Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community  

Go Back   Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community > The Academy > Tilted Politics


 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 08-24-2004, 02:10 PM   #1 (permalink)
Huggles, sir?
 
seretogis's Avatar
 
Location: Seattle
Cheney backs "Freedom" for same-sex marriage

LINK

Quote:
Cheney Backs 'Freedom' for Gay Relationships
Tue Aug 24 2004 16:25:16 ET

During a rally in Davenport, Iowa on Tuesday, Vice President Dick Cheney was asked by a woman "What do you think about homosexual marriage?"

"Lynne and I have a gay daughter, so it's an issue our family is very familiar with. With the respect to the question of relationships, my general view is freedom means freedom for everyone... People ought to be free to enter into any kind of relationship they want to.

"The question that comes up with the issue of marriage is what kind of official sanction or approval is going to be granted by government? Historically, that's been a relationship that has been handled by the states. The states have made that fundamental decision of what constitutes a marriage."

Cheney then went on to blast the courts for interfering in the matter and not allowing for the states to decide the issue:

"I think his perception was that the courts, in effect, were beginning to change, without allowing the people to be involved. The courts were making the judgment for the entire country."

Developing..
This is an example of what Bush/Cheney should be doing to win their re-election campaign, not proposing constitutional amendments to cater to the 2% of the US that thinks defining marriage is a role for the federal govenrment. I think it's nice to hear about what Cheney thinks, rather than what four-letter word he happens to use when attacked. :P
__________________
seretogis - sieg heil
perfect little dream the kind that hurts the most, forgot how it feels well almost
no one to blame always the same, open my eyes wake up in flames
seretogis is offline  
Old 08-24-2004, 02:16 PM   #2 (permalink)
Addict
 
Location: nyc
i agree that this is a positive statement, but i'm awfully surprised to hear it coming form an administration that has repeatedly worked to limit access to marriage for homosexual couples. it's a nice thing to say -- i'd like to see a little back-up in the form of action.
brianna is offline  
Old 08-24-2004, 02:33 PM   #3 (permalink)
Like John Goodman, but not.
 
Journeyman's Avatar
 
Location: SFBA, California
With Cheney backing gay marriage and Ron Reagan, Jr. backing stem cell research, I find it odd how conservative values get tossed out the door when it's their own family member who has something riding on the line.
Journeyman is offline  
Old 08-24-2004, 04:01 PM   #4 (permalink)
Huzzah for Welcome Week, Much beer shall I imbibe.
 
Location: UCSB
Remember boys and girls, the Bush adminstration is hoping to bank on the Evangelical Jesus vote. Gay marriage is just a pawn to get the Jesus vote in Bush's corner. I would imagine that most of the people in the Bush adminstration really don't care what people do sexually in their private lives.

Edit: Except for Ashcroft, he's an ass in this regard.
__________________
I'm leaving for the University of California: Santa Barbara in 5 hours, give me your best college advice - things I need, good ideas, bad ideas, nooky, ect.

Originally Posted by Norseman on another forum:
"Yeah, the problem with the world is the stupid people are all cocksure of themselves and the intellectuals are full of doubt."
nanofever is offline  
Old 08-24-2004, 06:08 PM   #5 (permalink)
Kiss of Death
 
Location: Perpetual wind and sorrow
Maybe they are banking on the fact that more then 60% of the country is opposed to homosexual marriage, perhaps not solely in amendment form. Some of us disagree with homosexual marriage, that doesn't make us bible thumping fundie's.
__________________
To win a war you must serve no master but your ambition.
Mojo_PeiPei is offline  
Old 08-24-2004, 06:41 PM   #6 (permalink)
Mencken
 
Scipio's Avatar
 
Location: College
Although the position Cheney takes sounds reasonable, it rings somewhat hollow to me when I consider what other efforts to erode civil rights took place under the guise of "states' rights." I just can't see any reason that people should be denied simple common law rights, such as inheritance, because of their sexual orientation.
__________________
"Erections lasting more than 4 hours, though rare, require immediate medical attention."
Scipio is offline  
Old 08-25-2004, 04:28 AM   #7 (permalink)
Junkie
 
Location: NJ
Wait a second, what happened to all the experts who claimed that Cheney was controlling the administration and pulling the strings of George Bush's marionette?

