Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community  

Go Back   Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community > The Academy > Tilted Politics


 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 08-14-2008, 01:21 PM   #1 (permalink)
Junkie
 
Is McCain Senile?

McCain is a gaffe machine. Almost daily he is tripping over his own words saying things that are completely wrong. Is he senile, stupid, or blatantly lying?

Examples of this:

Iran is training Al'Queda:

Iraq borders Pakistan:

My new personal favorite, nations don't invade other nations (unless it is the US)

Others:

McCain confuses the Packers and the Steelers (or was he just pandering).
McCain volunteers his wife for a topless beauty contest...
McCain schedules a speech on an oil platform to promote offshore drilling but has to cancel because of a giant oil spill!
McCain's economic adviser says recession is just a figment of our imagination and we are just whining.
McCain refers to Czechoslovakia.
McCain says the sunni awakening happened after the Surge (sorry other way around).
McCain says no to a timetable, Iraq says yes...
McCain misstates the number of economists that support his plan.
McCain says he doesn't really know much about economics (on video) then says I never said that!

Combine this with McCain's numerous flip flops.

I'm sure I could continue for another few pages but I think I made my point

If Obama were to mess up like this he would be eaten alive by the media yet McCain gets passes on these. For example, Obama gives a speech in Germany the media says he is being presumptuous, McCain does his own diplomatic mission to Georgia...not one mention of him being presumptuous.

So what do you think is McCain senile, stupid, or dishonest?

Last edited by Rekna; 08-14-2008 at 01:26 PM..
Rekna is offline  
Old 08-14-2008, 01:33 PM   #2 (permalink)
Lover - Protector - Teacher
 
Jinn's Avatar
 
Location: Seattle, WA
Is there an option for "all of the above"?

And as much as my bias agrees with your bias, I have to admit that I don't see this discussion going well. Staunch McCain supporters will deny the media is giving him a pass and instead say that Obama is getting a pass, and/or claim that Obama flipflops more than McCain. Obama supporters will agree with you.

Unfortunately someone's inability to speak accurately seems to have VERY LITTLE effect on the electorate. I decried Bush's absolutely terrible understanding of English and his inability to report facts accurately in 2000, but to most people it doesn't seem to matter.
__________________
"I'm typing on a computer of science, which is being sent by science wires to a little science server where you can access it. I'm not typing on a computer of philosophy or religion or whatever other thing you think can be used to understand the universe because they're a poor substitute in the role of understanding the universe which exists independent from ourselves." - Willravel
Jinn is offline  
Old 08-14-2008, 01:38 PM   #3 (permalink)
... a sort of licensed troubleshooter.
 
Willravel's Avatar
 
He's trying to lie, but he's a bit too far gone to do it as successfully as, say, a Bill Clinton or George H. W. Bush (W. Bush, of course, is simply not intelligent enough to convincingly lie).

It's a shame some people don't have "smart" on their list of presidential attributes. I'm not saying intellect is the end all be all of presidencies, but an oval office with under a 90 IQ is likely to see a lot of problems.
Willravel is offline  
Old 08-14-2008, 01:52 PM   #4 (permalink)
 
dc_dux's Avatar
 
Location: Washington DC
Give the man a break....he graduated 894th out of 899 in his class at the Naval Academy!
__________________
"The perfect is the enemy of the good."
~ Voltaire
dc_dux is offline  
Old 08-14-2008, 02:01 PM   #5 (permalink)
has all her shots.
 
mixedmedia's Avatar
 
Location: Florida
Maybe he figures...it worked for GW.
__________________
Most people go through life dreading they'll have a traumatic experience. Freaks were born with their trauma. They've already passed their test in life. They're aristocrats. - Diane Arbus
PESSIMISM, n. A philosophy forced upon the convictions of the observer by the disheartening prevalence of the optimist with his scarecrow hope and his unsightly smile. - Ambrose Bierce
mixedmedia is offline  
Old 08-14-2008, 02:27 PM   #6 (permalink)
Darth Papa
 
ratbastid's Avatar
 
Location: Yonder
I think he sometimes just doesn't think before he talks--the "bold, free-wheeling, straight-shooting maverick" thing. Worked for him when he was actually campaigning on things he believed, but now his campaign has gone into tack-right pander mode, and what he has to say isn't natural for him anymore, and things get wacky.

