Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community  

Go Back   Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community > The Academy > Tilted Politics


 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 08-21-2008, 03:24 PM   #81 (permalink)
has all her shots.
 
mixedmedia's Avatar
 
Location: Florida
It's not strange at all.

I think the McCain campaign has a democratic mole working in their editing room - and the really funny part is they think he's doing a fantastic job.

That ad is hilarious! I'm going to watch it again.
__________________
Most people go through life dreading they'll have a traumatic experience. Freaks were born with their trauma. They've already passed their test in life. They're aristocrats. - Diane Arbus
PESSIMISM, n. A philosophy forced upon the convictions of the observer by the disheartening prevalence of the optimist with his scarecrow hope and his unsightly smile. - Ambrose Bierce
mixedmedia is offline  
Old 08-21-2008, 03:57 PM   #82 (permalink)
Existentialist
 
forseti-6's Avatar
 
Location: New York City
Quote:
Originally Posted by dc_dux View Post
Dont you think that should apply to both candidates...and their surrogates?

Why single out Obama? The attacks against him have been far more scurrilous by any measure.
Well yes and no. McCain never sold himself as some type of "new" politics. You sort of expected attack campaigning out of McCain, as well as Hillary and so forth.

Obama portrays himself as a unifier, but is doing exactly what McCain and Hillary has done - attack.

I agree the Republicans have attacked Obama more so than Obama has attacked McCain, but it works doesn't it? Look at the latest Zogby polls or Rasmussen polls. Obama has lost a lot of ground since the McCain campaign started attacking Obama in full force.
__________________
"Don't cry because it's over. Smile because it happened." - Dr. Seuss
forseti-6 is offline  
Old 08-21-2008, 04:03 PM   #83 (permalink)
Junkie
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by forseti-6 View Post
Well yes and no. McCain never sold himself as some type of "new" politics. You sort of expected attack campaigning out of McCain, as well as Hillary and so forth.

Obama portrays himself as a unifier, but is doing exactly what McCain and Hillary has done - attack.

I agree the Republicans have attacked Obama more so than Obama has attacked McCain, but it works doesn't it? Look at the latest Zogby polls or Rasmussen polls. Obama has lost a lot of ground since the McCain campaign started attacking Obama in full force.

To say one candidate can go negative and the other one can't is pretty silly. If republicans want to complain when Obama goes negative that he is not the "new candidate" won't they be admitting that their candidate is the same old politician of old?
-----Added 21/8/2008 at 08 : 06 : 27-----
Quote:
Originally Posted by ottopilot View Post
Are they homes or houses? Does it really matter? Is it a matter of condominiums as rental or equity investments? Are any of their homes being used by family members?

Obama could not recall any racist or anti-American rhetoric coming from his pastor and church for over 20 years. He must be senile.

This is really a stretch by the Obama camp. Perhaps Barry should get his pal Tony (convicted felon) Resko to help his homeless half brother out with a new home like he did for him.
Tell me what Obama did wrong involving Rezko? Also while were talking about corruption maybe we should bring up Keating 5.

The truth of the matter is both Rezko and Keating 5 are too complex for it to resonate with the public. It is a sad state of affairs but the only thing that resonates with the voting public are tag lines that can be said in 5 words or less. If you have to explain anything the majority of the public won't care.

Last edited by Rekna; 08-21-2008 at 04:06 PM.. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Rekna is offline  
Old 08-21-2008, 04:55 PM   #84 (permalink)
Existentialist
 
forseti-6's Avatar
 
Location: New York City
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rekna View Post
To say one candidate can go negative and the other one can't is pretty silly. If republicans want to complain when Obama goes negative that he is not the "new candidate" won't they be admitting that their candidate is the same old politician of old?
Perhaps. All I'm saying is, Obama's whole selling point was that he wasn't a typical politician, and it's turning out that he is. McCain? Of course he's a typical politician. He's been in the Senate for 20 years.

Let me make myself clear. I have no problem with Obama attacking McCain. I do have a problem with him suggesting he wouldn't do that. McCain made no such suggestions.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rekna View Post
Tell me what Obama did wrong involving Rezko? Also while were talking about corruption maybe we should bring up Keating 5.

