04-06-2004, 10:41 AM | #1 (permalink) |
Addict
Location: Grey Britain
|
Retribution, Rehabilitation, Deterrence, Containment
Which of these do you consider to be the most important functions of the criminal justice system and why?
__________________
"No one was behaving from very Buddhist motives. Then, thought Pigsy, he was hardly a Buddha, nor was he a monkey. Presently, he was a pig spirit changed into a little girl pretending to be a little boy to be offered to a water monster. It was all very simple to a pig spirit." |
04-06-2004, 10:56 AM | #2 (permalink) | |
Junkie
Location: NJ
|
Re: Retribution, Rehabilitation, Deterrence, Containment
Quote:
__________________
Strive to be more curious than ignorant. |
|
04-06-2004, 11:03 AM | #4 (permalink) |
My future is coming on
Moderator Emeritus
Location: east of the sun and west of the moon
|
Containment, deterrence, rehabilitation, in that order. There's no place for retribution in a civilized society.
__________________
"If ten million people believe a foolish thing, it is still a foolish thing." - Anatole France |
04-06-2004, 11:15 AM | #5 (permalink) |
Junkie
Location: NJ
|
If the police are part of the definition, I'd have to go with Deterrance, containment, rehab, retribution. By retribution I mean that there is punishment as a result of crimes not that there is revenge for the crimes.
__________________
Strive to be more curious than ignorant. |
04-06-2004, 11:16 AM | #6 (permalink) |
undead
Location: Duisburg, Germany
|
rehabilitation, Containment, deterrence
I think deterrence doesn't work. and I agree with lurkette, there should be no room for retribution.
__________________
"It seems to me that the idea of a personal God is an anthropological concept which I cannot take seriously. I also cannot imagine some will or goal outside the human sphere. Science has been charged with undermining morality, but the charge is unjust. A man's ethical behavior should be based effectually on sympathy, education, and social ties and needs; no religious basis is necessary. Man would indeed be in a poor way if he had to be restrained by fear of punishment and hope of reward after death — Albert Einstein |
04-06-2004, 11:43 AM | #7 (permalink) |
will always be an Alyson Hanniganite
Location: In the dust of the archives
|
Containment, Rehabilitation, Deterrence and Retribution. Though I don't think that deterrence works, and I have to echo lurkette's sentiments on retribution. I think that the number one priority is protecting the general population from criminal activity. If the criminal can be rehabilitated, then so much the better.
__________________
"I distrust those people who know so well what God wants them to do because I notice it always coincides with their own desires." - Susan B. Anthony "Hedonism with rules isn't hedonism at all, it's the Republican party." - JumpinJesus It is indisputable that true beauty lies within...but a nice rack sure doesn't hurt. |
04-06-2004, 12:17 PM | #9 (permalink) |
Junkie
Location: Right here
|
I just want to point out that criminologists differentiate between general deterrence (punish one crook, the rest of the population is afraid to steal) and specific deterrence (punish one crook, he or she becomes afraid to steal again).
I believe the consensus is that specific deterrence works when people believe they are likely to be caught and general deterrence only "works" in that it prevents crimes for a short period of time. For example, death penalty studies show that murders do decrease after an execution, but they only do so for a few weeks. After that, they tend to increase in rate. My order: Specific deterrence, Containment of those most likely to recidivate (this means releasing one-time murderers and non-violent sex-offenders to extremely strict home monitoring; drug users and property criminals (usually linked to drug abuse) to heavily monitored drug programs), containment of the 6-8% of rest in prison (only 6-8% of criminals comprise nearly all of the crime and are repeat, violent offenders), our containment centers ought to focus on Rehabilitation, and no retribution in terms of punishment for the sake of punishment (this includes making prisons "worse" to make sure people don't want to come back--FYI, most don't already).
__________________
"The theory of a free press is that truth will emerge from free discussion, not that it will be presented perfectly and instantly in any one account." -- Walter Lippmann "You measure democracy by the freedom it gives its dissidents, not the freedom it gives its assimilated conformists." -- Abbie Hoffman |
04-06-2004, 01:30 PM | #10 (permalink) | ||
Huggles, sir?
Location: Seattle
|
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
seretogis - sieg heil perfect little dream the kind that hurts the most, forgot how it feels well almost no one to blame always the same, open my eyes wake up in flames |
||
04-06-2004, 06:45 PM | #11 (permalink) |
Banned
Location: Urf
|
I consider deterrence to be the most important function of the criminal justice system. Detterence, which leads to the protection of the entire community, is much more important than rehabilitation, which assumes that the criminal is a good person at heart, and blames the surroundings on his misdeeds.
However, personally I am very spiteful. Civilization or not, I love to see people get punished for their misdeeds. I hope there's no argument about this, as this is just a description of my feelings, not a political statement. |
04-06-2004, 06:46 PM | #12 (permalink) | |
Cracking the Whip
Location: Sexymama's arms...
|
Quote:
__________________
"Of all tyrannies, a tyranny exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It may be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some point be satiated; but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end, for they do so with the approval of their own conscience." – C. S. Lewis The ONLY sponsors we have are YOU! Please Donate! |
|
04-06-2004, 07:45 PM | #13 (permalink) | |
Junkie
Location: Right here
|
Quote:
We have yet to indentify the cause of this, but suggestions range from time differences (it's difficult to do a controlled experiment with murder rates ) to a desenstization due to media portrayals of the execution (necessary for deterrence to work). |
|
04-07-2004, 01:05 AM | #14 (permalink) | |
Addict
Location: Grey Britain
|
Quote:
One reason I posted this thread is that normally, I would pretty much have agreed with Lurkette about this, but yesterday I started thinking about this slightly differently. While there is no room in civilised society for retribution, neither is there any for crime. Yet both still exist and always will in one way or another. These things are hardwired. We couldn't run society if we simply ignored crime, so we find ways of keeping it to a minimum instead. I think the same goes for retribution. Imagine some psychopath breaks into your house and murders your family blah blah blah. You're going to be pretty pissed off, right? Now lets imagine, Clockwork Orange stylee, that there is some system in place whereby criminals can be 'cured' of all criminality within a week, without suffering, thus fulfilling the need for rehabilitation and personal deterrence and negating the need for containment. This process wipes all recollection of their crime from the criminal's mind (I say this because I think guilt and shame, for the 25% who are capable of feeling it, are probably a large part of what the criminal suffers for their crime) Lets also imagine there is a fairly effective social mechanism in place to act as a a general deterrant. Consequently you see the same guy wander down your street, whistling a week later. Quite simply put, you're going to want to fuck him up... ...Oh dear I've just negated my own argument. I thought I was arguing the need for retribution, but this looks like the argument for containment: If the guy had been contained for long enough, then by the time you saw him, your desire for retribution might have died down. I'll leave this in, because it seems relevant anyway. D'oh!
__________________
"No one was behaving from very Buddhist motives. Then, thought Pigsy, he was hardly a Buddha, nor was he a monkey. Presently, he was a pig spirit changed into a little girl pretending to be a little boy to be offered to a water monster. It was all very simple to a pig spirit." |
|
Tags |
containment, deterrence, rehabilitation, retribution |
|
|