His campaign has been saying very strange things lately about "keeping the candidate focused on the campaign's message". VERY strange thing to say. Makes one wonder exactly what we're supposed to be voting for, when we vote McCain.

Other times, I think he just talks out his ass and isn't used to having every utterance scrutinized. He pulled the "Iran training Al Qaida" thing straight out of his ass. It's clear he was making that up as he went along. And the "Iraq/Pakistan border" thing was a bluff--if you watch closely, he's practically daring us to check that fact. It's all over him that he wants us to think he knows something we don't. He wants to come off as informed, so he makes up some information that sounds plausible.

I think if he was seriously senile, it'd be harder for him to string thoughts together. He's not incoherent. He just has CRS syndrome.

Last edited by ratbastid; 08-14-2008 at 02:30 PM..
ratbastid is offline  
Old 08-14-2008, 04:29 PM   #7 (permalink)
Junkie
 
filtherton's Avatar
 
Location: In the land of ice and snow.
Wasn't Reagan senile for most of his last term. Isn't he like Jesus for Republicans?

I think Americans like voting for people who remind them of their grandparents.
filtherton is offline  
Old 08-14-2008, 05:40 PM   #8 (permalink)
let me be clear
 
ottopilot's Avatar
 
Location: Waddy Peytona
All 57 states are safe with Obama
__________________
"It rubs the lotion on Buffy, Jodi and Mr. French's skin" - Uncle Bill from Buffalo
ottopilot is offline  
Old 08-14-2008, 06:11 PM   #9 (permalink)
Junkie
 
Seaver's Avatar
 
Location: Fort Worth, TX
Quote:
Give the man a break....he graduated 894th out of 899 in his class at the Naval Academy!
Better than Grant... and he was the Supreme Union Commander AND President.
__________________
"Smite the rocks with the rod of knowledge, and fountains of unstinted wealth will gush forth." - Ashbel Smith as he laid the first cornerstone of the University of Texas
Seaver is offline  
Old 08-14-2008, 07:01 PM   #10 (permalink)
Banned
 
"you forgot ugly, lazy, and disrespect....SHUT-UP BITCH!"

I can't believe you wasted the time to put this together....I find it hard to believe you haven't heard some of the dumb shit Obama has said, but be my guest check it out on this cool thing called goodle or something where you can search stuff like that.

Obama must have early onset Alzheimer's, or probably got like a 200 on his SAT's and graduated 3 in his class of like a million. What an IDIOT!! He needs to be impeached cause if he wins he stole it probably using those hanging chads and butterfly's to fool older people in states that have them.

I almost want this guy to be elected. The future of America is almost not worth another 4 years of this shit.
matthew330 is offline  
Old 08-14-2008, 07:10 PM   #11 (permalink)
Darth Papa
 
ratbastid's Avatar
 
Location: Yonder
By the way, anybody else think it's an indicator of the direction the wind's blowing that Obama's name is getting spelled correctly everywhere at long last, and "Mc'Cain" is getting a new apostrophe?
ratbastid is offline  
Old 08-14-2008, 07:18 PM   #12 (permalink)
Baltimoron
 
djtestudo's Avatar
 
Location: Beeeeeautiful Bel Air, MD
Quote:
Originally Posted by ottopilot View Post
All 57 states are safe with Obama
Ding, ding, ding.

Even I don't care that Obama said that, but if people are going to bullshit about McCain then it deserves to be brought into the discussion.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Seaver View Post
Better than Grant... and he was the Supreme Union Commander AND President.
Look at his presidency; bad example
__________________
"Final thought: I just rented Michael Moore's Bowling for Columbine. Frankly, it was the worst sports movie I've ever seen."
--Peter Schmuck, The (Baltimore) Sun
djtestudo is offline  
Old 08-14-2008, 07:25 PM   #13 (permalink)
has all her shots.
 
mixedmedia's Avatar
 
Location: Florida
Quote:
Originally Posted by ratbastid View Post
By the way, anybody else think it's an indicator of the direction the wind's blowing that Obama's name is getting spelled correctly everywhere at long last, and "Mc'Cain" is getting a new apostrophe?
I've noticed this, too.

