Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community  

Go Back   Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community > The Academy > Tilted Politics


 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 11-07-2004, 12:35 AM   #41 (permalink)
Banned
 
Rdr4evr's Avatar
 
I know for sure alcohol is illegal in Iran, not sure about other middle eastern countries.
Rdr4evr is offline  
Old 11-07-2004, 12:42 AM   #42 (permalink)
Pissing in the cornflakes
 
Ustwo's Avatar
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by pan6467
PS Loco: Iran has already stated that they would not hestitate to use nukes if we made any move they deemed hostile to them. Hope you are wrong.... pray to God you are wrong... because we have some truly dumbass people who have "we can do anything because we are the shit" attitudes and they see that threat as an invite to attack.
Perhaps, the solution, is to deny them the nukes in the first place.
__________________
Agents of the enemies who hold office in our own government, who attempt to eliminate our "freedoms" and our "right to know" are posting among us, I fear.....on this very forum. - host

Obama - Know a Man by the friends he keeps.
Ustwo is offline  
Old 11-07-2004, 12:46 AM   #43 (permalink)
Pissing in the cornflakes
 
Ustwo's Avatar
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rdr4evr
I know for sure alcohol is illegal in Iran, not sure about other middle eastern countries.
I have a friend who left Iran about 10 years ago.

To have a party with alcohol in Iran, the first thing you do is pay the police off. This way the police won't bother your party. As an added bonus you can get the alcohol from the police that they confiscated from others.
__________________
Agents of the enemies who hold office in our own government, who attempt to eliminate our "freedoms" and our "right to know" are posting among us, I fear.....on this very forum. - host

Obama - Know a Man by the friends he keeps.
Ustwo is offline  
Old 11-07-2004, 12:52 AM   #44 (permalink)
Banned
 
Rdr4evr's Avatar
 
Apparently Muslims in Iran can be imprisoned or lashed if caught with alcohol, but Jews and Christians are allowed to drink as long as it is in private.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/3697652.stm
Rdr4evr is offline  
Old 11-07-2004, 01:46 AM   #45 (permalink)
Tilted
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rdr4evr
Fighting a war that has nothing to do with the safety of your country and one that you don't believe in does not constitute “serving” your country; it constitutes being a coward for fighting for something you don't believe in.

For me personally, I don't believe in war at all, therefore I would not fight no matter what the purpose behind it is. If it comes down to life and death, I am off to another country, if the apocalypse is at hand and the only way to survive is to fight, than I will fight for myself and the ones I love, not any one country.
War has never solved anything besides ending slavery, nazism, facistism, and islamic militants
D Rice is offline  
Old 11-07-2004, 02:47 AM   #46 (permalink)
can't help but laugh
 
irateplatypus's Avatar
 
Location: dar al-harb
it's impossible to dissect someone's reason why they wouldn't go to war because sincere pacifists and cowards both use the same excuses. no cowards admit they are one to others (and probably rarely to themselves), so they invariably think of some face-saving reason they'd never fight.

i don't know anyone on here well enough to make a judgement between a moral objectionist and a coward... so i won't.
__________________
If you will not fight when your victory will be sure and not too costly, you may come to the moment when you will have to fight with all the odds against you and only a precarious chance for survival. There may even be a worse case. You may have to fight when there is no hope of victory, because it is better to perish than to live as slaves.

~ Winston Churchill
irateplatypus is offline  
Old 11-07-2004, 06:57 AM   #47 (permalink)
Upright
 
There will be no draft. Wouldn't it be great if more worthless youth actually stepped up so we wouldn't need more troops?
cbr9racr is offline  
Old 11-07-2004, 07:02 AM   #48 (permalink)
sob
Banned
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Locobot
It seems my complete unemployability may save my ass yet. I'm more than confidant that I have no "critical skills" that the military would be interested in. Sucks for you engineers and medical personnel though.
Let me make sure I understand this. There is NO employer who's deemed you a suitable person to hire, and you consider that a great situation? And we're supposed to be impressed with your perspicacity?

Just tell me that you're not living off the tax dollars of people who actually work. Especially people who are proud that they work.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Locobot
The more important question here is of course could there be a draft? Does the military still have the capability to indoctrinate and train conscripts? I could see a lot of 18-20 year old boys being succeptable to military brain washing, much older than that I'm not so sure.
I can assure you that people can be brainwashed at a later age. I saw plenty of older college students who intended to vote for Kerry. Hook them up with a rock star, and they're lemmings.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Locobot
All this talk of a gender-neutral draft is interesting to me also. I know some fairly tough 18-25 year old women who could probably hold their own in a warzone. I also know quite a few young women who would be completely useless in battle, I don't care how much training they have. Hypothetically it's pretty hilarious to think about GWBush sending wave after wave of 18-year-old girls at the enemy, but I wouldn't put it beyond him.
So you believe that women in the military are all infantry, and that they never work in such jobs as supply, medical, communications, or as pilots?

