Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community  

Go Back   Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community > The Academy > Tilted Politics


 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 10-31-2004, 07:19 PM   #1 (permalink)
Pissing in the cornflakes
 
Ustwo's Avatar
 
Iran wants new toys.

Quote:
TEHRAN, Iran - To shouts of "Death to America," Iran's parliament unanimously approved the outline of a bill Sunday that would require the government to resume uranium enrichment, legislation likely to deepen an international dispute over Iran's nuclear activities.
http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=stor...r_041031114949

Here is why I fear Kerry. He won't do anything about it but have talks where they will do what they want anyways like what happened to Clinton in N. Korea, and in a few years we will have a radical islamic government with nuclear weapons.

The solution to this is obvious, needed and needed fast. If Isreal doesn't do us the favor like they did in Iraq, we will have to do it ourselves.
__________________
Agents of the enemies who hold office in our own government, who attempt to eliminate our "freedoms" and our "right to know" are posting among us, I fear.....on this very forum. - host

Obama - Know a Man by the friends he keeps.
Ustwo is offline  
Old 10-31-2004, 07:48 PM   #2 (permalink)
Paq
Junkie
 
Paq's Avatar
 
Location: South Carolina
umm

no offense, but is bush really doing anything about this or is it just being a bit ignored, ala NK...
__________________
Live.

Chris
Paq is offline  
Old 10-31-2004, 07:57 PM   #3 (permalink)
Junkie
 
I think Israel will do something. And unfortunately I think such action could lead to a general conflagration in the entire Middle East.

Mr Mephisto
Mephisto2 is offline  
Old 10-31-2004, 10:04 PM   #4 (permalink)
Junkie
 
hannukah harry's Avatar
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ustwo
http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=stor...r_041031114949

Here is why I fear Kerry. He won't do anything about it but have talks where they will do what they want anyways like what happened to Clinton in N. Korea, and in a few years we will have a radical islamic government with nuclear weapons.

The solution to this is obvious, needed and needed fast. If Isreal doesn't do us the favor like they did in Iraq, we will have to do it ourselves.
what did isreal do in iraq?
__________________
shabbat shalom, mother fucker! - the hebrew hammer
hannukah harry is offline  
Old 10-31-2004, 10:09 PM   #5 (permalink)
can't help but laugh
 
irateplatypus's Avatar
 
Location: dar al-harb
Quote:
Originally Posted by hannukah harry
what did isreal do in iraq?
they took out saddam's nuclear reactor build with support from the french just before it was operational. all back in 1981... Israel was ahead of the curve.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/onthisday/hi/d...00/3014623.stm
__________________
If you will not fight when your victory will be sure and not too costly, you may come to the moment when you will have to fight with all the odds against you and only a precarious chance for survival. There may even be a worse case. You may have to fight when there is no hope of victory, because it is better to perish than to live as slaves.

~ Winston Churchill
irateplatypus is offline  
Old 10-31-2004, 10:14 PM   #6 (permalink)
Pissing in the cornflakes
 
Ustwo's Avatar
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr Mephisto
I think Israel will do something. And unfortunately I think such action could lead to a general conflagration in the entire Middle East.

Mr Mephisto
What would they do? Would they would hate Isreal more, teach their children to hate Isreal more, and have youngsters kill themselves more because of Isreal?

Invasion is going to happen AGAIN to Isreal one of these days, might as well get it over with now before one of these wackjob nations gets the bomb.
__________________
Agents of the enemies who hold office in our own government, who attempt to eliminate our "freedoms" and our "right to know" are posting among us, I fear.....on this very forum. - host

Obama - Know a Man by the friends he keeps.
Ustwo is offline  
Old 10-31-2004, 10:16 PM   #7 (permalink)
Pissing in the cornflakes
 
Ustwo's Avatar
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Paq
umm

no offense, but is bush really doing anything about this or is it just being a bit ignored, ala NK...

North Korea is a different problem due to the fact that, they may for one already have the weapons, and two have a giant army aimed at South Korea.

