Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community

Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community (https://thetfp.com/tfp/)
-   Tilted Politics (https://thetfp.com/tfp/tilted-politics/)
-   -   Who will you be voting for in the presidential election? (https://thetfp.com/tfp/tilted-politics/140756-who-will-you-voting-presidential-election.html)

telekinetic 09-25-2008 07:42 AM

Who will you be voting for in the presidential election?
 
I'm surprised this thread wasn't created with the subforum. Who has your vote?

Jozrael 09-25-2008 07:51 AM

I'm currently voting for Obama, but I'm keeping my mind open. I don't -expect- it to change, but the possibility is always there.

Willravel 09-25-2008 08:25 AM

Senator Obama has my vote, but to be honest it's more like Senator McCain doesn't have my vote.

Herk 09-25-2008 09:35 AM

If only I could pick Obama with the guarantee that he'd pick Ron Paul as the Secretary of the Treasury.

@Will - Yeah that really helps push into Obama's corner.

Jozrael 09-25-2008 09:37 AM

Wow. I had no idea TFP was so firmly liberal. Honestly, I find myself leaning more democratic on many issues not relating to money, but I thought myself an independent that would vote either way in an election.

Poppinjay 09-25-2008 09:40 AM

Begrudgingly, Obama. McCain could have had me if he hadn't decided to make friends with the religio-insane people like Pat Robertson.

The thing that gets me about Obama is his plan to use the war money for education. There is no war money.

ottopilot 09-25-2008 09:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Willravel (Post 2531708)
Senator Obama has my vote, but to be honest it's more like Senator McCain doesn't have my vote.

Well... I'm not for Obama.

Will, how do we get along so well while maintaining such polar political views? Beer and turning wrenches (among other things) must be the true binding social element of the universe.

Willravel 09-25-2008 09:42 AM

They're the binding elements of our gender, that's for sure. Also, the boat can't hurt.

ottopilot 09-25-2008 09:53 AM

ya... das boot

khe1138 09-25-2008 10:38 AM

Nader has my vote. I'm sorry, but our political system needs serious change, and corporate controlled democrats and republicans won't do it.

laconic1 09-25-2008 10:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Poppinjay (Post 2531803)
The thing that gets me about Obama is his plan to use the war money for education. There is no war money.

A couple of the Democrat Congressional candidates around here are using that same line about using the money saved on the war to pay for all their pet projects. You're absolutely right though, there is no war money, it is all deficit spending. Me personally, I'm leaning towards Bob Barr but am still undecided.

jewels 09-25-2008 10:48 AM

Obama-Biden, without a doubt.

It's time to kick the trash to the curb and start clean and fresh. Let's see where educated idealism can take us. It's got to be better than this.

khe1138 09-25-2008 10:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by laconic1 (Post 2531853)
A couple of the Democrat Congressional candidates around here are using that same line about using the money saved on the war to pay for all their pet projects. You're absolutely right though, there is no war money, it is all deficit spending. Me personally, I'm leaning towards Bob Barr but am still undecided.


Politically, my views are very close to Barr's, but he really doesn't have the name or backing to be elected. On the other hand, if Nader was let into the debate (which is controlled by democrats and republicans), he would have a very good chance of winning.

snowy 09-25-2008 11:12 AM

Obama-Biden here. I'm sure that's not much of a shocker to anyone.

anti fishstick 09-25-2008 11:16 AM

I'm voting for Obama. Us oregoonies are certainly liberal :)

telekinetic 09-25-2008 11:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by khe1138 (Post 2531855)
Politically, my views are very close to Barr's, but he really doesn't have the name or backing to be elected. On the other hand, if Nader was let into the debate (which is controlled by democrats and republicans), he would have a very good chance of winning.

There's a chance he could 'win' the debate...there is not a chance that he could win the election. Sad but true.

khe1138 09-25-2008 11:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by twistedmosaic (Post 2531881)
There's a chance he could 'win' the debate...there is not a chance that he could win the election. Sad but true.