If every woman in the military were suddenly gone right now, the services would be unable to function.
sob is offline  
Old 11-07-2004, 08:47 AM   #49 (permalink)
Tilted
 
posted by UsTwo
Perhaps, the solution, is to deny them the nukes in the first place.

Hope you aren't suggesting more events like the misplaced attack on Iraq. We have failed to deny Nuclear bombs to many of the least stable countries in the world (Pakistan, N. Korea, Soviet Union, China) even when that was our position. What can you possibly suggest that will allow us to accomplish this?
maypo is offline  
Old 11-07-2004, 11:27 AM   #50 (permalink)
Pissing in the cornflakes
 
Ustwo's Avatar
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by maypo
posted by UsTwo
Perhaps, the solution, is to deny them the nukes in the first place.

Hope you aren't suggesting more events like the misplaced attack on Iraq.
Yes, yes I am.

Quote:
We have failed to deny Nuclear bombs to many of the least stable countries in the world (Pakistan, N. Korea, Soviet Union, China) even when that was our position.
They currently are not shouting 'death to America' in their ruling bodies.

Quote:
What can you possibly suggest that will allow us to accomplish this?
Day one: They shout death to America with the possibility of nuclear weapons.

Day two:


Day Three: They shout death to America without the possibility of nuclear weapons.
__________________
Agents of the enemies who hold office in our own government, who attempt to eliminate our "freedoms" and our "right to know" are posting among us, I fear.....on this very forum. - host

Obama - Know a Man by the friends he keeps.
Ustwo is offline  
Old 11-07-2004, 11:34 AM   #51 (permalink)
sob
Banned
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by maypo
posted by UsTwo
Perhaps, the solution, is to deny them the nukes in the first place.

Hope you aren't suggesting more events like the misplaced attack on Iraq. We have failed to deny Nuclear bombs to many of the least stable countries in the world (Pakistan, N. Korea, Soviet Union, China) even when that was our position. What can you possibly suggest that will allow us to accomplish this?
"Failed to deny" is inaccurate. Jimmy Carter and Bill Clinton GAVE nuclear material to North Korea, because they believed their promise to "use it only for generating power." How idiotic was that?

Don't forget that if it's ever winging its way toward us in a missile, that missile will be guided by our own technology, which Loral sold to the Chinese.

Documents verify that ".. the president [Clinton] was informed that Loral may have contributed technology to China's ballistic missile program before he decided to grant Loral a waiver on February 18th of this year [1998] to permit them to export yet another satellite to China."

Can you say, "big fat campaign contribution from Loral?"
sob is offline  
Old 11-07-2004, 12:14 PM   #52 (permalink)
Lennonite Priest
 
pan6467's Avatar
 
Location: Mansfield, Ohio USA
Quote:
Originally Posted by sob
"Failed to deny" is inaccurate. Jimmy Carter and Bill Clinton GAVE nuclear material to North Korea, because they believed their promise to "use it only for generating power." How idiotic was that?

Don't forget that if it's ever winging its way toward us in a missile, that missile will be guided by our own technology, which Loral sold to the Chinese.

Documents verify that ".. the president [Clinton] was informed that Loral may have contributed technology to China's ballistic missile program before he decided to grant Loral a waiver on February 18th of this year [1998] to permit them to export yet another satellite to China."

Can you say, "big fat campaign contribution from Loral?"
First if you know your history Carter really didn't have much choice. China needed electricity and to be brought into the modern age. Plus, don't be so naive as to believe that without our help the Chinese would never have developed it on their own. What Carter did was provide SAFE plans to develop power plants. Otherwise China would have had disasters worse than 3 Mile Island and Chernobyl... but I'm sure to some of you who don't give a damn about the world and people you would say that was what China deserved.

Clinton helped China because China offered to turn over any illegal sales from the ex-USSR's "missing" arsenal. Again, in order to protect yourself you sometimes must help your enemy to believe he is on equal footing. Do you trulky believe that ANY president would give information out that the Chinese would not be able to get either elsewhere or on their own? Well, I'm sure some of you are so f-ing partisan and hate filled that you would believe that.

