HarmlessRabbit

http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp...nguage=printer

To me, this is yet another example of why Rumsfeld's ideas about war on-the-cheap are not workable. Here you have untrained reservists handling prisoners in stressful conditions, which results in the murder of a prisoner.

One of the accused is a major. I don't know if this is just because he was in charge or because he was directly involved, but it's sad to see such a large group of army personnel being charged with such a nasty crime.

seretogis

Ehh.. You don't have to go through any training to understand that assault and battery to the point of death are bad things. Then again, the details about the death are not in this article, but I really doubt that it is something that required more than common sense on the part of the accused.

I think you are a bit backwards on this one. I think it's sad to see army personnel committing such a nasty crime, not for them to get charged for it.

__________________
seretogis - sieg heil
perfect little dream the kind that hurts the most, forgot how it feels well almost
no one to blame always the same, open my eyes wake up in flames

HarmlessRabbit

Heh, in parsing out my grammar I have to agree with you.

chavos

people under stress do do stupid things....this is known. would have additional training given them the ability to avoid being stupid? I dunno...

Food Eater Lad

You are correct, out of what 60,000 troops being used overseas in places like Iraq, Kosovo, Korea, the fact that 8 commit a crime means Rumsfeild is wrong?

Its called grasping at straws for those who dont know.

chavos

what would be a statistically significant ratio of atrocities, FEL?

santafe5000

Lack of training is no excuse for mistreatment of prisoner's. I'm sure there is probably more to the story that was not reported, but the prisoner's death was unwarrented, Unless the prisoner had gained access to a weapon, which was trying to use. The fact that Marine's were staffing a detention center, has no real bearing on the story. I'm sure the military will make every effort to see that the alleged perpetrator's are dealt with accordingly.

__________________
When all else fails, QUIT.

pocon1

Chavos,
certainly more than one.

I would like to find out more about the situation before passing judgement on it, and what our people are doing over there (in prison. I mean, not the whole war). This is why we have criminal investigations. We have no idea if the Iraqi brought it upon himself, like by attacking a guard, or if the soldiers actually murdered the prisoner.

The_Dude

I dont see how these can be blamed on poor training.

__________________
"Luck is what happens when preparation meets opportunity." - Darrel K Royal

Ustwo

Its a tribute to the US that we prosecute people who do this sort of thing.

I don't see what issue you are trying to bring up here.

__________________
Agents of the enemies who hold office in our own government, who attempt to eliminate our "freedoms" and our "right to know" are posting among us, I fear.....on this very forum. - host

Obama - Know a Man by the friends he keeps.

HarmlessRabbit

That untrained reservists are being deployed to jobs they aren't prepared for, and are committing crimes. I thought the article made that point pretty clear.

So, if I understand your point, the more crimes that soldiers commit and prosecute, the more tribute the USA deserves?

Food Eater Lad

No his point is that we take it seriously when military comit crimes. But you knew that, you just want to see the negative in anything that America is doing right. Just like most liberals.

HarmlessRabbit

Actually, I'd like to discuss the greater implications of rumsfeld's war on-the-cheap policy. Unfortunately, you and Ustwo don't want to discuss anything, you just want to troll the board with your conservative beliefs.

When you or Ustwo are ready to discuss political issues rather than troll, I'll respond. From now on though, I have no interest in replying to content-free trolls from either of you.

What do you think of the article, Food Eater Lad? It, and the other article I posted about medical conditions for reservists in Georgia, seem to imply that Rumsfeld's attempt to conduct war in a new way isn't working very well. Several non-liberal generals have criticized Rumsfeld, and both of those articles came from Drudge Report. Matt Drudge is hardly a liberal.

I'm a liberal, however, and I'm proud of that. I care about the condition of the poor, including our troops and reservists, most of whom live in poverty are impacted quite severely by the Bush Administration's tax cuts for the rich and benefit reduction for the poor.

Let me know when you're ready to actually discuss something by bringing up your opinions and thoughts on an issue.

Ustwo

How well trained does someone have to be to not be violent?

This sort of thing has been going on in war since there has been war. I'm not sure what kind of training you would like to do, maybe sensitivity training? Empathy with the enemy?