Mc'Cain? What the...
__________________
Most people go through life dreading they'll have a traumatic experience. Freaks were born with their trauma. They've already passed their test in life. They're aristocrats. - Diane Arbus
PESSIMISM, n. A philosophy forced upon the convictions of the observer by the disheartening prevalence of the optimist with his scarecrow hope and his unsightly smile. - Ambrose Bierce
mixedmedia is offline  
Old 08-14-2008, 07:28 PM   #14 (permalink)
Junkie
 
samcol's Avatar
 
Location: Indiana
Is the pope catholic?
__________________
It's time for the president to hand over his nobel peace prize.
samcol is offline  
Old 08-15-2008, 05:02 AM   #15 (permalink)
let me be clear
 
ottopilot's Avatar
 
Location: Waddy Peytona
Quote:
Originally Posted by samcol View Post
Is the pope catholic?
Is Obama an empty suit?

oh no he didn't!
__________________
"It rubs the lotion on Buffy, Jodi and Mr. French's skin" - Uncle Bill from Buffalo
ottopilot is offline  
Old 08-15-2008, 05:29 AM   #16 (permalink)
Junkie
 
samcol's Avatar
 
Location: Indiana
Quote:
Originally Posted by ottopilot View Post
Is Obama an empty suit?

oh no he didn't!
Yes.
__________________
It's time for the president to hand over his nobel peace prize.
samcol is offline  
Old 08-15-2008, 05:50 AM   #17 (permalink)
warrior bodhisattva
 
Baraka_Guru's Avatar
 
Super Moderator
Location: East-central Canada
Ugh! I can't believe that Stephen Harper is looking like the strongest, most competent leader in North America!
__________________
Knowing that death is certain and that the time of death is uncertain, what's the most important thing?
—Bhikkhuni Pema Chödrön

Humankind cannot bear very much reality.
—From "Burnt Norton," Four Quartets (1936), T. S. Eliot
Baraka_Guru is offline  
Old 08-15-2008, 06:14 AM   #18 (permalink)
Junkie
 
I'm fully aware of the gaffes Obama has made also. The difference is Obama's gaffes are talked about for a week on all the news stations that love to follow fox news' lead. McCain's are never mentioned.

Remember when Obama gave a speech that included words from a friend of his? He got accused of plagiarism for weeks. McCain just ripped part of his speech from Wikipedia and the media is mum on it. (Of course the true crime is he used Wikipedia as a reliable source....)
Rekna is offline  
Old 08-15-2008, 06:25 AM   #19 (permalink)
 
roachboy's Avatar
 
Super Moderator
Location: essex ma
let's try to find a way to steer this thread away from the direction it is currently taking, which is not interesting.
__________________
a gramophone its corrugated trumpet silver handle
spinning dog. such faithfulness it hear

it make you sick.

-kamau brathwaite
roachboy is offline  
Old 08-15-2008, 11:25 AM   #20 (permalink)
Junkie
 

Now Georgia is the first serious crisis since the end of the cold war... i guess 9/11, Iraq 1, Iraq 2, etc were not serious....
Rekna is offline  
Old 08-15-2008, 01:38 PM   #21 (permalink)
let me be clear
 
ottopilot's Avatar
 
Location: Waddy Peytona
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rekna View Post
YouTube - McCain on Russia and Georgia war

Now Georgia is the first serious crisis since the end of the cold war... i guess 9/11, Iraq 1, Iraq 2, etc were not serious....
The clip does not begin at the start of his comments, nor does it include the remainder of his commentary. It's possible that's all he said, but I firmly believe he understands all of these events in their proper perspective. I also believe it's disingenuous for the media to suggest otherwise. However, the consequences of unchallenged Russian aggression in Eastern Europe could easily eclipse any of those events you mentioned.
__________________
"It rubs the lotion on Buffy, Jodi and Mr. French's skin" - Uncle Bill from Buffalo