Does the article you quote from talk about how Rev. Moon (owner of the Washington Times and close friend to the Bush's) sold nuclear subs to N. Korea, how he gave millions to N. Korean leaders for the sole purpose to help their nuclear program? (BTW.... why did Reagan and Bush SELL Moon those subs anyway? What does a private citizen who runs the mother of all religious cults need with them? And why did Bush I let Moon sell them to North Korea?) Course you won't answer those questions, you'd rather point fingers at the president from the other party and say it was all his fault, Reagan and the Bushys NEVER, NEVER did anything bad.

Point is, we have had president's giving China and N. Korea information for a very long time, and it isn't just one party. What do you think Nixon truly did when he went to China DURING A WAR AGAINST THEM? HOw do you think Nixon was able to end the war?

Study your history.
__________________
I just love people who use the excuse "I use/do this because I LOVE the feeling/joy/happiness it brings me" and expect you to be ok with that as you watch them destroy their life blindly following. My response is, "I like to put forks in an eletrical socket, just LOVE that feeling, can't ever get enough of it, so will you let me put this copper fork in that electric socket?"
pan6467 is offline  
Old 11-07-2004, 12:17 PM   #53 (permalink)
Tilted
 
UsTwo, your fantasies of our efficiency leave me baffled. All these countries have shouted "death to America" at some point, when, exactly, should we have atttacked each of them in your opinion. Your concept of international relations makes me understand their desire for nuclear weapons.
Quote:
posted by sob
"Failed to deny" is inaccurate.
No, I consider this part of the process. The United States has provided weapons for many our enemies. It is a constantly shifting range from friend to enemy(see photos of Rumsfeld shaking hands with Saddam Hussein) It is these events that make the fantasy of our military strength so unsustainable, the one hand is giving while the other takes away.
maypo is offline  
Old 11-07-2004, 12:33 PM   #54 (permalink)
Pissing in the cornflakes
 
Ustwo's Avatar
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by maypo
UsTwo, your fantasies of our efficiency leave me baffled. All these countries have shouted "death to America" at some point, when, exactly, should we have atttacked each of them in your opinion. Your concept of international relations makes me understand their desire for nuclear weapons.
We tried the cold war, it sucked.

Pakistan is helping us.

China is a demon waiting another 20 years.

Iran is now.
__________________
Agents of the enemies who hold office in our own government, who attempt to eliminate our "freedoms" and our "right to know" are posting among us, I fear.....on this very forum. - host

Obama - Know a Man by the friends he keeps.
Ustwo is offline  
Old 11-07-2004, 01:16 PM   #55 (permalink)
Illusionary
 
tecoyah's Avatar
 
I do so very much hope you are not recommending an incursion into Iran.
This would be quite detrimental to stability in the region, and to our country as a whole. While I simply disagree with the invasion of Iraq, I would be extremely opposed to the same in Iran. Partially because we would likely lose such a war (three times the area of Iraq) but also because it would create the conditions for a third world war. Such a move would likely draw all parties, and the possibility of Nuclear assault into play, not something I am willing to consider as a viable course of action.

Opinion only....not reality
__________________
Holding onto anger is like grasping a hot coal with the intent of throwing it at someone else; you are the one who gets burned. - Buddha
tecoyah is offline  
Old 11-07-2004, 01:44 PM   #56 (permalink)
Pissing in the cornflakes
 
Ustwo's Avatar
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by tecoyah
I do so very much hope you are not recommending an incursion into Iran.
This would be quite detrimental to stability in the region, and to our country as a whole. While I simply disagree with the invasion of Iraq, I would be extremely opposed to the same in Iran. Partially because we would likely lose such a war (three times the area of Iraq) but also because it would create the conditions for a third world war. Such a move would likely draw all parties, and the possibility of Nuclear assault into play, not something I am willing to consider as a viable course of action.

Opinion only....not reality
Iran must not be allowed to have nuclear weapons, period.

If that means blowing up their reators, so be it.

Iran has one of the better chances of having an anti-islamofacist revolution, and I'm willing to wait and see what happens, BUT if the choice is between letting the current Iranian government gain nuclear weapons, vrs bombing, I side strongly with bombing.
__________________
Agents of the enemies who hold office in our own government, who attempt to eliminate our "freedoms" and our "right to know" are posting among us, I fear.....on this very forum. - host

Obama - Know a Man by the friends he keeps.
Ustwo is offline  
Old 11-07-2004, 01:47 PM   #57 (permalink)
Lennonite Priest
 
pan6467's Avatar
 
Location: Mansfield, Ohio USA
What part of "THE IRANIANS HAVE ALREADY SAID THEY WOULD USE NUKES IF WE SHOWED ANY AGRESSION TOWARDS THEM" do people not understand?