Bush has his beliefs and he's standing up for them. Cheney has his and he's standing up for them. In the end it's Bush's administration and he determines policy just like Cheney said.

If anything this is a positive that shows the administration is open to other points of view.
__________________
Strive to be more curious than ignorant.
onetime2 is offline  
Old 08-25-2004, 07:30 AM   #8 (permalink)
Addict
 
Location: nyc
Quote:
Originally Posted by onetime2
Wait a second, what happened to all the experts who claimed that Cheney was controlling the administration and pulling the strings of George Bush's marionette?

Bush has his beliefs and he's standing up for them. Cheney has his and he's standing up for them. In the end it's Bush's administration and he determines policy just like Cheney said.

If anything this is a positive that shows the administration is open to other points of view.
or it's lip service.

if Cheney *really* is pro gay unions he should be doing something to make it happen. if, as vice president, he can't work to further issues that he cares about then he is ineffectual.
brianna is offline  
Old 08-25-2004, 07:35 AM   #9 (permalink)
Junkie
 
Location: NJ
Quote:
Originally Posted by brianna
or it's lip service.

if Cheney *really* is pro gay unions he should be doing something to make it happen. if, as vice president, he can't work to further issues that he cares about then he is ineffectual.

As stated, it's President Bush's administration. They have a fundamental disagreement over it and nothing Cheney does is likely to sway administration policy on this.
__________________
Strive to be more curious than ignorant.
onetime2 is offline  
Old 08-25-2004, 08:10 AM   #10 (permalink)
Tilted
 
Location: Canada
I think the only reason Cheney is changing is tune is because his daughter is gay. Now that the issue actually effects him in a personal way he is standing up for gay rights.
Himbo is offline  
Old 08-25-2004, 08:11 AM   #11 (permalink)
can't help but laugh
 
irateplatypus's Avatar
 
Location: dar al-harb
brianna, it just isn't the role of the vice-president to campaign for issues that run against the President's platform. Thank goodness we have at least one leader in Washington who realizes that it isn't all about his own agenda and recognizes the institutional limits placed on his position.
__________________
If you will not fight when your victory will be sure and not too costly, you may come to the moment when you will have to fight with all the odds against you and only a precarious chance for survival. There may even be a worse case. You may have to fight when there is no hope of victory, because it is better to perish than to live as slaves.

~ Winston Churchill
irateplatypus is offline  
Old 08-25-2004, 08:41 AM   #12 (permalink)
will always be an Alyson Hanniganite
 
Bill O'Rights's Avatar
 
Location: In the dust of the archives
Quote:
Originally Posted by Journeyman
I find it odd how conservative values get tossed out the door when it's their own family member who has something riding on the line.
Nothing odd about it. Sometimes that's what it takes...getting knocked up alongside the back of the head to shake the blinders loose.
__________________
"I distrust those people who know so well what God wants them to do because I notice it always coincides with their own desires." - Susan B. Anthony

"Hedonism with rules isn't hedonism at all, it's the Republican party." - JumpinJesus

It is indisputable that true beauty lies within...but a nice rack sure doesn't hurt.
Bill O'Rights is offline  
Old 08-25-2004, 09:15 AM   #13 (permalink)
Psycho
 
Location: Broken Arrow, OK
Quote:
Originally Posted by Himbo
I think the only reason Cheney is changing is tune is because his daughter is gay. Now that the issue actually effects him in a personal way he is standing up for gay rights.