Ummm harmless, since the top 50% of the wage earners pay 97% of the taxes, how does one cut the taxes of someone not paying taxes? How are the poor hurt by Bush's tax cut? Why is it the governments job to steal money from me to give to someone else? If you feel so much for the poor, go work in a soup kitchen, and give YOUR money to them. I'm sure the money you spend on your internet connectivity would keep a hungry child fed all year. Why you feel YOU have the right to take what I earn and give to someone else is beyond me.

And reguardless, despite all the give aways, do we still have poverty? Do we still have crime? Are the schools better? Liberalism works on feelings, not results. Something a good parent teaches their child early on is the value of hard work, and that you can't just expect things handed to you, yet this lesson is lost on liberals giving away other peoples money.

I too care about the poor, but liberal programs don't slove poverty, they enable it.

__________________
Agents of the enemies who hold office in our own government, who attempt to eliminate our "freedoms" and our "right to know" are posting among us, I fear.....on this very forum. - host

Obama - Know a Man by the friends he keeps.

Astrocloud

Alow me to play devil's advocate and voice the simple fact that these guys are only charged with a crime. They are still innocent until proven guilty.

There are a lot of hardcore resistance fighters and Iraqi irregulars still in Iraq. I bet if the guy they killed, managed to kill 2 or 3 marines and escape... This wouldn't have been in the news as anything more than just three more flags sent home. Meanwhile, who would've put the Iraqi on trial?

I just guess we won't know; we can't know -until we have more facts to consider.

HarmlessRabbit

These were reservists and apparently not trained in how to handle hostile prisoners who speak a foreign language. How much training do you need not to be violent? I'm sure any police officer or soldier could tell you that you need a hell of a lot more training to handle civilians properly than you do to engage in battle.

Your other points are interesting, but off-topic. Feel free to write up your thoughts into a new post. I'm interested in having a rational discussion about your points.

Ustwo

And look how often these 'well trained' cops get overly violent. From broom sticks in NY to Rodney King (though Rodney earned his beating in my book). The problem as I see it wasn't training, it was a couple of sick jerks (provided the charges are true) and some people who tried to cover for them.

If you expect some 500,000 men, under harsh conditions, to NEVER do something like this with 'training' you don't understand human nature very well.

seretogis

Exactly. The attempt by some of you to link this with the actions of higher-ups is nothing but an attempt at a political jab. If Rumsfeld's policies truly were putting thousands of untrained reservists into jobs they couldn't handle, there would be thousands of screw-ups like this -- not just eight buddies that have a taste for blood.

On another note, can we please stay away from moronic generalizations of "all liberals" and "all conservatives?" It's really not helpful, especially since a couple of people who I would consider ultra-liberal have agreed with the "conservatives" on this thread.

P.S. My new avatar makes my posts look smart!

__________________
seretogis - sieg heil
perfect little dream the kind that hurts the most, forgot how it feels well almost
no one to blame always the same, open my eyes wake up in flames

The_Dude

if i remember properly, the US did not join the international court setup just for this.

__________________
"Luck is what happens when preparation meets opportunity." - Darrel K Royal

HarmlessRabbit

Actually, that's what the article, linked by the conservative Matt Druge, said.

Facts from the case so far:
- These guys were reservists
- They didn't receive their supposedly mandatory training in handling prisoners
- Reservists aren't supposed to handle prisoners anyway, only full time soldiers should

Now, these are statements from the defendant's lawyer, so you can choose to believe or not believe them, but I believe they are valid points.

I'm apparently not alone in my beliefs. A quick search:

http://news.google.com/news?hl=en&ed...nG=Search+News

Turns up this:

http://washingtontimes.com/commentar...5654-4779r.htm

And yes, your avatar does make you look smart.

onetime2

Now that's a laugh. Liberals caring about the "poor" military personnel. Interesting new philosophy being touted by the left with regard to the military. On one hand they want military spending cut and on the other they want soldiers to be paid more. Throw in the "sympathy" they have for those poor soldiers who are staying deployed longer than they were "promised" and you've got one of the biggest loads of horse crap I've seen in a long time.

Funny how the "tax cuts" done by the Bush administration are being blamed for everything from underpaid soldiers to social failures in the US. Just how far do you think a $ could possibly stretch?

eple

well I guess $87 000 000 000 could get something done....

Food Eater Lad

Like make Iraq a decent viable part of the world, why liberals are agaisnt that and at the same time pretend to care about people is absurd. By the way in just this month alone, the US is Up 84 billion more than expected due to the upswing in the economy. So stop complaining about the money going to Iraq, at this point its almost found money.