It's not a question of do they have them, or will they use them ..... it's a REALITY. Do we need to prove the US is so great that we are willing to start a nuclear war to prove it?

W. in all his greatness could have prevented Iran from getting this far, but chose instead to invade a country so down beaten from years of assault that they couldn't do much, and yet they are holding their own so far, aren't they?

Now we have people on this board wanting Iran or saying "if we invade Iran it MAY lead to nuclear war"...... there is no maybe.... there is only it WILL.
__________________
I just love people who use the excuse "I use/do this because I LOVE the feeling/joy/happiness it brings me" and expect you to be ok with that as you watch them destroy their life blindly following. My response is, "I like to put forks in an eletrical socket, just LOVE that feeling, can't ever get enough of it, so will you let me put this copper fork in that electric socket?"
pan6467 is offline  
Old 11-07-2004, 01:52 PM   #58 (permalink)
Illusionary
 
tecoyah's Avatar
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ustwo
Iran must not be allowed to have nuclear weapons, period.

If that means blowing up their reators, so be it.

Iran has one of the better chances of having an anti-islamofacist revolution, and I'm willing to wait and see what happens, BUT if the choice is between letting the current Iranian government gain nuclear weapons, vrs bombing, I side strongly with bombing.
One can only hope, this is not the direction we are heading. If indeed it is, I fear for humanity, as the results should be relatively obvious. But then again....I have always looked towards worst case scenario, as the possible reality.
__________________
Holding onto anger is like grasping a hot coal with the intent of throwing it at someone else; you are the one who gets burned. - Buddha
tecoyah is offline  
Old 11-07-2004, 01:57 PM   #59 (permalink)
Pissing in the cornflakes
 
Ustwo's Avatar
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by tecoyah
One can only hope, this is not the direction we are heading. If indeed it is, I fear for humanity, as the results should be relatively obvious. But then again....I have always looked towards worst case scenario, as the possible reality.
Where does this fear come from? Who would come to Iran's aid?
__________________
Agents of the enemies who hold office in our own government, who attempt to eliminate our "freedoms" and our "right to know" are posting among us, I fear.....on this very forum. - host

Obama - Know a Man by the friends he keeps.
Ustwo is offline  
Old 11-07-2004, 03:46 PM   #60 (permalink)
Crazy
 
Location: geff il
what a bunch of brat kids... i mean so verry typical. mmmm well if i can drink it might be ok... o the country were goging to dosnt support drinking well i guess its not so cool after all

oh wait i hat bush im not going..

sounds like a great big case of my parents have given me evreythign i want wip my as for me and why shoudl i start changing now.

otherwise known as pussitis thats puss- ite- is for those of you whos parents did your homework for you...


i hear the exact same thing form all the rich kids who got in the army for a free ride to school and then a war happens ( wether its rite or not ) and then all of a suden well i dont want to go fight.. i just want to goto school......

how about this scenerio clinton decides that we need to finish what bush sr started and creates the whole school deal and bouuses and all that shit that all the pretty people signed up for. and then leaves a not on the desk in the oval office for bush jr saying ok buddy i got the numbers for you now its your turn to use them.. go fucking invade someone yeah iraq is a great place...


that would fuck with some people....




edit #1


ok this was in response to #'s a long time ago.. but hey let er rip if yall want...
__________________
this post is a natural product made from recycled electrons.
the slight variations in spelling, grammar and punctuation
enhance its individual character and individuality and are
in no way to be considered flaws or defects.


if you cant read my post i dont want to hear about it move on. thanks

Last edited by rfra3645; 11-07-2004 at 04:16 PM..
rfra3645 is offline  
Old 11-07-2004, 06:17 PM   #61 (permalink)
Illusionary
 
tecoyah's Avatar
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ustwo
Where does this fear come from? Who would come to Iran's aid?
One possible scenario that comes to mind:

We attack Iran
Iran attacks Isreal
Isreal retaliates

If Isreal decides to attack ANY country in the middle east....it will escalate.
We do not have the needed forces to have a ground war in Iran.
Iraq would seem like childs play in comparison to an Iranian War.
We are far from "Winning" in Iraq at this time.(see tonights headlines)

If we cannot maintain control over Iraq, What makes one think we could attack, and control an area three times that size....with three times the population?