he is not changing his tune about it, he was asked a personl question, not what the administation feels, but what he feels. He has had this opinion since the first election in 2000. He is the VP and can have opinoins that are different then some others. But from what I can tell by reading what he said was that he feels that gays could get married but never actually said they should be recognized by the government. I don't know if that was just implied, but I did not see him actually say that.
__________________
It's hard to remember we're alive for the first time
It's hard to remember we're alive for the last time
It's hard to remember to live before you die
It's hard to remember that our lives are such a short time
It's hard to remember when it takes such a long time

phyzix525 is offline  
Old 08-25-2004, 09:27 AM   #14 (permalink)
can't help but laugh
 
irateplatypus's Avatar
 
Location: dar al-harb
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bill O'Rights
Nothing odd about it. Sometimes that's what it takes...getting knocked up alongside the back of the head to shake the blinders loose.
because blinders are the only thing keeping conservatives from being liberals... is that right?
__________________
If you will not fight when your victory will be sure and not too costly, you may come to the moment when you will have to fight with all the odds against you and only a precarious chance for survival. There may even be a worse case. You may have to fight when there is no hope of victory, because it is better to perish than to live as slaves.

~ Winston Churchill
irateplatypus is offline  
Old 08-25-2004, 09:54 AM   #15 (permalink)
Junkie
 
Seaver's Avatar
 
Location: Fort Worth, TX
I agree with a lot of what has been said here on neutral non-threatening terms.

He is VP, he realizes he's not the President and does not publically scrutinize Bush, though I'm sure he does behind closed doors. This is pivital that leadership does not scruitinize their upper level officials. Disagreeing is different than scrutinizing.

I think we should get less defensive about the gay marriage argument. A friend of mine was VERY against abortion until she had an accient. She was on both the pill and using condoms and still managed to get pregnant. So suddenly it wasnt just loose women who thought about it in her eyes. To have the child she would have had to drop her full scholarship to Notre Dame and ruin her bright future. Life changing events isnt taking the blindfolds off and see'ing the light, nor is it betraying what you once believed. It's taking a new perspective based on life events which are unique to every individual. Simplifying that is doing a disservice to the impact it truely has on a person.
Seaver is offline  
Old 08-25-2004, 10:22 AM   #16 (permalink)
I change
 
ARTelevision's Avatar
 
Location: USA
I'm not interested in marriage of any kind. However, the fact is that the courts will override states' rights on this one. That is the reason the Constitutional process is being proposed.
__________________
create evolution
ARTelevision is offline  
Old 08-25-2004, 10:39 AM   #17 (permalink)
Mencken
 
Scipio's Avatar
 
Location: College
Quote:
Originally Posted by ARTelevision
I'm not interested in marriage of any kind. However, the fact is that the courts will override states' rights on this one. That is the reason the Constitutional process is being proposed.
The states have no right to violate the US constitution. As I read it, the equal protection clause in the constitution doesn't allow states to deny simple common law rights to same sex couples, hence the "need" for a constitutional amendment. Even now, as gay marriage has become a major issue, the US Congress has rejected such an amendment. If I was a betting man, I'd bet that no such amendment will ever pass.

http://www.law.cornell.edu/topics/equal_protection.html
__________________
"Erections lasting more than 4 hours, though rare, require immediate medical attention."
Scipio is offline  
Old 08-25-2004, 10:56 AM   #18 (permalink)
will always be an Alyson Hanniganite
 
Bill O'Rights's Avatar
 
Location: In the dust of the archives
Quote:
Originally Posted by irateplatypus
because blinders are the only thing keeping conservatives from being liberals... is that right?
Hey,irateplatypus!! Long time no see. I've missed our little sparring matches.

