Ann Coulter is Insane
 

From her website: http://www.anncoulter.com/

Seriously, what is wrong with her? Is it all a show, or does this woman really think like this?

I can't even wrap my mind around this. :|

Yeah....but she's cute, though. ;)

Although not too bright.
Chuck Hagel is a Republican!!

Nor does she seem to know what time of the year it is.

I don't know much about her only heard the name and associate it with a right wing partisan hack, but damn does that lady hate liberals. Makes me want to meet her and talk to her just so see if I could irritate her.

Well obviously in her very narrow view of the outside world, she chooses to remark on everything she knows nothing about. Since when did it take so long for someones 15 minutes to run out?

http://mediamatters.org/items/200412010011 and click on Ann Coulter to see what a beaut she really is.

Don't take her too seriously, she does what she does to get a rise out of people, so they buy her books out of curiousity, and it works.

Yes, but the people who read her take her utterly seriously.
I used to belong to the Official Ann Coulter Messageboard. Then I was banned and they locked the board from outside viewers forever. I can take pride in being the actual cause of that. My posting was never any different from what I do here.

Those total psychos completely agree with everything that Ann says publicly. I also am forced into listening to Rush Limbaugh on occasion. Ditto, ya know.

We should take these nutcakes seriously, there are enough people that already do.

Go spend some time in freerepublic.com some time. The disgusting crap that spews out of there, is further proof that the mindset has a firm hold in america.

It's only because of liberals that people like Ann Coulter are allowed to exist. If there were no liberals, she would have been beheaded by now (or worse) for saying something out of turn at one time or another. Ironic really.

You win, thread closed.

I don't know what I hate more. Her or her audience. I don't think she's remotely cute. I do enjoy the fact that she gets her ass handed to her in any debate she ever gets into.

Ann Coulter = Michael Moore

Yes, both are retards, both embarass their political sides, and both make up stories to suite their needs. Moore just makes more money out of it.

Coulter is a bit more extreme than Moore.

Although they can easily be refuted, Moore actually has valid info to back up his claims. Moore makes a claim, states X, Y, and Z about it, and it gets refuted. However, the info that's used to refute Moore's claims can also be countered easily, which opens some type of debate.

Coulter just blurts out shit like, "Canada's lucky we didn't take them over". What the fuck kind of thing is THAT to say? I've read her books, and she contributes nothing serious to politics. You sit there the whole time thinking, "she CAN'T be for real.."

Love him or hate him, at least Moore provides something to be thought about.

Exactly, The difference between Moore and Coulter:
Moore wants to effect positive change.
Coulter wants to dominate all who don't think like her.
Coulter likes to just annoy,chafe and argue for arguments sake. Moore wants to discuss and effect for change. Moore wants to change opinions because he wants everyone to be right. Coulter could care less, would rather just give liberals the finger.
There is room for divergent views in Moore's world, Coulter wants to censor all who disagree with her, possibly indefinetly detain them.

Who would you least trust with his/her hand on the atomic 'button" Moore or Coulter?

If our worst is Moore, and yours is Coulter, the "other side" is far, far behind us.

Thats a joke site, right? I mean, its parody, satire?

Moore wouldn't use it, even if we were attacked. Coulter, on the other hand, might break it from overuse. I think her first target would be San Francisco or New England. We'd surely be in need of more nukes if she was in charge...

That, my socialist friend, is something that I, myself, have oft wondered. Many's the time that I've read her drivel, and said to myself...self, I said, surely this rather comely lass is but a shill. A Trojan Horse, if you will. Placed in her postition by none other than the very Liberals that she stertorously purports to hate so. Think about it. But, alas, I have yet to find any evidence to support my suspicions. So, until then, she is just as she seems to be. An embarasment to any true thinking conservative. Would you want her on your side?

Maybe in a suicide squad of some kind.
:thumbsup:

at the end of the day, to me, I couldnt describe her any more accurately than as a pro wrestling heel. I cant believe that what she says she intends to be taken seriously. Just look at comments like:

"Because I know so many of them. Liberals are clueless, amoral sexual degenerates, communists and pacifists – no offense to you or your readers intended, of course"

"Q: Who will win the elections 2004?

A: That's for the Supreme Court to sort out, you ignorant foreigner."

"Q: If Kerry should win, what will the changes in the USA be?

A: He's got this exciting new plan for Iraq I think you Italians may have heard of. It's called "unconditional surrender." Today, Christianity is legal and gay marriage is illegal. If Kerry wins, these will be reversed."

how can this be real???

A valid question, to be sure. However...I think the truly scary part is that there are people out there that not only listen to this tripe, but actually espouse, and embrace, her decidedly dubious ideals. True Conservatives don't bother me a bit. Hell, I can be staunchly conservative, or just as staunchly liberal, depending on the issue. It's the extremists, in any camp, that give me the heebie jeebies.

haha yeah, I've often though if liberals paid her to put on a show like this... I mean, what other reason is there?

She's said a LOT worse than "Just think: If we'd invaded your countries, killed your leaders and converted you to Christianity YOU'D ALL BE OPENING CHRISTMAS PRESENTS RIGHT ABOUT NOW!" around 9/11... shit that would make even the most conservative of people cringe.

I don't have much time to search em out, but I'm sure there's gotta be a site out there with all her live/written quips.

I saw an interview of Al Franken when he was publicizing his book "Lying Liars and the Lies They Tell" (or something like that). Forget who interviewed him, but they played the name game and Franken was very diplomatic on every name UNTIL COulter's came up...... this is his quote because I'll never forget it.

"I have many Conservative friends and when I researched the book I asked about different people, like Limbaugh, O'Reilly, to see what my friends would say. they said that they were decent men with good points. Then I would ask about Ann Coulter... and every single one of them would say she's certifiably nuts, we wish she'd shut up because she scares us and gives us a bad name."