Seriously Ustwo....do you honestly think a War in Iran is a good Idea?
__________________
Holding onto anger is like grasping a hot coal with the intent of throwing it at someone else; you are the one who gets burned. - Buddha
tecoyah is offline  
Old 11-07-2004, 06:24 PM   #62 (permalink)
Pissing in the cornflakes
 
Ustwo's Avatar
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by tecoyah
One possible scenario that comes to mind:

We attack Iran
Iran attacks Isreal
Isreal retaliates

If Isreal decides to attack ANY country in the middle east....it will escalate.
We do not have the needed forces to have a ground war in Iran.
Iraq would seem like childs play in comparison to an Iranian War.
We are far from "Winning" in Iraq at this time.(see tonights headlines)

If we cannot maintain control over Iraq, What makes one think we could attack, and control an area three times that size....with three times the population?

Seriously Ustwo....do you honestly think a War in Iran is a good Idea?
They said the same thing about Iraq, and Iraq would have a lot getter chance of attacking Israel than Iran.

We have already won Iraq, this is called clean up, and because we are a humane victor we are willing to risk our troops when no risk is really necessary. How would Iran do any better than Iraq, which was thought of as the strongest? Iran would be surrounded, but that is only a land battle.

A simple surgical strike is all that is required.

Would YOU rather wait and face the same people WITH nukes?
__________________
Agents of the enemies who hold office in our own government, who attempt to eliminate our "freedoms" and our "right to know" are posting among us, I fear.....on this very forum. - host

Obama - Know a Man by the friends he keeps.
Ustwo is offline  
Old 11-07-2004, 06:29 PM   #63 (permalink)
Illusionary
 
tecoyah's Avatar
 
As the information pertaining to the current power, and armament of Iran is in question, and it is unlikely you would believe it if you were shown, this is becoming a pointless debate. As to my actual question, of whether you consider war with Iran to be a good Idea, I think you answered it quite well. Thank You for your reply.
__________________
Holding onto anger is like grasping a hot coal with the intent of throwing it at someone else; you are the one who gets burned. - Buddha
tecoyah is offline  
Old 11-07-2004, 06:39 PM   #64 (permalink)
Pissing in the cornflakes
 
Ustwo's Avatar
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by tecoyah
As the information pertaining to the current power, and armament of Iran is in question, and it is unlikely you would believe it if you were shown
Please, I'm all ears.
__________________
Agents of the enemies who hold office in our own government, who attempt to eliminate our "freedoms" and our "right to know" are posting among us, I fear.....on this very forum. - host

Obama - Know a Man by the friends he keeps.
Ustwo is offline  
Old 11-07-2004, 06:43 PM   #65 (permalink)
Illusionary
 
tecoyah's Avatar
 
Thank you......but I will need to pass on the offer. Appreciate the information though.
__________________
Holding onto anger is like grasping a hot coal with the intent of throwing it at someone else; you are the one who gets burned. - Buddha
tecoyah is offline  
Old 11-07-2004, 06:48 PM   #66 (permalink)
Pissing in the cornflakes
 
Ustwo's Avatar
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by tecoyah
Thank you......but I will need to pass on the offer. Appreciate the information though.
Guess I need to find my own links.

Edit: Found a good one http://www.csis.org/features/0407_IransMilForces.pdf

You are right, I'm not worried in the least.

Quote:
Iran is still a major military power by Gulf terms. It has active forces of some 540,000 men, although some 220,000 of this total are 18-month conscripts which general receive limited training and have marginal military effectiveness. It also has an army reserve of some 350,000 men, although these reserves receive negligible training and Iran lacks the equipment, supplies, and leadership cadres to make effective use of such reserves without months of reorganization and training. Iran’s problems in military modernization have been compounded by a number of factors. The combat trained manpower Iran developed during the Iran-Iraq War have virtually all left service. Iran is now a largely conscript force with limited military training and little combat experience. The deep divisions between “moderates” and “hard-liners” in Iran’s government have inevitably politicized the armed forces, which remain under the command of the supreme religious leader, the Ayatollah Khamenei. Iran has also divided armed forces, split between the regular forces that existed under the Shah, and the Revolutionary Guards created under the Ayatollah Khomeini. This split is compounded by a highly bureaucratic force, which has made limited progress in joint warfare.
Quote:
Only part of Iran’s tank inventory is fully operational, however, and it is uncertain how many Chieftains and M-47/M-48s are operational. Some experts estimate that Iran's sustainable operational tank strength may be fewer than 1,000 tanks. Further, its Chieftains and M-60s are at least 16-20 years old, and the T-72 is Iran’s only tank with advanced fire control systems, sights, and anti-armor ammunition.
Quote:
The Iranian Air Force The Iranian Air Force has some 15,000 men and over 300 combat aircraft in its inventory (The IISS estimates 306). Many of these aircraft, however, are either not operational or cannot be sustained in air combat. This includes 50-60% of Iran’s US and French supplied aircraft and some 30-40% of its Russian and Chinese supplied aircraft. It has nine fighter-ground attack squadrons with 162-186 aircraft; seven fighter squadrons, with 70-74 aircraft, a reconnaissance unit with 4-8 aircraft, and a number of transport aircraft, helicopters, and special purpose aircraft. It operates most of Iraq’s land-based air defenses, including some 150 IHawks, 45 HQ-21s, 10 SA-5sm 30 Rapiers, and additional forces equipped with light surface-to-air missiles.
Its like Iraq lite. More untrained men, less real weapons.
__________________
Agents of the enemies who hold office in our own government, who attempt to eliminate our "freedoms" and our "right to know" are posting among us, I fear.....on this very forum. - host