Astrocloud

Strange how the thread has been jacked from about some soldiers in Iraq -to a Straw Man argument about "What Liberals think".

I would love to speak up but the quality of conversation just isn't to par with what certain people claim their IQ to be.

Example:

Q: What do you think about the soldiers in Iraq accused of murding someone.

A: Liberals suck.

It's a pretty pathetic substitute for intellectual discourse. I mean even if you hate someone else -at least do it in a unique or interesting way.

edited by rogue49 for over the top flashing rebuttal

Ustwo

'Conservative' Matt Druge nails both sides equally, so why the label?

The democrats are desprate for ANYTHING to pin on Bush. This is just a desperate attempt to blame the administration for the actions of a few individual soldiers. Oh and before you blame the Bush crew for this, who do you blame for this one?

I hope you get my point with this one eh?

__________________
Agents of the enemies who hold office in our own government, who attempt to eliminate our "freedoms" and our "right to know" are posting among us, I fear.....on this very forum. - host

Obama - Know a Man by the friends he keeps.

HarmlessRabbit

And if I replied saying "The conservatives are desparate to pin anything on Clinton. You conservatives are pathetic." and didn't address the larger issue, I would be behaving just like you.

Throughout this whole thread, you have refused to discuss the issue.

The issue is whether Rumsfeld's attempt to conduct cheaper wars is causing problems like this. The fact that Rumsfeld is trying to make US warfare cheaper and use fewer troops is not disputed by anyone. Several high-profile generals have disputed his policies publicly, and rumsfeld has defended himself publicly.

These reservists were apparently on an assignment they shouldn't have been assigned, doing something they weren't trained for. Something tragic happened, and I'm interested in discussing the event in the context of Rumsfeld's new way of conducting war.

If you don't want to join that conversation, then frankly I have no interest in hearing you spout off "all you liberals" this or that.

Kadath

Uh, I just realized that the error I pointed out was deliberate.

__________________
it's quiet in here

HarmlessRabbit

Oh, one more thing. edit by rogue49 My dad was a Master Tank Gunner in the army, I have an uncle that died from a land mine in Korea, and I have ALWAYS supported the troops on the ground. I don't support the war, but I support the troops. I am not a "they" I am a "me" with my own opinions and thoughts.

The Bush Administration has asked more of this military while treating the troops like crap, cutting troop pay, extending their tour of duty, and generally showing a lot of contempt for an all-volunteer, mostly-poor, mostly-minority army. I can care about the troops while thinking the policy of the administration towards the troops and the war is wrong.

edited by rogue49 for not knowing how to stop before I take things too personal and flame another member.

Ustwo

Here is my answer then: No

Rumsfelds policy has NOTHING to do with this, any more then Clintons did in my above quote. The only difference is no one tried to blame Clinton for it, like some are trying with Bush. I thought I was clear that I didn't blame Rumsfeld.

I've said no indirectly many times before, now I'm saying it directly.

I'm not sure what conversation I'm not joining here, but I'm being quite clear that armies do "bad things" at times. I don’t blame Clinton for soldiers actions, and I knew you wouldn't which is why I posted that bit of article. Its the liberals desperate desire to nail Bush for something that always happens in war that is the real meat of this discussion. There is nothing unique about these 8 men that makes them any different then the 9 men in the rape, (and I didn't post the whole article, there were more abuses).

I also wonder if these are the same Generals that thought we would need 2 million troops to invade Iraq, or 500k to invade Afghanistan. Generals always want more men, more guns, more supplies, more, more, more, its the nature of the job I think. Generals complain all the time about anyone who might cut their budget or tell them to make due, god knows they complained about Clinton, they complain about Rumsfeld (and Bush), and they will complain about whoever comes next.

So in case I'm not clear, no its not Rumsfeld's fault, and I really don't understand why you have to get so hostile. I don’t agree with the idea that somehow this wouldn’t have happened if Rumsfeld had spent a few billion more. You can't look at this only as 'how is this war being run' and draw conclusions on it, without looking at past conflicts and what happened during them.

This sort of thing happens in war, the US unlike most other countries does its best to make sure the abuses don’t happen, and punish those who commit them. End of story.

