Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community  

Go Back   Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community > The Academy > Tilted Politics


 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 03-06-2005, 04:31 PM   #41 (permalink)
Banned
 
Location: BFE
Quote:
Originally Posted by jorgelito
Daswig,

Do you think the UN or something like that is an impossibility?

What about disbanding it and starting from scratch?
The UN, like the League of Nations, gets high marks for theoretically noble goals, but extremely low marks for implementation and actual deeds. It's better to not have such an organization than to have an organization that repeatedly fails in it's goals and leads to the slaughter of those it supposedly is protecting. If there is no such organization, then people will not bet their lives on it and lose. I'm reminded of the Dutch "peacekeepers" in Srebrenica who placed thousands of Bosnian Muslims under their "protection" in a camp, and ended up running away to leave them pre-packaged for slaughter. The UN served as the mechanism for their massacre.
daswig is offline  
Old 03-06-2005, 07:20 PM   #42 (permalink)
 
roachboy's Avatar
 
Super Moderator
Location: essex ma
just wondering how this can possibly be a discussion of rwanda and not want to take into account any of the particular circumstances that either enabled the genocide or drove it?

of the two mid-level contexts manx talked about: the international arms trade is obviously a big deal--the united states is the worlds largest arms exporter by a mulitlpe of ten.

as for the word colonialism--there are enough smeantic problems raised by using the word that it seems pointless to try to sort them here. neocolonialism more. different structure of domination.

france (one of those nation-states so dear to american rightwingers) played a pivotal role in all this--they knew what was coming but radically underestimated it--unlilke bush, they were not interested in looking for pretexts, true or false, for war--they were caught off guard. ia am sure the conservatives here will argue that cowboy george would not have been, but that is speculation and refuting it is a waste of time.

the main driver was the radio--radio broadcasts were fundamental to ordering, controlling the pace of, and providing a rationalization for genocide.

look here for example:

http://www2.rnw.nl/rnw/en/features/m.../rwanda-h.html

the role of mass media in rwanda--which used nationalist and militarist slogans to trigger genocide--should give folk in the states pause. it is not only folk in rwanda who allow radio or television to structure the ways in which they hate people different from themselves.
__________________
a gramophone its corrugated trumpet silver handle
spinning dog. such faithfulness it hear

it make you sick.

-kamau brathwaite
roachboy is offline  
Old 03-06-2005, 08:34 PM   #43 (permalink)
Psycho
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by daswig
It's outlived it's usefulness, and nobody, and I mean NOBODY, with a lick of sense would give them one IOTA of power, since they've proved over and over again to be either completely incompetent or genuinely evil.
So because I think the UN is worth fixing, can I conclude that I don't have a lick of sense?

I would hope that you would be a little more careful writing such inflammatory nonesense. This community isn't supposed to always agree with each other, but it IS supposed to respect each other.

To throw out opinions such as the one above clearly doesn't do that. It doesn't add to the discussion, nor does it make anyone that might disagree with you interested in discussing the issue. My prediction is that it either makes those with differing opinions mad (which doesn't help the debate), or it makes them close the thread and go elsewhere.

Needless to say, it isn't nice and it doesn't help.

Have a nice day.
boatin is offline  
Old 03-06-2005, 10:52 PM   #44 (permalink)
Crazy
 
Location: Austin, TX
Quote:
Originally Posted by Manx
It does not "ultimately come down to" individual responsibility.
For me it does.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Manx
Assuredly, the mobs that commited the attrocities should not have commited the attrocities. No one is disputing that fact.
Good, then the blame is on the mobs. I am glad we agree on something.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Manx
But neither does it excuse, in any way, the West from constantly and consistently creating the situations that bring about such mob mentality.
That may be true. But your constant "blame the west" mantra often turns me off to your posts.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Manx
Your example was just an arbitrary example of responsibility. If you want an example that in some fashion is more closely related to the subject:

Let's say the government picks your neighbor to tell you what to do and the government gives nice things to your neighbor and lets your neighbor decide what (or if) he should pass anything along to you. Then one day, the government decides that it doesn't want to give anything to anyone anymore, and in the process of packing its bags, puts you in charge of your neighbor who had been hoarding and treating you like shit. And then, another government comes along and puts a gun in your hand. Now mutliply yourself by hundreds of thousands.
Your example is a better characterization, but I think they have the same meaning as far as responsibilty.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Manx
I don't know you from Adam - but I do know we can't expect anything close to every person in your situation in that scenario to not seek revenge. But when you say "responsibility" is the ultimate issue, that is exactly the expectation you are suggesting we have.
Expecting humans to not run around and kill each other is too much, I know. But I don't expect that. I would, however, say that NOT running around and killing each other is more responsible behavior. The way you decribe this, one would think the "west" was pulling the trigger. I stand by what I said before. Ultimately, it comes down to the individual person. I acknowledge that the boogeyman, I mean west, could have help create this situation, BUT that does not in anyway absolve the murderers.

