Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community  

Go Back   Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community > The Academy > Tilted Politics


 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 01-25-2010, 01:38 PM   #81 (permalink)
Who You Crappin?
 
Derwood's Avatar
 
Location: Everywhere and Nowhere
Quote:
Originally Posted by aceventura3 View Post
We have been through the Bush years, there is a lot of stuff posted on his economic policies. I don't think Bush is responsible for the "bubble" in real estate or the "meltdown" in the financial sector and personally I was doing pretty good when he was in office. It was his TARP plan that Obama takes credit for when he says he saved the economy from the brink, look at the dates and compare what he did in office that would have "saved us" compared to when he started saying he "saved us".

Who created the real estate bubble and the financial meltdown, then?
__________________
"You can't shoot a country until it becomes a democracy." - Willravel
Derwood is offline  
Old 01-25-2010, 01:51 PM   #82 (permalink)
Junkie
 
rahl's Avatar
 
Location: Ohio
Quote:
Originally Posted by aceventura3 View Post
We have been through the Bush years, there is a lot of stuff posted on his economic policies. I don't think Bush is responsible for the "bubble" in real estate or the "meltdown" in the financial sector and personally I was doing pretty good when he was in office. It was his TARP plan that Obama takes credit for when he says he saved the economy from the brink, look at the dates and compare what he did in office that would have "saved us" compared to when he started saying he "saved us".
Bush was in office for eight years. During which time he implimented certain economic policies. As a result of those policies the economy tanked. Obama has been in office for one year. During which time he implemented certain economic policies. As a result of those policies the economy has started to recover.
__________________
"Your life is Yours alone...Rise up and live it"
rahl is offline  
Old 01-25-2010, 01:54 PM   #83 (permalink)
warrior bodhisattva
 
Baraka_Guru's Avatar
 
Super Moderator
Location: East-central Canada
Quote:
Originally Posted by aceventura3 View Post
I have consistently held the position that Presidents get too much cred and too much blame for economic conditions. I am a free market capitalist, I do not believe government or centralized control is effective in managing an economy. Government can maintain an environment that promote healthy economic growth or Government can do the opposite, so in that regard government can have an impact on economic conditions. Government is not the root cause of normal business cycles nor is government the answer to them.
I agree with this to a point. I think people put too much stock in the impact they have, but I do think governments play an important role in the economy.

Quote:
At this point in time I think his rhetoric and attack against the financial sector, the "rich", etc. has hurt. I also believe the uncertainty of tax increases, increases in cost for health care, cap and trade, etc., has hurt. Banks are not lending, credit is frozen, he has not helped in this regard either. He said his stimulus would limit unemployment to 8%, we are well above that.

I want him to listen to the sectors of the economy that actually create jobs. His plans for targeted tax credits, ain't going to help. I don't need a child care tax credit, I need access to lines of credit at reasonable costs. I don't need a retirement savings, I need to be able to sell my home to a guy who can get a mortgage.
Um, wait. What has hurt more, Obama's "rhetoric and attack" or the financial sector's history of ludicrous credit practices coming to term? The reason why banks aren't lending and credit is frozen has a hell of a lot more to do with the breakneck speed and heavy-handedness at which banks threw around their own money and the money of others. What is your opinion of Obama's recent move regarding how banks may or may not do business in the future?

Quote:
Originally Posted by roachboy View Post
because the fact is that obama is not a leftist except in the bizarre-o frames that conservatives and folk to the right of them want to lay over him.
Well, it's fairly clear that to a lot of conservatives, even centre politics is "left wing." It's interesting to hear that view from where I'm sitting.
__________________
Knowing that death is certain and that the time of death is uncertain, what's the most important thing?
—Bhikkhuni Pema Chödrön

Humankind cannot bear very much reality.
—From "Burnt Norton," Four Quartets (1936), T. S. Eliot

Last edited by Baraka_Guru; 01-25-2010 at 01:58 PM..
Baraka_Guru is offline  
Old 01-25-2010, 02:04 PM   #84 (permalink)
Still Free
 
Cimarron29414's Avatar
 
Location: comfortably perched at the top of the bell curve!
You guys are correct and I am wrong. Have a nice day.
__________________
Gives a man a halo, does mead.

"Here lies The_Jazz: Killed by an ambitious, sparkly, pink butterfly."
Cimarron29414 is offline  
Old 01-25-2010, 02:12 PM   #85 (permalink)
Who You Crappin?
 
Derwood's Avatar
 
Location: Everywhere and Nowhere
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cimarron29414 View Post
You guys are correct and I am wrong. Have a nice day.

awwwwwwwwwww
__________________
"You can't shoot a country until it becomes a democracy." - Willravel
Derwood is offline  
Old 01-25-2010, 02:16 PM   #86 (permalink)
Still Free
 
Cimarron29414's Avatar
 
Location: comfortably perched at the top of the bell curve!
Quote:
Originally Posted by Derwood View Post
awwwwwwwwwww
Honestly, is there anything that I can say that will make you go, "You know, that's true. I didn't think of it that way." Nope. I will convince you of nothing, so why waste the time?
__________________
Gives a man a halo, does mead.

"Here lies The_Jazz: Killed by an ambitious, sparkly, pink butterfly."
Cimarron29414 is offline  
Old 01-25-2010, 02:32 PM   #87 (permalink)
Who You Crappin?
 