I think Bush is holding off due to the election more than anything.
__________________
Agents of the enemies who hold office in our own government, who attempt to eliminate our "freedoms" and our "right to know" are posting among us, I fear.....on this very forum. - host

Obama - Know a Man by the friends he keeps.
Ustwo is offline  
Old 10-31-2004, 10:19 PM   #8 (permalink)
Somnabulist
 
guy44's Avatar
 
Location: corner of No and Where
Quote:
Here is why I fear Kerry. He won't do anything about it but have talks where they will do what they want anyways like what happened to Clinton in N. Korea, and in a few years we will have a radical islamic government with nuclear weapons.

The solution to this is obvious, needed and needed fast. If Isreal doesn't do us the favor like they did in Iraq, we will have to do it ourselves.

The Clinton Administration actually was rather successful at limiting and slowing the North Korean nuclear program. International observers had access to N. Korean nuclear reactors and monitored the activity within. Was it perfect? No.

Bush decided on his own to abandon the safeguards on N. Korean nuclear programs, directly causing the dramatic acceleration of the program's timetable. Similarly, the news that Iran was developing nuclear weapons surfaced in early 2002. What was it, exactly, that Bush has done "fast" to stop the Iranian nuclear weapons program? Perhaps his Iraq invasion was intended to, I don't know, stop Iran from resuming uranium enrichment? Because we knew about the N. Korean and Iranian nuclear programs before we invaded Iraq, a country with no nuclear programs and no WMDs (in contrast to, say, North Korea and Iran.)

The problem with short-circuited thinking is, you think that:

Bush talks tough - facts = Bush IS tough.

Meanwhile, back in the real world:

Bush talks tough + does jack shit with regards to N. Korea and Iran = Bush is full of shit.
__________________
"You have reached Ritual Sacrifice. For goats press one, or say 'goats.'"
guy44 is offline  
Old 10-31-2004, 10:21 PM   #9 (permalink)
Junkie
 
hannukah harry's Avatar
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by irateplatypus
they took out saddam's nuclear reactor build with support from the french just before it was operational. all back in 1981... Israel was ahead of the curve.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/onthisday/hi/d...00/3014623.stm


ah, i see. i already knew about this, i thought he meant in the current conflict. thought maybe i missed something.
__________________
shabbat shalom, mother fucker! - the hebrew hammer
hannukah harry is offline  
Old 10-31-2004, 10:23 PM   #10 (permalink)
Somnabulist
 
guy44's Avatar
 
Location: corner of No and Where
Quote:
I think Bush is holding off due to the election more than anything.
Wow. I never thought someone would actually admit that the candidate they favor for president delays taking action against a developing nuclear enemy in the most unstable part of the world for 2 years in order to futher his re-election chances. And they think that is O.K.

Wow.

I hope any candidate I support for president would formulate a stance towards this country, act on it, and do what is best for the United States and the world in general without regards to his own personal political ambitions.
__________________
"You have reached Ritual Sacrifice. For goats press one, or say 'goats.'"
guy44 is offline  
Old 10-31-2004, 10:27 PM   #11 (permalink)
Pissing in the cornflakes
 
Ustwo's Avatar
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by guy44
Wow. I never thought someone would actually admit that the candidate they favor for president delays taking action against a developing nuclear enemy in the most unstable part of the world for 2 years in order to futher his re-election chances. And they think that is O.K.

Wow.

I hope any candidate I support for president would formulate a stance towards this country, act on it, and do what is best for the United States and the world in general without regards to his own personal political ambitions.
So in other words you are not voting for Kerry?
__________________
Agents of the enemies who hold office in our own government, who attempt to eliminate our "freedoms" and our "right to know" are posting among us, I fear.....on this very forum. - host

Obama - Know a Man by the friends he keeps.
Ustwo is offline  
Old 10-31-2004, 10:32 PM   #12 (permalink)
Junkie
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ustwo
What would they do? Would they would hate Isreal more, teach their children to hate Isreal more, and have youngsters kill themselves more because of Isreal?

Invasion is going to happen AGAIN to Isreal one of these days, might as well get it over with now before one of these wackjob nations gets the bomb.
Who are "they" that you refer to? The Middle Eastern countries?

