Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community  

Go Back   Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community > The Academy > Tilted Politics


 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 05-14-2009, 08:58 AM   #41 (permalink)
Tilted Cat Head
 
Cynthetiq's Avatar
 
Administrator
Location: Manhattan, NY
Quote:
Originally Posted by Willravel View Post
Exactly. The point to all of this is about prosecuting those actually responsible, including the former president, vice president, and anyone else indicated by the evidence.

BTW, DC, after going to the Tea Parties, it's nice to know that some people still understand what "no taxation without representation" means.

---------- Post added at 09:48 AM ---------- Previous post was at 09:47 AM ----------


There's an element of public pressure necessary to investigations like this. Remember Clinton? Remember the insane public outrage over his sexual impropriety?
I don't believe that 5, 10, 20, 100, 1000, 10,000 photos make a difference. If the evidence is there the evidence is there. If the Administration or Congress doesn't care to bother, they don't care to bother.

no, I don't remember the outrage over his sexual impropriety, I remember him LYING under oath. I didn't give a shit that some girl sucked his cock in the oval office, I was upset that he commited perjury.
__________________
I don't care if you are black, white, purple, green, Chinese, Japanese, Korean, hippie, cop, bum, admin, user, English, Irish, French, Catholic, Protestant, Jewish, Buddhist, Muslim, indian, cowboy, tall, short, fat, skinny, emo, punk, mod, rocker, straight, gay, lesbian, jock, nerd, geek, Democrat, Republican, Libertarian, Independent, driver, pedestrian, or bicyclist, either you're an asshole or you're not.
Cynthetiq is offline  
Old 05-14-2009, 09:04 AM   #42 (permalink)
 
dc_dux's Avatar
 
Location: Washington DC
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cynthetiq View Post
I don't believe that 5, 10, 20, 100, 1000, 10,000 photos make a difference. If the evidence is there the evidence is there. If the Administration or Congress doesn't care to bother, they don't care to bother.
5, 10, 20 photos can be "explained" as overly aggressive acts on the part of a few lower level personnel w/o authorization.

1,000 or 2,000 photos would suggest a more wide spread pattern of practices that would be hard to "explain" other than to believe those actions were sanctioned.
__________________
"The perfect is the enemy of the good."
~ Voltaire

Last edited by dc_dux; 05-14-2009 at 09:08 AM..
dc_dux is offline  
Old 05-14-2009, 09:14 AM   #43 (permalink)
... a sort of licensed troubleshooter.
 
Willravel's Avatar
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cynthetiq View Post
no, I don't remember the outrage over his sexual impropriety, I remember him LYING under oath. I didn't give a shit that some girl sucked his cock in the oval office, I was upset that he commited perjury.
I didn't say you were outraged, Cynth. I said there was outrage, and there was. It's why he was giving testimony about a sexual affair in the first place. Yeesh.
Willravel is offline  
Old 05-14-2009, 09:49 AM   #44 (permalink)
Junkie
 
powerclown's Avatar
 
Location: Detroit, MI
Quote:
Originally Posted by dc_dux View Post
1,000 or 2,000 photos would suggest a more wide spread pattern of practices that would be hard to "explain" other than to believe those actions were sanctioned.
Quote:
And I’d like to interject a note of balance here. There are times when we all get in high dudgeon. We ought to be reasonable about this. I think there are probably very few people in this room or in America who would say that torture should never, ever be used, particularly if thousands of lives are at stake.

Take the hypothetical: If we knew that there was a nuclear bomb hidden in an American city and we believed that some kind of torture, fairly severe maybe, would give us a chance of finding that bomb before it went off, my guess is most Americans and most senators, maybe all, would say, Do what you have to do.

So it’s easy to sit back in the armchair and say that torture can never be used. But when you’re in the foxhole, it’s a very different deal.


-Senator Charles Schumer (D), Senate Judiciary Committee hearing on June 8, 2004.
War criminal?
powerclown is offline  
Old 05-14-2009, 09:57 AM   #45 (permalink)
 
roachboy's Avatar
 
Super Moderator
Location: essex ma
this is funny stuff.
for all the years of blah blah blah personal responsibility this personal responsibility that, these days conservatives just can't stop themselves from trying at all costs to evade it. but this torture business--the legal arguments for it, the formulation of policy, it's questionable implementation, that it was kept partially secret from congress---all of it is squarely on the right's shoulders.

it'd be nice for these heroes of personal responsibility blah blah blah to suck it up for once and deal with the self-evident.

but they just can't do it.
goes to show that "personal responsibility" mainly applies to other people, not to conservatives themselves.
__________________
a gramophone its corrugated trumpet silver handle
spinning dog. such faithfulness it hear

it make you sick.

-kamau brathwaite
roachboy is offline  
Old 05-14-2009, 11:55 AM   #46 (permalink)
Darth Papa
 
ratbastid's Avatar
 
Location: Yonder
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cynthetiq View Post
I've not discounted your point of view or position
No, it was mine that you discounted.