Derwood's Avatar
 
Location: Everywhere and Nowhere
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cimarron29414 View Post
Honestly, is there anything that I can say that will make you go, "You know, that's true. I didn't think of it that way." Nope. I will convince you of nothing, so why waste the time?
it's called a debate. you express your views, I counter with mine. Just because no one states that the other person has swayed them doesn't mean a healthy debate isn't happening.

That said, when was the last time I convinced YOU to change your mind?
__________________
"You can't shoot a country until it becomes a democracy." - Willravel
Derwood is offline  
Old 01-25-2010, 03:06 PM   #88 (permalink)
warrior bodhisattva
 
Baraka_Guru's Avatar
 
Super Moderator
Location: East-central Canada
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cimarron29414 View Post
You guys are correct and I am wrong. Have a nice day.
Well if you look at what goes on in Canadian politics, you will see actually working left politics. Real-life, self-proclaimed leftist parties holding actual real-life seats of power. You see the same thing in South America too. The U.S. is virtually surrounded by it. I won't even get into Europe.

The U.S. is essentially a two-party system. One party is essentially centrist (often Third Way), while the other is essentially centre-right. There is no left-wing political power in the U.S. There's left politics, but they operate on the fringes and in the grassroots.

Much of the "socialist" aspects in America that people are concerned with, and even those things that people don't even talk much about anymore, are so mainstream in contemporary politics that even conservative politicians have accepted them as the norm and deal with them as political realities.
__________________
Knowing that death is certain and that the time of death is uncertain, what's the most important thing?
—Bhikkhuni Pema Chödrön

Humankind cannot bear very much reality.
—From "Burnt Norton," Four Quartets (1936), T. S. Eliot

Last edited by Baraka_Guru; 01-25-2010 at 03:09 PM..
Baraka_Guru is offline  
Old 01-26-2010, 06:11 AM   #89 (permalink)
Darth Papa
 
ratbastid's Avatar
 
Location: Yonder
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cimarron29414 View Post
You guys are correct and I am wrong. Have a nice day.
Hey, here's a marble you missed before you took all the rest and went home:

From my perpective you're a high-pressure firehose of bullshit. But that's just my perspective. As is the case with TFP Politics in general, you're not going to change my view and I'm not going to change yours. I wrestled with that and came to terms with it a few months back. Nature of the beast. And if you can gain some peace with that, this place gets interesting again.
ratbastid is offline  
Old 01-26-2010, 07:40 AM   #90 (permalink)
Junkie
 
aceventura3's Avatar
 
Location: Ventura County
Debates with liberals on economics is sorta fun. Let's have some more fun. Let's look at the failed cash for clunkers program or the CARS (The U.S. government’s Car Allowance Rebate System). On the surface many people got a benefit and we could argue there was a benefit by getting some gas guzzling high polluting cars off the road. I am not disputing the benefit of getting some gas guzzlers off of the road, but for everyone that got a benefit many more ended up paying higher prices for used cars.

Quote:
Effect on used car market.

* Normally, incentives on new vehicles drive used vehicle prices down. According to Manheim Consulting chief economist Tom Webb, every $1,000 in new vehicle incentives decreases used vehicle prices by $750. However, new vehicle inventories were low even before CARS started on July 24, which has helped to support higher used vehicle prices.

* Furthermore, CARS has actually increased demand for used vehicles. Many consumers went to dealerships intending to participate in CARS but found out their trade-in was ineligible, so they decided to look for a used vehicle on the same dealer’s lot.

* Dealers are thus bidding up auction prices as they acquire more used vehicles to sell to customers who cannot trade in their clunkers. According to Manheim, the Manheim Used Vehicle Value Index for July was at its highest level since September 2007.

* The (bankers) confidence in dealerships is going up. There is now, even, talk of all the dealerships that lost the franchise in recent auto industry reorganization joining together to form a new auto chain. (which can only mean more demand on used car market).

Bottomline.

To start with, the supply of used vehicles was down with people driving cars longer than ever – thanks to the economy.

Lot of, otherwise, cheaper used vehicles (clunkers) which would have landed at the used car lot are now headed to metal graveyard.

The demand is either same or headed higher.

The profiles of folks who bought vehicles seems to show they are a large number of buy-and-drive-till-wheels-fall-off types, who are unlikely to trade-in at the end of model year.

We think the pressure on used car prices will be upward. Compared to the rock bottom (give away to get out of auto loan) prices a few months ago, we expect the prices on used vehicles to go up by about 35%.

One more good thing, the part suppliers seem to have received a boost in arm (with orders to supply new vehicles) and lot of them should survive the auto reorganization!
Effect of Cash for Clunkers (CARS) on used car prices. : News.PreOwnedCar.com

I point this out to illustrate that there are no free rides, in order for the government to give there has to be an off-setting cost. Think about it - the single mom in poverty needing a used car but did not have a "cluncker" or did not participate in the program, who now goes out to buy a car, let's say a $2,000 car needed for a new job, will pay about $700 more for the car. Thanks Mr. President.
__________________
"Democracy is two wolves and a sheep voting on lunch."
"It is useless for the sheep to pass resolutions on vegetarianism while the wolf is of a different opinion."
"If you live among wolves you have to act like one."
"A lady screams at the mouse but smiles at the wolf. A gentleman is a wolf who sends flowers."


Last edited by aceventura3; 01-26-2010 at 07:47 AM..
aceventura3 is offline  
Old 01-26-2010, 07:55 AM   #91 (permalink)
warrior bodhisattva
 
Baraka_Guru's Avatar
 
Super Moderator
Location: East-central Canada
You're making the assumption that the prices for used cars would have remained static or would have not climbed by that $700 value in your example over the same period. Would this be realistic in this environment where, you know, people would be more reluctant to sell their cars into the used market and opt instead to hang onto their vehicles indefinitely? That puts a chokehold on the supply in the used car market.

