Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community  

Go Back   Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community > The Academy > Tilted Politics


 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 03-04-2009, 04:28 PM   #1 (permalink)
Tilted Cat Head
 
Cynthetiq's Avatar
 
Administrator
Location: Manhattan, NY
Karl Rove to testify in front of Congress

Quote:
View: Rove, Miers agree to questioning about U.S. attorney firings
Source: CNN
posted with the TFP thread generator

Rove, Miers agree to questioning about U.S. attorney firings
Rove, Miers agree to questioning about U.S. attorney firings

* Story Highlights
* Questions are about allegations of improper political influence in Justice Department
* Statement: Both to give depositions; claims of privilege will be "significantly limited"
* Bush administration insisted the firings of nine U.S. attorneys were legal
* Questions about reasons for firings remain unanswered, critics say

WASHINGTON (CNN) -- Former White House political adviser Karl Rove and counsel Harriet Miers have agreed to face questions from Congress about allegations of improper political influence in the Justice Department, the House Judiciary Committee announced Wednesday.

Both will give depositions to investigators from the committee, and claims of privilege will be "significantly limited," according to a statement from the committee.

Rove and Miers had been resisting congressional subpoenas about the matter since the House Judiciary Committee began trying to force Miers to testify in 2006. The Bush White House resisted, claiming she could not be compelled to appear. But a federal judge in Washington ruled that the former Bush administration officials had no grounds to invoke executive privilege in the case.

The committee, led by Rep. John Conyers, D-Michigan, has been investigating claims that Rove and his White House allies fired U.S. attorneys for political reasons and prosecuted officials whom they saw as opponents. Conyers called the agreement "a victory for the separation of powers and congressional oversight."

"It is also a vindication of the search for truth," Conyers said in a statement accompanying the announcement. "I am determined to have it known whether U.S. attorneys in the Department of Justice were fired for political reasons, and if so, by whom."

The controversy stems from the 2006 firings of the top federal prosecutors in nine U.S. cities, some of whom were singled out because they were considered insufficiently "loyal Bushies," according to one e-mail from a former Justice Department official uncovered in the probe.

U.S. attorneys are political appointees who serve at the pleasure of the president. But the Justice Department's description of the firings as "performance-related" once the shake-up became public triggered an outcry from the fired lawyers and led to allegations of political influence on Justice Department hiring decisions and cases.

In September, the department's internal watchdog found the process behind the firings "fundamentally flawed" and sharply criticized top Justice officials, including former Attorney General Alberto Gonzales. Its report called for an outside probe to examine potential charges, and Gonzales' successor, Michael Mukasey, appointed a special prosecutor to investigate the case.

The Bush White House insisted the firings of the nine U.S. attorneys were legal. But Democrats said the central questions behind the dismissals -- who decided the prosecutors should be ousted and why -- remain unanswered.

Rove was former President Bush's top political adviser for most of his two terms, and Miers was the top White House legal adviser from 2005 until early 2007. They had been resisting congressional subpoenas in the investigation, citing executive privilege.

Rob Saliterman, a spokesman for the former president, issued a statement saying the deal had been reached "at the urging of the Obama administration and in consideration of the executive branch interests at stake." The agreement "satisfies the Committee's desire for additional information and will finally put this matter to rest," Saliterman said.

Congress went to court to enforce the subpoenas, and a federal judge in Washington ruled last year that the former Bush administration officials had no grounds to invoke executive privilege. After Rove received a new subpoena in January, the Obama administration said it was reviewing whether Rove and Miers were still covered by executive privilege and worked to clear the way for Wednesday's agreement.

White House counsel Greg Craig said the deal allows the committee to go forward with its investigation.

"The president is pleased that the parties have agreed to resolve this matter amicably and that they have committed to work in good faith to bring about a timely and final resolution of this matter, which is in the interest of the American people," Craig said in a statement from the White House.

The Justice Department will file a joint motion from Congress and the administration to put the court case on hold, Justice officials said, allowing it to be reopened if necessary.