It's not surprising that so few Americans are interested in confronting the moral implications of this thing. This isn't a sociological or logistical or practical phenomenon. This is a moral question. One can dodge that, but only at the price of one's one morality.
ratbastid is offline  
Old 05-14-2009, 05:14 PM   #47 (permalink)
Junkie
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cynthetiq View Post
I don't believe that 5, 10, 20, 100, 1000, 10,000 photos make a difference. If the evidence is there the evidence is there. If the Administration or Congress doesn't care to bother, they don't care to bother.
The government has all of the power, and the government of and by the people needs transparency to serve those people. If they don't make a difference, then what's the harm in releasing them? The terrorists want to kill us no matter how many photos they have. Assuming they're sitting around and these photos are what gets them to decide to attack them is just silly. Keeping these photos secret doesn't heal the country as the outcry will continue. Ignoring problems doesn't make them go away. The only way to move past this is to act like adults. Owning up to the wrong doing is the only way to move forward.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cynthetiq View Post
no, I don't remember the outrage over his sexual impropriety, I remember him LYING under oath. I didn't give a shit that some girl sucked his cock in the oval office, I was upset that he commited perjury.
I agree, that is exactly why it was a problem. Even though it was something that seemed small and harmless, it was a person charged with faithfully executing federal law breaking that law.
__________________
"Fuck these chains
No goddamn slave
I will be different"
~ Machine Head
spectre is offline  
Old 05-14-2009, 06:02 PM   #48 (permalink)
Tilted Cat Head
 
Cynthetiq's Avatar
 
Administrator
Location: Manhattan, NY
Quote:
Originally Posted by spectre View Post
The government has all of the power, and the government of and by the people needs transparency to serve those people. If they don't make a difference, then what's the harm in releasing them? The terrorists want to kill us no matter how many photos they have. Assuming they're sitting around and these photos are what gets them to decide to attack them is just silly. Keeping these photos secret doesn't heal the country as the outcry will continue. Ignoring problems doesn't make them go away. The only way to move past this is to act like adults. Owning up to the wrong doing is the only way to move forward.



I agree, that is exactly why it was a problem. Even though it was something that seemed small and harmless, it was a person charged with faithfully executing federal law breaking that law.
Again, I'll ask, what's the benefit in releasing them to the general public? Being released to allow for prosecution, I'm down with, but what is the benefit to the public at large?

Murder and rape victims get privacy and compassion from the media and the world at large, why not someone who's also been tortured? When do they get to heal?

Quote:
iraq: Abu Ghraib Victims Speak: August 8, 2004

'Before the publishing of the photographs, I had been keeping my experience to myself,' he said. 'After the publishing of the photographs, my mother came to me and asked me, 'Have they done to you what they have done to them?' I had to say, 'No.' Then, a relative of mine, who was detained with us and who knew of my story there, told my family what he knew, and that they did so-and-so to me.' Now, he said, he doesn't see anyone — not his mother or brothers or sisters-in-law. He's too ashamed."
__________________
I don't care if you are black, white, purple, green, Chinese, Japanese, Korean, hippie, cop, bum, admin, user, English, Irish, French, Catholic, Protestant, Jewish, Buddhist, Muslim, indian, cowboy, tall, short, fat, skinny, emo, punk, mod, rocker, straight, gay, lesbian, jock, nerd, geek, Democrat, Republican, Libertarian, Independent, driver, pedestrian, or bicyclist, either you're an asshole or you're not.
Cynthetiq is offline  
Old 05-14-2009, 06:14 PM   #49 (permalink)
... a sort of licensed troubleshooter.
 
Willravel's Avatar
 
Ah, so trying to bring the torturers to justice prevents the tortured from healing? What about the closure that comes from justice? Have you ever been tortured?
Willravel is offline  
Old 05-14-2009, 06:21 PM   #50 (permalink)
Junkie
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cynthetiq View Post
Again, I'll ask, what's the benefit in releasing them to the general public? Being released to allow for prosecution, I'm down with, but what is the benefit to the public at large?

Murder and rape victims get privacy and compassion from the media and the world at large, why not someone who's also been tortured? When do they get to heal?
This isn't about privacy and compassion, it's about sweeping the problem under the rug. The photos can be released while retaining the privacy of those in the pics. The benefit to the public at large is letting them know that their government takes responsibility for their bad actions. It doesn't just lie to the people and pretend that everything is okay when everyone knows better. This is the sort of stuff that keeps people from trusting or believing in the government.
__________________
"Fuck these chains
No goddamn slave
I will be different"
~ Machine Head
spectre is offline  
Old 05-14-2009, 06:33 PM   #51 (permalink)
Tilted Cat Head
 
Cynthetiq's Avatar
 
Administrator
Location: Manhattan, NY
Quote:
Originally Posted by Willravel View Post
Ah, so trying to bring the torturers to justice prevents the tortured from healing? What about the closure that comes from justice? Have you ever been tortured?
no and that's a dumb if not stupid question.

The quote specifically says someone who is tortured is no longer associating with family members out of embarassment. Great healing there.

