01-29-2009, 09:53 PM | #1 (permalink) | |
I have eaten the slaw
|
Obama's celebrity - dangerous?
The Last Psychiatrist: Wrong About Obama
Quote:
__________________
And you believe Bush and the liberals and divorced parents and gays and blacks and the Christian right and fossil fuels and Xbox are all to blame, meanwhile you yourselves create an ad where your kid hits you in the head with a baseball and you don't understand the message that the problem is you. |
|
01-29-2009, 11:32 PM | #2 (permalink) |
Insane
|
The next few years were going to suck no matter who got elected.
Presidents can't fix the economy. Only the people can fix their economy. Nothing short of a world war has ever stopped a large depression. Obama has it made, for now. The outlook is so bleak, him and the rest of the democrats can use "OMG!!! THE ECOMOMY IS SO BAD!!!!" to get anything passed. The tactic is exactly the same as Bush's "OMG!!! THE TERRORISTS ARE GOING TO GET US!!!" except the liberal media will paint the tactic as caring about the working class instead of being paranoid. If things simply don't get as bad as the media wants to scare you into believing, then "Obama must have saved us all". If things get worse, then they will still be able to pull of using Bush as an excuse for any evil in the world. I'm still not quite sure what will happen once the magic wears off. The article is correct in pointing out that the longer the media plays up his victory, the more hate it generates towards Obama supporters. Coupled with the fact, that for now, anyone who attempts to take out their frustration on him is automactically branded a rascist, this hate runs very deep. The only predictions I can make are that: 1. The two parties will not be united. Any bi-partisan efforts that take place will simply be fake smiles covering up the wedge that is driven deeper and deeper. 2. The 2012 elections will be extremely nasty. The will be no punches held. Both sides will do anything and everything it takes to destroy the other. |
01-30-2009, 04:51 AM | #3 (permalink) |
Darth Papa
Location: Yonder
|
The right has an opportunity RIGHT NOW to get on the train before it leaves the station. It's that or get consigned to the dustbin. There's room for them on the train--the man WANTS a plurality of voices and visions. But clinging to partisanship and division (like, say, voting down party lines against the Economic Stimulus package yesterday) will result in their being utterly irrelevant in the future.
That's the spirit being spoken from in this piece. Bitter, negative, sore loser. Not interested in getting on the train. So okay. Their call. Their loss. I'm not going to cry for them. |
01-30-2009, 05:00 AM | #4 (permalink) | |
Tilted Cat Head
Administrator
Location: Manhattan, NY
|
Quote:
I'm hopeful that the man will perform, he now has the onus to walk the talk, and accept responsibility for whatever the results are, good or bad.
__________________
I don't care if you are black, white, purple, green, Chinese, Japanese, Korean, hippie, cop, bum, admin, user, English, Irish, French, Catholic, Protestant, Jewish, Buddhist, Muslim, indian, cowboy, tall, short, fat, skinny, emo, punk, mod, rocker, straight, gay, lesbian, jock, nerd, geek, Democrat, Republican, Libertarian, Independent, driver, pedestrian, or bicyclist, either you're an asshole or you're not. |
|
01-30-2009, 05:06 AM | #5 (permalink) | |
Location: Washington DC
|
IMO, the opinion expressed in the OP article ignores nearly all the polling data out there.
The issue is far greater than Obama. The American voters have repudiated the conservatism of the Republican party. And the Republican party has dug in its heels and insists on responding to its base rather than expanding its appeal. The more it does so, the more it refuses to be part of a bi-partisan solution to the many problems we face and the more the Independent swing voters will continue turn away. It wont last forever, but it will last beyond Obama, regardless of his success or failure. -----Added 30/1/2009 at 08 : 14 : 02----- If I were a Republican, this would be a wake-up all: Quote:
__________________
"The perfect is the enemy of the good." ~ Voltaire Last edited by dc_dux; 01-30-2009 at 05:32 AM.. Reason: Automerged Doublepost |
|
01-30-2009, 06:48 AM | #6 (permalink) |
Who You Crappin?
Location: Everywhere and Nowhere
|
I believe Hilary Clinton would have defeated McCain by a similar margin that Obama did. People were simply tired of the GOP, plain and simple.
Also, if you're going to write an article (and, presumably, get paid for it), at least spell people's names right (Keith Oberman....really?) |
01-31-2009, 03:30 PM | #7 (permalink) |
Please touch this.
Owner/Admin
Location: Manhattan
|
My opinion on the article: too much being said before there is anything to say. Sure, be pensive, but to whip up 7 points out of thin air to knock down an opportunity when all we have is hope... that's just being too cool for school.
__________________
You have found this post informative. -The Administrator [Don't Feed The Animals] |
01-31-2009, 04:27 PM | #8 (permalink) | |
Junkie
Location: Fort Worth, TX
|
Quote:
I'm all about bi-partisanship, but there's give and take. Pelosi is running the Senate with stricter rules than even the hardest Republicans, not even allowing time to review a bill before you vote on it. If you don't agree with whats in it, instead of debating like is intended, you either vote for it or you're a heel-digging partisan. If there is truly going to be a unification, why is Obama not putting conservatives in his cabinet? I'm not saying everything is going off the edge of the cliff, but it's another issue of standards only apply when one doesn't have the power to be held to them.
