09-04-2008, 05:52 PM | #1 (permalink) |
Getting it.
Super Moderator
Location: Lion City
|
CANADA: an election this fall?
So it looks like there will be a Federal Election called this weekend. The only way I can interact with this election, the issue and the people is through the Internet (you can't imagine how little coverage Canadian politics gets in the local and international press - imagine zero and you are close).
I am looking to you my TFP friends to help me keep up on the news on the ground. To help me understand the issues of this election and how things are playing out. I am having a difficult time determining the mood of the nation (there is almost no coverage of people like Layton or Duceppe - is it really all about Harper and Dion)? One poll I just read suggests that when the dust settles, Harper could be able to squeak through with a majority. How realistic do you think this is? Will Harper be able to stand on his, "Promises Made, Promises Kept" and "Five Point Plan" ideals that he put forward in the last election? Or has his record been less than stellar? What are you thinking?
__________________
"My hands are on fire. Hands are on fire. Ain't got no more time for all you charlatans and liars." - Old Man Luedecke |
09-04-2008, 06:34 PM | #2 (permalink) | |
warrior bodhisattva
Super Moderator
Location: East-central Canada
|
There was a poll recently that suggested this might be true of Harper (i.e. he might be able to get a majority):
Quote:
Dion has been weak despite his attempts to sound like a critic of Harper's agenda and related performance. Unfortunately, I haven't had my nose in the news for a long time, so I can't comment much more beyond the general feel for things. All I can say is that Layton has been looking more like a leader than Dion and it's driving me nuts because it's the Liberals who normally stand a chance to take the Tories out of power, not the NDP. I can only hope the NDP wins more seats, but it's up to the Liberals to at least keep the Tories out of a majority. I'm not sure this is going to happen. In the run-up to the election, I'll be sure to keep abreast of the goings on. I'll try to keep things alive in what we can make of a "Tilted Canadian Politics." I'm sure fresnelly and a few others wouldn't mind pitching in....
__________________
Knowing that death is certain and that the time of death is uncertain, what's the most important thing? —Bhikkhuni Pema Chödrön Humankind cannot bear very much reality. —From "Burnt Norton," Four Quartets (1936), T. S. Eliot Last edited by Baraka_Guru; 09-04-2008 at 06:37 PM.. |
|
09-04-2008, 06:42 PM | #3 (permalink) |
Getting it.
Super Moderator
Location: Lion City
|
I find it very interesting what you are saying about Layton. The only thing I have read about him was a brief mention that he was one of the leaders invited to Harper's House for tea to discuss playing nice with Harper's agenda in the House of Commons (a place that Harper seems to want to label as dysfunctional despite getting most of his bills passed into law -- with only a few adjustments).
__________________
"My hands are on fire. Hands are on fire. Ain't got no more time for all you charlatans and liars." - Old Man Luedecke |
09-04-2008, 06:53 PM | #4 (permalink) |
warrior bodhisattva
Super Moderator
Location: East-central Canada
|
Make no mistake: Harper knows what he's doing. I've yet to see anything to the contrary. Despite my disagreeing with his party's policies, I give him a lot of credit. Right now he's probably the shrewdest politician in North America.
I'm truly frightened by a Tory majority. And with the circus that's unfolding south of the border, another Republican president on top of that will make me even more uneasy...especially if their terms coincide. *Shudder*
__________________
Knowing that death is certain and that the time of death is uncertain, what's the most important thing? —Bhikkhuni Pema Chödrön Humankind cannot bear very much reality. —From "Burnt Norton," Four Quartets (1936), T. S. Eliot |
09-04-2008, 07:00 PM | #5 (permalink) |
Functionally Appropriate
Location: Toronto
|
It's still early and the parties are just getting their ducks in a row. Most of the chatter is still about "Will he or won't he?" and what the house could look like afterwards. Policy talk is only just ramping up. I suspect the Liberals main attack will focus on Food safety and the Conservatives' industry self regulation policies.
Liberals call for Ritz's resignation over listeriosis outbreak One interesting story is that the Green Party now has an MP after independant Blair Wilson signed up so they could get podium at the debates. (fingers crossed!) The Conservatives are arguing against this because the Liberal Party and Green Party have stated in the past that they wouldn't run candidates against each other and this means the debate would be unfairly stacked. globeandmail.com: Let Elizabeth May be heard But enough of that. Did you hear the one about the US Republican VP Candidate?