Quote:
Originally Posted by spectre View Post
This isn't about privacy and compassion, it's about sweeping the problem under the rug. The photos can be released while retaining the privacy of those in the pics. The benefit to the public at large is letting them know that their government takes responsibility for their bad actions. It doesn't just lie to the people and pretend that everything is okay when everyone knows better. This is the sort of stuff that keeps people from trusting or believing in the government.
I've not stated anything about sweeping a problem under the rug. I've not advocated for the non pursuit of offenders. I've asked simply "how does MORE photos make it better?" I've gotten a decent answer from dc but releasing it to public at large, how does it help?
__________________
I don't care if you are black, white, purple, green, Chinese, Japanese, Korean, hippie, cop, bum, admin, user, English, Irish, French, Catholic, Protestant, Jewish, Buddhist, Muslim, indian, cowboy, tall, short, fat, skinny, emo, punk, mod, rocker, straight, gay, lesbian, jock, nerd, geek, Democrat, Republican, Libertarian, Independent, driver, pedestrian, or bicyclist, either you're an asshole or you're not.
Cynthetiq is offline  
Old 05-14-2009, 06:36 PM   #52 (permalink)
Junkie
 
Location: Chicago
I say release the photos so former President Bush can use them as exhibits in his presidential library. This is, after all, going to be one of his greatest legacies.
__________________
"I can normally tell how intelligent a man is by how stupid he thinks I am" - Cormac McCarthy, All The Pretty Horses
JumpinJesus is offline  
Old 05-14-2009, 06:41 PM   #53 (permalink)
 
roachboy's Avatar
 
Super Moderator
Location: essex ma
fact is that while there is a fairly compact chain of bush administration appointees who were directly responsible for this policy and its rationale, the entire political class caved in before the arguments that the bush administration put forward in favor of these actions. i think it is an ethical lapse of very considerable proportions and a political problem of even greater proportions. i see no way to address it apart from transparency to the greatest possible extent: release of the photos is an aspect of that transparency. the problem really with the release is not what the right says, but that the magnitude of the capitulation of the political class of the time to this bush administration policy becomes more and more obvious. but i think this a serious enough problem that the political class SHOULD feel the heat from it and should be forced to deal with it. sweeping it under the rug is not dealing with it. an ancillary fact is that the right will pay for this more than the democrats--but that too is as it should be.

it is because bureaucracies are such basically stupid organizations that it is all the more incumbent on the people who fashion--and approve---policy to not allow themselves to loose track of ethics not loose sight of fundamental human rights and the rule of law.
__________________
a gramophone its corrugated trumpet silver handle
spinning dog. such faithfulness it hear

it make you sick.

-kamau brathwaite
roachboy is offline  
Old 05-14-2009, 06:46 PM   #54 (permalink)
Banned
 
i agree with roachboy that this is very funny stuff.

that this poor, sad 9 year psychotic effort to prosecute President Bush or someone in his administration for something...anything, which started with hanging chads, and ended with 183, counting the drips, instances of torture (but not the fingernail/bamboo kind) on one poor soul in 30 days .....


that in the face of your own elected President (NOT MY PRESIDENT!!) blocking an effort to release interogation photos without context or even what was gained from them....that you still attempt to convice people that this is an issue of most americans being afraid of the "moral implications" of the matter is astounding.

that you now believe this is an issue of the right shying away from personal responsibility in the face of the current administration practically retiring the phrase "we inherited it" from the english language within 100 days of office

that Nancy Pelosi has convinced you things were partially kept from her....

The denial of your own motivations are in themselves mind bottling, but the pedestal you put yourselves on to take this position in an attempt to fool the populace is even more so.

Last edited by matthew330; 05-14-2009 at 06:50 PM..
matthew330 is offline  
Old 05-14-2009, 06:50 PM   #55 (permalink)
 
roachboy's Avatar
 
Super Moderator
Location: essex ma
matthew--i've read your post 3 times and really have no idea what you're talking about.

you apparently feel the need to trivialize this behind a smoke-screen of conservative talking points. i suppose that's your prerogative, but the idea that you agree in any way with anything i've said here (or elsewhere) about the question of torture and the bush administration is absurd.
__________________
a gramophone its corrugated trumpet silver handle
spinning dog. such faithfulness it hear

it make you sick.

-kamau brathwaite
roachboy is offline  
Old 05-14-2009, 06:53 PM   #56 (permalink)
Tilted Cat Head
 
Cynthetiq's Avatar
 
Administrator
Location: Manhattan, NY
I think he only agrees with you that it's funny.

this seems more interesting to me for some reason, since we're now all in for the long haul... if you go by the law, you go by the law....
Quote:
Abuse photos put U.S. in 'double catch-22' - CNN.com
Inmates in U.S. detention with arrest warrants against them will be turned over to Iraqi authorities under the terms of the U.S.-Iraqi security agreement. All others will be released.

But the United States has signed the international treaty against torture, which compels a nation to keep suspects detained rather than send them to another country if that other country might ill-treat them.

"Iraqi detention facilities are not good, they are not like American facilities," said a woman who had just visited her detainee husband at Camp Cropper. "There is a lot of witness testimony from detainees who suffered maltreatment in Iraqi detention facilities."

