Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community  

Go Back   Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community > The Academy > Tilted Politics


 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 03-06-2005, 11:47 AM   #41 (permalink)
Illusionary
 
tecoyah's Avatar
 
I am left to ponder the reason I ever decided to post my opinions in here .....but on the bright side, SOB certainly helped in my descision making.

Enjoy
__________________
Holding onto anger is like grasping a hot coal with the intent of throwing it at someone else; you are the one who gets burned. - Buddha
tecoyah is offline  
Old 03-06-2005, 10:19 PM   #42 (permalink)
Crazy
 
Location: Austin, TX
Quote:
Originally Posted by raveneye
It's not really surprising when you think about it. People dislike Moore not because he lies, but because he attacks the foundations of their belief system, and does so very effectively. He's threatening, and the easiest way to neutralize him is with ridicule and insult.

That so many people are obsessed with demonizing him is actually a pretty good testimony to how persuasive and effective he is.

Disclaimer: I have never seen a Moore film or read any of his books. Anybody who generates this much debate and controversy though, I think is very good for political discourse.
I would argue that people attack MM because they think he is full of shit, and it pisses them off when other people believe him. People defend MM because they think he is telling the truth. I have seen almost 2.2 of his films (always fall asleep, R&M,BFC,F911) and not only do I find them boring, but I think they would make even Riefenstahl smile.

I don't need to insult MM to marginalize his "threatening" criticisms. He doesn't shake the foundations of my beliefs. He is a propagandist. I insult him because I think he is a jackass while I pity those too blind to see through his bullshit.

To say that MM elevates political discourse is laughable. Look at this thread. You think this is constructive debate?
retsuki03 is offline  
Old 03-06-2005, 10:45 PM   #43 (permalink)
Junkie
 
Seaver's Avatar
 
Location: Fort Worth, TX
Quote:
Exactly when did "Moore" mutate into "Clinton"?

This guy Clinton sure has magical powers around here, being able to settle so many arguments with such deft rhetorical flourish.
If you read the quotes I sited it would make sense... somehow "Moore" mutated into "Bush" and his supposed lies.
Seaver is offline  
Old 03-07-2005, 05:29 AM   #44 (permalink)
Born Against
 
raveneye's Avatar
 
Quote:
I would argue that people attack MM because they think he is full of shit,
. . . as are 99% of politicians. So why attack a harmless filmmaker when you could be attacking the politicians themselves, and actually accomplishing something positive?
raveneye is offline  
Old 03-07-2005, 05:34 AM   #45 (permalink)
Born Against
 
raveneye's Avatar
 
Quote:
If you read the quotes I sited it would make sense... somehow "Moore" mutated into "Bush" and his supposed lies.
Moore's subject is (apparently) Bush. You can't counter a claim about Bush by making a similar claim about Clinton, who has been out of office for 5 years now.
raveneye is offline  
Old 03-07-2005, 05:42 AM   #46 (permalink)
Born Against
 
raveneye's Avatar
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by retsuki03
To say that MM elevates political discourse is laughable. Look at this thread. You think this is constructive debate?
Are you including your own post in this assessment?
raveneye is offline  
Old 03-07-2005, 08:12 AM   #47 (permalink)
Junkie
 
Seaver's Avatar
 
Location: Fort Worth, TX
Quote:
Moore's subject is (apparently) Bush. You can't counter a claim about Bush by making a similar claim about Clinton, who has been out of office for 5 years now.
Since you apparently can not hit the back button to check the quotes I cited to understand, I'll repost them for you so it can finally make sense to you.

Quote:
Another Lies and people DIE.
He lies and diminishes the respect of our Nation in the eyes of the world (which does matter believe it or not). He lies and generates fear in my mind.
MY subject was the myth of the "Bush lie", and how it holds less validity than most of MM's movies.
Seaver is offline  
Old 03-07-2005, 08:19 AM   #48 (permalink)
Born Against
 
raveneye's Avatar
 
Quote:
MY subject was the myth of the "Bush lie", and how it holds less validity than most of MM's movies.
And my point was you can't refute the claim that Bush lied by claiming that Clinton lied. Where's the logic?
raveneye is offline  
Old 03-07-2005, 10:46 AM   #49 (permalink)
Crazy
 
Location: Austin, TX
Quote:
Originally Posted by raveneye
. . . as are 99% of politicians. So why attack a harmless filmmaker when you could be attacking the politicians themselves, and actually accomplishing something positive?
How about because this thread is titled "MM exposed" and not "99% of Politicians Exposed." I agree that MM is harmless (as proven by the fact of Bush being reelected.)
Quote:
Originally Posted by raveneye
Are you including your own post in this assessment?
Yes, my post included, does not elevate political discourse. But "MM exposed" is not about political discourse, it is about specious propaganda.
retsuki03 is offline  
Old 03-07-2005, 11:37 AM   #50 (permalink)
Born Against
 
raveneye's Avatar
 
Quote:
How about because this thread is titled "MM exposed" and not "99% of Politicians Exposed."
There's nothing about the title of this thread that requires you to attack MM. Nor is there any reason that you need to even respond to this thread. Instead of spending time in this thread attacking MM (e.g. calling him a "jackass"), you could be out attacking real politicians who are causing real harm right now.