__________________
Building an artificial intelligence that appreciates Mozart is easy. Building an A.I. that appreciates a theme restaurant is the real challenge - Kit Roebuck - Nine Planets Without Intelligent Life |
09-04-2008, 07:39 PM | #6 (permalink) | ||
warrior bodhisattva
Super Moderator
Location: East-central Canada
|
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
Knowing that death is certain and that the time of death is uncertain, what's the most important thing? —Bhikkhuni Pema Chödrön Humankind cannot bear very much reality. —From "Burnt Norton," Four Quartets (1936), T. S. Eliot |
||
09-04-2008, 08:03 PM | #7 (permalink) |
... a sort of licensed troubleshooter.
|
Amen to that. You kanucks have no idea how often I cite your government as
an example of how to fix things down here in Canada's basement. We've seen what a half Tory can do to the UK, basically gutting and leaving Labour to wither and die. The last thing we need is another western power fall to neo-conservatism. Neeways, while if I were a Canadia, I'd still be Green, I understand that the only way to beat Harper is Canada Lib. It's disconcerting and interesting at the same time that you have two reasonably sized liberal parties, Liberal and NDP. Is there a concern that the division could allow the conservatives an advantage? |
09-04-2008, 09:01 PM | #8 (permalink) | |
Getting it.
Super Moderator
Location: Lion City
|
Quote:
The NDP is much further to the left than just about anything you can imagine in the US. Which, to the rest of the world, means they are just left of centre. The Conservatives were once two parties. The Progressive Conservatives and the Reform (later Alliance) Party. The PCs were once (in Canadian terms) just to the right of centre. They held office, with prime minister Brian Mulroney, during much of the Regan years. The PC party never really recovered. The Reform Party was both fiscally and socially conservative. It was a fringe party (largely made of Western ideologues) that wanted "change". They were very popular in the west and managed to only win one or two seats East of Manitoba. Thanks to a push to "unite the right" the two parties joined to form The Conservative Party. From what I can see, the progressive part of the progressive conservatives was excised both in name and spirit from the party. It is, more or less, The Reform Party with a few more members and an ability to win seats in the East (mostly thanks to the Liberal Party being massively corrupt and, in many ridings, unelectable). Add to the mix, Quebec and it's Party of separation The Bloc Quebecquois and you have the makings of minority governments.
__________________
"My hands are on fire. Hands are on fire. Ain't got no more time for all you charlatans and liars." - Old Man Luedecke |
|
09-04-2008, 09:23 PM | #9 (permalink) |
... a sort of licensed troubleshooter.
|
Great information, thanks! I'm ashamed to say that I'm mostly ignorant to Canadian politics (thus the reference to the Torys from the UK). We hear echos of policy down here, but the mechanics elude us. Part of me is curious to see if the NDP and Libs would be interested in also combining to combat the Torys, but honestly I hate the two party "Coke or Pepsi" system down here. Having more than two viable options is a privilege, I hope you guy understand that.
|
09-04-2008, 09:56 PM | #10 (permalink) | |
Getting it.
Super Moderator
Location: Lion City
|
Quote:
The closest we've had to this sort of combining forces is when the Liberals were in a minority government and the NDP had enough seats to give them the balance of power (i.e. enough seats to have a majority). It was that sort of situation that brought about Universal Health Care in Canada. I don't see the New Democratic Party merging with the Liberal Party any time soon. The Liberals, even as centrists, have too many members that lean to the right.
__________________
"My hands are on fire. Hands are on fire. Ain't got no more time for all you charlatans and liars." - Old Man Luedecke |
|
09-05-2008, 01:41 AM | #11 (permalink) |
Junkie
Location: Ontario, Canada
|
Dion is making the same mistake John Tory made in the Ontario election - he's stickign stubbornly to a bad a idea (the carbon tax) that will kill him at the polls.
With the uncertain state of the economy and the rise in the cost of livng, the last thing people will accept is more taxation. Harper will win, certainly a strong minority, and yes, possibly a majority.
__________________
Si vis pacem parabellum. |
09-05-2008, 03:16 AM | #12 (permalink) | |
warrior bodhisattva
Super Moderator
Location: East-central Canada
|
Quote:
The Tories are virtually the only right-wing party in Canada. * * * * * highthief, you have a good point. I just hope you're wrong. Dion must have someone in the party who can tell him how to win an election....
__________________
Knowing that death is certain and that the time of death is uncertain, what's the most important thing? —Bhikkhuni Pema Chödrön Humankind cannot bear very much reality. —From "Burnt Norton," Four Quartets (1936), T. S. Eliot |
|
09-05-2008, 09:20 AM | #13 (permalink) | ||
|
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
Sticky The Stickman |
||
09-05-2008, 01:30 PM | #14 (permalink) |
Addict
Location: Where the music's loudest
|
I for one am excited for the upcoming election. While it is wrong to underestimate the Liberal party at any time, I think that by the time this election is over you will see the Liberals smashed into the ground. The Liberal version of 1990s conservatives. For too long the Liberal Party has decided they know what is best for us. Their legacy is big government, compromised freedom of speech, compromised property rights, and compromised federalism.
