12-21-2003, 07:46 AM | #1 (permalink) | |
Dubya
Location: VA
|
Let's talk, fellow Democrats
Alright, this is directed at my fellow Democrats, but I'm sure some independents and Republicans won't be able to resist giving their opinions as well. Anyway, I really enjoyed this editorial, it gave me a different perspective on our current situation. Let me know what you all think...
Quote:
__________________
"In Iraq, no doubt about it, it's tough. It's hard work. It's incredibly hard. It's - and it's hard work. I understand how hard it is. I get the casualty reports every day. I see on the TV screens how hard it is. But it's necessary work. We're making progress. It is hard work." |
|
12-21-2003, 07:59 AM | #2 (permalink) |
Super Agitator
Location: Just SW of Nowhere!!! In the good old US of A
|
This really ought to do what you're wanting - play the Clinton card! He is such a loved and respected politician I'm really sure he can help bail out their floundering efforts!!! Dean, Kerry Want Clinton to Broker Mideast Peace Friday, December 19, 2003 By Kelley Beaucar Vlahos http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,106158,00.html WASHINGTON — Bill Clinton could pose a striking — and promising — contrast to President Bush's efforts if he accepts the mission proposed by two would-be Democratic presidents to pursue Israeli-Palestinian peace negotiations, say some foreign policy analysts. Those supporters add that considering the former president for the job helps Democrats John Kerry and Howard Dean send the right message about their visions for peace in the Middle East. "Clinton would be a formidable negotiator. He has plausibility with both sides in the region, he knows the players and he knows the issues, probably better than any president — probably better than this president," said Will Marshall, president of the Progressive Policy Institute, a Democratic think tank built around Clinton's political philosophies. "It would be hard to pick a better representative of American interests."
__________________
Life isn't always a bowl of cherries, sometimes it's more like a jar of Jalapenos --- what you say or do today might burn your ass tomorrow!!! |
12-21-2003, 08:43 AM | #3 (permalink) | |
Pissing in the cornflakes
|
Quote:
You are right I couldn't resist because this piece is a pathetic cry for help. I give him credit for figuring out what Rush Limbaugh has said about the democrats for the last 3 years, which is they are running on hate and offer no vision of the future, maybe this guy is a closet ditto head (). But perhaps what I find disturbing is this idea that party comes before country. Bush is doing well, therefore we need another way to beat him. Christ if he is doing well, leave him in place.
__________________
Agents of the enemies who hold office in our own government, who attempt to eliminate our "freedoms" and our "right to know" are posting among us, I fear.....on this very forum. - host Obama - Know a Man by the friends he keeps. |
|
12-21-2003, 07:51 PM | #4 (permalink) |
Crazy
Location: Land of the Hanging Chad
|
You have to look at the 2004 race in terms of electoral allocation to get a clear picture.
Presently, Bush's approval ratings are between 50-60 percent, and, as is usual, his re-elects are lower. Now, obviously the landscape could be vastly different come November, but if the Iraqi resistance continues at its current pace, given demographic trends over the past four years, the election should be somewhat of a rehash of 2000. Obviously, the advantage of incumbency now belongs to the GOP, but it should still be incredibly close. Al Gore ran a pretty uninspiring (to democrats + swing voters) campaign in 2000. If someone in the Dean mold could employ more effective rhetoric, he could appeal to a greater cross section of those groups. But Dean's electibility is a topic for another thread. What's at issue here is the fact that, with only I believe 9 electoral votes (based on 2000) changing on account of the census, a Democrat winning Al Gore's states + one or two others would win. And Al Gore did horribly in the South (he lost his home state) perhaps due to his inept campaign, something a Clark or Edwards on the ticket could remedy. That said, Bush has the bully pulpit and he will be able to define the debate. It all comes down to (in large part) who has the more effective economic stump speech - no matter how well the economy performs, deficits and massive debt will remain for the foreseeable future. If the Democrat can use these unfortunate facts effectively, he's got a shot.
__________________
The tragedy of life is what dies inside a man while he lives. -- Albert Schweitzer |
12-21-2003, 08:07 PM | #5 (permalink) | |
The sky calls to us ...
Super Moderator
Location: CT
|
Quote:
Yes, that's what we need, a candidate with a personality! I really think that's why Gore lost. While some accuse Bush of being "stupid" and "uneducated," the fact is that showing a couple of flaws like fumbling words or mispronouncing "nuclear" helps to put him more in touch with the common man. Gore was too uptight. If he had taken the stick out of his ass, he might have swung enough people to his side to make the Florida incident irrelevant, or less damaging. |
|
12-22-2003, 02:12 AM | #6 (permalink) |
Dubya
Location: VA
|
An interesting statistic:
The Republican Party hasn't won a plurality of the vote for President since 1988. That's quite a long time in politics. I think the outlook starts looking even better when you consider the 3 million Nader voters in 2000. He'll be making an announcement in the next month whether he's running or not, but even if he does, I highly doubt he is going to be able to generate the amount of support he did last term.
__________________
"In Iraq, no doubt about it, it's tough. It's hard work. It's incredibly hard. It's - and it's hard work. I understand how hard it is. I get the casualty reports every day. I see on the TV screens how hard it is. But it's necessary work. We're making progress. It is hard work." Last edited by Sparhawk; 12-22-2003 at 02:18 AM.. |
12-22-2003, 04:19 AM | #7 (permalink) |
This vexes me. I am terribly vexed.
