Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community  

Go Back   Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community > The Academy > Tilted Politics


 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 03-04-2005, 08:34 AM   #41 (permalink)
 
roachboy's Avatar
 
Super Moderator
Location: essex ma
raveneye: interesting scenario. a bit unnerving.

the more general question this church-as-charity raises for me is that this model was dominant in the 19th century and failed miserably.
the assumptions then seem like those of the bushpeople today: that poverty is a function of individual moral failings, therefore it made some sense to enlist the aid of churches for redemption at various levels. then, as now for the american right, the correlate is that there is nothing necessarily wrong about the operation of capitalism as a system, no real problem with the destruction of the lives of those exlcuded from holding capital. the invisible hand mythology dovetailed nicely into a christian mythology. what is real is rational because the invisible hand of god says so.

these assumptions were, and are (more so now) insane.

the shift back toward this already-antiquated, already-proven-ineffectual model slides across a wholly irrational view of the welfare state, how it came into being, what its meanings are, its relation to taxation etc. constructing this view has been an important political function of the conservative media apparatus at least since the earliest phases of the clinton period.

the main shift in assumptions that played out across the period that lead up to the development of the welfare state was simple: what was at stake was not the redemption of individuals, but the survival of the system itself.
the uneven distribution of wealth creates fundamental political torsions at the heart of the capitalist order.
the welfare state was an attempt to co-opt this political threat.

these problems have not gone away.
you would have to be blind to the actual history of capitalism to think otherwise.

the bottom line: i do not understand what bush is doing with this "faith-based initiative" idea at all. the question of hiring practices simply follow from this bigger irrationality, repeat the problems that attend it in general at a particular level.
__________________
a gramophone its corrugated trumpet silver handle
spinning dog. such faithfulness it hear

it make you sick.

-kamau brathwaite
roachboy is offline  
Old 03-04-2005, 09:40 AM   #42 (permalink)
Tone.
 
shakran's Avatar
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by KMA-628
Would a Christian bookstore hire a Muslim activist?
Would a company that actively proclaims itself a Christian company hire a Pagan?
Should a Mosque hire a Christian? A Jew? (It works both ways you know--and we are "infidels" to them)
would any of these get money from the feds? Hopefully not.

Quote:
In these cases, hiring based on religious identity is essential to the success of the "business".
Bull

Quote:
There are many, many cases where the religious identity of the person is very important to the customer.

Again, bull. When's the last time you marched into a christian book store, found the clerk, and interrogated her on what religion she was.

Are you saying only a christian is capable of helping you find the book about Jesus? Only a christian is capable of operating the cash register in the christian bookstore?

Obviously, all that's absurd. If they want to hire based on religion, they certainly can do that, but they shouldn't be getting rewarded by the government for it.
shakran is offline  
Old 03-04-2005, 09:50 AM   #43 (permalink)
Born Against
 
raveneye's Avatar
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by roachboy
i do not understand what bush is doing with this "faith-based initiative" idea at all.
My question (for anybody in favor of this initiative) is pretty simple: isn't the term "faith-based" completely empty? Faith in what? Isn't it possible to have faith in just about anything under the sun? What if you place your faith in principles that are completely counter to the Constitution, Bill of Rights, common sense morality, etc.? Should you still have the political support of the Bush administration and federal funding? Just because you have "faith" in something?

Should you now be completely free (by yesterday's Republican vote) to use federal funds to discriminate at will?

Quote:
the question of hiring practices simply follow from this bigger irrationality, repeat the problems that attend it in general at a particular level.
Seems to be the case, doesn't it?
raveneye is offline  
Old 03-04-2005, 10:44 AM   #44 (permalink)
....is off his meds...you were warned.
 
KMA-628's Avatar
 
Location: The Wild Wild West
oh, wow....i'm a dumbass
__________________
Before you criticize someone, you need to walk a mile in their shoes. That way, if they get angry at you.......you're a mile away.......and they're barefoot.

Last edited by KMA-628; 03-05-2005 at 10:26 PM..
KMA-628 is offline  
Old 03-04-2005, 10:50 AM   #45 (permalink)
....is off his meds...you were warned.
 
KMA-628's Avatar
 
Location: The Wild Wild West
Quote:
Originally Posted by shakran
Again, bull. When's the last time you marched into a christian book store, found the clerk, and interrogated her on what religion she was.
There are periodicals that advertise strictly "Christian" businesses that follow "Christian" teachings, ethics, etc. The companies that advertise are then monitored that they follow through with their claims (kinda like periodicals that advertise hispanic-owned companies--is the owner hispanic or merely a front man, etc.).

People use these guides because they want to support a company that values the same things that they do (my parents do this as much as possible). They expect that any and all people they come across in these companies espouse the virtues of Christianity.

So, no, you are mistaken, it is not bull.

Don't believe me? Call my parents. And there are many, many people like them.
__________________
Before you criticize someone, you need to walk a mile in their shoes. That way, if they get angry at you.......you're a mile away.......and they're barefoot.
KMA-628 is offline  
 

Tags
bad, based, good, hiring, person, religion


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:32 AM.

Tilted Forum Project

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
© 2002-2012 Tilted Forum Project

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360