Obama - Know a Man by the friends he keeps.

Last edited by Ustwo; 11-07-2004 at 07:06 PM..
Ustwo is offline  
Old 11-07-2004, 08:53 PM   #67 (permalink)
sob
Banned
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by pan6467
First if you know your history Carter really didn't have much choice. China needed electricity and to be brought into the modern age. Plus, don't be so naive as to believe that without our help the Chinese would never have developed it on their own. What Carter did was provide SAFE plans to develop power plants. Otherwise China would have had disasters worse than 3 Mile Island and Chernobyl... but I'm sure to some of you who don't give a damn about the world and people you would say that was what China deserved.
It would save a lot of effort if you would read what I said before trying to "correct" it.

I said NORTH KOREA. There's a difference between North Korea and China. They happen to be two different countries.



Quote:
Originally Posted by pan6467
Clinton helped China because China offered to turn over any illegal sales from the ex-USSR's "missing" arsenal. Again, in order to protect yourself you sometimes must help your enemy to believe he is on equal footing. Do you trulky believe that ANY president would give information out that the Chinese would not be able to get either elsewhere or on their own? Well, I'm sure some of you are so f-ing partisan and hate filled that you would believe that.
Clinton demonstrated that he would do or say anything, including bombing countries without even consulting Congress, if he thought it would keep him in office.

BTW, why is it okay to hate Bush, but saying anything negative about Clinton is "f-ing partisan and hate filled?"

Quote:
Originally Posted by pan6467
Does the article you quote from talk about how Rev. Moon (owner of the Washington Times and close friend to the Bush's) sold nuclear subs to N. Korea, how he gave millions to N. Korean leaders for the sole purpose to help their nuclear program? (BTW.... why did Reagan and Bush SELL Moon those subs anyway? What does a private citizen who runs the mother of all religious cults need with them? And why did Bush I let Moon sell them to North Korea?) Course you won't answer those questions, you'd rather point fingers at the president from the other party and say it was all his fault, Reagan and the Bushys NEVER, NEVER did anything bad.
Well, if you can still manage to read your monitor with your knee jerking so furiously, I'll correct you again:

In January, 1994, a Japanese trading company "Touen Hoji" in Suganami-Ku, Tokyo, purchased 12 F and G Class submarines from the Russian Pacific Fleet Headquarters. These submarines were then sold to a KN (North Korean) trading company. Although this transaction garnered a great deal of coverage in the Japanese media, it was not disclosed at the time that Touen Hoji is an affiliate of the Unification Church.

Do you happen to remember who was president in 1994? Kind of hurts your credibility when people see that you blamed Reagan (who left office five years before), now doesn't it?


Quote:
Originally Posted by pan6467
Study your history.
Likewise, but add geography to the list.
sob is offline  
Old 11-07-2004, 08:58 PM   #68 (permalink)
Gentlemen Farmer
 
j8ear's Avatar
 
Location: Middle of nowhere, Jersey
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rdr4evr
I know for sure alcohol is illegal in Iran, not sure about other middle eastern countries.
Bahrain and Dubai were certainly not dry, and while Kuwait and most of Saudi Arabia were, there definately wasn't any shortage of "listerine bottles" of jack!

All US naval vessels are dry. HMS naval vessels are not. We used to love taking tours aboard the ships of our conterparts of the British Royal Marines!

Aaaah the good ole days.

-bear
__________________
It's alot easier to ask for forgiveness then it is to ask for permission.

Last edited by j8ear; 11-07-2004 at 09:01 PM..
j8ear is offline  
Old 11-07-2004, 09:16 PM   #69 (permalink)
is awesome!
 