Location: Grantville, Pa
|
Actually, Nader has decided not to run if Dean runs. Which is a huge boon to Dean if he does get the nomination.
Think of where democrats will be in many swing states with that extra 3% of to vote to count on. |
12-22-2003, 06:00 AM | #8 (permalink) |
Right Now
Location: Home
|
I saw this in the Post this weekend. I think it's a well written article, and makes some good points. I would like to see the Democratic Party pull together more and run on substantive issues. American politics was never intended to be a one-party system.
|
12-22-2003, 06:58 AM | #9 (permalink) | |
Dubya
Location: VA
|
Quote:
__________________
"In Iraq, no doubt about it, it's tough. It's hard work. It's incredibly hard. It's - and it's hard work. I understand how hard it is. I get the casualty reports every day. I see on the TV screens how hard it is. But it's necessary work. We're making progress. It is hard work." |
|
12-22-2003, 07:01 AM | #10 (permalink) | |
This vexes me. I am terribly vexed.
Location: Grantville, Pa
|
Al Hunt's Campaign Journal:
Quote:
|
|
12-22-2003, 07:24 AM | #11 (permalink) | |
Junkie
Location: Right here
|
Quote:
While I understand he will have to return more to the center of the platform, at least he will have given legitimacy to many of the more left's issues. Not only that, but I think that our party has been slipping due to the proliferation of Republican-lite candidates rather than the their inability to speak to some ephemereal indecisive population.
__________________
"The theory of a free press is that truth will emerge from free discussion, not that it will be presented perfectly and instantly in any one account." -- Walter Lippmann "You measure democracy by the freedom it gives its dissidents, not the freedom it gives its assimilated conformists." -- Abbie Hoffman |
|
12-22-2003, 08:15 AM | #12 (permalink) | |
Loser
|
Quote:
The vote was that close. Nader and the green party screwed themselves over in the long run. (at least as far as their viewpoint is concerned) The Dems need a clear, strong theme The need a "face" The need to make GW and his administration into the bad guy, despite any news on the war or the economy. And GW needs to stick his foot in it more often. That's the only way they will win. But you never know, a year is a long time in politics. It's all about, "what have you done for me lately?" |
|
12-22-2003, 01:40 PM | #13 (permalink) |
Who You Crappin?
Location: Everywhere and Nowhere
|
Democrats have been running around like Chickens without heads for the past 3 years. I only hope that they get their shit together this year, or it's 4 more years of Dubya, and a country of broke, pissed off people
__________________
"You can't shoot a country until it becomes a democracy." - Willravel |
12-22-2003, 03:56 PM | #14 (permalink) | |
Banned
|
Quote:
Is this what the Democrates have to offer? I will pass. |
|
12-22-2003, 03:57 PM | #15 (permalink) | |
Banned
|
Quote:
|
|
12-22-2003, 07:05 PM | #16 (permalink) |
Minion of the scaléd ones
Location: Northeast Jesusland
|
<blockquote>"Ladies and gentlemen, my opponent wants to lead this country into the 20th century. He says he'll leave no child behind! I, on the otherhand, believe that most of you can count, and realize we're in a new century, where we need new solutions, not some cowboys and Indians swagger. John Wayne is dead! God rest his soul. What do we need a bad impression of him for?
"My opponent tarred one of my colleagues with a broad brush of dishonesty, saying he claimed to have 'created the internet'. I'll tell you who created the internet: people who weren't afraid to invest in the future of this country! Democrats! Sure, we cost a little more, but we're worth it! "And, really, do we actually cost any more? The economy is sure going gangbusters right now, but are you better off than you were four years ago? I asked a waiter the other day what he thought about the 150,000 jobs that this economy created last month. He thought they were great! He had three of them. Folks, we don't cost you any more. We are experiencing the bugs bunny effect right now, where we ran out of ladder $500 billion dollars ago, and yet we rise. I watched my cartoons. I know what happens after that. We are going to make an America shaped hole in the groud unless we take back those handouts to the super rich and start using them to make the ladder longer."</blockquote> OK, I've run down. And that wasn't really what you were talking about anyway. Absolutely we need a candidate with a face and a personality. That means Dean or Sharpton or Edwards, and maybe Clark. Absolutely we need to start looking ahead to the future and getting folks to start seeing the Shrub as the Past (though I would argue that it ould never hurt to let people know just what a lousy human being he is and what a wretched thing this administration has been for the country.) We need to talk about a Prescription Drug plan that works. We need to lay out a plan to make sure that, when we make sure no child is left behind, the damn schoolhouse doesn't fall down behind them. We need to remind people that industrial pollution is just murder in slow motion, and have an idea to do something about it. We need to talk about raising the standard of living for the bottom 99% of Americans who really only got a loan from Bush. We need to talk about how not to live in fear, but how to live secure in a world community. School costs more. College costs more. Energy, water, the drugs that keep our seniors healthy all cost more. It's still the economy, and he's still stupid! Guess I hadn't run down all the way.
__________________
Light a man a fire, and he will be warm while it burns. Set a man on fire, and he will be warm for the rest of his life. |
Tags |
democrats, fellow, talk |
|
|