11-27-2009, 10:33 AM | #1 (permalink) |
Who You Crappin?
Location: Everywhere and Nowhere
|
Lobbyists to be Barred from Advisory Panels
washingtonpost.com
This is the first really strong initiative by Obama to curb the influence of K Street in Washington. Strangely, it's not getting much air time.... |
11-27-2009, 02:02 PM | #2 (permalink) |
Please touch this.
Owner/Admin
Location: Manhattan
|
Its a step in the right direction, but I don't know how effective it will be.
__________________
You have found this post informative. -The Administrator [Don't Feed The Animals] |
11-28-2009, 09:51 AM | #4 (permalink) |
Junkie
Location: Fort Worth, TX
|
It won't mean anything until earmarks are ended. They can sit out the advisory panels, but just strong-arm their pocketed congressman as it goes through the committees.
__________________
"Smite the rocks with the rod of knowledge, and fountains of unstinted wealth will gush forth." - Ashbel Smith as he laid the first cornerstone of the University of Texas |
11-29-2009, 06:43 AM | #8 (permalink) | |
Location: Washington DC
|
Quote:
The focus of these Executive branch advisory panels is primarily on recommendations for the regulations to implement programs AFTER legislation has been enacted. Removing the direct lobbying influence in rule-making (writing regulations) is significant.
__________________
"The perfect is the enemy of the good." ~ Voltaire |
|
11-30-2009, 11:57 AM | #12 (permalink) |
Junkie
Location: bedford, tx
|
pork projects/earmarks are just like beauty. It's all in the eye of the beholder. in other words, one mans bridge to nowhere is another mans necessary infrastructure rebuilding.
__________________
"no amount of force can control a free man, a man whose mind is free. No, not the rack, not fission bombs, not anything. You cannot conquer a free man; the most you can do is kill him." |
12-01-2009, 06:25 AM | #14 (permalink) |
Still Free
Location: comfortably perched at the top of the bell curve!
|
In my opinion, here's how it should work: The federal government has a budget for maintaining interstate commerce. This covers roads, airports, and shipping ports in the States. This money is divided amongst the states each year based on one of two ways:
1) Population (from census data) 2) Contribution to interstate commerce (perhaps the state's percentage of GDP) Here's the kicker: "Do with it what you will, nothing more is coming." No earmarks, no pork. It is up to the state to prioritize what they do with their federal highway funds. You want a bridge to nowhere built? No, problem: use your highway funds. No special projects at all, period.
__________________
Gives a man a halo, does mead. "Here lies The_Jazz: Killed by an ambitious, sparkly, pink butterfly." |
12-01-2009, 07:01 AM | #15 (permalink) | |
Location: Washington DC
|
Quote:
It would have been better to have it issued as an Executive Order, carrying the force of law (and requiring future presidents to formally rescind it through another EO) rather than through a Presidential Memorandum...but it is a big step to minimizing the impact of lobbyists. ---------- Post added at 10:01 AM ---------- Previous post was at 09:40 AM ---------- But.....if the interest is continuing with the earmark/pork discussion.....most of those have less to do with the influence of lobbyists and more to do with responding to constituents by funding projects in the home state/districts....some certainly worthy of federal funding and others not so much. I dont think the lobbyists for the road builders association or the civil engineers association had much to do with the bridge to nowhere.
__________________
"The perfect is the enemy of the good." ~ Voltaire Last edited by dc_dux; 12-01-2009 at 07:07 AM.. |
|
Tags |
advisory, barred, lobbyists, panels |
|
|