All I said was that such an action could lead to a general conflagration. It would be seen, rightly, as an act of war. Would that result in an actual war? Who knows? It "could" happen, as I said. And that would be unfortunate.

Why do you have to jump down every single post of mine? Especially when all I'm doing is engaging in a thread you started?


Mr Mephisto
Mephisto2 is offline  
Old 10-31-2004, 10:33 PM   #13 (permalink)
Paq
Junkie
 
Paq's Avatar
 
Location: South Carolina
see Ustwo...you just said it yourself that Bush is holding off bc of the election...then you turn around and say that Kerry would hesitate bc it's not within his own ambitions...

and you call kerry a waffler?????

I wish i had your sense of reality...must be great there...probably lonely, though
__________________
Live.

Chris
Paq is offline  
Old 10-31-2004, 10:46 PM   #14 (permalink)
Pissing in the cornflakes
 
Ustwo's Avatar
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Paq
see Ustwo...you just said it yourself that Bush is holding off bc of the election...then you turn around and say that Kerry would hesitate bc it's not within his own ambitions...

and you call kerry a waffler?????

I wish i had your sense of reality...must be great there...probably lonely, though
No I said I think he was.

I didn't say I agree with it.

I didn't say I think it is right if he is.

I am just going by a hunch.

I KNOW that Kerry would do such things.

That is the difference.

There are a lot of factors with the Iran issue we don't know, something might already be planned, perhaps we are waiting for better intel.

I am a cynic by nature, so I am being cynical about Bush, that does not mean he acts based on my cynicism.
__________________
Agents of the enemies who hold office in our own government, who attempt to eliminate our "freedoms" and our "right to know" are posting among us, I fear.....on this very forum. - host

Obama - Know a Man by the friends he keeps.
Ustwo is offline  
Old 10-31-2004, 11:13 PM   #15 (permalink)
Somnabulist
 
guy44's Avatar
 
Location: corner of No and Where
Ustwo, we keep running into each other.

OK, so the situation is that Iran and N. Korea have substantially advanced their respective nuclear weapons programs in the time that Bush has been president, and done so publicly for Bush's last 2 years.

Bush didn't do anything about it, a position I think we are all in agreement on. You posited that you believe that Bush has refrained from taking action in order to further his personal political ambitions.

You also believe that Kerry wouldn't do anything as long as it would further his political ambitions (how not doing anything about N. Korea and Iran helps Kerry politically should he become president remains unexplained, but nonetheless I will grant you this unsubstantiated claim for the sake of argument.)

Only one of these men has had the opportunity to engage in actions towards either N. Korea or Iran while president: Bush. He has, without a doubt, done nothing. Yet you say you are MORE CONFIDENT that Kerry would do nothing if placed in the same situation, despite the fact that he has never, in fact, had the opportunity to do nothing.

You may be right that Kerry will do nothing. However, only Bush has proven that he will do nothing.

That, Ustwo, is the real difference between the two men. I will take the man more likely to fail than the one proven to have failed every time.
__________________
"You have reached Ritual Sacrifice. For goats press one, or say 'goats.'"
guy44 is offline  
Old 10-31-2004, 11:38 PM   #16 (permalink)
Banned
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ustwo
No I said I think he was.

I didn't say I agree with it.

I didn't say I think it is right if he is.

I am just going by a hunch.

I KNOW that Kerry would do such things.
Surely you're not suggesting that you can foretell the future - so you it must be that you THINK Kerry woud do such things. You're just going by a hunch.
bling is offline  
Old 11-01-2004, 06:26 AM   #17 (permalink)
Kiss of Death
 
Location: Perpetual wind and sorrow
Quote:
Originally Posted by guy44
Ustwo, we keep running into each other.

OK, so the situation is that Iran and N. Korea have substantially advanced their respective nuclear weapons programs in the time that Bush has been president, and done so publicly for Bush's last 2 years.

Bush didn't do anything about it, a position I think we are all in agreement on.
As brought up earlier, blame Clinton. North Korea signed the Non-Proliferation treaty, as such they are bound by it. Bush is right for not succumbing to their threats and black mail like Clinton did, that is negative reinforcement.