Last edited by ottopilot; 08-15-2008 at 01:58 PM..
ottopilot is offline  
Old 08-15-2008, 02:07 PM   #22 (permalink)
Baltimoron
 
djtestudo's Avatar
 
Location: Beeeeeautiful Bel Air, MD
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rekna View Post
Now Georgia is the first serious crisis since the end of the cold war... i guess 9/11, Iraq 1, Iraq 2, etc were not serious....
I'm not watching the clip, but I'll take a guess that the involvement of Russia was either implied or cut from the clip.
__________________
"Final thought: I just rented Michael Moore's Bowling for Columbine. Frankly, it was the worst sports movie I've ever seen."
--Peter Schmuck, The (Baltimore) Sun
djtestudo is offline  
Old 08-15-2008, 02:09 PM   #23 (permalink)
Junkie
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by ottopilot View Post
The clip does not begin at the start of his comments, nor does it include the remainder of his commentary. It's possible that's all he said, but I firmly believe he understands all of these events in their proper perspective. I also believe it's disingenuous for the media to suggest otherwise. However, the consequences of unchallenged Russian aggression in Eastern Europe could easily eclipse any of those events you mentioned.
Of course what McCain fails to mention is Georgia was the aggressor and Russia responded to their aggression. I'm not saying Russia was right to do what they did but Georgia is not innocent at all. In fact, the closest example of this happening in the past was when Saddam invaded Kuwait and in response the US invaded Iraq. Anyway it is irrelevant to the fact that he is claiming that Iraq 1 & 2, 9/11, Afganastan, Darfur, Sudan, Kosovo, and many others were not serious.
Rekna is offline  
Old 08-15-2008, 02:23 PM   #24 (permalink)
 
dc_dux's Avatar
 
Location: Washington DC
The media has every right to question McCain's statements on Georgia in light of the fact that his top foreign policy advisor was, until very recently, a paid lobbyist for Georgia:
Quote:
Sen. John McCain's top foreign policy adviser prepped his boss for an April 17 phone call with the president of Georgia and then helped the presumptive Republican presidential nominee prepare a strong statement of support for the fledgling republic.

The day of the call, a lobbying firm partly owned by the adviser, Randy Scheunemann, signed a $200,000 contract to continue providing strategic advice to the Georgian government in Washington.

The McCain campaign said Georgia's lobbying contract with Orion Strategies had no bearing on the candidate's decision to speak with President Mikheil Saakashvili and did not influence his statement. "The Embassy of Georgia requested the call," said campaign spokesman Brian Rogers.

But ethics experts have raised concerns about former lobbyists for foreign governments providing advice to presidential candidates about those same countries. "The question is, who is the client? Is the adviser loyal to income from a foreign client, or is he loyal to the candidate he is working for now?" said James Thurber, a lobbying expert at American University. "It's dangerous if you're getting advice from people who are very close to countries on one side or another of a conflict."

While Aide Advised McCain, His Firm Lobbied for Georgia
Just one of the many lobbyists with foreign government contracts in the McCain (the anti-lobbyist candidate) inner circle.
__________________
"The perfect is the enemy of the good."
~ Voltaire
dc_dux is offline  
Old 08-15-2008, 02:36 PM   #25 (permalink)
change is hard.
 
thespian86's Avatar
 
Location: the green room.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Baraka_Guru View Post
Ugh! I can't believe that Stephen Harper is looking like the strongest, most competent leader in North America!
hahaha I was prepared the second thing.
__________________
EX: Whats new?
ME: I officially love coffee more then you now.
EX: uh...
ME: So, not much.
thespian86 is offline  
Old 08-15-2008, 02:49 PM   #26 (permalink)
let me be clear
 
ottopilot's Avatar
 
Location: Waddy Peytona
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rekna View Post
Of course what McCain fails to mention is Georgia was the aggressor and Russia responded to their aggression. I'm not saying Russia was right to do what they did but Georgia is not innocent at all. In fact, the closest example of this happening in the past was when Saddam invaded Kuwait and in response the US invaded Iraq. Anyway it is irrelevant to the fact that he is claiming that Iraq 1 & 2, 9/11, Afganastan, Darfur, Sudan, Kosovo, and many others were not serious.
omg!

Georgia was the aggressor? Perhaps like Hitler claiming Poland to be the aggressor in WWII.
__________________
"It rubs the lotion on Buffy, Jodi and Mr. French's skin" - Uncle Bill from Buffalo
ottopilot is offline  
Old 08-15-2008, 03:41 PM   #27 (permalink)
Junkie
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by ottopilot View Post
omg!