Yeah, they also said Jesse Ventura would never become governor of Minnesota. Nader has done alot that the people agree with. If it wasn't for the media blackout of his campaign, he would probably be leading in most polls right now.

hannukah harry 09-25-2008 04:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by khe1138 (Post 2531895)
Yeah, they also said Jesse Ventura would never become governor of Minnesota. Nader has done alot that the people agree with. If it wasn't for the media blackout of his campaign, he would probably be leading in most polls right now.

i think, at least nationally, party identification trumps actual accomplishment/past waaaay too much for nader or any third party cadidate to have a shot. maybe take 1 state if they're lucky, but that's probably a long shot too.

asaris 09-25-2008 04:30 PM

It's Nader's third election since 2000. He had no chance of winning in 2000, and did badly. He did even less well in 2004. What makes you think that this is suddenly his year?

ngdawg 09-25-2008 04:42 PM

Cynthia Ann McKinney.

This two-party elitism is sending this country right into the crapper...

Tully Mars 09-25-2008 04:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ngdawg (Post 2532079)
Cynthia Ann McKinney.

This two-party elitism is sending this country right into the crapper...

I'm voting for Obama, just can't throw my vote away this time.

But God I think you're onto to something. I keep hearing "The Who" in my head... "Meet the new boss, same as the old boss..."

My problem, right now, is the Palin-McCain ticket scares the living crap out of me.

jorgelito 09-25-2008 05:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jozrael (Post 2531797)
Wow. I had no idea TFP was so firmly liberal. Honestly, I find myself leaning more democratic on many issues not relating to money, but I thought myself an independent that would vote either way in an election.

Hell yeah, TFP is hard left. I am one of maybe 4 or 5 conservatives here (but I'm actually moderate, it's the extreme left here that make me seem so conservative).

I am undecided, independent, swing voter. But I am leaning towards Obama (just look at my avatar, bonus points to those who get it). I am only undecided because I want the Dems to work harder at earning my vote and to give McCain an outside chance of earning it back.

ASU2003 09-25-2008 08:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ngdawg (Post 2532079)
Cynthia Ann McKinney.

This two-party elitism is sending this country right into the crapper...

She's in the lead with me right now. Nader is in second and Obama is close behind in third. McCain is in forth, but could move up if he comes back to the center. And yes, she is a little wild, but I vote for what the person will do instead of their past. Then again, writing in Ron Paul wouldn't be out of the realm of possibilities either.

(I like how Cynthia said she would step in and debate Obama if McCain couldn't make it. That would be great.)

I'll be fine if either Obama or McCain win, and really, there will just be gridlock and politics as usual if either are picked. I would rather have liberal supreme court justices or ones that wouldn't impose their religious morals on the people.

Makedde 09-25-2008 08:57 PM

I not from the US, but if I were, I vote would be for Obama/Biden.

telekinetic 09-26-2008 05:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jorgelito (Post 2532102)
Hell yeah, TFP is hard left. I am one of maybe 4 or 5 conservatives here (but I'm actually moderate, it's the extreme left here that make me seem so conservative).

Something about a message board with a subforum where it is acceptable (and encouraged!) for the owner to post pics of his third leg seems to attract a more liberal segment of society. Go figure.

Glory's Sun 09-26-2008 06:14 AM

I'm voting democrat really for one reason in this election and that is while it's a bit scary to have a house,senate and presidency all controlled by one party (we've seen where that gets us) the Dems record on Fiscal Responsibility is just heads and shoulders above the Republicans.

However, I will agree that I am and have been sick of all this two party elitism shit.

ottopilot 09-26-2008 06:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by guccilvr (Post 2532482)
I'm voting democrat really for one reason in this election and that is while it's a bit scary to have a house,senate and presidency all controlled by one party (we've seen where that gets us) the Dems record on Fiscal Responsibility is just heads and shoulders above the Republicans.

However, I will agree that I am and have been sick of all this two party elitism shit.