The truth of the matter is both Rezko and Keating 5 are too complex for it to resonate with the public. It is a sad state of affairs but the only thing that resonates with the voting public are tag lines that can be said in 5 words or less. If you have to explain anything the majority of the public won't care.
You're right. Rezko is way too complicated for the general public, and I think only people really into politics really understand it.

Now the way I understand it with Rezko is (and don't quote me on the correct order of this, I'm doing this off the top of my head)...
#1 Rezko gave Obama a deal on his house $300K below market value.
#2 Obama turned to Rezko for political expediency
#3 Obama fought for a lot of funding to get Rezko contracts on housing projects in Chicago.
#4 Rezko goes to jail for fraud and bribery.

For someone who follows politics a lot, I can't say I totally understand all the details.
__________________
"Don't cry because it's over. Smile because it happened." - Dr. Seuss
forseti-6 is offline  
Old 08-21-2008, 05:23 PM   #85 (permalink)
Living in a Warmer Insanity
 
Tully Mars's Avatar
 
Super Moderator
Location: Yucatan, Mexico
Quote:
Originally Posted by dc_dux View Post
IMO....posters here (and I include myself on occasion) have sunk to the level of the less informed general public and the most trite and hackneyed partisans hacks.

Perhaps that explains the lack of lustre in TFP politics lately....somehow, the issues and facts have gotten tossed aside along the way.

Sad to see.
I read. I rarely post. Most posts seem to come directly from a talking points memo put out by either the DNC or the RNC.
__________________
I used to drink to drown my sorrows, but the damned things have learned how to swim- Frida Kahlo

Vice President Starkizzer Fan Club
Tully Mars is offline  
Old 08-21-2008, 05:41 PM   #86 (permalink)
Junkie
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by forseti-6 View Post

Now the way I understand it with Rezko is (and don't quote me on the correct order of this, I'm doing this off the top of my head)...
#1 Rezko gave Obama a deal on his house $300K below market value.
#2 Obama turned to Rezko for political expediency
#3 Obama fought for a lot of funding to get Rezko contracts on housing projects in Chicago.
#4 Rezko goes to jail for fraud and bribery.

For someone who follows politics a lot, I can't say I totally understand all the details.
#1 Rezko did not give Obama a deal. Obama paid the owner (no relation to Rezko) 1.65 million, which was 300,000 below the asking price (not the value) (~18%). However, the house was on the market for months and Obama's offer was the highest one. The seller has said that Obama's paid a fair price. The seller also sold an adjacent vacant lot to Rezko and the seller made it a condition of both bids that they close on the same day. Later Obama purchased a strip of the vacant land from Rezko for $104,500 which was $60,000 more then the assessed value. That is definitely not a deal.

#2 Rezko donated a total of about $4,000 to his campaign and threw a single fund raiser for im.

#3 No evidence of this has ever surfaced nor of any favors done by Obama for Rezko

#4 this it true, but the bribery and fraud was related to other politicians not Obama.

From what I can tell the Rezko/Obama relation is really this: They owned land next to each other, Obama overpaid for a small strip of land, They both served on the board of a non-profit together, Rezko donated to Obama's campaigns a few times and held a single fund raiser for him.

Even when all the complexities are explained there still doesn't appear to be anything wrong it.
Rekna is offline  
Old 08-21-2008, 05:57 PM   #87 (permalink)
let me be clear
 
ottopilot's Avatar
 
Location: Waddy Peytona
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rekna
Even when all the complexities are explained there still doesn't appear to be anything wrong it.
If you say so...



... as long as the perception is out there, it's going to have legs.



what the heck... while we're at it.



It's a sad truth... but true.
__________________
"It rubs the lotion on Buffy, Jodi and Mr. French's skin" - Uncle Bill from Buffalo

Last edited by ottopilot; 08-21-2008 at 06:09 PM..
ottopilot is offline  
Old 08-21-2008, 06:39 PM   #88 (permalink)
Darth Papa
 
ratbastid's Avatar
 
Location: Yonder
Quote:
Originally Posted by ottopilot View Post
It's a sad truth... but true.
I'm sorry, otto, but posting videos that contain the phrase "I'm X and I approve this message" and calling that ANY sort of truth, sad or otherwise, is evidence of delusion well beyond what this forum can help you with.