Hmmm that's funny, another foreign policy blunder from the Clinton administration coming home to roost.
__________________
To win a war you must serve no master but your ambition.
Mojo_PeiPei is offline  
Old 11-01-2004, 06:48 AM   #18 (permalink)
can't help but laugh
 
irateplatypus's Avatar
 
Location: dar al-harb
i really don't see iran doing anything forceful if israel were to pre-emptively strike their nuclear program. it would be an act of war... but there isn't a single arab country that that is capable of waging war on israel. iran doesn't have the force to compete with the israelis in the air and if i'm not mistaken, iran doesn't share a border with israel... meaning they would need another country to be complicit in their attack from the ground. i just don't see this happening. i think that arab impotence in dealing with israel military really foments their hatred of the nation.

the worst iran would do is try to get international opinion to condemn israel... but that really isn't a very big stick to shake at israel anyway. it's not like they have many friends as it stands.
__________________
If you will not fight when your victory will be sure and not too costly, you may come to the moment when you will have to fight with all the odds against you and only a precarious chance for survival. There may even be a worse case. You may have to fight when there is no hope of victory, because it is better to perish than to live as slaves.

~ Winston Churchill
irateplatypus is offline  
Old 11-01-2004, 07:40 AM   #19 (permalink)
MSD
The sky calls to us ...
 
MSD's Avatar
 
Super Moderator
Location: CT
This is going to be the same crap that's happened with every other country that developed nukes. They'll get them, they'll blow one up while watching and saying "ooh, that's bright," scare the rest of the world, now that we have all these treaties, they'll get sanctioned for testing one, and nothing will happen because they aren't stupid enough to launch one against another country.

If Israel could've gotten the reactor before it was operational, that would've been great, but right now they're not going to be able to do anything because of the contamination that would result from an attack.
MSD is offline  
Old 11-01-2004, 08:59 AM   #20 (permalink)
undead
 
Pacifier's Avatar
 
Location: Duisburg, Germany
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ustwo
Here is why I fear Kerry. He won't do anything about it
since you obviously can see the future tell me what will Bush do? invade?
__________________
"It seems to me that the idea of a personal God is an anthropological concept which I cannot take seriously. I also cannot imagine some will or goal outside the human sphere. Science has been charged with undermining morality, but the charge is unjust. A man's ethical behavior should be based effectually on sympathy, education, and social ties and needs; no religious basis is necessary. Man would indeed be in a poor way if he had to be restrained by fear of punishment and hope of reward after death
— Albert Einstein
Pacifier is offline  
Old 11-01-2004, 09:08 AM   #21 (permalink)
Sarge of Blood Gulch Red Outpost Number One
 
archer2371's Avatar
 
Location: On the front lines against our very enemy
Heh heh, I'm reminded of what Reagan's response was to Israel bombing the Iraqi nuclear facility.

"Well, boys will be boys."
__________________
"This ain't no Ice Cream Social!"

"Hey Grif, Chupathingy...how bout that? I like it...got a ring to it."

"I have no earthly idea what it is I just saw, or what this place is, or where in the hell O'Malley is! My only choice is to blame Grif for coming up with such a flawed plan. Stupid, stupid Grif."
archer2371 is offline  
Old 11-01-2004, 10:00 AM   #22 (permalink)
Cracking the Whip
 
Lebell's Avatar
 
Location: Sexymama's arms...
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ustwo
What would they do? Would they would hate Isreal more, teach their children to hate Isreal more, and have youngsters kill themselves more because of Isreal?

Invasion is going to happen AGAIN to Isreal one of these days, might as well get it over with now before one of these wackjob nations gets the bomb.
I agree.

What would they do, threaten to Destroy Israel three times a day instead of twice a day?
__________________
"Of all tyrannies, a tyranny exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It may be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some point be satiated; but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end, for they do so with the approval of their own conscience." – C. S. Lewis

The ONLY sponsors we have are YOU!

Please Donate!
Lebell is offline  
Old 11-01-2004, 10:56 AM   #23 (permalink)
Junkie
 
powerclown's Avatar
 
Location: Detroit, MI
Iran, Iran, Iran,
you live in a garbage can.
you can't shoot your way out
so you holler about,
Like a girl with a burning suntan.