The downside is that I do not see a Conservative majority as being successive. While I commend Stephen Harper on slowly selling Canadians the "right side of things", I believe the Canadian right currently lacks the grassroots activism, media influence, and academic atmosphere that the American right or Canadian left has. I hope that changes. I hope Stephen Harper is successful with his top down strategy of selling the conservatism to Canadians. But the left in Canada is still a titan in activism, journalism, and academia; a goliath to our David.
__________________
Where there is doubt there is freedom. |
09-05-2008, 04:08 PM | #15 (permalink) | |
Getting it.
Super Moderator
Location: Lion City
|
Quote:
Balance in all things is essential.
__________________
"My hands are on fire. Hands are on fire. Ain't got no more time for all you charlatans and liars." - Old Man Luedecke |
|
09-05-2008, 04:23 PM | #16 (permalink) |
Addict
Location: Where the music's loudest
|
I wish I could agree with you that there is a balance. There is not. The currect state of affairs is such that we have a domineering leftist political culture. When the Toronto Star and CTV omit center important aspects on Stephen Harper's testimony regarding the non-existant Cadman affair, that is not balance. A media culture that purposefully conspires with the Liberal Party is not balance. A campus culture that ridicules right leaning students and faculty is not balance. A student union that silences its members because the "debate on abortion is over" is not balance.
__________________
Where there is doubt there is freedom. |
09-05-2008, 10:29 PM | #17 (permalink) |
Crazy
Location: BC, Canada
|
I agree that Harper will win the election and most likely get a majority. The Liberal party picking Dion as leader already did themselves in. Pardon my french, but the guy is a fucking idiot and has more trouble with english than Harper has with French.
As usual, I'll vote for the Marijuana party if possible. I like their rallies where they give out free drugs and whatnot. |
09-08-2008, 01:41 AM | #18 (permalink) |
Getting it.
Super Moderator
Location: Lion City
|
THE ELECTION IS ON!
October 14th is election day. The last election was over Christmas and this one is over Thanksgiving... and both were because of Harper. What does he have against Canadians enjoying their holidays... Harper had vowed that the election would take place every four years unless a minority government was voted no confidence. I think this goes against his old mantra of Promises Made, Promises Kept. I realize he broke that mantra a long time ago but this one is just another example of him not doing what he said he would do. How do you feel about Harper breaking his own law? Now I just need to figure out if I even qualify to vote.
__________________
"My hands are on fire. Hands are on fire. Ain't got no more time for all you charlatans and liars." - Old Man Luedecke |
09-08-2008, 03:40 AM | #19 (permalink) | |
warrior bodhisattva
Super Moderator
Location: East-central Canada
|
It reveals that he's doing it because he sees the possibility of a majority. This doesn't make me feel very good. Harper has been tolerable because of his slim minority. I really don't want to see what he does with power.
Now they're saying the Tories are making inroads in Quebec.... Quote:
__________________
Knowing that death is certain and that the time of death is uncertain, what's the most important thing? —Bhikkhuni Pema Chödrön Humankind cannot bear very much reality. —From "Burnt Norton," Four Quartets (1936), T. S. Eliot |
|
09-08-2008, 06:34 AM | #20 (permalink) |
Addict
Location: Where the music's loudest
|
Has anyone read that law? It clearly states the power of the Governor General is untouched. So while he may have broken the spirit of the law, the letter of the law is unbroken.
__________________
Where there is doubt there is freedom. |
09-08-2008, 06:56 AM | #21 (permalink) | |||||||
Wehret Den Anfängen!
Location: Ontario, Canada
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Which is the case?
__________________
Last edited by JHVH : 10-29-4004 BC at 09:00 PM. Reason: Time for a rest. |
|||||||
09-08-2008, 08:36 AM | #22 (permalink) | |
|
Quote:
I don't believe this is the case. I think that they are calling the election now becuase of the uncertainty in the future for the economy. If they call it now they feel they will at leat win a minority. If they wait and the conomu tanks then the outlook for them only gets worse.
__________________
Sticky The Stickman |
|
09-01-2009, 12:07 PM | #23 (permalink) | |
warrior bodhisattva
Super Moderator
Location: East-central Canada
|
No more Liberal support for Tories
Oh, hey! Another fall election?
Quote:
__________________
Knowing that death is certain and that the time of death is uncertain, what's the most important thing? —Bhikkhuni Pema Chödrön Humankind cannot bear very much reality. —From "Burnt Norton," Four Quartets (1936), T. S. Eliot |
|
09-01-2009, 12:26 PM | #24 (permalink) | |
Junkie
Location: The Danforth
|
fuck. another election.