I think our views could be summed up as:
Manx: I BLAME THE WEST! (and capitalism!)
Me: I blame the people who did the killing.

I am glad we can agree to disagree.
retsuki03 is offline  
Old 03-06-2005, 10:55 PM   #45 (permalink)
Loser
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by retsuki03
That may be true. But your constant "blame the west" mantra often turns me off to your posts.
That's the crux of your post since you added nothing else to your previous one - so I'll just address that briefly:

Somehow I'm able to handle your constant "excuse the west" mantra, so if you want to engage in discussion you're going to have to deal with whatever you perceive my mantra to be. Or maybe you're not interested in discussion.

Last edited by Manx; 03-06-2005 at 11:02 PM..
Manx is offline  
Old 03-07-2005, 12:18 AM   #46 (permalink)
Crazy
 
Location: Austin, TX
Quote:
Originally Posted by Manx
That's the crux of your post since you added nothing else to your previous one - so I'll just address that briefly:

Somehow I'm able to handle your constant "excuse the west" mantra, so if you want to engage in discussion you're going to have to deal with whatever you perceive my mantra to be. Or maybe you're not interested in discussion.
No so much with you because I don't think most your views are rooted in reality.

I hardly have a mantra of "excuse the west." The "crux" of my post was that regardless of the involvement of the west, that does not in anyway absolve the murderers. And to think, I even put it in bold for you.
retsuki03 is offline  
Old 03-07-2005, 01:48 AM   #47 (permalink)
Crazy
 
Location: Various places in the Midwest, all depending on when I'm posting.
Does anyone else think that it is amazing that while everyone here is willing to research and argue points about who is responsible for genocide, no one really wants to stand up and say, "We should really do something about it."

I can understand if you think that genocide in other nations is none of our business and that is why you are silent, but many posters here are clearly sympathetic with the plight of the oppressed. Has anyone written their Senators? Informed a real-live (aka non TFP) community about what is going on so that they can also get involved? Donated to Amnesty International?

I will agree that the United Nations, United States and yes, even the West has dropped the ball on this issue and many others like it. Is anyone interested in picking the ball back up?
__________________
Look out for numbers two and up and they'll look out for you.
Killconey is offline  
Old 03-07-2005, 07:06 AM   #48 (permalink)
Loser
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by retsuki03
The "crux" of my post was that regardless of the involvement of the west, that does not in anyway absolve the murderers. And to think, I even put it in bold for you.
And I never denied that:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Manx
Assuredly, the mobs that commited the attrocities should not have commited the attrocities. No one is disputing that fact.
But since you're not interested in a discussion with me, it is not suprising that you are unable to comprehend the points I have made.
Quote:
Originally Posted by retsuki03
No so much with you
Then stop responding to my posts. TFP is for discussion, not petty arguments.

Last edited by Manx; 03-07-2005 at 07:17 AM..
Manx is offline  
Old 03-07-2005, 01:16 PM   #49 (permalink)
sob
Banned
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Manx
Your discussion was nothing to begin with - so I am not suprised you have such derision for my perspective....rant, rant, rant....
Hardly silly at all. One need only open the newspaper to see it happening live in Iraq. But I have no doubt that your imagined facts disagree with that reality as well.
It appears that you consider attempting to turn a country over to its citizens as a form of "colonization."

We should therefore stay away from Rwanda, lest we be accused of trying to "colonize it."

However, nothing is preventing you from going there to offer your assistance, since you feel so strongly about it.

I won't hold my breath.
sob is offline  
Old 03-07-2005, 02:22 PM   #50 (permalink)
Loser
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by sob
It appears that you consider attempting to turn a country over to its citizens as a form of "colonization."
Not at all. I would first have to fool myself into believing the marketing of the U.S. gov't that their actions and intent are meant to turn Iraq over to its citizens.

How about if you go and "defend" Iraq, since you feel so strongly about it.