Georgia was the aggressor? Perhaps like Hitler claiming Poland to be the aggressor in WWII.

Who attacked who first? Georgia attacked SO. Russia responded by liberating SO and then continued into Georgia.
-----Added 15/8/2008 at 08 : 03 : 08-----
From wiki:

2008 South Ossetia war - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The 2008 South Ossetia war began on August 7, 2008, and involves the country of Georgia, the Russian Federation and the breakaway republics of South Ossetia and Abkhazia. The war began after a ceasefire agreement between Georgia and South Ossetia broke down (each side accused the other of breaking the ceasefire), and Georgia sent a large military force into South Ossetia which reached the capital Tskhinvali.

Tell me how is Russia's invasion of Georgia different from America's invasion of Iraq during the first gulf war?

Last edited by Rekna; 08-15-2008 at 04:04 PM.. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Rekna is offline  
Old 08-15-2008, 08:55 PM   #28 (permalink)
Living in a Warmer Insanity
 
Tully Mars's Avatar
 
Super Moderator
Location: Yucatan, Mexico
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rekna View Post
Who attacked who first? Georgia attacked SO. Russia responded by liberating SO and then continued into Georgia.
-----Added 15/8/2008 at 08 : 03 : 08-----
From wiki:


The 2008 South Ossetia war began on August 7, 2008, and involves the country of Georgia, the Russian Federation and the breakaway republics of South Ossetia and Abkhazia. The war began after a ceasefire agreement between Georgia and South Ossetia broke down (each side accused the other of breaking the ceasefire), and Georgia sent a large military force into South Ossetia which reached the capital Tskhinvali.

Tell me how is Russia's invasion of Georgia different from America's invasion of Iraq during the first gulf war?
Yeah that's pretty much the way it's unfolded.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/7553390.stm

What I can't understand is why Georgia would think Russia would sit back and allow this to happen. Talk about throwing rocks at a hornets nest.

Also there seems to be more then a little irony in the US government making statements like 'it's not alright for one country to be invading another in the 21st century." I had a neighbor from Denmark over for coffee the other morning. Bush made some comment like that and my friend started laughing so hard I thought he was going to fall over.

Between this, the middle east situation(s) and Russia now threatening action in Poland it seems like pretty serious times are afoot.
__________________
I used to drink to drown my sorrows, but the damned things have learned how to swim- Frida Kahlo

Vice President Starkizzer Fan Club

Last edited by Tully Mars; 08-16-2008 at 04:50 AM.. Reason: Link not working
Tully Mars is offline  
Old 08-15-2008, 10:01 PM   #29 (permalink)
Baltimoron
 
djtestudo's Avatar
 
Location: Beeeeeautiful Bel Air, MD
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rekna View Post
Who attacked who first? Georgia attacked SO. Russia responded by liberating SO and then continued into Georgia.
-----Added 15/8/2008 at 08 : 03 : 08-----
From wiki:

2008 South Ossetia war - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The 2008 South Ossetia war began on August 7, 2008, and involves the country of Georgia, the Russian Federation and the breakaway republics of South Ossetia and Abkhazia. The war began after a ceasefire agreement between Georgia and South Ossetia broke down (each side accused the other of breaking the ceasefire), and Georgia sent a large military force into South Ossetia which reached the capital Tskhinvali.

Tell me how is Russia's invasion of Georgia different from America's invasion of Iraq during the first gulf war?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rekna View Post
(Of course the true crime is he used Wikipedia as a reliable source....)
(Just yanking your chain...)
__________________
"Final thought: I just rented Michael Moore's Bowling for Columbine. Frankly, it was the worst sports movie I've ever seen."
--Peter Schmuck, The (Baltimore) Sun
djtestudo is offline  
Old 08-16-2008, 04:50 AM   #30 (permalink)
Junkie
 
Seaver's Avatar
 
Location: Fort Worth, TX
South Ossetia is part of Georgia. Georgia sent Georgian troops into Georgia and they are the aggresser?!?!