I wouldn't call the CARS program a rousing success, but I wouldn't call it a failure either.
__________________
Knowing that death is certain and that the time of death is uncertain, what's the most important thing?
—Bhikkhuni Pema Chödrön

Humankind cannot bear very much reality.
—From "Burnt Norton," Four Quartets (1936), T. S. Eliot
Baraka_Guru is offline  
Old 01-26-2010, 08:12 AM   #92 (permalink)
Who You Crappin?
 
Derwood's Avatar
 
Location: Everywhere and Nowhere
I don't know what your business does, Ace, but would you have vehemently opposed an Obama initiative that gave incentives for consumers to utilize YOUR business?
__________________
"You can't shoot a country until it becomes a democracy." - Willravel
Derwood is offline  
Old 01-26-2010, 08:35 AM   #93 (permalink)
 
roachboy's Avatar
 
Super Moderator
Location: essex ma
that would in all likelihood be understood as a self-defeating effort on the part of a state that is as it can only be which is misguided, fucked up, a mobile principle of irrationality, that would introduce distortions into the otherwise grandly functioning bidness empire that is ace's.

he's a supply-sider you know.
__________________
a gramophone its corrugated trumpet silver handle
spinning dog. such faithfulness it hear

it make you sick.

-kamau brathwaite
roachboy is offline  
Old 01-26-2010, 08:39 AM   #94 (permalink)
Junkie
 
filtherton's Avatar
 
Location: In the land of ice and snow.
I like it when Ace pretends to sympathize with the economic needs of poor folks to make a point.

Ace, none of the single mothers I know are in a position to buy a used car. But you're probably more concerned with single mothers as a useful crutch for your economic positions than you are in supporting economic positions that help single mothers (maybe I'm wrong about this).
filtherton is offline  
Old 01-26-2010, 10:29 AM   #95 (permalink)
Junkie
 
aceventura3's Avatar
 
Location: Ventura County
Quote:
Originally Posted by Baraka_Guru View Post
You're making the assumption that the prices for used cars would have remained static or would have not climbed by that $700 value in your example over the same period. Would this be realistic in this environment where, you know, people would be more reluctant to sell their cars into the used market and opt instead to hang onto their vehicles indefinitely? That puts a chokehold on the supply in the used car market.

I wouldn't call the CARS program a rousing success, but I wouldn't call it a failure either.
If the Obama administration gave it as much thought as you did above I would be surprised. The primary point is that unintended consequences have to be accounted for, the costs of government programs have to be looked at, the Obama administration has a pattern of selling the benefits and ignoring the costs.

---------- Post added at 06:04 PM ---------- Previous post was at 06:01 PM ----------

Quote:
Originally Posted by Derwood View Post
I don't know what your business does, Ace, but would you have vehemently opposed an Obama initiative that gave incentives for consumers to utilize YOUR business?
Yes.

I have no interest in being beholden to the government. If you talk to the car dealers who had to jump through the government hoops to get paid, many have said it was not worth the aggravation. I just want to pay my fair share of taxes, follow the law and be done with it.

---------- Post added at 06:18 PM ---------- Previous post was at 06:04 PM ----------

Quote:
Originally Posted by roachboy View Post
that would in all likelihood be understood as a self-defeating effort on the part of a state that is as it can only be which is misguided, fucked up, a mobile principle of irrationality, that would introduce distortions into the otherwise grandly functioning bidness empire that is ace's.

he's a supply-sider you know.
I am also a free market capitalist and think it is the best system for average people in an economy.

Let's play a game, let's call it who wins, corporate America or real middle class people.

Scenario #1

We have a closed economy called America, everything else is equal. The economy supports 100 car transactions per year at a price of $10,000. Corporate America handles the transactions and gets a 10% cut - that, $10,000 x 100 x 10%, which is $100,000. Now let's say the government causes prices to increase 35%. a few things could happen, including...

let's say transaction volume stays the same, but the costs go up to $13,500. Corporate America gets 10%, now they earn $135,000, with no increase in costs, who wins?

let's say transaction volume goes down 35% at the higher cost. Corporate American makes $877,500 at a volume of 65 transaction, they fire 35% of their work force, who wins?

And so it goes, Corporate America is chalking up record profits during an economic recession with no jobs growth, and people call it corporate greed, I call it short-sighted economic policy.

I am a supply sider, don't you know.

---------- Post added at 06:21 PM ---------- Previous post was at 06:18 PM ----------

Quote:
Originally Posted by Derwood View Post
Who created the real estate bubble and the financial meltdown, then?
Easy credit, overly optimistic outlooks, secondary markets allowing risk transfer, mixed in with greed. We have had this combination of issues in the past and will see them again in the future, with or without Bush.

---------- Post added at 06:24 PM ---------- Previous post was at 06:21 PM ----------

Quote:
Originally Posted by rahl View Post
Bush was in office for eight years. During which time he implimented certain economic policies. As a result of those policies the economy tanked.
Using your logic was Clinton responsible for the Dot Com bubble creation and bursting? I would say no.

Quote:
Obama has been in office for one year. During which time he implemented certain economic policies. As a result of those policies the economy has started to recover.
That is the "rainman" argument that I alluded to earlier. If not for Obama the economy would not recover????