I won't hold my breath.
Manx is offline  
Old 03-07-2005, 05:28 PM   #51 (permalink)
Easy Rider
 
flstf's Avatar
 
Location: Moscow on the Ohio
I have read all the posts in this thread in order to learn something about the Rwanda confilict. The statement that the U.S. is the largest arms supplier in the world has been brought up several times so I did some searches in order to find out what we supplied there. Apparently the U.S. was not heavily involved in selling arms to Rwanda but rather they came from France, Egypt and South Africa mostly.
Quote:
Arming Rwanda
The influx of weapons from foreign sources to the Rwandese government as well as to the RPF contributed significantly to the civil war during 1990-1994, as well as to the massacres in 1994. Some foreign governments and other suppliers were ready to supply arms.

The major sources for this Annex on the supply of arms to Rwanda are the Human Rights Watch/ Arms Project, which issued a comprehensive report on Rwanda in January 1994 and a complementary report in May 1995, and the Human Rights Watch report of December 1994. The reports substantiate their findings with different kinds of evidence. The content of these reports has been discussed with a number of respected researchers, who themselves have found evidence supporting most of the findings therein.

Rwanda government

When the war began in 1990, Rwanda had an army of some 5,000 men (Prunier, 1995). They were equipped with light arms, including Belgian-made FAL, German-made G-3 and Kalashnikov automatic rifles manufactured by China or countries of the former Eastern Bloc. The army's weaponry included eight 81mm mortars, six 57mm anti-tank guns, French-made 83mm Blindicide rocket launchers, 12 AML-60 armoured cars and 16 M-3 armoured personnel carriers (International Institute for Strategic Studies, 1990).

During the war, the Rwandese armed forces expanded, and the arsenal of weaponry increased and became more sophisticated. France, Egypt and South Africa supplied the majority of the weapons. According to the Human Rights Watch/Arms Project, Egypt was the key arms supplier and France the major military supporter.

A major weapons deal was made in March 1992 when Egypt sold US$6 million worth of arms to Rwanda. The deal was guaranteed by the French bank, Crédit Lyonnais. It included a wide range of light arms, infantry support weapons and ammunition.

France has played an important role in arming and supporting Rwanda. Apart from equipment such as mortars, light artillery, guns, armoured vehicles and even helicopters, France also provided spare parts, technical assistance and military training. The Arms Project has further documented rather large arms supplies coming from South Africa (light arms, machine-guns, grenade launchers and ammunition, valued at US$5.9 million), and US$2.3 million worth of military equipment sold by the US to Rwanda.

Belgium was traditionally Rwanda's main supplier of assistance and training. However, after the civil war started in October 1990, Belgium withdrew. France, in contrast, continued its military role, and provided weapons, munitions and advisors. France furthermore deployed troops in Rwanda.

The weapons obtained by the Rwandese government did not go only to the army. Already in 1991, a programme was started by the government to distribute a gun for every unit of 10 households.

At the beginning of the war, France sent 300 soldiers to Rwanda. Part of this force was later withdrawn, but 170 soldiers remained stationed in the country. Immediately after the RPF launched its offensive on 8 February 1993, the number of French soldiers increased to some 670. Two companies were deployed on the main roads north of the capital, and two were posted in strategic positions in Kigali, including the airport.

While the French insisted that their troops were deployed for the purpose of protecting French nationals only, the Arms Project has witnessed first hand French military activities tantamount to direct participation in the war, e.g. French soldiers manning checkpoints just north of Kigali. In addition to combat troops, France sent military advisors to provide training in, among other things, combat skills and commando operations, to Rwandese troops.

In December 1993, following deployment of the UN forces, all French troops were withdrawn.
Arming Rwanda
flstf is offline  
Old 03-07-2005, 08:52 PM   #52 (permalink)
Banned
 
Location: BFE
Quote:
Originally Posted by boatin
So because I think the UN is worth fixing, can I conclude that I don't have a lick of sense?
In light of recent UN stupidity (the various massacres it enabled, the human rights violations by it's "peacekeepers", it's total ineffectiveness in preventing war (which is why it was created), the rampant cronyism and corruption that is apparently systemic there) what power would you give to the UN? The organization is fundamentally flawed, and I don't see any way it can be fixed. I am, however, open to suggestions.
daswig is offline  
 

Tags
hotel, politics, rwanda


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:54 AM.

Tilted Forum Project

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
© 2002-2012 Tilted Forum Project

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360