12-01-2004, 07:59 PM | #1 (permalink) |
... a sort of licensed troubleshooter.
|
Kurdish history
Everyone seems to be an expert on how the Kurdish people were murdered in Iraq. The U.S. media took a very big interest when we found out that these people were being tortured, imprisoned, and killed. Nerve gas was used at times. It was a terrible and disgusting part of world history. But there are Kurdish people living all over the middle east. There are many Kurds in Iran and Turkey.
Now I have heard some aweful stories about how the Kurdish people have been treated by the Turks over the years from friends that travel in that area, some of whome are Kurdish themselves - they rarely talk about what heppened, though. Does anyone know anything about the political history of the Kurdish people, and also about what is presently being done to safeguard and help these people? The Kurds are arguabally the most pro-American group in the middle east, but we never hear anything about them in the news (with the exception of the nerve gas used on them by Iraq back at the end of the 80s). I'd just like to know. Thanks for any help or information. |
12-01-2004, 08:09 PM | #2 (permalink) |
Kiss of Death
Location: Perpetual wind and sorrow
|
The largest displaced ethnic group on the planet.
Turkey has many issues as a country, many conflicting interests ethnically, that's why they qwell the Kurds, Many millions of Kurds live there in the southern part. I think their are a great many resources in Northern "Kurdistan", that's a big reason why no secession is allowed. Resources and sovereignity, retaining of power. Who knows, it's all largely fucked up.
__________________
To win a war you must serve no master but your ambition. |
12-01-2004, 09:43 PM | #4 (permalink) |
Junkie
Location: Fort Worth, TX
|
The Kurds have been a pain ever since the Ottoman Empire. When the Turks took over they claimed the homelands of the Kurds, and since then they've been out in the cold representitively wise.
Interesting fact... Saladin, one of the most revered of all Muslims in history, was a Kurd. |
12-02-2004, 08:31 AM | #5 (permalink) |
is awesome!
|
Turkey will never allow there to be a soverign "Kurdistan" and neither would the rest of Iraq. The Kurds are concentrated in areas of extreme oil wealth which they seldom profit from .
I think the reason more isn't made about our Kurdish allies is because of their close ties to the anti-Turk terrorist organizations. Justified or not, we're not really in a position where we can openly support terrorist tactics. |
12-02-2004, 12:32 PM | #6 (permalink) | |
Crazy
Location: Never Never Land
|
I thought about writing out a long detailed history for you, but fortunately I was able to a fairly good brief history online, to which I can add my comments at the end.
Quote:
My first comment would be concerning the Kurds in Turkey. Turkey’s policy towards the Kurds is to be honest not entirely friendly. I spent the better part of a summer over in Turkey studying, amongst other things, Turkish inter-political policies. The official Turkish policy is and has been for some time that “Kurds are Turks who have forgotten their identity” (nearly a direct quote from what one governmental official told me). With Turkey attempting to join the EU, however, this policy is undergoing change. Turkey, of course, still views the Kurds as an “internal problem” and as such should be a matter of internal governance without outside interference. One governmental employee liken the present problem to that of the situation of American Indians here in the US. I’m not sure I necessarily agree with his analogy exactly, but given the changes taking place in Turkey, I can foresee a time in the very near future when this could be the case. As for why Turkey is very adamant in its position about not surrendering any of the traditionally Kurdish controlled regions is somewhat complicated. First, although there is no question that the Kurds do occupy a general region in Turkey, many of them are also disseminated throughout Turkey, as are many Turks in traditional Kurdish lands. Kurdish Turkey is strategically important to the Turks not only because it is the boarder between Iran and Iraq, but also of its geographical features, most notably the Tarsus and anti-Tarsus mountains and Lake Van. This area is where the headwaters for the Tigris and Euphrates rivers which are the main water supplies for much of the Middle East. Controlling the flow of these rivers (the Turks have many dam works built here) is an important leveraging point for the Turks in regional politics and they will not give this up lightly. It is also important to note that Turkey has no major oil or gas supplies, either inside Kurdish areas or otherwise, but major oil transportation line coming from the major oil producing do travel through Kurdish territory as they carry oil across Turkey to the Mediterranean and Black Sea regions where they are refined (Turks may not have oil of their own but they do a significant portion of the oil refining) and then largely shipped to Europe. One