---------- Post added at 06:29 PM ---------- Previous post was at 06:24 PM ----------

Quote:
Originally Posted by Baraka_Guru View Post
Um, wait. What has hurt more, Obama's "rhetoric and attack" or the financial sector's history of ludicrous credit practices coming to term?
I think the market could have handled the issues "coming to term", however, creating a panic can overwhelm what could have been an orderly unwinding of excessive risk and speculation in the market.


Quote:
The reason why banks aren't lending and credit is frozen has a hell of a lot more to do with the breakneck speed and heavy-handedness at which banks threw around their own money and the money of others. What is your opinion of Obama's recent move regarding how banks may or may not do business in the future?
I think banks will find away to make and grow profits. There are armies of people trying to figure a way to make more money compared to those in Washington trying to control it. What the market needs is openness, fair and honest disclosures - that should be the focus.
__________________
"Democracy is two wolves and a sheep voting on lunch."
"It is useless for the sheep to pass resolutions on vegetarianism while the wolf is of a different opinion."
"If you live among wolves you have to act like one."
"A lady screams at the mouse but smiles at the wolf. A gentleman is a wolf who sends flowers."

aceventura3 is offline  
Old 01-26-2010, 01:27 PM   #96 (permalink)
Ambling Toward the Light
 
SirSeymour's Avatar
 
Location: The Early 16th Century
You have to differentiate between the candidate and the office holder. Bottom line, Obama the candidate did not have all the facts and I don't care what you think you would do differently from your predecessor, you can't be sure until you have 100% of the facts involved in making the decision.

I fully expected to see much of what we have today in the foreign policy department, especially as it pertains to Iraq and Afghanistan. The facts being reported by the experts on the ground don't change because a Democrat moved into 1600 Penn Ave. No one, not Bush, not Obama, not the Joint Chiefs, not Congress and not the commanders in theater want to see a single American life taken needlessly or frivolously. If Obama is following many of the same policies as Bush and people view him as having broken with campaign promises then maybe they should consider that he now knows something he did not know then and that they still don't. Just a thought.

As for the domestic economy...well, we did not get into this mess overnight and no one can get us out of it overnight either.

I will say the healthcare thing is a mess and I hold not only Obama responsible but also Pelosi and Reid. They mistook the outcome of the elections 14 months ago as some sort of sweeping mandate to usher in a new populist era. It really wasn't that at all, I don't think. Rather it was a vote to change business as usual in Washington and that just simply has not happened. This was reflected in the opinion polls when you separated Obama from his policies. Obama had a personally high rating but the work on healthcare did not. Someone (Obama, Reid or Pelosi) should have noticed that sooner.

*shrug*

Can't give him a grade yet but if forced to it would be an "I" for Incomplete. Were Obama as smart as he is touted to be, he would have said the same when asked the question by Oprah.
__________________
SQL query
SELECT * FROM users WHERE clue > 0
Zero rows returned....

Last edited by SirSeymour; 01-26-2010 at 01:29 PM..
SirSeymour is offline  
Old 01-26-2010, 01:51 PM   #97 (permalink)
Junkie
 
rahl's Avatar
 
Location: Ohio
Quote:
Originally Posted by aceventura3 View Post

Using your logic was Clinton responsible for the Dot Com bubble creation and bursting? I would say no.



.
The dot com buble burst wasn't a result of a deregulated economy. No govn't intervention would have saved it, there just wasn't time. Clinton couldn't have changed anything about it. Bush on the other hand had 7 years of consistant deregulation before the economy fell apart.
__________________
"Your life is Yours alone...Rise up and live it"
rahl is offline  
Old 01-26-2010, 02:42 PM   #98 (permalink)
Psycho
 
Heck we have been deregulating since the mid 90's. Deregulation didn't just happen during Bush's term. Part if the deregulation bargain between the Dems and the Republicans back in the 90's was the cause of the housing meltdown and the subsequent world wide economic meltdown.
__________________
"The beauty of the second amendment is that it will not be needed until they try to take it."
Thomas Jefferson
scout is offline  
Old 01-26-2010, 02:47 PM   #99 (permalink)
Junkie
 
aceventura3's Avatar
 
Location: Ventura County
Quote:
Originally Posted by rahl View Post
The dot com buble burst wasn't a result of a deregulated economy. No govn't intervention would have saved it, there just wasn't time. Clinton couldn't have changed anything about it. Bush on the other hand had 7 years of consistant deregulation before the economy fell apart.
There was a bubble in technology stocks and there was a bubble in real estate, there have been other bubbles in our history and in other economies. It happens. It will happen again.

As we go through this, the seeds of the next bubble is forming. Perhaps it will be in "green" industries or perhaps carbon off-sets, who would you hold responsible for the next bubble bursting? Wouldn't it be cool if we just happened to have a Republican in charge?
__________________
"Democracy is two wolves and a sheep voting on lunch."
"It is useless for the sheep to pass resolutions on vegetarianism while the wolf is of a different opinion."
"If you live among wolves you have to act like one."
"A lady screams at the mouse but smiles at the wolf. A gentleman is a wolf who sends flowers."

aceventura3 is offline  
Old 01-26-2010, 03:24 PM   #100 (permalink)
 
roachboy's Avatar
 
Super Moderator
Location: essex ma
Quote:
I am also a free market capitalist and think it is the best system for average people in an economy.
how quaint.
the way i figure it, ace, understanding capitalism is best undertaken by using models in conjunction with actual historical investigation. if you did any of that, you'd probably have figured out that markets don't tend toward anything in principle but historically if they've tended toward anything it's toward concentration. there's really no models under which concentration in production and "average people" making out go together.

i'm not interested in econ 101 games.
and i see no reason to take "free market capitalism" seriously in 2010. but i don't often debate religious questions with religious people. so i'll leave it at that.
__________________
a gramophone its corrugated trumpet silver handle
spinning dog. such faithfulness it hear

it make you sick.