A U.N. report examining the second half of 2008 agreed, saying that detention centers run by Iraqis are using torture and physical abuse to extract confessions.
__________________
I don't care if you are black, white, purple, green, Chinese, Japanese, Korean, hippie, cop, bum, admin, user, English, Irish, French, Catholic, Protestant, Jewish, Buddhist, Muslim, indian, cowboy, tall, short, fat, skinny, emo, punk, mod, rocker, straight, gay, lesbian, jock, nerd, geek, Democrat, Republican, Libertarian, Independent, driver, pedestrian, or bicyclist, either you're an asshole or you're not.
Cynthetiq is offline  
Old 05-14-2009, 06:54 PM   #57 (permalink)
Junkie
 
Location: Chicago
Quote:
Originally Posted by matthew330 View Post
i agree with roachboy that this is very funny stuff.

that this poor, sad 9 year psychotic effort to prosecute President Bush or someone in his administrationfor something...anything, which started with hanging chads, and ended with 183 instances of torture (but not the fingernail/bamboo kind) on one poor soul in 30 days .....

that in the face of your own elected President (NOT MY PRESIDENT!!) blocking an effort to release interogation photos without context or even what was gained from them....that you still attempt to convice people that this is an issue of most americans being afraid of the "moral implications" of the matter is astounding.

that you now believe this is an issue of the right shying away from personal responsibility in the face of the current administration practically retiring the phrase "we inherited it" from the english language within 100 days of office

that Nancy Pelosi has convinced you things were partially kept from her....

The denial of your own motivations are in themselves mind bottling, but the pedestal you put yourselves on to take this position in an attempt to fool the populace is even more so.
I'll agree with you with regards to Nancy Pelosi. For her to pretend that she is the poor hapless victim of Republican shenanigans is laughable. When the fallout of this political shit sandwich hits the ground, I want her to be one of the ones at ground zero. I detest any Democrat who sold out his or her ethics in 2002-2006 due to fear of being branded anti-American or simply for the purpose of political expediency. They're all doing their worst Claude Raines impressions and I hope they get the hook for their lousy acting.

Now, as an aside: please please please - it's "mind boggling", not "mind bottling". Language matters. It really really does.
__________________
"I can normally tell how intelligent a man is by how stupid he thinks I am" - Cormac McCarthy, All The Pretty Horses
JumpinJesus is offline  
Old 05-14-2009, 07:03 PM   #58 (permalink)
Banned
 
"but the idea that you agree in any way with anything i've said here (or elsewhere) about the question of torture and the bush administration is absurd"

if you read it 3 times in an honest effort to get, I would have at least thought you could've picked up on the fact that I only agree with you that this is funny, just for different reasons.

And Jumpin Jesus - I was laughing while I typed mind bottling, hoping it would draw some of the other more excitable members out. You blew it for me, you could have at least given it a chance to work its magic.
matthew330 is offline  
Old 05-14-2009, 07:06 PM   #59 (permalink)
Junkie
 
Location: Chicago
Shit. Sorry about that.
__________________
"I can normally tell how intelligent a man is by how stupid he thinks I am" - Cormac McCarthy, All The Pretty Horses
JumpinJesus is offline  
Old 05-14-2009, 07:13 PM   #60 (permalink)
Banned
 
No sweat, I'll make more opportunities, stay tuned...
matthew330 is offline  
Old 05-14-2009, 08:00 PM   #61 (permalink)
Junkie
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cynthetiq View Post
no and that's a dumb if not stupid question.

The quote specifically says someone who is tortured is no longer associating with family members out of embarassment. Great healing there.
Yes, that has already happened as you have just stated. They were tortured. This gives them a chance to have their stories told and for something to actually be done with it. Without the outrage, nothing will happen, it will be ignored, and will likely happen again.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cynthetiq View Post
I've not stated anything about sweeping a problem under the rug. I've not advocated for the non pursuit of offenders. I've asked simply "how does MORE photos make it better?" I've gotten a decent answer from dc but releasing it to public at large, how does it help?
The government has a bad habit of breaking the law or breaching ethical conduct regularly if people don't stand up against that behavior. They have breached it on a massive scale and what was done needs to be seen. This isn't for sick sense of voyeurism, it's to document fully what was done. It's too easy to go back and change the facts down the road. It's much more difficult with overwhelming amounts of proof.
__________________
"Fuck these chains
No goddamn slave
I will be different"
~ Machine Head
spectre is offline  
Old 05-14-2009, 10:14 PM   #62 (permalink)
... a sort of licensed troubleshooter.
 
Willravel's Avatar
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cynthetiq View Post
no and that's a dumb if not stupid question.
You lack the credibility to make such a determination.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cynthetiq View Post
The quote specifically says someone who is tortured is no longer associating with family members out of embarassment. Great healing there.
It's too bad we don't have some sort of computer program that has the ability to blur faces. If such a technology existed, we could demonstrate publicly evidence of torture without revealing the identity of the victims and further victimizing them. C'est la vi.

And don't worry, I'd never dream of suggesting that anything you've posted is dumb or stupid. That would be disrespectful and uncalled for.
Willravel is offline  
Old 05-15-2009, 02:17 AM   #63 (permalink)
Psycho
 
What's really fucking sad is the "left" is so hell bent on destroying the "right" they didn't fucking care how much damage they done until it was found out some of their very own was implicated and suddenly they are doing a complete 180 to minimize that damage. It's the same old story same old song and dance it's just being sung and danced to by a different party.