The REAL sad truth is, people who have swallowed the kool-aid that thoroughly are beyond recovery.
ratbastid is offline  
Old 08-21-2008, 09:20 PM   #89 (permalink)
Existentialist
 
forseti-6's Avatar
 
Location: New York City
Quote:
Originally Posted by ratbastid View Post
I'm sorry, otto, but posting videos that contain the phrase "I'm X and I approve this message" and calling that ANY sort of truth, sad or otherwise, is evidence of delusion well beyond what this forum can help you with.
Well many of the campaign ads *are* based on truths, but many times don't tell the whole truth. For instance, the latest Obama ad pokes fun at McCain's multiple houses. It basically tries to vilify McCain for being wealthy. Ummm isn't Obama fairly well off himself? Half the story....

Quote:
The REAL sad truth is, people who have swallowed the kool-aid that thoroughly are beyond recovery.
Well there are certainly kool aid drinkers on both sides. In that 'rock star' video, the video producer obviously found some. It certainly isn't representative of most Obama supporters, but there certainly is no scarcity of them. Trust me I know a few.
-----Added 22/8/2008 at 01 : 43 : 35-----
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rekna View Post
#1 Rezko did not give Obama a deal. Obama paid the owner (no relation to Rezko) 1.65 million, which was 300,000 below the asking price (not the value) (~18%). However, the house was on the market for months and Obama's offer was the highest one. The seller has said that Obama's paid a fair price. The seller also sold an adjacent vacant lot to Rezko and the seller made it a condition of both bids that they close on the same day. Later Obama purchased a strip of the vacant land from Rezko for $104,500 which was $60,000 more then the assessed value. That is definitely not a deal.
$60k more than assessed value? Sounds a little fishy to me there.

As for the property Rezko bought, it is purported that he paid the asking price. Nothing wrong with that there, but combined with Obama's lot, seems a little shady.

Obama even regrets buying the property: Obama on Rezko deal: It was a mistake :: CHICAGO SUN-TIMES :: Politics

Quote:
#2 Rezko donated a total of about $4,000 to his campaign and threw a single fund raiser for im.
Rezko's fundraiser raised almost $250k for Obama.

While Obama turning to Rezko for political expediency certain is not illegal in any terms. However, associating with a felon is coming back to bite him in the butt. He's been lucky not too much has been made of this yet, but don't bet the house that it stays that way.

Perhaps it's human nature, but there is a saying that goes "you are judged by the company you keep." With Obama befriending Rezko, Reverend Wright, Bill Ayers, Raila Odinga and Father Michael Pfleger, you have to wonder if there are some skeletons in the closet.


Quote:
#3 No evidence of this has ever surfaced nor of any favors done by Obama for Rezko
Taken from a NY Post article:
BARACK'S FAVORS FOR CORRUPT CRONY - New York Post

-In October 1998, Obama wrote city and state officials, urging them to give Rezko $14 million to build an apartment complex outside of Obama's state Senate district. The Chicago Sun-Times noted last year that Obama's request included $855,000 in "development fees" for Rezko and for another developer, Allison Davis, who happened to be Obama's old law-firm boss. Obama's spokesman said it was just a coincidence that the state senator wrote letters to obtain millions of dollars for his two longtime friends.

-In 2001, Obama cosponsored a bill allowing developers to sell state tax credits to others and pocket half of the proceeds.

- In 2002 and 2004, he was chief cosponsor of a bill to authorize a rent-subsidy fund giving "grants . . . directly to developers" of low-income housing. Seventy percent of the money was earmarked for the Chicago area.

-Obama cosponsored the Illinois Housing Initiative Act of 2003, which required the governor to develop a plan for more low-income housing and "provide[d] for funding for housing construction and rehabilitation and supportive services."

-In 2003, Obama voted for the Affordable Housing Planning and Appeal Act, which required Illinois municipalities to make 10 percent of their housing units "affordable" (by definition, this included subsidized housing). This forced 46 communities just outside of Chicago to create more than 7,000 new "affordable" units - a huge boost in demand for area developers. The bill also provided loopholes for developers to circumvent local ordinances and regulations.