Death! Death! Death! Death!
to America,
you scream at the top of your lungs,
but instead of behaving,
you insist on proliferating
Now join that other pariah, Il-Sung.

Who do you think you are fooling?
we can all see you mad mullahs there, drooling.
here's a thought for you fools:
concentrate on the tools,
That will improve your poor citizens' schooling.

Iran, oh sweet Persia, please keep,
your arsenal of nuke missiles asleep.
For if you should try,
to alight up the sky,
Israel shall rename you 'Bo-Peep'.

So dry up all that spit in your beards,
and dispense with the nonsensical cheers,
climb out of your dungheap,
and get on with the upkeep,
Until you can look in the mirror.

powerclown is offline  
Old 11-01-2004, 11:14 AM   #24 (permalink)
Somnabulist
 
guy44's Avatar
 
Location: corner of No and Where
Quote:
As brought up earlier, blame Clinton. North Korea signed the Non-Proliferation treaty, as such they are bound by it. Bush is right for not succumbing to their threats and black mail like Clinton did, that is negative reinforcement.

Hmmm that's funny, another foreign policy blunder from the Clinton administration coming home to roost.
What did N. Korea do to blackmail Clinton? How did he succumb to blackmail? Did the fact that N. Korea's nuclear program was relatively contained while Clinton upheld the Non-proliferation treaty, and amped up while Bush ignored it, mean Clinton was at fault? Is EVERY GODDAM BUSH FUCKUP Clinton's fault?

By the way, negative reinforcement is "the contingent withdrawal of a stimulus following a response, resulting in an increased likelihood of the response occurring in the future." How is "succumbing to their threats and blackmail (undefined and mysterious as those may be) negative reinforcement? Was some sort of threat on the part of the N. Korean's removed following the desired withdrawl of some Clintonian demand?
__________________
"You have reached Ritual Sacrifice. For goats press one, or say 'goats.'"
guy44 is offline  
Old 11-01-2004, 09:43 PM   #25 (permalink)
Junk
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ustwo

The solution to this is obvious, needed and needed fast. If Isreal doesn't do us the favor like they did in Iraq, we will have to do it ourselves.
So what is Israel waiting for? They don't need U.S permission. They don't give a flying fuck what the U.S or any other country in the world says because they are above international law. They can do as they please and stupid people in the world will applaud because they have repeated over and over that they are the victim's of the world, they are going to be pushed into the sea,..yada,yada,yada.... It gets so fucking old.

Here's a thought. Let's make the mideast a nuclear free zone including Israel. Israel shouldn't mind. They've got the U.S on a string anyways that jumps when told to jump. Kinda like a dog that bites when told to bite. But naturally all in the name of peace that the Israeli's want so bad while they continue with their nuclear program. I'd say double standard but I wouldn't want to offend the poor hapless Israeli's.
__________________
" In Canada, you can tell the most blatant lie in a calm voice, and people will believe you over someone who's a little passionate about the truth." David Warren, Western Standard.
OFKU0 is offline  
Old 11-01-2004, 10:09 PM   #26 (permalink)
Pissing in the cornflakes
 
Ustwo's Avatar
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by OFKU0
Here's a thought. Let's make the mideast a nuclear free zone including Israel. Israel shouldn't mind. They've got the U.S on a string anyways that jumps when told to jump. Kinda like a dog that bites when told to bite. But naturally all in the name of peace that the Israeli's want so bad while they continue with their nuclear program. I'd say double standard but I wouldn't want to offend the poor hapless Israeli's.
Perhaps you coudl explain how one would enforce a nuclear free mid east?

Maybe using Carters magical powers of negoatiation?

If you were Isreal, on a tiny strip of land, invaded twice, surrounded by 200million people who were taught since birth to hate you, you would want nukes too.
__________________
Agents of the enemies who hold office in our own government, who attempt to eliminate our "freedoms" and our "right to know" are posting among us, I fear.....on this very forum. - host

Obama - Know a Man by the friends he keeps.
Ustwo is offline  
Old 11-01-2004, 10:34 PM   #27 (permalink)
Tilted
 
If nothing else, the fact that Israel is much closer to Iran than the United States is provides some comfort.
seep is offline  
Old 11-01-2004, 10:45 PM   #28 (permalink)
Pissing in the cornflakes
 
Ustwo's Avatar
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by powerclown
Iran, Iran, Iran,
you live in a garbage can.
you can't shoot your way out
so you holler about,
Like a girl with a burning suntan.

