Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community  

Go Back   Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community > The Academy > Tilted Politics


 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 11-27-2009, 10:33 AM   #1 (permalink)
Who You Crappin?
 
Derwood's Avatar
 
Location: Everywhere and Nowhere
Lobbyists to be Barred from Advisory Panels

washingtonpost.com

This is the first really strong initiative by Obama to curb the influence of K Street in Washington. Strangely, it's not getting much air time....
Derwood is offline  
Old 11-27-2009, 02:02 PM   #2 (permalink)
Please touch this.
 
Halx's Avatar
 
Owner/Admin
Location: Manhattan
Its a step in the right direction, but I don't know how effective it will be.
__________________
You have found this post informative.
-The Administrator
[Don't Feed The Animals]
Halx is offline  
Old 11-28-2009, 08:32 AM   #3 (permalink)
Junkie
 
I have to wonder how long this policy will last after Obama leaves office.
Rekna is offline  
Old 11-28-2009, 09:51 AM   #4 (permalink)
Junkie
 
Seaver's Avatar
 
Location: Fort Worth, TX
It won't mean anything until earmarks are ended. They can sit out the advisory panels, but just strong-arm their pocketed congressman as it goes through the committees.
__________________
"Smite the rocks with the rod of knowledge, and fountains of unstinted wealth will gush forth." - Ashbel Smith as he laid the first cornerstone of the University of Texas
Seaver is offline  
Old 11-28-2009, 10:48 AM   #5 (permalink)
Who You Crappin?
 
Derwood's Avatar
 
Location: Everywhere and Nowhere
Quote:
Originally Posted by Seaver View Post
It won't mean anything until earmarks are ended. They can sit out the advisory panels, but just strong-arm their pocketed congressman as it goes through the committees.
Earmarks are fine. Pork projects are not.
Derwood is offline  
Old 11-29-2009, 02:02 AM   #6 (permalink)
Junkie
 
Seaver's Avatar
 
Location: Fort Worth, TX
Earmarks are THE way pork projects occur.
__________________
"Smite the rocks with the rod of knowledge, and fountains of unstinted wealth will gush forth." - Ashbel Smith as he laid the first cornerstone of the University of Texas
Seaver is offline  
Old 11-29-2009, 05:44 AM   #7 (permalink)
Darth Papa
 
ratbastid's Avatar
 
Location: Yonder
Water is the way drownings occur. Ban water!
ratbastid is offline  
Old 11-29-2009, 06:43 AM   #8 (permalink)
 
dc_dux's Avatar
 
Location: Washington DC
Quote:
Originally Posted by Seaver View Post
It won't mean anything until earmarks are ended. They can sit out the advisory panels, but just strong-arm their pocketed congressman as it goes through the committees.
This has little or nothing to with earmarks.

The focus of these Executive branch advisory panels is primarily on recommendations for the regulations to implement programs AFTER legislation has been enacted.

Removing the direct lobbying influence in rule-making (writing regulations) is significant.
__________________
"The perfect is the enemy of the good."
~ Voltaire
dc_dux is offline  
Old 11-29-2009, 08:48 AM   #9 (permalink)
Who You Crappin?
 
Derwood's Avatar
 
Location: Everywhere and Nowhere
Quote:
Originally Posted by Seaver View Post
Earmarks are THE way pork projects occur.
All pork projects are earmarks.

Not all earmarks are pork projects
Derwood is offline  
Old 11-30-2009, 06:21 AM   #10 (permalink)
Still Free
 
Cimarron29414's Avatar
 
Location: comfortably perched at the top of the bell curve!
Only term limits will curb the influence of lobbyists.
__________________
Gives a man a halo, does mead.

"Here lies The_Jazz: Killed by an ambitious, sparkly, pink butterfly."
Cimarron29414 is offline  
Old 11-30-2009, 11:48 AM   #11 (permalink)
Who You Crappin?
 
