Repubs hold only 2 more seats in the House). The consensus from the legislatures - both Dems and Repubs, including House Speaker Danny Carroll - was that things are very difficult in to get done in the legislatures because of the divided Senate. In fact, this very Constitutional Amendment was sponsored by Danny Carroll. There was a lively debate over whether or not Danny should be spending precious time on the amendment because it had a 0% chance of passing the Senate, which everyone acknowledges. So I wouldn't get too wound up - this one is dead in the water. Luckily. EDIT - By the way, the reason the article mentions that the amendment won't make it into committee is that the power-sharing arrangement in the Iowa Senate gives each committee two chairs, one for a Republican and one for a Democrat. Both chairs must agree to let that bill into committee - meaning that either one can simply not allow it in. This is how the amendment will be stopped in the Senate before it even will get started.
__________________
"You have reached Ritual Sacrifice. For goats press one, or say 'goats.'" Last edited by guy44; 03-15-2005 at 09:04 PM.. |
Tags |
guys |
|
|