Quote:
Mountainous South Ossetia, which is in Georgia, is separated from North Ossetia, which is in Russia, by the border between the two countries running high in the Caucasus. Much of the region lies more than 1000 metres above sea level.
BBC NEWS | World | Europe | Country profiles | Regions and territories: South Ossetia

A little more reliable than Wiki.
__________________
"Smite the rocks with the rod of knowledge, and fountains of unstinted wealth will gush forth." - Ashbel Smith as he laid the first cornerstone of the University of Texas
Seaver is offline  
Old 08-16-2008, 04:59 AM   #31 (permalink)
Living in a Warmer Insanity
 
Tully Mars's Avatar
 
Super Moderator
Location: Yucatan, Mexico
Quote:
Originally Posted by Seaver View Post
South Ossetia is part of Georgia. Georgia sent Georgian troops into Georgia and they are the aggresser?!?!



BBC NEWS | World | Europe | Country profiles | Regions and territories: South Ossetia

A little more reliable than Wiki.
The problem being Ossetia voted for independence and didn't want to be part of Georgia. Russia supported the Ossetia independence, Georgia... not so much.
__________________
I used to drink to drown my sorrows, but the damned things have learned how to swim- Frida Kahlo

Vice President Starkizzer Fan Club
Tully Mars is offline  
Old 08-16-2008, 05:18 AM   #32 (permalink)
Mad Philosopher
 
asaris's Avatar
 
Location: Washington, DC
The problem, Tully, is that, unlike say Kosovo, everyone in the international community other than Russia thinks S. Ossetia shouldn't be independent. I mean, just look at a map -- it doesn't look like a separate county; it would still be almost completely surrounded by Georgia. Georgia sending troops into S. Ossetia may have been unwise, but it certainly was not an invasion of a sovereign country.
__________________
"Die Deutschen meinen, daß die Kraft sich in Härte und Grausamkeit offenbaren müsse, sie unterwerfen sich dann gerne und mit Bewunderung:[...]. Daß es Kraft giebt in der Milde und Stille, das glauben sie nicht leicht."

"The Germans believe that power must reveal itself in hardness and cruelty and then submit themselves gladly and with admiration[...]. They do not believe readily that there is power in meekness and calm."

-- Friedrich Nietzsche
asaris is offline  
Old 08-16-2008, 06:26 AM   #33 (permalink)
Junkie
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by djtestudo View Post
(Just yanking your chain...)
Yeah I know For informal posts its ok but for public speeches, papers, etc don't even think about it
Rekna is offline  
Old 08-16-2008, 06:30 AM   #34 (permalink)
Living in a Warmer Insanity
 
Tully Mars's Avatar
 
Super Moderator
Location: Yucatan, Mexico
Quote:
Originally Posted by asaris View Post
The problem, Tully, is that, unlike say Kosovo, everyone in the international community other than Russia thinks S. Ossetia shouldn't be independent. I mean, just look at a map -- it doesn't look like a separate county; it would still be almost completely surrounded by Georgia. Georgia sending troops into S. Ossetia may have been unwise, but it certainly was not an invasion of a sovereign country.
All I'm saying is that Georgia basically fired the first volley here. There's a pretty long history of Ossetia trying to separate from Georgia:

BBC NEWS | Europe | Country profiles | Regions and territories: South Ossetia

As for "just look at a map -- it doesn't look like a separate county" What does a separate country look like? IMO, maps and logic make strange bed fellows. If you just looked at a map you have to wonder why Alaska isn't part of Canada. Or why Hawaii isn't it's own nation (which it was until the US forcefully removed it's royal family.) Heck just look at a map of Europe, how many countries are completely surrounded by other countries? So I'm not sure why looking at a map would help with deciding what area of land belongs to what country.

From everything I've read, as always I could be wrong, it seems the South Ossetia people want to be independent. They voted to be independent. Seems to me what they want should be taken seriously.
__________________
I used to drink to drown my sorrows, but the damned things have learned how to swim- Frida Kahlo

Vice President Starkizzer Fan Club
Tully Mars is offline  
Old 08-16-2008, 06:32 AM   #35 (permalink)
Junkie
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by asaris View Post
The problem, Tully, is that, unlike say Kosovo, everyone in the international community other than Russia thinks S. Ossetia shouldn't be independent. I mean, just look at a map -- it doesn't look like a separate county; it would still be almost completely surrounded by Georgia. Georgia sending troops into S. Ossetia may have been unwise, but it certainly was not an invasion of a sovereign country.