Yes, the reigning leadership of House Financial Services Committee chairman Barney Frank, D-Mass., and Senate Banking chairman Christopher Dodd, D-Conn. have both demonstrated stellar qualities... of incompetency. Along with the personal troubles of House Ways & Means Committee chairman, Charles Rangel, D-NY, I'd say the democrats have proven to be just as irresponsible as the president on these matters. I'm not feeling so warm and fuzzy with Obama's "hands-off" approach either. All one party governance is a BAD IDEA.

Jozrael 09-26-2008 06:44 AM

I'll take it over a heaping helping of McCain-Palin anyday.

Glory's Sun 09-26-2008 06:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ottopilot (Post 2532500)
Yes, the reigning leadership of House Financial Services Committee chairman Barney Frank, D-Mass., and Senate Banking chairman Christopher Dodd, D-Conn. have both demonstrated stellar qualities... of incompetency. Along with the personal troubles of House Ways & Means Committee chairman, Charles Rangel, D-NY, I'd say the democrats have proven to be just as irresponsible as the president on these matters. I'm not feeling so warm and fuzzy with Obama's "hands-off" approach either. All one party governance is a BAD IDEA.


Which makes it even more appalling that the Dems Record is still head's and shoulders above the Republicans in this area. You can look at the current crop of Dems and use their small sample of records but when you look at it as a whole there is simply no comparison. Even in the days of Carter, the economic records are leaps and bounds above the republican party.

One party governance is a bad idea, however if I had to choice one party to have complete control I would still choose the Dems in this election.

Fotzlid 09-26-2008 08:46 AM

Since it doesn't really matter which one wins as the country is run by mega-corporations, lobbyists and the filthy rich, I am leaning towards McCain-Palin if for no other reason than I find it amusing how apoplectic the liberals are over Palin.

telekinetic 09-26-2008 09:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fotzlid (Post 2532637)
Since it doesn't really matter which one wins as the country is run by mega-corporations, lobbyists and the filthy rich, I am leaning towards McCain-Palin if for no other reason than I find it amusing how apoplectic the liberals are over Palin.

Ah yes, rooting for the leader of the free world based on schadenfreude...what a time we live in.

Fotzlid 09-26-2008 10:13 AM

Tongue-in-cheek does loose something in forums.

Obama has been talking about change. Change. Change. Change. Beating us over the head with it. Then what does he do? Picks the prototypical Washington insider for a running mate. Thats not change. Its Bush/Cheney for the Democrats. Obama has little experience on the world stage, much like Bush when he first got into office. Biden will be calling the shots behind the scenes much like Cheney has been doing for the past 8 years.

I was heavily leaning towards Obama till he picked Biden as a running mate. Now I'm not saying McCain is some fresh faced kid new to town. He is as much of an insider as Biden but at least he was looking outside the beltway in trying to find some new blood. Plus he has stated he plans on putting some democrats on his cabinet if elected. That, to me at least, represents an attempt to affect change.

I'm not naive enough to believe the change is going to be drastic, I'd be suprised if it makes it past perceptible, but at least its something of a start.

The only way the people are going to get back control of the government is by getting rid of the majority of the people running it now otherwise the only thing that will change is the capital letters in parenthesis after the names of the people indicted in the latest government scandal.

Thats my opinion anyway...

connyosis 09-26-2008 11:23 AM

My wife is voting for Obama/Biden. Not from the US myself, but Obama would have my vote if I could vote.

mcgeedo 09-26-2008 11:45 AM

"If atheism is a religion, then not collecting stamps is a hobby. "

I love the quote!

jorgelito 09-26-2008 02:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by twistedmosaic (Post 2532467)
Something about a message board with a subforum where it is acceptable (and encouraged!) for the owner to post pics of his third leg seems to attract a more liberal segment of society. Go figure.

Haha, touche!

But then again, one of our most conservative members on this forum was a swinger. Go figure...

Skutch 09-26-2008 02:44 PM

I will be voting for Barack Obama because I think he is the right man for the right job at the right time. In my view, the Republicans have had nothing to offer this country for the last 55 years, since Eisenhower.

