10-26-2003, 11:52 AM | #1 (permalink) |
Location: Waterloo, Ontario
|
What does it take to overturn a Supreme Court ruling?
This article demonstrates that there is a non-trivial number of Supreme Court justices who wish to overturn Roe v Wade. Obviously, it can't be easy or they'd have done it by now but what does it take?
How do you overturn a ruling of the Supreme Court? |
10-26-2003, 12:03 PM | #3 (permalink) |
Sarge of Blood Gulch Red Outpost Number One
Location: On the front lines against our very enemy
|
You can't basically, because as established in Marbury v. Madison and McCulloch v. Maryland, the principle of judicial review is the final word. So pretty much an act of God would have to happen to overturn the SCOTUS.
__________________
"This ain't no Ice Cream Social!" "Hey Grif, Chupathingy...how bout that? I like it...got a ring to it." "I have no earthly idea what it is I just saw, or what this place is, or where in the hell O'Malley is! My only choice is to blame Grif for coming up with such a flawed plan. Stupid, stupid Grif." |
10-26-2003, 12:55 PM | #4 (permalink) |
Dubya
Location: VA
|
A constitutional amendment, passed by 2/3's of each house of congress and 3/4's of the states.
So you can see why we've only had 3 or so in the last 50 years.
__________________
"In Iraq, no doubt about it, it's tough. It's hard work. It's incredibly hard. It's - and it's hard work. I understand how hard it is. I get the casualty reports every day. I see on the TV screens how hard it is. But it's necessary work. We're making progress. It is hard work." |
10-26-2003, 01:25 PM | #6 (permalink) |
The GrandDaddy of them all!
Location: Austin, TX
|
the last 3 .
yes, it would take a constitutional ammendment to overturn a supreme court judgement. what happens most of the time is that the congress would rewrite the controversial law so that it will get by judicial review. its kinda sad that some of our justices and our prez is against a landmark decision.
__________________
"Luck is what happens when preparation meets opportunity." - Darrel K Royal |
10-26-2003, 05:32 PM | #7 (permalink) |
Pissing in the cornflakes
|
I wonder if any liberals would like the abortion question to go up to a vote?
__________________
Agents of the enemies who hold office in our own government, who attempt to eliminate our "freedoms" and our "right to know" are posting among us, I fear.....on this very forum. - host Obama - Know a Man by the friends he keeps. |
10-26-2003, 06:13 PM | #9 (permalink) | |
Junkie
Location: In the land of ice and snow.
|
Quote:
Sorry, couldn't resist. Don't try to rebut me on that comment, obviously i am wrong. Seriously, try posting sans the word liberal sometime. Free your mind. Besides, last i heard, the majority was for abortion rights with certain restrictions. I think change would have to come in the form of an amendment. If they overturn it, what is the point of precedent at all? Why even keep records of how any judges rule anymore, if they're just going to ignore previous rulings anyway. |
|
10-26-2003, 06:51 PM | #10 (permalink) | |
Junkie
Location: San Jose, CA
|
Quote:
When you have something constructive to add, I'll listen. |
|
10-27-2003, 01:53 AM | #11 (permalink) | |
Huggles, sir?
Location: Seattle
|
Quote:
Oh well, better late than never, eh?
__________________
seretogis - sieg heil perfect little dream the kind that hurts the most, forgot how it feels well almost no one to blame always the same, open my eyes wake up in flames |
|
10-27-2003, 09:08 AM | #13 (permalink) | |
Pissing in the cornflakes
|
Quote:
On the other hand, the liberals, even Canadian liberals it seems always have some fear that the precious, and close, supreme court ruling that made abortion the law of the land will be overturned. Its not so wrong to ask, was this the will of the people (aka would it pass a vote) or was this the rule of a liberal court?
__________________
Agents of the enemies who hold office in our own government, who attempt to eliminate our "freedoms" and our "right to know" are posting among us, I fear.....on this very forum. - host Obama - Know a Man by the friends he keeps. |
|
10-27-2003, 11:50 AM | #14 (permalink) |
The GrandDaddy of them all!
Location: Austin, TX
|
wait a sec...the court is not supposed to reflect the opinion of the majority. that's what the legislature is for.
court is supposed to protect the rights of the citizens, however unpopular that it might be with the majority. the bill of rights was written to protect the minority rights from a mobbish majority. i see no need for a referendum on this issue. the minority (in this case would be the women seeking abortions) rights must be protected no matter what the majority thinks.