Locobot's Avatar
 
ustwo brings up a salient point with his posting of the stealth jet photo. Americans and the world at large should be aware that Americans are capable of, and have exhibited violent behavior unrivalled in the annals of history [note I am NOT making a value judgement]. The other unspoked draft alternative is the use of overwhelming indiscriminate ordinanace: napalm, carpet bombing, or nuclear weaponry on population centers. These weapons are in place and there are contingency plans for their use. If our leaders feel threatened enough they will use them, ask the old folk in Dresden, Nagasaki, Hiroshima, Tokyo, or Nuremburg--they can tell you about American vengence.
Locobot is offline  
Old 11-07-2004, 10:00 PM   #70 (permalink)
is awesome!
 
Locobot's Avatar
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ustwo
Its like Iraq lite. More untrained men, less real weapons.
It's as if GWBush declared "mission accomplished" and you stopped paying attention. It turns out that Iraq had far fewer functional conventional weapons and troops than our prewar intelligence indicated (and none, zip, zero, 0%, nada of the WMDs we thought they had). And yet we're in a position of facing 50-100 attacks per day on our troops with a steady casaulty rate.

Your statistics fail to address the biggest adversities our country would face in a possible Iran invasion. If only they lined up their tanks and troops and we could line up our weapons across from them and have at. Sorry ustwo, that kind of war hasn't occured in the past 50 years. It's much more important to look at the prevailing sentiment of the people (rabidly anti-American), experience of the troops (Iran has troops that have actually been in battle not just seen them on TV), terrain (Iran is mountainous which would provide ample cover for a resisitance), and distribution of small arms (I'm not sure about Iran on this, but I would guess it's pretty similar to Iraq--an AK for every person).

If war is such a cakewalk why don't you enlist?
Locobot is offline  
Old 11-07-2004, 10:07 PM   #71 (permalink)
Insane
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ustwo
To have a party with alcohol in Iran, the first thing you do is pay the police off. This way the police won't bother your party. As an added bonus you can get the alcohol from the police that they confiscated from others.
REALLY??? WOW...that's awesome. That would be sweet to pull that off over there. Pretty interesting experience. Good thing they don't do that here in the States. We have enough crackheads as it is
- Undercover_Man
Undercover_Man is offline  
Old 11-07-2004, 10:23 PM   #72 (permalink)
Pissing in the cornflakes
 
Ustwo's Avatar
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Locobot
ustwo brings up a salient point with his posting of the stealth jet photo. Americans and the world at large should be aware that Americans are capable of, and have exhibited violent behavior unrivalled in the annals of history
I'm sorry but you have a very short history book. You are so far from logic here I have to wonder if you post this impared. Saying our 'violent behavior' is unrivalled in history is so amazingly wrong that I would think it was a troll post if you weren't so consistant.
__________________
Agents of the enemies who hold office in our own government, who attempt to eliminate our "freedoms" and our "right to know" are posting among us, I fear.....on this very forum. - host

Obama - Know a Man by the friends he keeps.
Ustwo is offline  
Old 11-07-2004, 11:44 PM   #73 (permalink)
is awesome!
 
Locobot's Avatar
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ustwo
I'm sorry but you have a very short history book. You are so far from logic here I have to wonder if you post this impared. Saying our 'violent behavior' is unrivalled in history is so amazingly wrong that I would think it was a troll post if you weren't so consistant.
Uh oh! Am I not being patriotic enough for you? Did you miss my [not making value judgements] disclaimer? Tell me which other nations have offensively detonated nuclear weapons and I'll concede that the U.S. has had an undistinguished record of violent wartime acts.

What a concession that will be too, to be rated average in violent acts.
Locobot is offline  
Old 11-08-2004, 12:08 AM   #74 (permalink)
Insane
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Locobot
Uh oh! Am I not being patriotic enough for you? Did you miss my [not making value judgements] disclaimer? Tell me which other nations have offensively detonated nuclear weapons and I'll concede that the U.S. has had an undistinguished record of violent wartime acts.

What a concession that will be too, to be rated average in violent acts.
Why do you hate America?
hammer4all is offline  
Old 11-08-2004, 12:22 AM   #75 (permalink)
Insane
 
Kalibah's Avatar
 
Location: Padded Playhouse
I think a draft was more likely under Kerry- being that Dems started the bill


Or wait Would we rather have Clinton - a firefight and we back outta Somalia- that sends the wrong message... We arent a Spain


I'd trust Bush with my life- He'd go nuclear before we had a draft


Its like Reagan, you wnana President that acts so crazy- they think he'd push the button

Kalibah is offline  
Old 11-08-2004, 01:08 AM   #76 (permalink)
Banned
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kalibah
I think a draft was more likely under Kerry- being that Dems started the bill


Or wait Would we rather have Clinton - a firefight and we back outta Somalia- that sends the wrong message... We arent a Spain


I'd trust Bush with my life- He'd go nuclear before we had a draft


Its like Reagan, you wnana President that acts so crazy- they think he'd push the button

Well....we're gettin' to see, pretty quickly, where the real threats to
America's future are coming from......from the white house, and from the
heeartland. Uncannily similar to Macnamara's description of General Curtis
LeMay's attitude during the Cuban missle crises (see the film, "The Fog of
War"). And.....when Powell resigns from Statee, just disband the department,
and recall all the ambassadors......ain';t gonna need 'em.....anymore!