Ladies and Gentlemen there is no hope for the Republic, we are so fucked no matter which party is in charge.

Hell almost all of Obama's promises of change suddenly went by the wayside after he got in office. Either life at the top is a bit different than he surmised, the reality of the massive responsibility of being president began sinking in or he just fucking flat out lied to get elected. No matter what the excuse is we the people are so fucked.
__________________
"The beauty of the second amendment is that it will not be needed until they try to take it."
Thomas Jefferson
scout is offline  
Old 05-15-2009, 03:33 AM   #64 (permalink)
 
roachboy's Avatar
 
Super Moderator
Location: essex ma
so wait---the bush administration instituted a policy of torture and now it's out and as a result of THAT you claim that "the republic is fucked"?
so it follows then that had the policy of torture NOT been made public that the republic would not be fucked?
if thats the case, then what makes a healthy republic is the ability to torture in secret.
what kind of logic is that?

so attempts to deal with the consequences of torture, once public, has to come from "enemies of america"?
this because, of course, the right is america.

wow.
__________________
a gramophone its corrugated trumpet silver handle
spinning dog. such faithfulness it hear

it make you sick.

-kamau brathwaite
roachboy is offline  
Old 05-15-2009, 04:40 AM   #65 (permalink)
Tilted Cat Head
 
Cynthetiq's Avatar
 
Administrator
Location: Manhattan, NY
Quote:
Originally Posted by spectre View Post
Yes, that has already happened as you have just stated. They were tortured. This gives them a chance to have their stories told and for something to actually be done with it. Without the outrage, nothing will happen, it will be ignored, and will likely happen again.

The government has a bad habit of breaking the law or breaching ethical conduct regularly if people don't stand up against that behavior. They have breached it on a massive scale and what was done needs to be seen. This isn't for sick sense of voyeurism, it's to document fully what was done. It's too easy to go back and change the facts down the road. It's much more difficult with overwhelming amounts of proof.
Actually, it will happen again, with or without the stories or judicial review. This is more true than your statement of "If we do this, it will never happen again."

Why? Because human beings are sick and twisted stupid motherfuckers who seem to think that this case here, this time, special case, this version, this occasion is different from the rest and they think they can get away with it.

You'd think that there's going to be no corrupt politicians, there's laws that prohibit it, there's checks and balances, there's others getting caught and prosecuted. But still, the fucked up human being thinks, "Hey, this time, I have the in, I do it this way, I call it this...." and suddenly it's rationalized and they go ahead with the action.

And the American public is shocked and outraged... shocked and outraged that some American politician shouldn't have been corrupt in the first place. Hello... politicians have been corrupt since the dawn of organized politics.

There are already people on camera, there's enough evidence showing that this happened, all that is left is the paper trail to the who and how high it went up to. Are you expecting to see Rice or Rumsfeld in the photos? Are you expecting to see some 5 star Generals?

So again, what purpose does releasing more photos serve?

There is already someone on camera in the documentary Torturing Democracy:
Quote:
TORTURINGDEMOCRACY.ORG - Interview Moazzam Begg
Transcript
MOAZZAM BEGG – Detainee #558: You want to fall asleep. You want to do anything in order that you can just lie down in the corner no matter how hard the floor is, how cold it is, no matter how uncomfortable sleep would be with shackles on your arms and legs.
Read through the transcript, watch the show. If these individuals wish to be part of the prosecution and tribunal they can come forward when the time comes.

Again, how does more photos change what information is already out there and available?

Quote:
' I don't like words that hide the truth. I don't like words that conceal reality. I don't like euphemisms, or euphemistic language. And American English is loaded with euphemisms. Cause Americans have a lot of trouble dealing with reality. Americans have trouble facing the truth, so they invent the kind of a soft language to protect themselves from it, and it gets worse with every generation. For some reason, it just keeps getting worse. I'll give you an example of that.

There's a condition in combat. Most people know about it. It's when a fighting person's nervous system has been stressed to it's absolute peak and maximum. Can't take anymore input. The nervous system has either (click) snapped or is about to snap.

In the first world war, that condition was called shell shock. Simple, honest, direct language. Two syllables, shell shock. Almost sounds like the guns themselves.

That was seventy years ago. Then a whole generation went by and the second world war came along and very same combat condition was called battle fatigue. Four syllables now. Takes a little longer to say. Doesn't seem to hurt as much. Fatigue is a nicer word than shock. Shell shock! Battle fatigue.

Then we had the war in Korea, 1950. Madison avenue was riding high by that time, and the very same combat condition was called operational exhaustion. Hey, we're up to eight syllables now! And the humanity has been squeezed completely out of the phrase. It's totally sterile now. Operational exhaustion. Sounds like something that might happen to your car.

Then of course, came the war in Viet Nam, which has only been over for about sixteen or seventeen years, and thanks to the lies and deceits surrounding that war, I guess it's no surprise that the very same condition was called post-traumatic stress disorder. Still eight syllables, but we've added a hyphen! And the pain is completely buried under jargon. Post-traumatic stress disorder.