Except that they have been their own country for around 18 years now. Which does give them some claim to independence. If we had not invaded Iraq and Saddam would have sent troops into the north to reclaim the Kurdish regions how would the US have reacted? We would have likely invaded and liberated them and the Kurds never were their own country.

Now I'm not saying Russia was right in attacking Georgia but Georgia definitely does not have its hands clean.
-----Added 16/8/2008 at 10 : 41 : 56-----
Here is testimony from a 12 year old American girl who was there:


Pay attention to who she says was the aggressor.

Last edited by Rekna; 08-16-2008 at 06:41 AM.. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Rekna is offline  
Old 08-16-2008, 04:32 PM   #36 (permalink)
Junkie
 
Seaver's Avatar
 
Location: Fort Worth, TX
Quote:
If we had not invaded Iraq and Saddam would have sent troops into the north to reclaim the Kurdish regions how would the US have reacted?
What would we have done? Nothing... just like when he did it the last dozen times.

Oh yeah, and if Russia was really interested in people voting themselves independent they would have no problem with Chechnya gaining their independence.
__________________
"Smite the rocks with the rod of knowledge, and fountains of unstinted wealth will gush forth." - Ashbel Smith as he laid the first cornerstone of the University of Texas

Last edited by Seaver; 08-16-2008 at 05:14 PM..
Seaver is offline  
Old 08-17-2008, 05:30 AM   #37 (permalink)
Mad Philosopher
 
asaris's Avatar
 
Location: Washington, DC
And voting oneself independent isn't sufficient to be independent. Just ask South Carolina, or Scotland, or Ireland, or the Basques, or Belgium, or Hungary, or any other group which has desired independence, but hasn't gained it just by wanting it. This makes sense. I can' secede from the United States by voting myself out, right? And if my family decided we wanted to form our own country, we couldn't, right? Mere numbers of people can't be why the South Ossetians would have the right to secede.

When should a country be able to divorce itself from another country? I don't know; I've heard it suggested that there has to be some bad behavior on the part of the bigger country (eg, Serbia ethic cleansing Kosovo). This probably isn't the worse suggestion out there. And that's not the case here; Georgia certainly wants to cut down on the massive amount of criminal activity based in South Ossetia, but that's not ethnic cleansing.

Besides, they haven't been their own country for 18 years. As I pointed out above, everyone except for Russia views them as part of Georgia. The only reason they've been more or less autonomous is that there have been Russian troops occupying the region for most of that time, under the fictitious pretense that the South Ossetians are Russian citizens. Certainly the options are not a Georgian South Ossetia or an independant South Ossetia, but a Georgian (that is, free and democratic) or a Russian (that is, authoritarian) South Ossetia.
__________________
"Die Deutschen meinen, daß die Kraft sich in Härte und Grausamkeit offenbaren müsse, sie unterwerfen sich dann gerne und mit Bewunderung:[...]. Daß es Kraft giebt in der Milde und Stille, das glauben sie nicht leicht."

"The Germans believe that power must reveal itself in hardness and cruelty and then submit themselves gladly and with admiration[...]. They do not believe readily that there is power in meekness and calm."

-- Friedrich Nietzsche

Last edited by asaris; 08-17-2008 at 05:33 AM..
asaris is offline  
Old 08-17-2008, 07:03 AM   #38 (permalink)
Junkie
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by asaris View Post
And voting oneself independent isn't sufficient to be independent. Just ask South Carolina, or Scotland, or Ireland, or the Basques, or Belgium, or Hungary, or any other group which has desired independence, but hasn't gained it just by wanting it. This makes sense. I can' secede from the United States by voting myself out, right? And if my family decided we wanted to form our own country, we couldn't, right? Mere numbers of people can't be why the South Ossetians would have the right to secede.

When should a country be able to divorce itself from another country? I don't know; I've heard it suggested that there has to be some bad behavior on the part of the bigger country (eg, Serbia ethic cleansing Kosovo). This probably isn't the worse suggestion out there. And that's not the case here; Georgia certainly wants to cut down on the massive amount of criminal activity based in South Ossetia, but that's not ethnic cleansing.