These and the other Obama-backed bills helped make millionaires of Rezko and other slum developers at taxpayers' expense. The developers - including his former law boss and an adviser to his current campaign - reciprocated, together giving and raising hundreds of thousands of dollars for Obama's campaigns.

Quote:
#4 this it true, but the bribery and fraud was related to other politicians not Obama.
To sum up: Obama got them subsidies to build. He secured them a steady income of government rent subsidies. He arranged special tax credits and abatements for them. He backed measures that increased demand for their services, and helped them legally circumvent local laws.

From what I can tell the Rezko/Obama relation is really this: They owned land next to each other, Obama overpaid for a small strip of land, They both served on the board of a non-profit together, Rezko donated to Obama's campaigns a few times and held a single fund raiser for him.

Even when all the complexities are explained there still doesn't appear to be anything wrong it.
Well I quoted all the NY Post stuff that addressed this in the previous section. The question is now what was the motivation? There lies everything. If Obama had in fact been motivated to help Rezko make millions, there is a serious crime here. If not, well, it's shady, but legal. The problem is proving the intent. Obama is not going to come out and say it, and I highly doubt there is a good paper trail either way.

Either way, however, the only one that is hurt is Obama. Just the perception he might have done something illegal (and by associating with a felon) will hurt him dearly in the eyes of voters.
__________________
"Don't cry because it's over. Smile because it happened." - Dr. Seuss

Last edited by forseti-6; 08-21-2008 at 09:45 PM.. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
forseti-6 is offline  
Old 08-22-2008, 09:08 AM   #90 (permalink)
Paq
Junkie
 
Paq's Avatar
 
Location: South Carolina
Quote:
Originally Posted by Seaver View Post
Better than Grant... and he was the Supreme Union Commander AND President.

Umm...his presidency is often considered the biggest flop ever.....
__________________
Live.

Chris
Paq is offline  
Old 08-22-2008, 10:23 AM   #91 (permalink)
let me be clear
 
ottopilot's Avatar
 
Location: Waddy Peytona
Would McCain be considered senile or incompetent if he couldn't say at what point human rights begins (in reference to Obama's "above my pay-grade" quote)?

This just continues to spiral... and we're only getting started. Yes, we've got the "old coot" vs. the "empty suit". I say let them beat the crap out of each other.
__________________
"It rubs the lotion on Buffy, Jodi and Mr. French's skin" - Uncle Bill from Buffalo
ottopilot is offline  
Old 08-22-2008, 10:48 AM   #92 (permalink)
Existentialist
 
forseti-6's Avatar
 
Location: New York City
Quote:
Originally Posted by ottopilot View Post
Would McCain be considered senile or incompetent if he couldn't say at what point human rights begins (in reference to Obama's "above my pay-grade" quote)?

This just continues to spiral... and we're only getting started. Yes, we've got the "old coot" vs. the "empty suit". I say let them beat the crap out of each other.
I would love to see Obama pick Biden as his VP and McCain Romney. They can go at each other's throats. That would make for some good debating.
__________________
"Don't cry because it's over. Smile because it happened." - Dr. Seuss
forseti-6 is offline  
Old 08-22-2008, 11:01 AM   #93 (permalink)
let me be clear
 
ottopilot's Avatar
 
Location: Waddy Peytona
Quote:
Originally Posted by forseti-6 View Post
I would love to see Obama pick Biden as his VP and McCain Romney. They can go at each other's throats. That would make for some good debating.
At least entertaining at some level.
-----Added 22/8/2008 at 04 : 29 : 37-----
Quote:
Originally Posted by ratbastid View Post
I'm sorry, otto, but posting videos that contain the phrase "I'm X and I approve this message" and calling that ANY sort of truth, sad or otherwise, is evidence of delusion well beyond what this forum can help you with.

The REAL sad truth is, people who have swallowed the kool-aid that thoroughly are beyond recovery.
Yes "they" have and are.
__________________
"It rubs the lotion on Buffy, Jodi and Mr. French's skin" - Uncle Bill from Buffalo

Last edited by ottopilot; 08-22-2008 at 12:29 PM.. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
ottopilot is offline  
 

Tags
mccain, senile


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:40 AM.

Tilted Forum Project

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
© 2002-2012 Tilted Forum Project

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360