I'll bet you if we'd of still been calling it shell shock, some of those Viet Nam veterans might have gotten the attention they needed at the time. I'll betcha. I'll betcha.' - George Carlin
When I heard "enhanced interrogation techniques" it was already apparent to me that there was something fishy about the whole thing. We have plenty of words, words that have specific meaning and purpose, but as Mr. Carlin points out, we don't like them. We like to feel special, we like to make it softer, more palatable to the cranium.
__________________
I don't care if you are black, white, purple, green, Chinese, Japanese, Korean, hippie, cop, bum, admin, user, English, Irish, French, Catholic, Protestant, Jewish, Buddhist, Muslim, indian, cowboy, tall, short, fat, skinny, emo, punk, mod, rocker, straight, gay, lesbian, jock, nerd, geek, Democrat, Republican, Libertarian, Independent, driver, pedestrian, or bicyclist, either you're an asshole or you're not.
Cynthetiq is offline  
Old 05-15-2009, 07:42 AM   #66 (permalink)
... a sort of licensed troubleshooter.
 
Willravel's Avatar
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by scout View Post
What's really fucking sad is the "left" is so hell bent on destroying the "right" they didn't fucking care how much damage they done until it was found out some of their very own was implicated and suddenly they are doing a complete 180 to minimize that damage.
Every "leftist" in this thread seems to believe that torture was and is wrong regardless of who's in the white house. Or do you mean politicians? Because there aren't many politicians on the left in the US, just centrists.

A lot of people I know voted for Obama to vote against McCain. What do you think McCain would be doing right now?
Willravel is offline  
Old 05-15-2009, 10:27 AM   #67 (permalink)
warrior bodhisattva
 
Baraka_Guru's Avatar
 
Super Moderator
Location: East-central Canada
Will, I take it "left" was meant as its colliquial meaning in the U.S., which is "liberal" or "Democrat." Most of us know that there are very few actual "leftists" with any power in the U.S. The furthest left the Democrats go are left-centre. This leaning happens as some members are more focused on social liberalism than others.

That said, it's a common trait of social liberals (and even classical liberals, from which the Republicans arose a long, long time ago) to be concerned about issues of human rights, civil liberties, etc., and have worked long and hard to create new rights regarding capital punishment, abortion, immigration, and same-sex marriage. They support a positive sense of liberty, which is why liberals (not just the left kind) are rather opposed to the idea of torture and it being trivialized by cases such as these.
__________________
Knowing that death is certain and that the time of death is uncertain, what's the most important thing?
—Bhikkhuni Pema Chödrön

Humankind cannot bear very much reality.
—From "Burnt Norton," Four Quartets (1936), T. S. Eliot
Baraka_Guru is offline  
Old 05-15-2009, 02:16 PM   #68 (permalink)
... a sort of licensed troubleshooter.
 
Willravel's Avatar
 
I wish the right wingers had some hard left leaders to deal with instead of centrist softies.
Willravel is offline  
Old 05-15-2009, 03:14 PM   #69 (permalink)
 
dc_dux's Avatar
 
Location: Washington DC
Quote:
Originally Posted by Willravel View Post
I wish the right wingers had some hard left leaders to deal with instead of centrist softies.
I'm probably a bit more hawkish on national security issues than you, roachboy and others...but I consider myself a pragmatic progressive and not a centrist softie.
__________________
"The perfect is the enemy of the good."
~ Voltaire
dc_dux is offline  
Old 05-15-2009, 04:57 PM   #70 (permalink)
... a sort of licensed troubleshooter.
 
Willravel's Avatar
 
I'd say the only thing standing between you and real leftism is your devotion to the Democratic party.
Willravel is offline  
Old 05-15-2009, 10:53 PM   #71 (permalink)
Junkie
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cynthetiq View Post
Actually, it will happen again, with or without the stories or judicial review. [removed and quoted below]

Why? Because human beings are sick and twisted stupid motherfuckers who seem to think that this case here, this time, special case, this version, this occasion is different from the rest and they think they can get away with it.
Yes, they are. Does that make it okay then? Do we get to go out and punch old ladies in the face because, as a whole, human beings are dicks?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cynthetiq View Post
You'd think that there's going to be no corrupt politicians, there's laws that prohibit it, there's checks and balances, there's others getting caught and prosecuted. But still, the fucked up human being thinks, "Hey, this time, I have the in, I do it this way, I call it this...." and suddenly it's rationalized and they go ahead with the action.

And the American public is shocked and outraged... shocked and outraged that some American politician shouldn't have been corrupt in the first place. Hello... politicians have been corrupt since the dawn of organized politics.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cynthetiq View Post
This is more true than your statement of "If we do this, it will never happen again."
Who said anything about totally ending corruption or torture never happening again? That's a ridiculous leap to take from what I said. Can you please tell me where I said that by publishing these photos, we would never have another corrupt politician again or that it would mean the absolute end of torture throughout the future of mankind? If I'm wrong, let me know, but I think you're just taking what I said out of context and pointfucking it so that you can make your point by distorting mine.