-kamau brathwaite
roachboy is offline  
Old 01-26-2010, 03:53 PM   #101 (permalink)
Junkie
 
aceventura3's Avatar
 
Location: Ventura County
Quote:
Originally Posted by roachboy View Post
how quaint.
the way i figure it, ace, understanding capitalism is best undertaken by using models in conjunction with actual historical investigation. if you did any of that, you'd probably have figured out that markets don't tend toward anything in principle but historically if they've tended toward anything it's toward concentration.

First to understand markets one must understand costs, even those that are hidden.

Second, markets, even free markets trend toward concentration for predictable reasons. One of those reasons is the benefits of economies of scale, with that comes market competitive restrictions. The next phase in market evolution becomes key. There is a tendency for the "collective" (market participants or government) to protect the status quo rather than allowing or even encouraging new more agile competition. This will lead to the demise of US capitalism, as evidenced by, for example, the auto industry.

Quote:
there's really no models under which concentration in production and "average people" making out go together.
Not sure I understand your point here.

Quote:
i'm not interested in econ 101 games.
and i see no reason to take "free market capitalism" seriously in 2010. but i don't often debate religious questions with religious people. so i'll leave it at that.
Studying markets never gets boring to me. Currently, I love being able to see the evolution of the internet and how it operates as a market. But I am weird that way, and I understand people wanting to ignore things like that, but there are still lessons to be learned.
__________________
"Democracy is two wolves and a sheep voting on lunch."
"It is useless for the sheep to pass resolutions on vegetarianism while the wolf is of a different opinion."
"If you live among wolves you have to act like one."
"A lady screams at the mouse but smiles at the wolf. A gentleman is a wolf who sends flowers."

aceventura3 is offline  
Old 01-26-2010, 07:10 PM   #102 (permalink)
Who You Crappin?
 
Derwood's Avatar
 
Location: Everywhere and Nowhere
Quote:
Originally Posted by aceventura3 View Post
Not sure I understand your point here.
In a "free" capitalist system (i.e. completely unregulated), those with the money will dominate the system. Thus, the "average guy" will generally get the shaft
__________________
"You can't shoot a country until it becomes a democracy." - Willravel
Derwood is offline  
Old 01-27-2010, 05:41 AM   #103 (permalink)
Darth Papa
 
ratbastid's Avatar
 
Location: Yonder
Quote:
Originally Posted by aceventura3 View Post
Studying markets never gets boring to me.
Studying the bible never gets boring for some people either. Doesn't mean their faith is based in facts.

Not that I'm knocking faith--faith as faith is possibly the most powerful force in all of humanity. But when you confuse faith with facts, you've got trouble.

You have faith in the free market. I got that, and more power to you. You'll do best, though, if you can keep it in a "faith and belief" space, rather than a "facts and evidence" space.
ratbastid is offline  
Old 01-27-2010, 07:05 AM   #104 (permalink)
Conspiracy Realist
 
Sun Tzu's Avatar
 
Location: The Event Horizon
Quote:
Originally Posted by Derwood View Post
In a "free" capitalist system (i.e. completely unregulated), those with the money will dominate the system. Thus, the "average guy" will generally get the shaft
Not if that average guy has 100% intention, is not intimidated by risk, and is willing to make sacrifices for the financial goals they are shooting for. (IMO and observations)
__________________
To confine our attention to terrestrial matters would be to limit the human spirit.- Stephen Hawking
Sun Tzu is offline  
Old 01-27-2010, 08:17 AM   #105 (permalink)
Who You Crappin?
 
Derwood's Avatar
 
Location: Everywhere and Nowhere
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sun Tzu View Post
Not if that average guy has 100% intention, is not intimidated by risk, and is willing to make sacrifices for the financial goals they are shooting for. (IMO and observations)
how can someone not be intimidated by the risk of, say, trying to start up a small appliance store when Best Buy is a mile down the road?
__________________
"You can't shoot a country until it becomes a democracy." - Willravel
Derwood is offline  
Old 01-27-2010, 09:07 AM   #106 (permalink)
Tilted Cat Head
 
Cynthetiq's Avatar
 
Administrator
Location: Manhattan, NY
Quote:
Originally Posted by Derwood View Post
how can someone not be intimidated by the risk of, say, trying to start up a small appliance store when Best Buy is a mile down the road?
Well, I can ask the Chinese family that opened a pharmacy just across the street from a CVS and down the street from a 24 hour Rite Aid. Many in the neighborhood predicted their demise. They have been in business now for at least 2 years. When I went to CVS to get a prescription filled, they said it would take 3 days because it wasn't in stock and needed to be ordered from the warehouse. These guys filled it in 20 minutes.

