Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community

Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community (https://thetfp.com/tfp/)
-   Tilted Politics (https://thetfp.com/tfp/tilted-politics/)
-   -   Arnold in Wonderland (https://thetfp.com/tfp/tilted-politics/47786-arnold-wonderland.html)

Rodney 03-03-2004 09:00 PM

Arnold in Wonderland
 
Well, I have to admit it -- Ahnuld is holding his own as governor of California. Between Democrats and the ultra-right wing of his own party (which controls the Republican party apparatus in California), I thought he'd be a goner in trying to deal with such big problems as the California budget deficit and so on.

But the bond financing proposition he proposed to cover part of the state deficit actually passed -- went from 30 percent approval to over 50 percent in the last month or so, solely because of Arnold's nonstop campaigning and his ability to connect. And it passed, along with a balanced budget amendment.

He could still crash. Lot of other serious issues coming up, including workers's comp reform. But I've got to hand it to him. None of the traditional pols out here came anywhere close to doing what he's done to fix the budget deficit; they were all too beholden the special interests.

I don't agree with everything he's doing, but I think that his ideas are at least valid and have some fairness. I just hope he doesn't also get tied up in special interests; he's taking more and more of their money.

But for now, good job.

smooth 03-04-2004 12:08 AM

We've just been saddled with over 30 billion dollars of debt, for the next few decades. That's the same type of "remedy" he was castigating Davis during the recall campaign.

We've haven't even done anything to address the unbalanced budget--he still has to wallow through that. And we're going to end up paying this huge amount of money at the same time interest rates start to skyrocket again.

Everyone who is overextended on credit right now is about to lose their assets in the near future. I think of this as one last wrenching of whatever assets the middle class still possessed. Now our state has been in a similar dire position, and our services (along with the impoverished and people scraping by) are going to feel the final crunch.

Boo 03-04-2004 12:14 AM

How many companies are planning to change states right now? The loss of tax base could create another larger problem.

smooth 03-04-2004 12:20 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Boo
How many companies are planning to change states right now? The loss of tax base could create another larger problem.
Companies aren't fleeing the state, I think that's B.S. Not only is California very pro-business, companies (like the people) have access to wonderful climate and beautiful areas to reside in.

Regardless, I wish large companies would leave. Then we might actually see the action of the free market--small businesses would rise to accomodate demand. The difference between if that happened and now would be that California would become a hot-spot for progressive companies. I see that as positive--a business culture that was in line with the street (or working) culture.

Downtownat10 03-04-2004 06:21 AM

So, with Arnold's recent comments on allowing immigrants to become president, do you guys think he could perhaps be the next Ronald Reagan?

Ustwo 03-04-2004 06:38 AM

If I were him I'd have let the fucking state go broke. California got what it deserved when they voted for an asshat like Davis in the first place.

Lebell 03-04-2004 09:35 AM

I've thought about the California budget crisis and my own suggestion to Arnold is this:

Eliminate CalOSHA and CalEPA.

They are massive duplications of Federal programs which I don't think are providing Californians with any additional benefit.

smooth 03-04-2004 11:27 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Lebell
I've thought about the California budget crisis and my own suggestion to Arnold is this:

Eliminate CalOSHA and CalEPA.

They are massive duplications of Federal programs which I don't think are providing Californians with any additional benefit.

Thanks for the interest, but I'd rather keep paying for both. Besides, is CalEPA really a duplication anymore ;)

If we are to eliminate anything, it should be massive corporate tax loopholes. Angelides had a proposal to bring taxes back to their previous levels--under Wilson and Reagan.

That sage advice was ignored by both Arnold, the media, and consequently the people. So no, Arnold isn't going to be the next Reagan--beyond the fact that his comments don't amount to shit in terms of what Congress has to do in order for him to even run.

He hasn't done anything magnificent right now, whereas Reagan actually guided this state in some very beneficial endeavors. Case in point: Reagan developed the higher education system we currently have, Arnold is undermining it. He's using his celebrity status to ramrod bad policy into law.

There is a reason we had a constitutional amemdment against this type of borrowing for close to 200 years--that's a big chunk of history to wipe under the table to do the exact policy implementations he accused Davis of doing, and which he laid the blame of our economic woes on. Of course, it shouldn't have been any surprise to see Davis appearing next to Arnold endorsing this action--it's the same damn plan Davis was going to do before angry voters kicked his ass out for manipulating the budget numbers without any real fix.

Well, we still don't have a real fix. We don't even have a fake fix--this bond doesn't address the budget imbalance. It rolls all the past debt into one big package and refinances it for the next few decades--thanks!

I'm sure my grandchildren are really going to appreciate paying back a however many billions of dollars that we have been spending to lock up drug offenders and people stealing video tapes, etc. Especially since by the time this loan is finally paid, the criminal justice programs we are currently using will look pretty stupid to that future generation--they're already looking too costly to us now.

smooth 03-04-2004 11:33 AM

BTW, we shouldn't be surprised that this outcome occurred. It's not as though people don't understand or know what I'm talking about--it just doesn't fit our culture anymore.

People claim our government ought to model those households; ironically, it seems to be doing exactly that.

I don't think the middle class reduces spending to remain within their budget, though; rather, they buy on credit.

Here's a portion of an article today that supports what I was stating:

Quote:

State finance officials will rush to sell the bonds approved Tuesday as quickly as possible. They hope to secure the money in time to cover $14 billion in short-term loans that the state must repay to a syndicate of banks in June.

They already have formed a working group that includes Schwarzenegger's finance director, the state controller, the treasurer and others, and will map out how to get the state the best interest rates on any borrowing, which would be repaid over the next 8 to 14 years.

This week the state will name a finance team of underwriters, bond counsel and financial advisors to push the bond sale. State Treasurer Phil Angelides noted that it would be "the largest municipal bond sale in U.S. history."

Experts question whether passage of the two ballot measures warrants the kind of celebration evident at Tuesday's victory party, where the drink of the night was a "poinsettia," a blend of champagne [how about stop buying fucking champagne on the public's money, for starters] and cranberry juice, and the emcee was radio disc jockey Rick Dees.

Wall Street rating agencies on Wednesday applauded California voters for approving the deficit bond issue, raising their outlook on California finances — although not the state's credit ratings [interest rates are contingent on credit ratings, BTW]. But they urged lawmakers to quickly close the gap between what the state spends and what it takes in.

Until the Legislature and Schwarzenegger pare the structural deficit that has plagued the state budget for the last three years, the rating agencies said California cannot expect to see improvement in its worst-in-the-nation credit standing.

Even with Tuesday's vote, "The state's increased ability to sell bonds to fund current operations merely postpones the difficult taxation or expenditure reduction decisions," said Standard & Poor's analyst David Hitchcock.

"They've bought themselves some time. We'll see how they make use of it."

Without decisive steps toward shrinking the structural deficit, Hitchcock said, the state again could find itself in a serious cash crisis.
--http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-bonds4mar04,1,6719131.story?coll=la-home-local


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:59 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
© 2002-2012 Tilted Forum Project


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360