Quote:
Originally Posted by forseti-6
Well yes and no. McCain never sold himself as some type of "new" politics. You sort of expected attack campaigning out of McCain, as well as Hillary and so forth.
Obama portrays himself as a unifier, but is doing exactly what McCain and Hillary has done - attack.
I agree the Republicans have attacked Obama more so than Obama has attacked McCain, but it works doesn't it? Look at the latest Zogby polls or Rasmussen polls. Obama has lost a lot of ground since the McCain campaign started attacking Obama in full force.
|
To say one candidate can go negative and the other one can't is pretty silly. If republicans want to complain when Obama goes negative that he is not the "new candidate" won't they be admitting that their candidate is the same old politician of old?
-----Added 21/8/2008 at 08 : 06 : 27-----
Quote:
Originally Posted by ottopilot
Are they homes or houses? Does it really matter? Is it a matter of condominiums as rental or equity investments? Are any of their homes being used by family members?
Obama could not recall any racist or anti-American rhetoric coming from his pastor and church for over 20 years. He must be senile.
This is really a stretch by the Obama camp. Perhaps Barry should get his pal Tony (convicted felon) Resko to help his homeless half brother out with a new home like he did for him.
|
Tell me what Obama did wrong involving Rezko? Also while were talking about corruption maybe we should bring up Keating 5.
The truth of the matter is both Rezko and Keating 5 are too complex for it to resonate with the public. It is a sad state of affairs but the only thing that resonates with the voting public are tag lines that can be said in 5 words or less. If you have to explain anything the majority of the public won't care.