Or the 3 appliance stores that are in my neighborhood how they are faring against Best Buy and PC Richards and Son.
__________________
I don't care if you are black, white, purple, green, Chinese, Japanese, Korean, hippie, cop, bum, admin, user, English, Irish, French, Catholic, Protestant, Jewish, Buddhist, Muslim, indian, cowboy, tall, short, fat, skinny, emo, punk, mod, rocker, straight, gay, lesbian, jock, nerd, geek, Democrat, Republican, Libertarian, Independent, driver, pedestrian, or bicyclist, either you're an asshole or you're not.
Cynthetiq is offline  
Old 01-27-2010, 09:27 AM   #107 (permalink)
Junkie
 
aceventura3's Avatar
 
Location: Ventura County
Quote:
Originally Posted by Derwood View Post
In a "free" capitalist system (i.e. completely unregulated), those with the money will dominate the system. Thus, the "average guy" will generally get the shaft
I have been giving examples of the "average guy" getting the shaft under liberal style capitalism, mostly through unintended consequences.

In a market the assumption is that participants have something of value to bring to the market. I do agree that as a society we have a moral obligation to those unable to take care of themselves, i.e. children, disabled, elderly and a safety net for people in transitional need. If you have followed my posts, you will find I have been consistent. I agree that there is no true "free" capitalist system. All markets have some form of regulation, even if it is self-imposed by the participants, and I think markets need some regulation to function properly. In that regard you could say I am not a "purest".

---------- Post added at 05:23 PM ---------- Previous post was at 05:18 PM ----------

Quote:
Originally Posted by ratbastid View Post
Studying the bible never gets boring for some people either. Doesn't mean their faith is based in facts.
Nor is worship at the alter of Obama.

Quote:
Not that I'm knocking faith--faith as faith is possibly the most powerful force in all of humanity. But when you confuse faith with facts, you've got trouble.
I gave some very specific examples and arguments supporting my view, but your response is a broad meaningless generalization.

Quote:
You have faith in the free market.
This is like saying I have faith in the laws of physics or math??? I don't get your point.

---------- Post added at 05:27 PM ---------- Previous post was at 05:23 PM ----------

Quote:
Originally Posted by Derwood View Post
how can someone not be intimidated by the risk of, say, trying to start up a small appliance store when Best Buy is a mile down the road?
Adding value to the consumer. Best Buy has competition. I don't buy everything that Best Buy sells at Best Buy, do you? I don't always buy the lowest price, do you? Occasionally I put a big premium on service, relationships, expertise, convenience, choice, etc., don't you?.
__________________
"Democracy is two wolves and a sheep voting on lunch."
"It is useless for the sheep to pass resolutions on vegetarianism while the wolf is of a different opinion."
"If you live among wolves you have to act like one."
"A lady screams at the mouse but smiles at the wolf. A gentleman is a wolf who sends flowers."

aceventura3 is offline  
Old 01-27-2010, 04:55 PM   #108 (permalink)
Upright
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by aceventura3 View Post
I don't judge him based on unemployment.


At this point in time I think his rhetoric and attack against the financial sector, the "rich", etc. has hurt. I also believe the uncertainty of tax increases, increases in cost for health care, cap and trade, etc., has hurt. Banks are not lending, credit is frozen, he has not helped in this regard either. He said his stimulus would limit unemployment to 8%, we are well above that.

This is my problem with Obama up to this point, he's been wishy washy and negative... His agenda has stifled growth, because of the uncertainty of his priorities... I think you hit the nail on the head - Proposed tax increases (Both hidden or outright), Health Care Reform, Cap and Trade.. how does he expect small businesses to expand with this type of agenda... people are scared to death of what the government might do.. and he's not instilling ANY confidence imo. Add the continued credit crisis to the mix and it's gonna stay abysmal for a long time.

FDR didn't get it all right when leading us out of the great depression, but he certainly did LEAD the country and instill confidence. Leadership is exactly what is needed right now! I think we'll see from tonights State of the Union that his administration is going to make some changes in priority and because of that, it is safe to assume we've been off course.
Vabeachdude is offline  
Old 01-27-2010, 07:06 PM   #109 (permalink)
Who You Crappin?
 
Derwood's Avatar
 
Location: Everywhere and Nowhere
Quote:
Originally Posted by aceventura3 View Post
Adding value to the consumer. Best Buy has competition. I don't buy everything that Best Buy sells at Best Buy, do you? I don't always buy the lowest price, do you? Occasionally I put a big premium on service, relationships, expertise, convenience, choice, etc., don't you?.
You may, but history says otherwise.

My family moved to State College, PA in 1986. At that time, the entire town consisted of small, privately owned businesses. There were 7 or 8 record stores, several small grocers, half a dozen independent video rental stores, etc. First Blockbuster came in, and within 2 years, all the little guys were closed. Then Walmart came, and there went the grocers. Finally, Best Buy and Circuit City came, and this past week, the last independent record store closed it's doors (and it had been the only one for at least half a decade).

The truth is, whether the economy is good or bad, people will always buy where it's cheapest. They'll put up with lousy customer service to save a few bucks (see: Walmart, whose customer service is terrible, but sells a bajillion dollars worth of cheap crap every year)

---------- Post added at 10:06 PM ---------- Previous post was at 09:36 PM ----------

I know ace thinks Obama has no leadership, but I'm pretty excited by (and proud of) Obama for more or less calling out ALL of Congress for being petty assholes this past year. To me, this is what a President should be doing: hold his fellow leaders/public servants accountable. If nothing else comes of this State of the Union, hopefully his message will be heard by Congress.

Probably not though.....if they're not being petty assholes they don't know what to do with themselves
__________________
"You can't shoot a country until it becomes a democracy." - Willravel
Derwood is offline  
Old 01-27-2010, 09:08 PM   #110 (permalink)
Lennonite Priest
 
pan6467's Avatar
 
Location: Mansfield, Ohio USA
Quote:
Originally Posted by Derwood View Post
In a "free" capitalist system (i.e. completely unregulated), those with the money will dominate the system. Thus, the "average guy" will generally get the shaft
This is why we should incorporate regulations and have some modified Socialism.