Food Eater Lad

You mean its not Bush's fault? But thats what I was told to think...

filtherton

Whether you want to link it to rumsfeld or not, somebody fucked up for making these undertrained reservists do a job that reservists, much less undertrained reservists aren't supposed to do. Whether you can chalk that up to the fact that we seem to be fighting a "war on cheap"(not really that cheap) or not is up to you. I can't imagine what would be said if medics or engineers were asked to interrogate hostile prisoners and some atrocity level shit went down. Under normal circumstances i'm pretty sure that, if given the choice, the army would want people who are qualified to do the things that require qualification.
So i guess my question is, who is holding the army back? Responsibility lies somewhere, right?
The statement that atrocities are part of any military conflict, is unfortunately true(i wonder how many of these dandies we haven't heard about), but it seems like under these circumstances we are practically asking for it. If my 10 yr old cousin(or anyone else who doesn't know how to drive) gets behind the wheel of a car and proceeds to crash it i wouldn't just shake my head and say, "Car accidents are inevitable." There's obviously more to it than just the fact that car accidents do happen. I think we could very accurately attribute the accident to the fact that my cousin had no experience or training and really no business being behind the wheel.

I've heard the president marvel at the "humaneness" of our current war/occupation. I wonder how much more humane it would be if our soldiers were actually qualified to do the jobs the administration is asking them to do.

debaser

Did Rumsfeld lead to this aboration? No. But his policy of "War on the cheap" led to an increased number of casualties. Had we waited another few weeks and put 1st ID or 4th ID on the ground, there would have been adequate rear security for our assault forces, so incidents such as the overhyped Jessica Lynch issue would not have happened.

As far as these 8 men go, there are criminals in the army, and if war brings out the best in a man then it can also do the opposite. If convicted, they will spend a very long time making big rocks into small rocks, and rightfully so.

__________________

debaser

Another thing, the training required for this kind of thing is not rocket science. These men were guarding a prison, not interogating prisoners. This is a simple task that can be accomplished without in-depth training. The ecuse that they were improperly trained for the task is just that, an excuse made by a lawyer to defend his client.

__________________

filtherton

Yeah, i mean all of us could probably guard a prison effectively if we had to. Type "stanford prison experiment" in to google and see how the average person fares as prison guard.

debaser

The difference is that these people are disciplined soldiers, under the command of trained officers and subject to the UCMJ. All soldiers recieve training on the Geneva Conventions regarding the treatment of POWs.

__________________

filtherton

According to their lawyer these soldiers didn't actually recieve their mandatory training and, as reservists, shouldn't have been handling prisoners anyway.

Ustwo

A lawyer would never lie to reporters, right?

Nor does it matter for them, military trails don't go up before an LA Jury. Maybe they arn't guilty, and will get off, but they won't get off by blaming someone else for their cruelty.

__________________
Agents of the enemies who hold office in our own government, who attempt to eliminate our "freedoms" and our "right to know" are posting among us, I fear.....on this very forum. - host

Obama - Know a Man by the friends he keeps.

filtherton

Whether he is lying is unknowable by any of us and is therefore irrelevant. Politicians have been known to lie, yet many people still trust them.

btw, if you're not going to address any substantial points in anything i am saying, please don't be the little fly that buzzes around my posts and whispers sweet, irrelevant techinicalities in my ear, for after this post i will do my best to ignore such mutterings.

debaser

As reservists they went through the exact same basic training as every other member of their branch of the armed forces (in this case Marines). They recieved the training.

The responsibility for this act rests on the individuals and their immediate commanders.

__________________

Ustwo

Boy, you are touchy, just because I see your agument differently they you do, doesn't mean I am wrong. I think the most important thing you said was According to their lawyer which I pointed out as questionable. The lawyer said they didn't get the right training, which in terms of debate means nothing. Now if it turns out they didn't get the training then we can talk about it, but debating the merits of a case based on the words of a defense lawyer is futile. Have you ever heard a lawyer say 'Its all my clients fault, I don't know what got into them.' or the like?

But lets assume they didn't get the training, just for fun. Do you really think they didn't get the training budget because of Rumsfeld, or more likely because someone screwed up and they got out of it?

__________________
Agents of the enemies who hold office in our own government, who attempt to eliminate our "freedoms" and our "right to know" are posting among us, I fear.....on this very forum. - host

Obama - Know a Man by the friends he keeps.