You're right, politicians are corrupt, so by your logic, we just let it go and be complicit in enabling their corruption because they're corrupt anyway?

Why put a thief in jail if they'll just go out and steal again, right? Just save the taxpayers a lot of money and send him on his way?

When someone has power and chooses to abuse it, they should be called on it. The people should know the person they've elected is corrupt so something can be done. As a resident of Illinois, I'm glad Blagojevich was called out on being corrupt. I wouldn't want that douchebag having power just because corruption has been around for a long time so that makes it okay.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cynthetiq View Post
There are already people on camera, there's enough evidence showing that this happened, all that is left is the paper trail to the who and how high it went up to. Are you expecting to see Rice or Rumsfeld in the photos? Are you expecting to see some 5 star Generals?
So how many released photos are enough? Are there guidelines to this that I'm not aware of? I didn't realize that we reached a photo quota.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cynthetiq View Post
So again, what purpose does releasing more photos serve?
So you keep asking this question to me and continually brush my answers without answering yourself, I have to ask, what purpose does hiding the photos serve? If releasing them must have a purpose, then hiding them has to as well, right?
__________________
"Fuck these chains
No goddamn slave
I will be different"
~ Machine Head
spectre is offline  
Old 05-16-2009, 09:26 PM   #72 (permalink)
let me be clear
 
ottopilot's Avatar
 
Location: Waddy Peytona
Quote:
Originally Posted by spectre View Post
... I have to ask, what purpose does hiding the photos serve? If releasing them must have a purpose, then hiding them has to as well, right?
Agreed, I think they should show all the pictures ...

... ONLY if they show them along with the pictures of every innocent terrified soul that jumped to their horrifying deaths from the rooftops and windows of the World Trade Towers. Showing frame-by-frame their entire descent through space, some holding hands with other jumpers for comfort, the mid-air prayers and complete hysteria as they plummit to a sidewalk-splat, many landing on and killing 1st-responders and innocent victims below.

Show them ONLY if they show them alongside the images of people like Daniel Pearle having their heads sawed off.

Just trying to get it all out there. Context, perspective, intellectual honesty.

Allah Akbar!
__________________
"It rubs the lotion on Buffy, Jodi and Mr. French's skin" - Uncle Bill from Buffalo
ottopilot is offline  
Old 05-16-2009, 09:49 PM   #73 (permalink)
Crazy, indeed
 
Location: the ether
Quote:
Originally Posted by ottopilot View Post
Agreed, I think they should show all the pictures ...

... ONLY if they show them along with the pictures of every innocent terrified soul that jumped to their horrifying deaths from the rooftops and windows of the World Trade Towers. Showing frame-by-frame their entire descent through space, some holding hands with other jumpers for comfort, the mid-air prayers and complete hysteria as they plummit to a sidewalk-splat, many landing on and killing 1st-responders and innocent victims below.

Show them ONLY if they show them alongside the images of people like Daniel Pearle having their heads sawed off.

Just trying to get it all out there. Context, perspective, intellectual honesty.

Allah Akbar!

So in the name of "intellectual honesty" you think that the pictures of torture in an Iraqi prison should be released alongside and linked to the pictures of the dead in the 9/11 attacks and in Pakistan?
dippin is offline  
Old 05-16-2009, 09:59 PM   #74 (permalink)
 
roachboy's Avatar
 
Super Moderator
Location: essex ma
otto: i doubt you'd know intellectual honesty if it it spit in your face. what your "context" thing is about is repeating the framing of torture used by the bush administration, and amounts to what the bush administration argument really was: that it is ok for the united states to itself become the kind of organization that it supposedly opposes on "moral"grounds--you know, those tiresome fictions that appeal to conservatives, that nationalist circle jerk that makes conservatives come alive. so not only does your position throw ethics out the window, but it also makes the rule of law optional---even as the nationalist circle-jerk enables folk like you imagine themselves to be above all that.

i think that's funny.
you seem attuned to jokes, otto: don't you think that's funny?
__________________
a gramophone its corrugated trumpet silver handle
spinning dog. such faithfulness it hear

it make you sick.

-kamau brathwaite

Last edited by roachboy; 05-16-2009 at 10:01 PM..
roachboy is offline  
Old 05-17-2009, 03:27 AM   #75 (permalink)
Psycho
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Willravel View Post
Every "leftist" in this thread seems to believe that torture was and is wrong regardless of who's in the white house. Or do you mean politicians? Because there aren't many politicians on the left in the US, just centrists.