---------- Post added at 04:26 PM ---------- Previous post was at 04:18 PM ---------- Quote:
You forgot to mention that when they first merged, they called themselves the Canadian Reform Alliance Party (or was it Conservative Reform Alliance party?) At any rate, once they realized that the name spelled CRAP, they put on their thinking caps like good little conservatives and just called themselves The Conservative Party.
__________________
You said you didn't give a fuck about hockey And I never saw someone say that before You held my hand and we walked home the long way You were loosening my grip on Bobby Orr http://dune.wikia.com/wiki/Leto_Atreides_I |
|
09-01-2009, 04:06 PM | #25 (permalink) |
Getting it.
Super Moderator
Location: Lion City
|
What do you guys think? If there is an election what do you see as the outcome?
My prediction: about the same, give or take a few seats. Unless Ignatieff does something radically different from what he has been doing so far, he will pick up a few extra seats but not enough to bounce the Conservative minority.
__________________
"My hands are on fire. Hands are on fire. Ain't got no more time for all you charlatans and liars." - Old Man Luedecke |
09-05-2009, 05:14 AM | #26 (permalink) |
Junkie
Location: Toronto
|
Could go either way.
I don't really see a need for an election - just a waste of money, however, I am fairly sick of Harper because I feel that he has abandonned Central Canada. My opinion of him is that he is the kind of guy who figures that if it is not black goo that you dig out of the ground in Alberta, then he's not interested. Case in point Nortel. Now, everyone knows that it was a hugely fucked up company mgt. wise, however, at the end of the day, they were the biggest single R n D company in Canada by far. They could have been salvaged if a determined effort was made. Harper did nothing and let it be parted out and sold off in bits to foreign companies. Gone forever. thousands of Engineers and Scientists laid off. Talent lost. Now, ask yourself, if that was Syncrude - would Harper have done the same thing? Never in a million years. He reminds me of Diefenbaker and the Avro Arrow. I can't stand his short sightedness. |
09-06-2009, 08:02 AM | #27 (permalink) |
warrior bodhisattva
Super Moderator
Location: East-central Canada
|
I agree, this could go either way.
This would be an election with unusual circumstances:
I think whoever can sell their future vision of Canada best will win.
__________________
Knowing that death is certain and that the time of death is uncertain, what's the most important thing? —Bhikkhuni Pema Chödrön Humankind cannot bear very much reality. —From "Burnt Norton," Four Quartets (1936), T. S. Eliot Last edited by Baraka_Guru; 09-06-2009 at 08:04 AM.. |
09-06-2009, 04:05 PM | #28 (permalink) |
Getting it.
Super Moderator
Location: Lion City
|
This is what I was thinking as well. It's one thing to use stimulus money to build and repair infrastructure, it is another to invest in the future of people.
We need to drill more than just oil... we also need to tap the minds of our people.
__________________
"My hands are on fire. Hands are on fire. Ain't got no more time for all you charlatans and liars." - Old Man Luedecke |
09-06-2009, 06:56 PM | #29 (permalink) |
Junkie
Location: Toronto
|
As long as Quebec keeps voting for the BQ, a minority gov't is all you're going to see.
Alberta and Saskatchewan will be solidly conservative (as always - do they know anything else?) Ontario will be liberal with a smattering of Conservative and NDP. BC - Liberal, Ndp, Conservative. In order to win, either party has to somehow convince Quebec to vote for them. Good luck on that front. The Quebecers enjoy voting for a usless party naively thinking that it will somehow be good for them (or to enjoy being the spoiler yet again) In either case, we're in for another minority, the only questin is who? |
09-09-2009, 08:59 AM | #30 (permalink) |
|
While I have no interest in having an election I am interested in the politics.
This stuff is much more exciting from a spectator point of view now that there are minority governments. If it is going to happen, I am looking forward to seeing how the government will fall. I think that Ignatief made a slight mistake announcing this (his withdrawl of support). What this means is that the conservatives can now pick the issue that they want to be brought down by.
__________________
Sticky The Stickman |
09-10-2009, 10:11 AM | #31 (permalink) | |
Addict
Location: Where the music's loudest
|
Quote:
__________________
Where there is doubt there is freedom. |
|
10-03-2009, 07:26 PM | #32 (permalink) |
Addict
|
If an election will end the absolutely stupid and waste of time weekly motion of non-confidence votes, I am all for it. Good Lord, do these freaking people have nothing better to do than call non-confidence motions every week?
I think it is time to get all these ego driven, power hungry megalomaniacs, Iggy what ever the fuck his name is, Harper and Layton into a room and say, "Go to the private sector. None of you have a clue. You individually and collectively are all fuck ups, and are our only choices because real people with real skills, don't want your jobs.!!" |
Tags |
canada, election, fall |
|
|