Death! Death! Death! Death!
to America,
you scream at the top of your lungs,
but instead of behaving,
you insist on proliferating
Now join that other pariah, Il-Sung.

Who do you think you are fooling?
we can all see you mad mullahs there, drooling.
here's a thought for you fools:
concentrate on the tools,
That will improve your poor citizens' schooling.

Iran, oh sweet Persia, please keep,
your arsenal of nuke missiles asleep.
For if you should try,
to alight up the sky,
Israel shall rename you 'Bo-Peep'.

So dry up all that spit in your beards,
and dispense with the nonsensical cheers,
climb out of your dungheap,
and get on with the upkeep,
Until you can look in the mirror.

You know powerclown you are well named. Sometimes I forget to laugh at them, thanks
__________________
Agents of the enemies who hold office in our own government, who attempt to eliminate our "freedoms" and our "right to know" are posting among us, I fear.....on this very forum. - host

Obama - Know a Man by the friends he keeps.
Ustwo is offline  
Old 11-01-2004, 10:58 PM   #29 (permalink)
Somnabulist
 
guy44's Avatar
 
Location: corner of No and Where
Quote:
Perhaps you coudl explain how one would enforce a nuclear free mid east?

Maybe using Carters magical powers of negoatiation?

If you were Isreal, on a tiny strip of land, invaded twice, surrounded by 200million people who were taught since birth to hate you, you would want nukes too.
While I don't approve of your egregious swipe at Carter, Ustwo, I believe you and I are finally in agreement. Nobody should forget that Israel is the lone democracy in the Middle East. It is the one place terrorists DON'T come from. It is under constant attack. While that doesn't excuse all of its behavior, I think that those who argue that the U.S. is just some slave to Israel's whim (I know nobody here is anti-semetic, but you know, that's also what the KKK says...) seriously misunderstands the situation there.
__________________
"You have reached Ritual Sacrifice. For goats press one, or say 'goats.'"
guy44 is offline  
Old 11-01-2004, 10:59 PM   #30 (permalink)
Kiss of Death
 
Location: Perpetual wind and sorrow
For people that bitch about the UN and international law a lot on this board, many of you seem very fast to try and spite the United States by implying that it is for some reason alright that countries like Iran or North Korea have weapons like this. Very disturbing, really reinforces to me that people in America actually hate this beautiful country.
__________________
To win a war you must serve no master but your ambition.
Mojo_PeiPei is offline  
Old 11-01-2004, 11:16 PM   #31 (permalink)
Pissing in the cornflakes
 
Ustwo's Avatar
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by guy44
While I don't approve of your egregious swipe at Carter, Ustwo, I believe you and I are finally in agreement. Nobody should forget that Israel is the lone democracy in the Middle East. It is the one place terrorists DON'T come from. It is under constant attack. While that doesn't excuse all of its behavior, I think that those who argue that the U.S. is just some slave to Israel's whim (I know nobody here is anti-semetic, but you know, that's also what the KKK says...) seriously misunderstands the situation there.
Actually we have a few board members which are pretty openly anti-semetic.

And while you don't care for my swipe at Carter I'm sure you will get over it. Carter has gone from failed president, to eldar statesmen, to political hack. His weakness is a big part of why we have our current problems with Iran.
__________________
Agents of the enemies who hold office in our own government, who attempt to eliminate our "freedoms" and our "right to know" are posting among us, I fear.....on this very forum. - host

Obama - Know a Man by the friends he keeps.
Ustwo is offline  
Old 11-01-2004, 11:23 PM   #32 (permalink)
Banned
 
Rdr4evr's Avatar
 
We also have a few racist middle east haters as well.
Rdr4evr is offline  
 

Tags
iran, toys


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:04 AM.

Tilted Forum Project

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
© 2002-2012 Tilted Forum Project

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54