(I think the quote may be in his book also.)

The sad and scary fact is newspapers carry her column, and Limbaugh LOVES to quote her and talk about how great she is. Drudge loves to give her credit on things. Not that they can ever be considered unbiased but they give credence to this nut case and egg her on.

She's made claims such as "McCarthy was right and should have gone further."

I truly believe she believes what she says, unlike most who are just in it for shock value. I just can't wait for the day when she says something so outrageous that even the Conservatives that support her back away.

You're joking, right?

Moore and Coulter are flip sides of the same coin.

You're joking, right?

It's hard to take her serious but then you hear that people DO take her serious. She's like this fugly skinny little blonde caricature (sp?) running around. Actually, she sounds a lot like Pastor Richards on the Vice City soundtrack.

You're joking right?

"It would be a much better country if women did not vote. That is simply a fact. In fact, in every presidential election since 1950 - except Goldwater in '64 - the Republican would have won, if only the men had voted."

she has serious issues.

Michael Moore is on the right side at least. While his methods may be exploitative, what he is arguing for is basically good - or even if you disagree with him, comes from good motivations. People like Coulter, if she is real, represents all of the worst qualities and prejudices of society imo.

The reason they have gone after Moore so hard is that he attacked the gun lobby, which is very powerful and has a lot of money, and they are trying to destroy him. I have heard some people say he misquoted and misrepresented people in his documentary - and I honestly dont know enough about it to debate that: but the basic proposition that widepsread gun ownership and 10,000 gun deaths a year are somehow connected is a different proposition to stating that America should lead a crusade against Islam in response to a terrorist attack which killed a number of innocent civilians which was a fraction of the number of Iraqi civiliams killed by Allied forces since the first attack on Iraq.

Anyway, sorry to get off point. I think we all agree Coulter is either nuts, or a heel.

Michael Moore is not "fighting for the little guy" or "trying to promote change" all the way from his million dollar apartment in Manahatten. He's just venting hot air for the sake of making money and nothing more. What seperates him from Coulter is that he is such a self-hating, hypocritical jackass. To be honest, he himself is everything he could possibly hate: he's a fat, rich, stupid white man who more than likely doesn't know a foreign language, is racist, has played off the working class numerous times for money, and has also used fear to make a quick buck. Moore is no better than Coulter, end of story.

Reading this thread is quite amusing to me. I've met Ann Coulter, sat down with her and had a nice little discussion. Perhaps this might be because I am a Republician, but I found her to be very nice and had a great sense of humor. I can also say that she always puts some element of her humor into her one-liners.

Ann Coulter's problem is that she operates in the realm of politics, where nobody says what they mean nor do they mean what they say. Politicians have no clue what directness is, which is why they always give long winded answers where they skirt the issue until they decide it's a safe issue for them. Ann Coulter is on the other hand, extreemly direct and doesn't care what people think about her directness. She speaks her mind wheras others in the field of politics don't want you to know what's truely on their mind. And the thing that has Liberals/Progressives the most infuriated with her is that she is completly 100% against political corectness.

I see them both as the same as well. Coulters medium for spitting out the putrid bile that is her opinion is public speaking (and books). Moore puts out the same kind of drivel, he just doesnt let it come directly out of his mouth. He strings together unrelated, out of context video clips to paint his opposition in the same light that Coulter paints hers. Coulter is direct, Moore is manipulative. Their end results are the same. These two are great examples of how rediculous a person can be and still be taken seriously by many.

Bodyhammer,

You have no clue what Moore is about. He backs up everything he claims with documentation. You may disagree with the way the documentation is presented but his method of attack is much different than these people are unamerican/traitors/godless.

Mabye thats the problem. Shes so dry no one can tell if shes being serious or trying to be funny.

True, her sense of humor is a very dry, deadpan style of humor.

Strawman argument right there, I never said anything about his "documentation." and furthermore, the documentation he has used to back up his claims have either A) Been taken out of context or B) Been proven bullshit. You should read Dave Kopel's "the 59 Deceits," it throughly proves that Fahrenheit 9/11 is bullshit: http://www.davekopel.com/Terror/Fift...enheit-911.htm

She'd make a great wife for me.

No, Moore is willing to tell blatent lies to get people to dislike what he dislikes. Coulter does the same thing but minus the lies (hense the no-backing up claim).

Ok I can give you documentation that the sun revolves around the earth. The documents will be false, but that's ok because I back it up.

What about those of us who dont agree that Moore is on the right side? IMO Moore represents the worst qualities and prejudices of society. One being his quote of "the dumbest Canadian is smarter than the smartest American"... how does that represent "positive change"? Only looks like prejudice to me.

I love her.

when i saw the original post i thought, "here we go again", but after a few posts i rememberd, "they really are cute when they get angry".

Actually Seaver, the quote is "the dumbest Brit is smarter than the smartest American", but like you said, it's still prejudice.

"Yes, but the people who read her take her utterly seriously."

I'll assume you've never been on the recieving end of a theater letting out after a F 9/11 flick packed with impressionable little college kids...but then again....

"Michael Moore is on the right side at least."

Interesting how matthew felt the need to attempt to insult liberals on the board in every post so far. Please keep it to yourself, I don't appreciate your derogatory comments.


Anyway, I have no idea how Ann acts in private. Mirevolver, how did you meet her? At a dinner or at a function?

Because I would suspect that at a function, she would maintain her popular persona. Not necessarily so at the dinner table.

I don't have any evidence other than the fact that Bill Mahr counts her as a personal friend of his. So I suspect she isn't so vitriolic at the dinner table.