Pure Socialism, Communism, Capitalism, etc. are all in the end corruptible. What lies in between and can be modified and worked into a system is, IMHO, the system we should strive for. Because that would be "the perfect system".

Each economic philosophy in and of itself has great merit, the problem is when that system is used it becomes corrupted by the leaders who corrupt the system.

It's like a milk chocolate bar. If you eat pure chocolate, expecting this great treat, it's bitter, disgusting and eventually you get very ill. If you just do the milk and expectsomething wonderful, you don't get much taste, it's flat and for most the results aren't the same as that milk chocolate bar. If you just do the sugar, you get sweet, but no taste and eventually get sick.

Now, if you combine all three ingredients in the right way, you end up with something delicious and miraculous.

Finding the right combination of economic philosophies, again IMHO, leads to the perfect social climate where ALL of humanity will prosper.
__________________
I just love people who use the excuse "I use/do this because I LOVE the feeling/joy/happiness it brings me" and expect you to be ok with that as you watch them destroy their life blindly following. My response is, "I like to put forks in an eletrical socket, just LOVE that feeling, can't ever get enough of it, so will you let me put this copper fork in that electric socket?"
pan6467 is offline  
Old 01-28-2010, 07:42 AM   #111 (permalink)
Junkie
 
aceventura3's Avatar
 
Location: Ventura County
Quote:
Originally Posted by Derwood View Post
The truth is, whether the economy is good or bad, people will always buy where it's cheapest.
I will select McDonald's for lunch occasionally and I will even buy off of the $1 menu...oh, never mind we obviously live in different worlds...I am one of those exorbitant people who will pay way too much for a Five Guys burger, where I live now, or an In-N-Out burger when I live in California.
__________________
"Democracy is two wolves and a sheep voting on lunch."
"It is useless for the sheep to pass resolutions on vegetarianism while the wolf is of a different opinion."
"If you live among wolves you have to act like one."
"A lady screams at the mouse but smiles at the wolf. A gentleman is a wolf who sends flowers."

aceventura3 is offline  
Old 01-28-2010, 07:49 AM   #112 (permalink)
warrior bodhisattva
 
Baraka_Guru's Avatar
 
Super Moderator
Location: East-central Canada
I'm pretty sure he meant cheapest price for comparable goods.
__________________
Knowing that death is certain and that the time of death is uncertain, what's the most important thing?
—Bhikkhuni Pema Chödrön

Humankind cannot bear very much reality.
—From "Burnt Norton," Four Quartets (1936), T. S. Eliot
Baraka_Guru is offline  
Old 01-28-2010, 07:55 AM   #113 (permalink)
Junkie
 
aceventura3's Avatar
 
Location: Ventura County
Quote:
Originally Posted by Baraka_Guru View Post
I'm pretty sure he meant cheapest price for comparable goods.
McDonald's, Five Guys and In-N-Out sell burgers, fatty ground beef patties cooked on a grill, fries and a Coke. Mmmmm, is it lunch time yet.
__________________
"Democracy is two wolves and a sheep voting on lunch."
"It is useless for the sheep to pass resolutions on vegetarianism while the wolf is of a different opinion."
"If you live among wolves you have to act like one."
"A lady screams at the mouse but smiles at the wolf. A gentleman is a wolf who sends flowers."

aceventura3 is offline  
Old 01-28-2010, 08:07 AM   #114 (permalink)
warrior bodhisattva
 
Baraka_Guru's Avatar
 
Super Moderator
Location: East-central Canada
Quote:
Originally Posted by aceventura3 View Post
McDonald's, Five Guys and In-N-Out sell burgers, fatty ground beef patties cooked on a grill, fries and a Coke. Mmmmm, is it lunch time yet.
I've never heard of Five Guys or In-N-Out, but I know that I pay more for a burger from Lick's or South St. Burger Co. than I do at McDonald's. And there's a reason for it. McDonald's, if you think about it, doesn't actually make a very good burger, but they're cheap.
__________________
Knowing that death is certain and that the time of death is uncertain, what's the most important thing?
—Bhikkhuni Pema Chödrön

Humankind cannot bear very much reality.
—From "Burnt Norton," Four Quartets (1936), T. S. Eliot
Baraka_Guru is offline  
Old 01-28-2010, 08:12 AM   #115 (permalink)
Junkie
 
aceventura3's Avatar
 
Location: Ventura County
Quote:
Originally Posted by Baraka_Guru View Post
I've never heard of Five Guys or In-N-Out, but I know that I pay more for a burger from Lick's or South St. Burger Co. than I do at McDonald's. And there's a reason for it. McDonald's, if you think about it, doesn't actually make a very good burger, but they're cheap.
Wasn't that my point? A burger is not a burger, small business can differentiate. A TV is not a TV, small business can differentiate, perhaps by expertise, service, relationships, etc.
__________________
"Democracy is two wolves and a sheep voting on lunch."
"It is useless for the sheep to pass resolutions on vegetarianism while the wolf is of a different opinion."
"If you live among wolves you have to act like one."
"A lady screams at the mouse but smiles at the wolf. A gentleman is a wolf who sends flowers."

aceventura3 is offline  
Old 01-28-2010, 08:17 AM   #116 (permalink)
warrior bodhisattva
 
Baraka_Guru's Avatar
 
Super Moderator
Location: East-central Canada
Quote:
Originally Posted by aceventura3 View Post
Wasn't that my point? A burger is not a burger, small business can differentiate. A TV is not a TV, small business can differentiate, perhaps by expertise, service, relationships, etc.
Of course, but I think Derwood's point is that people often get hung up on price. If the product is essentially the same, many people would rather pay less—they can do without expertise, service, relationships. That's why big-box stores are so successful compared to the boutiques/independents (who care).