final note that this article leaves somewhat ambiguous about is about PKK leader Abdullah Ocalan. Although Ocalan was indeed given the death sentence by the Turkish Supreme Court, this sentence has yet to be carried out. There is a somewhat tenuous understanding between the PKK and the Turkish government that so long as the PKK does not resume open hostilities towards the Turkish government, the Turks will let Ocalan live. Now for just a few quick notes on the Kurds living in Iran and Iraq. This report leaves out what I believe to be a few crucial details about the conflict beginning in 1974 between the Kurds and Iraq (points that I think are very important to understanding the current situation between the Kurds, Iran, Iraq, and the US). In 1974 the leader of Iraq was none other then Ahmed Hassan Bakr, for which Saddam Hussein was vice president (and defacto successor, or more accurately, Bakr was the puppet president as Hussein was already running most of the country at this time). The outbreak of violence between the Kurds and Iraqis was do in large part to US instigation. Basically, the US (under Nixon) saw an opportunity to help “liberate” Iraqi Kurds (and the oil regions they controlled). The US through its embassy in Iran (and its CIA operatives located there) went to the Iraqi Kurds and promised to supply and fund them were they to revolt against Iraqi control (this was all very hush hush of course, I learned of it through first hand information from one of the primary CIA operation officers who was in Iran at the time). The Kurds took the bait and began revolting. However, sometime after the conflict was in full swing, the Nixon administration for whatever reason decided to drop US support leaving the Kurds on their own. Of course once this happened the Kurds were no match for the Iraqi forces and were slaughtered. (The unofficial story goes something like this. The embassy in Iran received a communication from the State Department to “cease and desist” all support of the Iraqi Kurds immediately. Embassy officials in Iran could not believe what they were being instructed to do (knowing that if followed through this order would mean the wholesale slaughter of the Kurds in Iraq), so they sent a reply communication to “clarify the situation”. They very quickly received a reply, signed by Kissinger himself stating, “What part of “cease and desist” don’t you understand?”. Needless to say heads rolled in the Iranian embassy over this issue (and of course the Kurds were indeed slaughtered). Like all great US diplomatic errors this one was too wonderful to not repeat, and so once again 1979 in Iran it was. Once again the CIA was instructed to promise support to the Kurds for attempting to raise up in arms, once again they took the bait and did, and once again the US withdrew it support and the Kurds were slaughtered (this time under Carter of course). Now, although the US did play a small part in the 1988 slaughter of the Kurds by Hussain (redo, rinse, repeat the above scenario) the greater blame is upon the fact that Kurds are not Iraqi nor Iranian, nor Turk. With the war between Iran and Iraq the Kurds on both sides of the borders saw for themself an opportunity to gain themselves some amount of independence. Kurds in Iran then (with the full support of the Iranian government of course), began supplying Kurds in Iraq with supplies to fight against Hussein. Although Hussein is blamed for “gassing his own people”, the Kurds are not his people, the Sunnis are Hussein’s people. Keep that in mind and politics in the region make a lot more sense. So then in 1991 when the US once again promised to support the Kurds against Iraq it should come to you as no surprise that, yet once again the US pulled back and watched them get slaughtered, only this time we decided to step back into the picture and establish a “safe zone” for the Kurds who have since then had near autonomous governing (well as near to autonomous as one can have living in a hostile nation with only outside intervention being your only protection). So now it should really come as no surprise that the Kurds (not just Iraqi Kurds mind you) are somewhat skeptical of US promises to aid them and they are much less willing to take risks they view to be on our behalf. It also shouldn’t surprise you too much to learn, then, that some Kurds are so disgusted with the US that they have turned to terror organizations like Al Qaeda (after all the supposed link between Hussein and Al Qaeda was through one such Kurdish terror organization, never mind the fact that the Kurds hated Hussein more then anything else). Anyway, I hope that this will help you have a better understanding of the Kurds and their present situation in the region and their relationship with the US. |
|
12-06-2004, 08:36 PM | #10 (permalink) | |
Junkie
|
Quote:
Thank you very much for that exemplary post. It was extremely interesting, well written and very educational. It was also remarkably fair minded and free from any obvious partisanship. Great work. Mr Mephisto |
|
Tags |
history, kurdish |
|
|