Of course blinders aren't the only thing keeping conservatives from being liberals. You have to learn the secret handshake, as well. J/K

Now...as usual, you're reading more into what I wrote than is really there. The wearing of "blinders" is not a trait that is exclusive to conservatives. They're just, in my opinion, utilized a little more often, by them. You can't solve problems by ignoring them, and hoping that they'll go away, any more than you can by throwing money at it.
__________________
"I distrust those people who know so well what God wants them to do because I notice it always coincides with their own desires." - Susan B. Anthony

"Hedonism with rules isn't hedonism at all, it's the Republican party." - JumpinJesus

It is indisputable that true beauty lies within...but a nice rack sure doesn't hurt.
Bill O'Rights is offline  
Old 08-25-2004, 11:23 AM   #19 (permalink)
I change
 
ARTelevision's Avatar
 
Location: USA
Scipio, I don't think it will pass either.
It's just not an important issue to me.
I figured I'd at least lay out the "justification" for the Constituional process advocates' position.
__________________
create evolution
ARTelevision is offline  
Old 08-25-2004, 01:50 PM   #20 (permalink)
can't help but laugh
 
irateplatypus's Avatar
 
Location: dar al-harb
Billy,

Yeah, I was playfully making a hyperbolic twist on your words... should've added a laughing emoticon as well. Good to be back and thanks for the warm welcome.
__________________
If you will not fight when your victory will be sure and not too costly, you may come to the moment when you will have to fight with all the odds against you and only a precarious chance for survival. There may even be a worse case. You may have to fight when there is no hope of victory, because it is better to perish than to live as slaves.

~ Winston Churchill
irateplatypus is offline  
Old 08-25-2004, 05:26 PM   #21 (permalink)
Insane
 
Location: Vancouver. No, the OTHER Vancouver
I really think that civil unions are the answer. I disagree with the idea of marriage being available to a non-heterosexual couple, but I do recognize that people can be committed to each other regardless of gender.

I definitely believe in the sanctity of marriage being between a man and a woman, and I am far from a bible thumper.
__________________
Visualize Whirled Peas.
damianjames is offline  
Old 08-25-2004, 09:52 PM   #22 (permalink)
Mencken
 
Scipio's Avatar
 
Location: College
Quote:
Originally Posted by ARTelevision
Scipio, I don't think it will pass either.
It's just not an important issue to me.
I figured I'd at least lay out the "justification" for the Constituional process advocates' position.
Fair enough. It's basically a time wasting wedge issue that's been brought up by both republicans and democrats. I suppose we've strayed from Cheney's comments though, and just started talking about gay marriage generally.
__________________
"Erections lasting more than 4 hours, though rare, require immediate medical attention."
Scipio is offline  
Old 08-27-2004, 08:11 AM   #23 (permalink)
hovering in the distance
 
Location: the land of milk and honey


"they can do that, but they can't get married"
__________________
no signature required

Last edited by moonstrucksoul; 08-27-2004 at 08:14 AM..
moonstrucksoul is offline  
Old 08-27-2004, 11:49 AM   #24 (permalink)
Kiss of Death
 
Location: Perpetual wind and sorrow
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scipio
The states have no right to violate the US constitution. As I read it, the equal protection clause in the constitution doesn't allow states to deny simple common law rights to same sex couples, hence the "need" for a constitutional amendment. Even now, as gay marriage has become a major issue, the US Congress has rejected such an amendment. If I was a betting man, I'd bet that no such amendment will ever pass.

http://www.law.cornell.edu/topics/equal_protection.html
Actually Congressional law afforded through DOMA, and through that DOMA protection act that is being proposed affords the states to override that EPC. Everything is completely "legal" ( I say it with quotations because I'm banking on it being over turned at some point) as of right now.

Quick question. Federal law supercedes state law unless it affords the right to the state, or if there is no standing federal law correct?
__________________
To win a war you must serve no master but your ambition.
Mojo_PeiPei is offline  
 

Tags
backs, cheney, freedom, marriage, samesex


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:02 AM.

Tilted Forum Project

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
© 2002-2012 Tilted Forum Project

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360