|
View Poll Results: I follow my party because: | |||
they truly represent my ideas on ALL issues that are close to me | 3 | 6.12% | |
they are closer than the other party in representing my views | 17 | 34.69% | |
they have the best platform even though I don't like their philosophy | 0 | 0% | |
I like some issues from both parties but mine seems most levelheaded | 5 | 10.20% | |
Both parties suck, but mine at least sucks less | 10 | 20.41% | |
I'm rebelling against my family so I am opposite them | 0 | 0% | |
What's philosophy, my party is best die all who disagree | 0 | 0% | |
14 | 28.57% | ||
Voters: 49. You may not vote on this poll |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
05-28-2004, 04:49 AM | #1 (permalink) |
Lennonite Priest
Location: Mansfield, Ohio USA
|
Just to be curious and maybe show us all something.
Ok, so in another thread I tried to show how the 2 parties have too much to lose if they stop hating the other.
So I thought I'd run a poll to see if it truly is just me having paranoidal delusions OR if we are all conditioned a certain way. So please take your time before you vote and do so with how YOU honestly feel, not how someone (the press bias you follow) tells you how to feel.
__________________
I just love people who use the excuse "I use/do this because I LOVE the feeling/joy/happiness it brings me" and expect you to be ok with that as you watch them destroy their life blindly following. My response is, "I like to put forks in an eletrical socket, just LOVE that feeling, can't ever get enough of it, so will you let me put this copper fork in that electric socket?" |
05-28-2004, 07:50 AM | #5 (permalink) |
Lennonite Priest
Location: Mansfield, Ohio USA
|
You are right Seretogis, but we have been conditioned to believe there are just 2. The press feeds this by ignoring any 3rd party, or lif they do follow a 3rd party they let it gain momentum then work to destroy it fast so that people will only focus on the 2 parties. (IE Perot, he did form a 3rd party and it had very good ideas, but once the press destroyed Perot's name, the party fell.)
Libertarians do have a good grasp, but they lack the charismatic leader (rightfully or wrongfully a party needs a charismatic leader, not just the issues) to truly get them anywhere.
__________________
I just love people who use the excuse "I use/do this because I LOVE the feeling/joy/happiness it brings me" and expect you to be ok with that as you watch them destroy their life blindly following. My response is, "I like to put forks in an eletrical socket, just LOVE that feeling, can't ever get enough of it, so will you let me put this copper fork in that electric socket?" |
05-28-2004, 02:04 PM | #9 (permalink) | |
Illusionary
|
Quote:
__________________
Holding onto anger is like grasping a hot coal with the intent of throwing it at someone else; you are the one who gets burned. - Buddha |
|
05-28-2004, 06:22 PM | #10 (permalink) |
I change
Location: USA
|
I vote Republican because "they are closer than the other party in representing my views." That's good enough for me. I don't expect any more from a vast national organization. Republicans are realists as far as I am concerned. Realists understand how the real world works. I don't expect anything more than pragmatic politics from a political organization. I don't consider my views to be the be all and end all of social existence. I accept that my own individual views are only a very small part of the whole and not so significant that I can go around and say things that I don't exactly agree with suck - or anything of the sort.
__________________
create evolution |
Tags |
curious, show |
|
|