If people want a better burger, they don't tend to mind too much that they must pay more for quality. But I don't think it's the same thing when you're looking at more or less the same Samsung television. Consumers are increasingly price sensitive these days.
__________________
Knowing that death is certain and that the time of death is uncertain, what's the most important thing?
—Bhikkhuni Pema Chödrön

Humankind cannot bear very much reality.
—From "Burnt Norton," Four Quartets (1936), T. S. Eliot
Baraka_Guru is offline  
Old 01-28-2010, 08:31 AM   #117 (permalink)
Junkie
 
aceventura3's Avatar
 
Location: Ventura County
Quote:
Originally Posted by Baraka_Guru View Post
Of course, but I think Derwood's point is that people often get hung up on price. If the product is essentially the same, many people would rather pay less—they can do without expertise, service, relationships. That's why big-box stores are so successful compared to the boutiques/independents (who care).
Sure, I understand his point. But, even a commodity product like gas (additives don't really add value, so gas is gas), one business can differentiate it self from another and command a premium price. I agree, all things being equal I will buy the lower priced item, but my point is that all things are rarely equal and the goal of a small business in a competitive market has to be to add value that others can not. If they can not do that they go out of business, pure and simple.

Quote:
If people want a better burger, they don't tend to mind too much that they must pay more for quality. But I don't think it's the same thing when you're looking at more or less the same Samsung television. Consumers are increasingly price sensitive these days.
Some people have the expertise, the resources, and ability to buy, transport and install a Samsung television, they buy based on price alone. The guy who needs advise, delivery, installation, integration with other items, follow-up, etc., may very well be willing to pay more for the Samsung to get access to the other services.
__________________
"Democracy is two wolves and a sheep voting on lunch."
"It is useless for the sheep to pass resolutions on vegetarianism while the wolf is of a different opinion."
"If you live among wolves you have to act like one."
"A lady screams at the mouse but smiles at the wolf. A gentleman is a wolf who sends flowers."

aceventura3 is offline  
Old 01-28-2010, 08:31 AM   #118 (permalink)
Who You Crappin?
 
Derwood's Avatar
 
Location: Everywhere and Nowhere
comparing a McDonald's burger to a steak house burger is like comparing a Pioneer plasma TV to an Acer.

I'm comparing two stores that sell the EXACT SAME TV, but one trades customer service for price. In THAT scenario, your average consumer will buy the TV at Walmart/Best Buy instead of Ed's Audio Video World if they can save $100
__________________
"You can't shoot a country until it becomes a democracy." - Willravel
Derwood is offline  
Old 01-28-2010, 08:38 AM   #119 (permalink)
Junkie
 
aceventura3's Avatar
 
Location: Ventura County
Quote:
Originally Posted by Derwood View Post
comparing a McDonald's burger to a steak house burger is like comparing a Pioneer plasma TV to an Acer.

I'm comparing two stores that sell the EXACT SAME TV, but one trades customer service for price. In THAT scenario, your average consumer will buy the TV at Walmart/Best Buy instead of Ed's Audio Video World if they can save $100
I give another example. I recently purchased a GPS Garmin Nuvi 205, I shopped Ebay and Amazon on the internet. Each source listed various vendors, I did not buy the from the lowest priced vendor, because of "feedback". I would rather pay a little more up-front to avoid aggravation later, that commands a premium in my book.
__________________
"Democracy is two wolves and a sheep voting on lunch."
"It is useless for the sheep to pass resolutions on vegetarianism while the wolf is of a different opinion."
"If you live among wolves you have to act like one."
"A lady screams at the mouse but smiles at the wolf. A gentleman is a wolf who sends flowers."

aceventura3 is offline  
Old 01-28-2010, 08:39 AM   #120 (permalink)
warrior bodhisattva
 
Baraka_Guru's Avatar
 
Super Moderator
Location: East-central Canada
Quote:
Originally Posted by aceventura3 View Post
[...] I agree, all things being equal I will buy the lower priced item, but my point is that all things are rarely equal and the goal of a small business in a competitive market has to be to add value that others can not. If they can not do that they go out of business, pure and simple.
I don't disagree....

Quote:
Some people have the expertise, the resources, and ability to buy, transport and install a Samsung television, they buy based on price alone. The guy who needs advise, delivery, installation, integration with other items, follow-up, etc., may very well be willing to pay more for the Samsung to get access to the other services.
...but I would say the lion's share of the market goes to those who provide the best prices, especially when some of the big boxes now send low-paid workers out to set up your TV at a premium. Chances are, you'd still come out ahead on cost.
__________________
Knowing that death is certain and that the time of death is uncertain, what's the most important thing?
—Bhikkhuni Pema Chödrön

Humankind cannot bear very much reality.
—From "Burnt Norton," Four Quartets (1936), T. S. Eliot
Baraka_Guru is offline  
 

Tags
obama, year


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:20 PM.

Tilted Forum Project

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
© 2002-2012 Tilted Forum Project

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360