A lot of people I know voted for Obama to vote against McCain. What do you think McCain would be doing right now?
I agree that any torture was wrong and it should have never happened. It just seems so much like business as usual {where's the change?} when it's "leaked" that Pelosi and other's in the Democratic Party leadership knew and one could even argue condoned the torture {by doing nothing} suddenly nothing will be gained by releasing the photos.
__________________
"The beauty of the second amendment is that it will not be needed until they try to take it."
Thomas Jefferson
scout is offline  
Old 05-17-2009, 05:02 AM   #76 (permalink)
Darth Papa
 
ratbastid's Avatar
 
Location: Yonder
Quote:
Originally Posted by scout View Post
I agree that any torture was wrong and it should have never happened. It just seems so much like business as usual {where's the change?} when it's "leaked" that Pelosi and other's in the Democratic Party leadership knew and one could even argue condoned the torture {by doing nothing} suddenly nothing will be gained by releasing the photos.
I punch you in the face. You stand there and take it. Suddenly it's your fault?
ratbastid is offline  
Old 05-17-2009, 06:00 AM   #77 (permalink)
Psycho
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by ratbastid View Post
I punch you in the face. You stand there and take it. Suddenly it's your fault?
oooooooooooooooookkkkkkkkkkkk where the hell are you coming from?

You don't see any conflicts with administration first stating they are releasing the photos then doing a 180 when it becomes public the democratic leadership knew in '03 or '04 {whenever the heck it was, my memory fails me momentarily} ? You see this as "change" from politics as usual?

Granted the fact the administration has publicly shied away from any future torture but in reality that is but a small change from politics as usual. Huge for the people on the receiving end of the torture but in the big picture it's but a small sliver of the whole pie.
__________________
"The beauty of the second amendment is that it will not be needed until they try to take it."
Thomas Jefferson

Last edited by scout; 05-17-2009 at 06:05 AM..
scout is offline  
Old 05-17-2009, 06:35 AM   #78 (permalink)
Darth Papa
 
ratbastid's Avatar
 
Location: Yonder
Quote:
Originally Posted by scout View Post
oooooooooooooooookkkkkkkkkkkk where the hell are you coming from?
I'm saying it's bizarre that the right is now saying, "Pelosi is the bad guy here--she KNEW what our people were doing, and didn't do anything about it!" That's just bizarre, and the blame-shifting is cynical and transparent.

I said I disagree with Obama on this. Given that, the rest of your comment MUST be aimed at someone other than me.

Last edited by ratbastid; 05-17-2009 at 09:34 AM..
ratbastid is offline  
Old 05-17-2009, 07:58 AM   #79 (permalink)
... a sort of licensed troubleshooter.
 
Willravel's Avatar
 
We should probably leave the Pelosi stuff in the Pelosi thread. Wait, is there a Pelosi flip flop thread?
Willravel is offline  
Old 05-17-2009, 08:10 PM   #80 (permalink)
Tilted Cat Head
 
Cynthetiq's Avatar
 
Administrator
Location: Manhattan, NY
Quote:
Originally Posted by spectre View Post
Yes, they are. Does that make it okay then? Do we get to go out and punch old ladies in the face because, as a whole, human beings are dicks?





Who said anything about totally ending corruption or torture never happening again? That's a ridiculous leap to take from what I said. Can you please tell me where I said that by publishing these photos, we would never have another corrupt politician again or that it would mean the absolute end of torture throughout the future of mankind? If I'm wrong, let me know, but I think you're just taking what I said out of context and pointfucking it so that you can make your point by distorting mine.

You're right, politicians are corrupt, so by your logic, we just let it go and be complicit in enabling their corruption because they're corrupt anyway?

Why put a thief in jail if they'll just go out and steal again, right? Just save the taxpayers a lot of money and send him on his way?

When someone has power and chooses to abuse it, they should be called on it. The people should know the person they've elected is corrupt so something can be done. As a resident of Illinois, I'm glad Blagojevich was called out on being corrupt. I wouldn't want that douchebag having power just because corruption has been around for a long time so that makes it okay.


So how many released photos are enough? Are there guidelines to this that I'm not aware of? I didn't realize that we reached a photo quota.



So you keep asking this question to me and continually brush my answers without answering yourself, I have to ask, what purpose does hiding the photos serve? If releasing them must have a purpose, then hiding them has to as well, right?
I don't know how many is enough. enough to prosecute? enough to convict? seems a modicum of respect and composure for the VICTIMS themselves. I've already used that as a reason, but that's not enough, because of whatever the fuck reasons that aren't enough. Willravel doesn't think that the victims seem to count because they don't need to be around their family members, justice is the the only way to be and live right. whatever that seems to be.

I have never said that there is any reason to hide them. I've not asked for them to be hidden. I've stated that they don't need to be in front of the entire public in order to prosecute or investigate. Why don't the need to be in the public? That's obviously the next question, because as I've shown before, respect for the victims. Not the obscuring their faces, or such thing that willravel thinks is enough, because they still live with it day to day for the rest of their lives. The damage is done the trauma is done.
__________________
I don't care if you are black, white, purple, green, Chinese, Japanese, Korean, hippie, cop, bum, admin, user, English, Irish, French, Catholic, Protestant, Jewish, Buddhist, Muslim, indian, cowboy, tall, short, fat, skinny, emo, punk, mod, rocker, straight, gay, lesbian, jock, nerd, geek, Democrat, Republican, Libertarian, Independent, driver, pedestrian, or bicyclist, either you're an asshole or you're not.
Cynthetiq is offline  
 

Tags
abu, ghraib, obama, orders, part, photos, stop

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:30 AM.

Tilted Forum Project

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
© 2002-2012 Tilted Forum Project

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360