Tully Mars 09-26-2008 03:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fotzlid (Post 2532724)

The only way the people are going to get back control of the government is by getting rid of the majority of the people running it now otherwise the only thing that will change is the capital letters in parenthesis after the names of the people indicted in the latest government scandal.


Remember when candidates would have a big R of D next to their name in all their ads?

I can't remember the last time I saw an ad with one of those letters. I get locals network feeds from about 10 US cities. I see ads for everything for the Senate to Governor, unless I Google them I have no idea what party they're with. "Hi my name is Sam Sameshitdifferentname, I believe in blah, blah ,blah.... Please vote for me."

Either they passed a law making it illegal to let people know what party you're with or the people running now days don't want to even be associated with their own party.

ngdawg 09-26-2008 04:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tully Mars (Post 2532083)
I'm voting for Obama, just can't throw my vote away this time.

But God I think you're onto to something. I keep hearing "The Who" in my head... "Meet the new boss, same as the old boss..."

My problem, right now, is the Palin-McCain ticket scares the living crap out of me.

My feeling is the more people that actually vote for those they like instead of voting for elitist party heads, the less there would be the thought that votes are being "thrown away". The only truly thrown away vote is the one not made.
I refuse to fall for the propaganda that these elections spew. Independent-minded candidates are completely blacked out of the process, even though they need a certain amount of petitioned backers to get on the ballot. Why, once they are on it, are they completely excluded?
If there are others running, they should be given the chance to be heard and included in debates, etc.
Everyone talks about change, but does the same old thing....like that adage, what's the definition of futile? Doing the same thing over and over, expecting a different result each time....

Jozrael 09-26-2008 04:58 PM

Actually that would be Einstein's definition of insanity.

ngdawg 09-26-2008 07:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jozrael (Post 2533041)
Actually that would be Einstein's definition of insanity.

I stand corrected(sit slouched over), but it's still nuts to expect true change when fed the same shit day after day after day.....

Jozrael 09-26-2008 07:32 PM

I totally agree with you. Hence why I'm voting Dem. I would vote for a lesser party but I don't think they've really got a chance :\

ngdawg 09-26-2008 07:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jozrael (Post 2533133)
I totally agree with you. Hence why I'm voting Dem. I would vote for a lesser party but I don't think they've really got a chance :


So you only side with winners instead of conscience?
I'm not the dullest pencil in the backpack, but I really don't get this thought process....
Six months from now, whoever is in, there will be whining and the only defense is "well, I didn't think [insert name here] would be any better..."?
Exercising the right to vote doesn't mean you go with who you "think" has a chance, it means having a say, even a tiny one, about who you think "should" be there. They lost? Yea, but look how many rejected the crap thrown to us.
The big ones can spout "change" all they want but we as a nation won't really see any unless we as a nation make it happen.

Bear Cub 09-26-2008 08:09 PM

Voting for the MILF and the Maverick.

While I'm a social liberal, I take a conservative stance on foreign and economic policy. I don't see abortion rights going anywhere in four years time with McCain, but I can see military action and my federal income tax rates going to hell with Obama in there.

archetypal fool 09-27-2008 04:55 AM

It's terrible about the idea that a vote for any 3rd party is considered a vote "thrown away", but it's a sad fact nonetheless. It's the media. It's the hard-wired partisanship of the majority of the voting populace. These 3rd party members aren't allowed in the debates... they have virtually no campaign presence on any media (save for the internet, of course)... And this has lead to stagnation in both of the majority parties - and by extension, stagnation in the US.

Anyways, back on topic... while I'm not "pro" Obama by any means, if there's one thing I'm absolutely certain about in this election, it's that McCain can't be trusted. At all. At least for me. He's a liar (or at the very least, very forgetful) with his nearly constant flip-flopping, and all of his distorted ads; a creationist, and thus an idiot of true form; a Bush supporter (add another mark to "idiot"); a proponent of meaningless wars and hard-headed politics; the disgusting "Keating 5" mess; and he's doing a great job of showing how incompetent he is with the whole Palin fiasco. I have less than no confidence in this man, and so I'll vote for Obama to keep him out of our White House.

asaris 09-27-2008 05:18 AM

Bear Cub -- on abortion rights, you realize that the next president will probably be appointing two, perhaps more, Supreme Court Justices, right?