Quote:
Yes, my post included, does not elevate political discourse. But "MM exposed" is not about political discourse, it is about specious propaganda.
Some folks say the film is specious, others with inside knowledge point out claims that they consider valid. In fact there have been several very on-point and informative posts in this thread.

There's no reason why a useful debate can't grow out of a discussion of that film or interview.
raveneye is offline  
Old 03-07-2005, 11:43 AM   #51 (permalink)
Crazy
 
Location: Austin, TX
Quote:
Originally Posted by raveneye
There's nothing about the title of this thread that requires you to attack MM. Nor is there any reason that you need to even respond to this thread. Instead of spending time in this thread attacking MM (e.g. calling him a "jackass"), you could be out attacking real politicians who are causing real harm right now.
I thought is was an appropriate venue to share my opinion about MM. If you don't like reading my opinions, please add me to your ignore list.
retsuki03 is offline  
Old 03-07-2005, 11:53 AM   #52 (permalink)
Born Against
 
raveneye's Avatar
 
Quote:
I thought is was an appropriate venue to share my opinion about MM. If you don't like reading my opinions, please add me to your ignore list.
I enjoy reading your opinions. I thought you might like to discuss what I perceive to be internal contradictions within your posts.

If you don't want to discuss those contradictions, then by all means don't.
raveneye is offline  
Old 03-07-2005, 12:01 PM   #53 (permalink)
Junkie
 
Seaver's Avatar
 
Location: Fort Worth, TX
Quote:
And my point was you can't refute the claim that Bush lied by claiming that Clinton lied. Where's the logic?
Look I'm sick of replying to you since you once AGAIN did not read my post. Read it, and then post a reply about it. It wasn't about Clinton lying or Bush lying, it was faulty intelligence that EVERYONE thought was right, including Clinton, Bush, Liberman, and everyone else I listed.

If you're going to spew crap about my post at least give me the benefit of reading it first.
Seaver is offline  
Old 03-07-2005, 12:18 PM   #54 (permalink)
Born Against
 
raveneye's Avatar
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Seaver
Stop with this "when Clinton lied no one died" crap already.
You did post this, correct?
raveneye is offline  
Old 03-07-2005, 12:22 PM   #55 (permalink)
Born Against
 
raveneye's Avatar
 
OK, maybe here is the source of the (my) confusion:

Quote:
Originally Posted by tecoyah
One man lies and makes some money, pisses a bunch of people off, makes a fool of himself, and makes an administration look bad. But gives me a good chuckle.
I assumed this "one man" here referred to Moore, not Clinton. In other words, he makes a movie that pisses a bunch of people off, makes a fool of himself in a variety of ways, and makes the Bush administration look bad.

If you (Seaver) read this as referring to Clinton (whom it may have been) then your post makes sense. My apologies.
raveneye is offline  
Old 03-07-2005, 01:05 PM   #56 (permalink)
sob
Banned
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by tecoyah
I am left to ponder the reason I ever decided to post my opinions in here .....but on the bright side, SOB certainly helped in my descision making.

Enjoy
Glad to help.

I look forward to fewer one-sided warnings, and not being denounced for using the word "comrades."
sob is offline  
Old 03-08-2005, 10:34 AM   #57 (permalink)
aka: freakylongname
 
Chamaeleontidae's Avatar
 
Location: South of the Great While North
This is an interesting dialog.

Here is a point I would like to make. MM calls his films Documentaries. I googled around to see what would be a good definition of a Documentary Film. Some sites want to give a simple answer and say that a documentary film is a film or TV program presenting the facts about a person or event. Another definition I found says that a documentary film is a
motion picture that shapes and interprets factual material for purposes of education or entertainment.


Personally I think the britannica definition is more realistic. Everything in life is colored by our personal beliefs, displayed in what we do, what we say, and how we act. It is hard to imagine that someone putting to gather a film would be able to remove themselves from their decisions on what to include, or not include in a movie, hence it’s my belief that all would contain some type of interpretation.

I have seen all 3 of MM’s movies, and although I don’t necessarily agree with everything he says, he does raise some interesting points. Even his forward on the “Bowling for Columbine” DVD he states that his purpose is to raise issues, and spark debate, something which I think he does well…
__________________
"Reality is just a crutch for people who can't cope with drugs."
Robin Williams.
Chamaeleontidae is offline  
 

Tags
exposed, michael, moore


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:43 AM.

Tilted Forum Project

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
© 2002-2012 Tilted Forum Project

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76