__________________
"Smite the rocks with the rod of knowledge, and fountains of unstinted wealth will gush forth." - Ashbel Smith as he laid the first cornerstone of the University of Texas |
|
01-31-2009, 09:56 PM | #9 (permalink) | |
Location: Washington DC
|
Quote:
How soon some forget the Hastert rule, where under the former Speaker Dennis Hastert, no bill could be considered in the House w/o having the support of the "majority of the majority (i.e. the majority of Republicans)....which effectively eliminated any possibility of bi-partisan bills that had both Democratic and Republican support, but not the support of a majority of Republicans. One of Pelosi's first acts was to end the Hastert Rule. If she hadnt, Bush would never have gotten Iraq war funding after 07 because the "majority of the majority" never supported it. Those funding bills passed in 07 and 08 with a majority of Republicans and a minority of Democrats. So please, STOP with the nonsense of Pelosi having "stricter rules than even the hardest Republican." The economic recovery bill had something like 200 proposed amendments in the House. Pelosi and the Republican majority leader agreed to limit the number of amendments brought to the floor for a vote to around 15....a mix of both Democratic and Republican amendments. Bi-partisanship does not mean an equal vote. It means having a voice. Obama has given the House Republicans far more opportunities for participation in crafting the bill, including many of their tax proposals, than Bush ever did with Democrats on any major piece of legislation. The Senate Republicans will now have their chance. But in the end, lets not forget who the voters put in the WH and gave a larger majority to in Congress.
__________________
"The perfect is the enemy of the good." ~ Voltaire Last edited by dc_dux; 01-31-2009 at 10:49 PM.. |
|
02-01-2009, 08:15 AM | #11 (permalink) | ||
Darth Papa
Location: Yonder
|
Quote:
|
||
02-01-2009, 08:20 AM | #12 (permalink) | |
Living in a Warmer Insanity
Super Moderator
Location: Yucatan, Mexico
|
Quote:
Plus he's reaching out far more then the GOP ever did. Gates is still in, Gregg's on deck it appears. Remind me- What was the number of liberals in Bush's inter circle? Opps! Edit- forgot about LaHood. As other's have pointed out that makes three. So he won, but hopefully the days of "My way or the highway" are over. I think the GOP is risking forcing that policy back in by refusing to join in with even one vote in the house. They managed to get items added to the bill that really the no Dem would have supported then failed to even provide a token yes vote. I think that type of stuff is likely to lead to shelving any of the items they wanted added. I mean why keep their stuff in if they're not going to support it in the end anyway? Then we can all go back to an all one sided federal government. Which in my opinion didn't go so well over the past 6-8 years.
__________________
I used to drink to drown my sorrows, but the damned things have learned how to swim- Frida Kahlo Vice President Starkizzer Fan Club Last edited by Tully Mars; 02-01-2009 at 08:26 AM.. |
|
02-01-2009, 10:16 AM | #13 (permalink) |
Future Bureaucrat
|
Maryland - County results - County results- msnbc.com
So I thought this was very interesting. If you look at it, the populous counties (Montgomery county--huge DC suburb, Baltimore County, Baltimore City, etc.) all voted Obama. But the rural areas voted McCain. The McCain 'landmass' if you will is far larger than the Obama landmass, but again, #'s count for more. |
02-01-2009, 12:19 PM | #14 (permalink) |
Junkie
Location: San Antonio, TX
|
You know, I think I'm pretty sure I've heard more people complain and wring their hands about 'Obamamania' than I've actually seen people expressing what I would consider Obamamania. Most people who support him that I've talked to, or even heard about in the media, have pretty realistic expectations. Sure, some people think he'll be a truly great president. Some people on the right thought W would be a 'great' president - hell, some people on the right think he *was* a great president, and we just haven't noticed yet. Obama is obviously more popular, and more people expect good things from him. But to me, that doesn't equal this meme about everyone having unrealistic, messianic expectations of the big O (hey, the Big O - add that to the 'nicknames for Obama' thread). He's almost as popular as Kennedy was at this point in his administration. Which is pretty damn good, considering the power of the right-wing hate machine. But it isn't messianic. It's just a combination of relief to be rid of W, and Hope that Obama will turn out to be a good president. So far, I'm pretty happy with how he's turning out. I'd like to see the results of some of these machinations over the stimulus package, and then see how I feel about his political skill.
Personally, I think he'll at least be a good president, and possibly a great one. I don't agree with all the positions he's taken, but I do agree with most of them. I'm Hopeful. Optimistic. But I think I'm still realistic. I don't expect him to fix all of our problems. And we have some major problems. But I think he's going in the right direction. |
02-01-2009, 12:28 PM | #15 (permalink) | |
Baltimoron
Location: Beeeeeautiful Bel Air, MD
|
Quote:
__________________
"Final thought: I just rented Michael Moore's Bowling for Columbine. Frankly, it was the worst sports movie I've ever seen." --Peter Schmuck, The (Baltimore) Sun |
|
Tags |
celebrity, dangerous, obama |
|
|