Tully Mars 09-27-2008 05:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by asaris (Post 2533265)
Bear Cub -- on abortion rights, you realize that the next president will probably be appointing two, perhaps more, Supreme Court Justices, right?

Yep, at least one and McCains stance on fiscal issues mirror those of Bush Jr. Not sure that's worked out so well. Spending, borrowing and cutting taxes have left us with a mess. McCain big proposal so far seems to be end ear marks and balance the budget. That won't even put a dent in the budget deficit. On foreign policy McCain's position seems more then a little dangerous. We can't use the military for every problem. And the mere fact he picked Palin as his number two tells me he really doesn't care about anything but winning. She doesn't have a clue on foreign policy. Her only benefits to the ticket is to rally the religious right's base.

hawtdog 09-28-2008 09:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jewels (Post 2531854)
Obama-Biden, without a doubt.

It's time to kick the trash to the curb and start clean and fresh. Let's see where educated idealism can take us. It's got to be better than this.

Well it doesn't 'have' to be better than this. Educated idealism is what lead to Stalin and Hitler. Hayek's The Road to Serfdom nicely illustrates how the "educated idealism" of the Germans led to the socialist policies that wrecked most of the world and took away most people genuine freedoms.

(Oh, and please note I'm not comparing Obama to Hitler or Stalin, just saying that change for the sake of change hasn't always worked out very well.)

guyy 09-29-2008 12:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by hawtdog (Post 2534344)
Well it doesn't 'have' to be better than this.

Easy for you to say. Tell that to someone without insurance, who has lost a home, who had a child die in a senseless war fought under false pretences.

Quote:

Educated idealism is what lead to Stalin and Hitler. Hayek's The Road to Serfdom nicely illustrates how the "educated idealism" of the Germans led to the socialist policies that wrecked most of the world and took away most people genuine freedoms.
Who was in charge in Nazi Germany? Workers? I didn't think so. Was Stalin in charge in the Soviet Union, or workers? Where was the socialism?

As one of the theoretical forebearers of Reaganism, we have Hayek to thank for the huge fucking mess we're in now. Take a look at this little Hayek-inspired gem from the Cato crowd:



Quote:


Glass-Steagall is a six-decade-old plan, which still blocks competitive adaptation and responses to clients' needs. The good news is that Glass- Steagall reform is afoot. The bad news is that the process is driven, at least in part, by those who cannot let go of the planning idea. What is needed is a Hayekian vision of competition in financial services. Otherwise, we may end up tinkering with the titles of Glass-Steagall without addressing the bill's inner contradictions.

The Meaning of Hayek


Putting aside the issue of market fundamentalism, the Road to Serfdom was to become Cold War propaganda eagerly spread by Readers Digest, GM, & the University of Chicago. It therefore contributing greatly to Unfreedom by providing the grounding legitimation for Cold War repression. What freedoms you now enjoy are products of resistance to that regime. I don't recall whether Hayek ever answered to this. I suspect that he would have said that McCarthyism was a temporary expedient, a state of exception, a necessary evil -- which was more or less the way he dealt with right wing dictatorships like Pinochet's. That's also how today's laissez-faire capitalists explain away your civil rights.

Thanks, Freddy, you were really full of shit.

Jaegyr 09-30-2008 12:21 AM

Wow the TFP is incredibly liberal, Here in Central Oregon we are a little more conservative then the Valleyites. Firmly Mccain/Palin

Tully Mars 09-30-2008 03:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jaegyr (Post 2535151)
Wow the TFP is incredibly liberal, Here in Central Oregon we are a little more conservative then the Valleyites. Firmly Mccain/Palin

Surprised you didn't use the term "flatlanders."

And yes, TFP leans left.

ottopilot 09-30-2008 07:58 AM

I'm changing my vote to the Dear Leader!