__________________
"Luck is what happens when preparation meets opportunity." - Darrel K Royal |
10-27-2003, 11:56 AM | #15 (permalink) | |
Location: Waterloo, Ontario
|
Quote:
Then you continue to troll. Even I think it was peculiar how hard people came down on you on that instance, considering the other crimes you're guilty of, but this is more inflammatory than your previous post, in my opinion. In addition to all this, your offending statement "On the other hand..." was very hard to parse. May I kindly suggest that you reread your post before submitting? If you read it again, I think you will find that it didn't come out quite as well as you had hoped... Yes, liberals get upset when freedom is at risk. Why is this noteworthy? Finally, I do believe that your country (anyone, correct me if I'm wrong) is firmly divided in half on the matter, much like the homosexual marriage issue we have in Canada... |
|
10-27-2003, 12:28 PM | #16 (permalink) |
Pissing in the cornflakes
|
This is NOT a troll.
It is a very legit question. DO you think that the 'right' to an abortion would pass if the people got to vote on it? If you did, you wouldn't worry about the supreme court.
__________________
Agents of the enemies who hold office in our own government, who attempt to eliminate our "freedoms" and our "right to know" are posting among us, I fear.....on this very forum. - host Obama - Know a Man by the friends he keeps. |
10-27-2003, 12:47 PM | #18 (permalink) | |
Adrift
Location: Wandering in the Desert of Life
|
Quote:
I am honestly unsure about the results of a nationwide vote on abortion. I would vote for the right of the mother to choose. My mother, who was morally opposed to abortion always told me that if it came to a vote she would, in defference to the Constitution and the protected rights of minority groups, vote for the right to choose, even though it would make her sick to do so. I think that you might be surprised at the ultimate result of a vote. The advantage for Pro-Life supporters is that they are very well organized and truly passionate about the issue. Many who would probably vote Pro-Choice, feel like my mother and may opt not to vote. It would certainly be interesting to have a non-biased/skewed poll to get the true pulse of the nation. Ustwo, I assume that you would vote for a ban, do you have any information that would back up your assumtion that, if voted upon, abortion would be banned?
__________________
Human beings, who are almost unique in having the ability to learn from the experience of others, are also remarkable for their apparent disinclination to do so." -Douglas Adams |
|
10-27-2003, 12:51 PM | #19 (permalink) | |
Location: Waterloo, Ontario
|
Quote:
The question of "what is the popular opinion?" is not trolling, your insult towards liberals was. Admittedly, the sentence was so poorly constructed that I may have misconstrued it's meaning but, from what I've seen of your previous posts, I think I got it's insinuation. I already answered your question to the best of my knowledge, it was 50/50, so it could go either way. Why did you ignore this and restate your question? Last edited by KnifeMissile; 10-27-2003 at 12:57 PM.. |
|
10-27-2003, 01:00 PM | #20 (permalink) | ||
Junkie
Location: In the land of ice and snow.
|
Quote:
Quote:
You may be surprised to learn that according to this poll most people favor letting roe v. wade stand. This page contains the results of 19 different polls conducted by many varying organizations from either side of the political spectrum. In my initial glance through i saw not a single poll where the majority of respondents favored an outright ban on abortion. Most people seem to favor the restricted right to abortion as opposed to an anything goes attitude. It seems that if there was a vote affirming the right, albeit with certain restrictions, to abortion the result would be the legalization of abortion. I'm willing to bet that it still wouldn't satisfy the prolife movement though. Last edited by filtherton; 10-27-2003 at 01:23 PM.. |
||
10-27-2003, 01:13 PM | #21 (permalink) |
Adrift
Location: Wandering in the Desert of Life
|
filtherton thanks for the info. I think you are right that most people would vote against a complete ban, but would vote for certain restrictions.
__________________
Human beings, who are almost unique in having the ability to learn from the experience of others, are also remarkable for their apparent disinclination to do so." -Douglas Adams |
10-28-2003, 03:18 AM | #23 (permalink) | ||
Junkie
Location: In the land of ice and snow.
|
Quote:
If you read the whole post, you'd have known i was joking, and included an admission of my "wrongness": Quote:
If you're going to try to come off high and mighty and preach about misunderstanding the constitution, maybe you should work to not misunderstand my post. |
||
10-28-2003, 02:26 PM | #24 (permalink) | |
Huggles, sir?
Location: Seattle
|
Quote:
__________________
seretogis - sieg heil perfect little dream the kind that hurts the most, forgot how it feels well almost no one to blame always the same, open my eyes wake up in flames |
|
10-28-2003, 05:34 PM | #25 (permalink) | |
Junkie
Location: In the land of ice and snow.
|
Quote:
Perhaps you'll take your own advice the next time you decide to post your pretty little troll.gif. |
|
10-28-2003, 11:43 PM | #27 (permalink) | |
Apocalypse Nerd
|
Quote:
|
|
Tags |
court, overturn, ruling, supreme |
|
|