Reagan ????? Reagan......oh...you must mean this Reagan.....
Quote:
Weinberger Doctrine <a href="http://college.hmco.com/history/readerscomp/mil/html/mh_057800_weinbergerdo.htm">the bombing of the U.S. Marine barracks at Beirut airport on October 23, 1983, a humiliating disaster in which 241 marines perished</a>

The Weinberger Doctrine was first made public by U.S. Secretary of Defense Caspar Weinberger on November 28, 1984. In a speech entitled "The Uses of Military Power" delivered before the National Press Club in Washington, D.C., Weinberger presented the doctrine in response to an ongoing debate between the secretary of defense and the Pentagon on the one hand, and Secretary of State George P. Shultz, the State Department, and members of the National Security Council on the other, concerning the presence of American troops in Lebanon and their contemplated use in Central America (in the civil wars in Nicaragua and San Salvador).

The proximate cause for the speech was the bombing of the U.S. Marine barracks at Beirut airport on October 23, 1983, a humiliating disaster in which 241 marines perished. This ill-fated U.S. peacekeeping mission in Lebanon had been undertaken despite the vigorous opposition of the secretary of defense and the Joint Chiefs of Staff, who argued that its purpose was never clearly defined and that the chaotic, violent situation in Lebanon could not be brought under control by any outside force. When dropped into the middle of this turmoil, the marine contingent would only, they insisted, become a convenient and prominent target for the various factions in the civil war.

The Weinberger address followed President Ronald Reagan's decision to withdraw the U.S. Marines from Lebanon and was therefore intended to summarize the lessons learned from this debacle in the hope that similar improper uses of American forces could be prevented in the future.

Last edited by host; 11-08-2004 at 01:28 AM..
host is offline  
Old 11-08-2004, 01:19 AM   #77 (permalink)
What the HELL?
 
sonikeko's Avatar
 
Location: Bowling Green, OH
Quote:
Originally Posted by D Rice
I am laughing my ass of right now. You are a damn fool if you think the draft is coming back. Just another so called scare tactic that only characterizes right wingers but the democrats are using. I would put every cent of my belongings and bet you there will not be a draft under this adminstration. And if there was i would go and serve becasue i have seen the world and you and i are blessed to live in this country and it is worth fighting for.
I agree...except that this war we're fighting now isn't trying to protect our "Beloved Country"...it definately is about Oil and revenge. Soon enough though, we will have to fight to protect our country, because everyone in this World hates us. Except the UK...oh, and don't forget Poland
__________________
"Adolescence is short, maturity is forever"
sonikeko is offline  
Old 11-08-2004, 01:22 AM   #78 (permalink)
What the HELL?
 
sonikeko's Avatar
 
Location: Bowling Green, OH
Quote:
Originally Posted by yeagbltz86
Stay in school. stay as long as you can. FOR THE LOVE OF GOD!
Under Bush's proposed plan, this would no longer matter
__________________
"Adolescence is short, maturity is forever"
sonikeko is offline  
Old 11-08-2004, 01:28 AM   #79 (permalink)
What the HELL?
 
sonikeko's Avatar
 
Location: Bowling Green, OH
Quote:
Originally Posted by cbr9racr
There will be no draft. Wouldn't it be great if more worthless youth actually stepped up so we wouldn't need more troops?
Worthless youth? I hope that's not your true feelings because us "worthless youth" are the future of the country that you live in and love.
__________________
"Adolescence is short, maturity is forever"
sonikeko is offline  
Old 11-08-2004, 01:37 AM   #80 (permalink)
What the HELL?
 
sonikeko's Avatar
 
Location: Bowling Green, OH
I think what people don't seem to understand here is that Iran DOES have and continues to develop nukes. The MILITARY is stretched way too thin for us to continue our dedications around the world. And finally, people need to realise that the US is not the only country that possesses nuclear materials or nuclear "Secrets". All of that is for sale if the money's right
__________________
"Adolescence is short, maturity is forever"
sonikeko is offline  
 

Tags
draft, rumors


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:49 AM.

Tilted Forum Project

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
© 2002-2012 Tilted Forum Project

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360