Change We Need.

YaWhateva 09-30-2008 09:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Herk (Post 2531791)
If only I could pick Obama with the guarantee that he'd pick Ron Paul as the Secretary of the Treasury.

Obama/Biden but I also wish Ron Paul could be Secretary of Treasury.

ottopilot 10-10-2008 05:36 PM

I have made the correct conversion. I now only serve "the one".



Glad Hosannas! The Messiah is speaking to the youth.
Rejoice comrades, for the dawn of a new world order is upon us!

dc_dux 10-10-2008 08:07 PM

Otto....you're turning against the ticket whose VP candidate has been protected from witchcraft and blessed in the name of Jesus to serve HIM in her political career?

"....bring finances her way even for the campaign in the name of Jesus... Use her to turn this nation the other way around and to keep her safe from every form of witchcraft."
Oh man.....a curse on you by Rev Muthee! When he is not blessing righteous christian politicians, he is persecuting non-believers as witches.
-----Added 11/10/2008 at 12 : 21 : 21-----
added:

Evidently, it didnt protect her from the bi-partisan Alaska legislative committee investigating violations of ethics and abuse of power:
Quote:

Sarah Palin unlawfully abused her power as governor by trying to have her former brother-in-law fired as a state trooper, the chief investigator of an Alaska legislative panel concluded Friday. The politically charged inquiry imperiled her reputation as a reformer on John McCain's Republican ticket.

Investigator Stephen Branchflower, in a report to a bipartisan panel that looked into the matter, found Palin in violation of a state ethics law that prohibits public officials from using their office for personal gain.

The inquiry looked into her dismissal of Public Safety Commissioner Walter Monegan, who said he lost his job because he resisted pressure to fire a state trooper involved in a bitter divorce and custody battle with the governor's sister. Palin says Monegan was fired as part of a legitimate budget dispute.

Monegan's firing was lawful, the report found, but Palin let the family grudge influence her decision-making — even if it was not the sole reason Monegan was dismissed.

"I feel vindicated," Monegan said. "It sounds like they've validated my belief and opinions. And that tells me I'm not totally out in left field."

Branchflower said Palin violated a statute of the Alaska Executive Branch Ethics Act. Lawmakers don't have the authority to sanction her for such a violation, and they gave no indication they would take any action against her.

Under Alaska law, it is up to the state's Personnel Board — which is conducting its own investigation into the matter — to decide whether Palin violated state law and, if so, must refer it to the Senate president for disciplinary action. Violations also carry a possible fine of up to $5,000.

Alaska panel finds Palin abused power in firing

Tully Mars 10-11-2008 06:16 AM

I spent most of yesterday and last night out and about. Partly because I had friends coming back for the winter and a neighbors birthday. So I missed most if not all of the news. I get up this morning and reading through stuff it sounds like McCains camp. reached complete meltdown mode yesterday. I mean between the Palin Troopergate report and McCain having to back track about Obama being an evil Muslim terrorist and getting booed by his own crowd. Reading through the news this morning I'm starting to wonder if McCain or the markets had a worse week.

ottopilot 10-11-2008 07:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dc_dux (Post 2542945)
Otto....you're turning against the ticket whose VP candidate has been protected from witchcraft and blessed in the name of Jesus to serve HIM in her political career?

Evidently, it didnt protect her from the bi-partisan Alaska legislative committee investigating violations of ethics and abuse of power:

Have faith comrade, "The One" has a plan for us all. The Governor need only accept the truth and she will be set free.

Force 10 10-16-2008 08:26 PM

Republican, of course.

mixedsubstance 10-18-2008 11:22 PM

This poll is great, nice too see what others across the country have decided. Nov. 11th is so close, guys!

Tully Mars 10-19-2008 02:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mixedsubstance (Post 2547226)
This poll is great, nice too see what others across the country have decided. Nov. 11th is so close, guys!

Umm, you realize the election is on Nov. 4th, right?


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:10 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
© 2002-2012 Tilted Forum Project


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360