CNN's Ed Henry and Terry Frieden contributed to this report.
I have always said that there is some sort of due process if someone believes that there is evidence to show wrong doing. Many people here seem to think that it should not happen in the first place, and while I can agree that it may be the Utopian view, it does happen. The recourses for wrong doings is that no one is above the law. It is a matter of convincing a court to do their duty and responsibility.

I'm interested in seeing this unfold.
__________________
I don't care if you are black, white, purple, green, Chinese, Japanese, Korean, hippie, cop, bum, admin, user, English, Irish, French, Catholic, Protestant, Jewish, Buddhist, Muslim, indian, cowboy, tall, short, fat, skinny, emo, punk, mod, rocker, straight, gay, lesbian, jock, nerd, geek, Democrat, Republican, Libertarian, Independent, driver, pedestrian, or bicyclist, either you're an asshole or you're not.
Cynthetiq is offline  
Old 03-04-2009, 05:45 PM   #2 (permalink)
immoral minority
 
ASU2003's Avatar
 
Location: Back in Ohio
I have to say that I am more interested in how they will solve the problems we currently are facing, not rehashing old grudges.
ASU2003 is offline  
Old 03-04-2009, 06:24 PM   #3 (permalink)
I have eaten the slaw
 
inBOIL's Avatar
 
This isn't (or shouldn't be) about rehashing old grudges, but about showing people in government that they will not be protected if they break the law. For too long there has been a de facto immunity from prosecution for people working in the executive branch, or working on orders from the president. If we're really lucky, that may start to come to an end in the near future.
__________________
And you believe Bush and the liberals and divorced parents and gays and blacks and the Christian right and fossil fuels and Xbox are all to blame, meanwhile you yourselves create an ad where your kid hits you in the head with a baseball and you don't understand the message that the problem is you.
inBOIL is offline  
Old 03-04-2009, 06:51 PM   #4 (permalink)
Tone.
 
shakran's Avatar
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by ASU2003 View Post
I have to say that I am more interested in how they will solve the problems we currently are facing, not rehashing old grudges.
Because government officials are used to being immune from prosecution for their acts of criminal wrongdoings which land us in messes like this, they don't feel any qualms about being criminals while in office. Yes, we must solve the problems we have right now, but we must also address the root causes of the problems. Theft is almost nonexistant in Saudi Arabia because everyone there knows that if you steal and get caught (and you probably WILL get caught), you will lose your hand. I would suggest that some politicians think that if they can only create enough havoc by the time they leave office, we won't go after them because we'll be too busy fixing what they broke. Perhaps if we proved that theory wrong, we'd cut down a bit on the crookedness.
shakran is offline  
Old 03-05-2009, 06:00 AM   #5 (permalink)
 
roachboy's Avatar
 
Super Moderator
Location: essex ma
the torture business seems to me a war crime that should be prosecuted unless we collectively really do think that war crimes only happen when a country looses a war. but i doubt that the prosecutions that i think should happen will, simply because the actions were framed by interpretations of executive power and state prerogatives in the context of a state of exception. it may have been done in grand fascist legal theory style, but it falls within the exercise of state power directly and so may in the end be immune. but i think for political reasons, the bush people should stand trial for this--otherwise saying that "we" oppose torture means nothing.

the actions regarding prosecutors seems far more straightforward an abuse of power, a mode of corruption that is eminently prosecutable and should be. much of this nonsense was carried out on the basis of an extrordinary arrogance, before the conservative house of cards collapsed and the dream of a thousand year retro-reich (the "permament republican majorities") along with it. whether the charges will stand or not in court is a separate question.
__________________
a gramophone its corrugated trumpet silver handle
spinning dog. such faithfulness it hear

it make you sick.

-kamau brathwaite
roachboy is offline  
 

Tags
congress, front, karl, rove, testify

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:00 AM.

Tilted Forum Project

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
© 2002-2012 Tilted Forum Project

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360