Derwood's Avatar
 
Location: Everywhere and Nowhere
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cimarron29414 View Post
Only term limits will curb the influence of lobbyists.
or magnify them
Derwood is offline  
Old 11-30-2009, 11:57 AM   #12 (permalink)
Junkie
 
Location: bedford, tx
Quote:
Originally Posted by Derwood View Post
Earmarks are fine. Pork projects are not.
pork projects/earmarks are just like beauty. It's all in the eye of the beholder. in other words, one mans bridge to nowhere is another mans necessary infrastructure rebuilding.
__________________
"no amount of force can control a free man, a man whose mind is free. No, not the rack, not fission bombs, not anything. You cannot conquer a free man; the most you can do is kill him."
dksuddeth is offline  
Old 11-30-2009, 07:16 PM   #13 (permalink)
Who You Crappin?
 
Derwood's Avatar
 
Location: Everywhere and Nowhere
Quote:
Originally Posted by dksuddeth View Post
pork projects/earmarks are just like beauty. It's all in the eye of the beholder. in other words, one mans bridge to nowhere is another mans necessary infrastructure rebuilding.

a lot of it is pretty clear cut, though.
Derwood is offline  
Old 12-01-2009, 06:25 AM   #14 (permalink)
Still Free
 
Cimarron29414's Avatar
 
Location: comfortably perched at the top of the bell curve!
Quote:
Originally Posted by Derwood View Post
a lot of it is pretty clear cut, though.
In my opinion, here's how it should work: The federal government has a budget for maintaining interstate commerce. This covers roads, airports, and shipping ports in the States. This money is divided amongst the states each year based on one of two ways:

1) Population (from census data)
2) Contribution to interstate commerce (perhaps the state's percentage of GDP)

Here's the kicker: "Do with it what you will, nothing more is coming." No earmarks, no pork. It is up to the state to prioritize what they do with their federal highway funds. You want a bridge to nowhere built? No, problem: use your highway funds. No special projects at all, period.
__________________
Gives a man a halo, does mead.

"Here lies The_Jazz: Killed by an ambitious, sparkly, pink butterfly."
Cimarron29414 is offline  
Old 12-01-2009, 07:01 AM   #15 (permalink)
 
dc_dux's Avatar
 
Location: Washington DC
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cimarron29414 View Post
In my opinion, here's how it should work: The federal government has a budget for maintaining interstate commerce. This covers roads, airports, and shipping ports in the States. This money is divided amongst the states each year based on one of two ways:

1) Population (from census data)
2) Contribution to interstate commerce (perhaps the state's percentage of GDP)

Here's the kicker: "Do with it what you will, nothing more is coming." No earmarks, no pork. It is up to the state to prioritize what they do with their federal highway funds. You want a bridge to nowhere built? No, problem: use your highway funds. No special projects at all, period.
All of this...and the earmark/pork talk...have little or nothing to do with the new policy to bar lobbyists from federal advisory boards and councils, the impact of which is significant on the development of federal regulations (not legislation).

It would have been better to have it issued as an Executive Order, carrying the force of law (and requiring future presidents to formally rescind it through another EO) rather than through a Presidential Memorandum...but it is a big step to minimizing the impact of lobbyists.

---------- Post added at 10:01 AM ---------- Previous post was at 09:40 AM ----------

But.....if the interest is continuing with the earmark/pork discussion.....most of those have less to do with the influence of lobbyists and more to do with responding to constituents by funding projects in the home state/districts....some certainly worthy of federal funding and others not so much.

I dont think the lobbyists for the road builders association or the civil engineers association had much to do with the bridge to nowhere.
__________________
"The perfect is the enemy of the good."
~ Voltaire

Last edited by dc_dux; 12-01-2009 at 07:07 AM..
dc_dux is offline  
 

Tags
advisory, barred, lobbyists, panels


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:04 PM.

Tilted Forum Project

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
© 2002-2012 Tilted Forum Project

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360