Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community  

Go Back   Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community > The Academy > Tilted Politics


 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 10-15-2008, 06:05 PM   #1 (permalink)
Junkie
 
Jozrael's Avatar
 
Taxes, take x+1

I'm borrowing the recent post in the blog of a respected game developer that I know: Dave’s random thoughts.

Why income tax in the United States is unfair
September 28th, 2008

Both political candidates seem to have ideas on how to reform the US tax system. I think that there is a certain unfairness in the US tax system that isn’t addressed often, so I’m going to talk about it here.

Many people with higher incomes ($200k or more) seem to think they pay a high rate of tax. One of the candidates seems determined to extend tax cuts to those with such high incomes. The US, of course, has a progressive tax system. Let’s look at the tax rates:

Here are the tax rates for a single filer in 2008:

To $8025: 10%
To $32,550: 15%
To $78,850: 25%
To $164,550: 28%
To $357,700: 33%
Above $357,700: 35%

This seems relatively fair, I suppose. Tax rates go up progressively as one earns more money, though the final 2% jump once someone earns a whopping $357k does seem a little small.

However, in addition to income tax, tax payers must also pay social security tax. Social security tax differs from income tax in that it goes into the social security fund, and those who pay social security tax may be eligible for certain social security benefits.

Let’s be realistic for a moment, though. Money paid into the social security fund is used to pay social security benefits to those currently receiving them. There is no guarantee that those paying into the fund now will ever see any benefits. If one could choose to opt out of the fund and instead manage the money themselves (perhaps having it put in their 401(k)) and waive social security benefits, they would almost undoubtedly be better off.

Thus, social security tax is essentially a tax like income tax. Worse, social security tax is flat, at 6.2%, until one reaches a certain threshold of income, $102,000 in 2008, and then it cuts off. Thus it is a regressive tax, the opposite of a progressive tax. Let’s look at what the tax rates look like if we include social security tax:

To $8025: 16.2%
To $32,550: 21.2%
To $78,850: 31.2%
To $102,000: 34.2%
To $164,550: 28%
To $357,700: 33%
Above $357,700: 35%

Look at those numbers: as soon as you’re earning over $32,550, you’re paying a marginal rate of 31.2%. That’s only 3.8% less than the very top earners who earn over $357k pay! Then, after $78k, you’re paying 34.2% — effectively the same as the very wealthiest pay.

After you earn over $102k, ironically enough, your marginal tax rate goes down considerably, due to social security tax cutting off. All income between $102k and $164k is at the rather sweet effective tax rate of only 28%.

Things are actually a little more complicated than this, because social security taxes do not have deductions applied, while income taxes do. This makes the situation even more favorable to the highest earners, though. It means that tax deductions really, truly matter to the highest earners, because they get the full benefit of them. To earners under the $102k threshold, tax deductions have more limited effect.

All in all, I think that people earning between about $50k and $120k are treated the least fairly under the current tax system. They must bear the burden of a regressive tax that brings their marginal tax rate — and in some cases even their average tax rate — at close to that of the very highest income earners.









That's kind of disturbing. I'm quite in favor of a progressive tax system, and was always under the impression that the stated income tax was pretty much the reality of it, and that only the stratospheric income bracket (like top .01%) were really getting out of paying their taxes by putting all their income in tax-exempt shelters.
Jozrael is offline  
Old 10-17-2008, 08:37 AM   #2 (permalink)
Junkie
 
One thing to keep in mind is that an individual is not taxed at a single rate. Income within said tax bracket is taxed at that tax bracket. Thus the first $X are taxed at one rate and later money is taxed at another rate.

(Just to be clear i'm not making any statement for or against what you have said only pointing out a common misconception that people have that can skew ones judgment.)
Rekna is offline  
Old 10-17-2008, 09:48 AM   #3 (permalink)
Junkie
 
Jozrael's Avatar
 
Thanks, I had forgotten about this, but was aware.
Jozrael is offline  
 

Tags
taxes

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:01 AM.

Tilted Forum Project

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
© 2002-2012 Tilted Forum Project

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360