That's a tad unfair. Nader is not the cause. That's Bush. Nader, however, is the enabler, the bartender who gave that extra one for the road to the guy who ran over our collective dog.

For all he protests that he's being censored (he's not; he's being asked to use his brain) if Ralph is truely worried about the constitution (as he should be), he will do everything he can to make sure that the next president will appoint people to the bench that care about the constitution and leave their bibles in the church before they go to court. That would be getting behind the Kerry/Edwards (or visa versa) ticket and pushing it like mad among the idealistic folks who wasted their votes on him last time to vote for someone with a chance of winning. (Idealism is cute in the young, but if you're in your thirties and voted for Nader, it's time to lay off the drugs.)

I actually had an inkling that this was his plan when I first heard about it. He would enter to sweep up some disenfranchised voters and get them behind his cause, and then cast them over to whoever the Dem candidate was and campaign for him. This, however, is about as wishful as SF's percentages.
On that note, Strange Famous, you know I like you. You're the strong left arm. But you don't have a solid grip on life here in the US. People here are split much more evenly than that, and sadly, a lot of people like Bush. Kerry could never get 75%.

Actually, I think the jews and homosexuals are responsible for all the problems we're facing in America.

Yes, after 30 years, the system crushes you, and you finally give up. The index rises...

Michael Moore tried to get Nader to do that in 2000, on the condition that Gore adopts certain issues. Didn't work then, won't work now.

You ought to make it clear you're joking, if you are. I've been reprimanded in the past for failing to recognize you can't be sarcastic with simple text.

Agree completely!!

SARCASM FLAG!!!!