Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community  

Go Back   Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community > The Academy > Tilted Politics


 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 12-24-2004, 10:19 AM   #1 (permalink)
Junkie
 
Location: bedford, tx
stop priscilla owens nomination

Although many republicans favor her for her anti-abortion stance it is her 'over-the-top' pro-business stance that will decimate consumer rights and allow business' to profit even greater from their unethical and sometimes illegal methods.

http://www.deal-with-it.org/hearts/owen.htm

study by Texans for Public Justice found that there is a disturbing correlation between Owen’s donors and the lawyers and litigants who have had legal matters in her court. The 2001 Texans for Public Justice report Pay to Play identified the employer and occupation of donors who gave a total of $926,516 to Owen’s 1994 campaign. Lawyers and litigants who were parties to petitions in Owen’s court between 1994 and 1998 provided 43 percent of this money that she raised.

Texans for Public Justice pointed out that "With its PAC and executives giving court members $134,558 since 1993, Enron Corp. was the justices’ biggest source of corporate donations. During this same period the justices received six Enron-related petitions for review. In three of them, Enron’s adversaries sought Supreme Court review and the justices denied review every time. In contrast, the court granted review in two of the three cases in which Enron sought review (66 percent). This is an extraordinary record in a court that accepts just 11 percent of all petitions received. The court then issued opinions favoring Enron in both cases that it heard. Both opinions overturned lower appeals court rulings against Enron and both occurred in 1996, two years after Owen and consultant Karl Rove raised $8,600 from Enron’s PAC and executives."


In another of many conflict of interest examples they provide, TPJ writes: “In another contributor-conflict case, Owen wrote a scathing dissent to a 2000 majority opinion that found a state law unconstitutional because it was written to let a single developer dodge Austin’s water-quality rules (FM Properties Operating Co. v. City of Austin). Owen decried the majority for curtailing the property rights of Freeport McMoRan’s development arm after taking $2,500 from Freeport board members and $45,458 from its lawyers.

Joe Conason: writes in Salon that “Even the most committed conservatives ought to be shocked by his account of her callous handling of a product-liability case in which both Ford Motor and the plaintiffs, whose paralyzed son's enormous medical expenses were ruining their family, sought expedited review. That request was denied for no stated reason, and Owen dithered for 17 months before rendering a baldly biased reversal in favor of Ford. This is what passes for "pro-family" jurisprudence in Texas.”

Joe Conason reported that in 22 out of 26 cases involving her top business donors, she ruled in their favor. He concluded, “If you can afford justice in her court, it’s a very worthwhile investment. She wrote the opinion in a decision that permitted Enron to escape paying $224,989 in school taxes. Imagine what she could do to the law on the Fifth Circuit bench.

As usual, people with such a finely developed ethical sense can be expected to be sanctimonious regarding abortion. Owen is against it, and that, for George Bush and his supposedly ethically oriented supporters, seems to be enough. Lazarus writes “According to Owen, for the teenager to prove she is ‘well informed,’ she must prove — regardless of her own religious background or lack thereof — that she knew about the many religious objections to abortion, and that some women who underwent abortions had serious remorse.” Interestingly, even very conservative Texas judges found this to go way beyond the law. Even then-Justice Alberto Gonzales, now counsel to Bush, was provoked to label Owen's interpretation an "unconscionable act of judicial activism." — Lazarus points out this is “legal code for saying Owen was reading her own anti-abortion views into the law.”
__________________
"no amount of force can control a free man, a man whose mind is free. No, not the rack, not fission bombs, not anything. You cannot conquer a free man; the most you can do is kill him."
dksuddeth is offline  
Old 01-04-2005, 12:06 PM   #2 (permalink)
Junkie
 
Location: bedford, tx
*bump*
nobody cares about judicial nominations anymore?
__________________
"no amount of force can control a free man, a man whose mind is free. No, not the rack, not fission bombs, not anything. You cannot conquer a free man; the most you can do is kill him."
dksuddeth is offline  
Old 01-04-2005, 04:39 PM   #3 (permalink)
Psycho
 
Fourtyrulz's Avatar
 
Location: io-where?
Well it was an interesting read...but how are we supposed to stop her nomination? I don't mean to sound sarcastic, I just don't have any idea where someone would eveb begin something like that. Doesn't the president choose and run the choices through the Senate? Perhaps writing state senators would help, I honestly don't know.
__________________
the·o·ry - a working hypothesis that is considered probable based on experimental evidence or factual or conceptual analysis and is accepted as a basis for experimentation.
faith - Belief that does not rest on logical proof or material evidence.
- Merriam-Webster's dictionary
Fourtyrulz is offline  
Old 01-05-2005, 08:02 AM   #4 (permalink)
Junkie
 
Location: bedford, tx
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fourtyrulz
Well it was an interesting read...but how are we supposed to stop her nomination? I don't mean to sound sarcastic, I just don't have any idea where someone would eveb begin something like that. Doesn't the president choose and run the choices through the Senate? Perhaps writing state senators would help, I honestly don't know.
good question. Yes, for judicial nominees it's important to let your state senators know how you feel about them.
__________________
"no amount of force can control a free man, a man whose mind is free. No, not the rack, not fission bombs, not anything. You cannot conquer a free man; the most you can do is kill him."
dksuddeth is offline  
Old 01-05-2005, 11:26 AM   #5 (permalink)
Wehret Den Anfängen!
 
Location: Ontario, Canada
In order to not get through senate hearings, one of two things has to happen.

Either 51 senators (including the VP) have to deny the appointment, or 41 senators have to be willing to keep debate open on the appointment until the appointment falls off the docket (a procedural fillibuster). Possibly there is a way to kill it in committee as well?

A sign of support from your constituents helps give senators the courage to do either of those two things, I would suspect.
__________________
Last edited by JHVH : 10-29-4004 BC at 09:00 PM. Reason: Time for a rest.
Yakk is offline  
 

Tags
nomination, owens, priscilla, stop

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:41 PM.

Tilted Forum Project

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
© 2002-2012 Tilted Forum Project

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360