Besides, they haven't been their own country for 18 years. As I pointed out above, everyone except for Russia views them as part of Georgia. The only reason they've been more or less autonomous is that there have been Russian troops occupying the region for most of that time, under the fictitious pretense that the South Ossetians are Russian citizens. Certainly the options are not a Georgian South Ossetia or an independant South Ossetia, but a Georgian (that is, free and democratic) or a Russian (that is, authoritarian) South Ossetia.
So by your logic the US is still part of Briton?
Rekna is offline  
Old 08-17-2008, 07:40 AM   #39 (permalink)
Living in a Warmer Insanity
 
Tully Mars's Avatar
 
Super Moderator
Location: Yucatan, Mexico
Quote:
Originally Posted by asaris View Post
And voting oneself independent isn't sufficient to be independent. Just ask South Carolina, or Scotland, or Ireland, or the Basques, or Belgium, or Hungary, or any other group which has desired independence, but hasn't gained it just by wanting it. This makes sense. I can' secede from the United States by voting myself out, right? And if my family decided we wanted to form our own country, we couldn't, right? Mere numbers of people can't be why the South Ossetians would have the right to secede.

When should a country be able to divorce itself from another country? I don't know; I've heard it suggested that there has to be some bad behavior on the part of the bigger country (eg, Serbia ethic cleansing Kosovo). This probably isn't the worse suggestion out there. And that's not the case here; Georgia certainly wants to cut down on the massive amount of criminal activity based in South Ossetia, but that's not ethnic cleansing.

Besides, they haven't been their own country for 18 years. As I pointed out above, everyone except for Russia views them as part of Georgia. The only reason they've been more or less autonomous is that there have been Russian troops occupying the region for most of that time, under the fictitious pretense that the South Ossetians are Russian citizens. Certainly the options are not a Georgian South Ossetia or an independant South Ossetia, but a Georgian (that is, free and democratic) or a Russian (that is, authoritarian) South Ossetia.

This situation is far more complicated then simply voting ones self out of a country. Go back 50 years and this area was part of the USSR, right? So the people of Georgia can vote themselves independent but the folks over in Ossetia cannot?
__________________
I used to drink to drown my sorrows, but the damned things have learned how to swim- Frida Kahlo

Vice President Starkizzer Fan Club
Tully Mars is offline  
Old 08-17-2008, 08:11 AM   #40 (permalink)
 
roachboy's Avatar
 
Super Moderator
Location: essex ma
there seems to be a kind of anxiety at the international level about what constitutes a state, yes? in the sense of who gets to declare themselves one and who does not. if you think about it, the process is pretty arbitrary---mostly a matter of recognition on the part of other states. the ex-yugoslavia experience plays into things at this level---apparently not all bases for state-making are equivalent, and some Declarations are better than others. it seems that in this case the problem at bottom is there was no particular chain of recognitions of south ossetia and nothing else. so the status of the space is (obviously) ambiguous. this is the condition of possibility for everything that's happened around it.

and apparently, there is some ambivalence about the ethnicity=nation=nation-state slide. and there is even more ambivalence in this case because it is not obvious "who" the ossetians "are" in that goofy sense. personally, i think most of this has to do with a gradual erosion of the functional centrality of nation-states over the past 30 years or so--so the basis for the idea of a nation-state is wobbly--but there seems to be no particular agreement even that there is such a problem, much less what might plausibly be done to respond to it, or even if a response is necessary--so you have situations like this.

but if nothing but recognition constitutes the basis for a "legitimate" nation state, then (a) the united states is not still part of england but (b) south ossetia is not anything at all. a province of somewhere.

i sometimes go to a public house that is nowhere--at one end of the parking lot, a town begins--at the opposite end of the parking lot, another begins. it is in a hole. if you go there, it seems that time does not happen. this is just a story i felt like writing down, and now i have written it down and that is good.
__________________
a gramophone its corrugated trumpet silver handle
spinning dog. such faithfulness it hear

it make you sick.

-kamau brathwaite
roachboy is offline  
 

Tags
mccain, senile


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:23 AM.

Tilted Forum Project

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
© 2002-2012 Tilted Forum Project

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360